Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:09:28.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - What does time buy? ESL student performance on home versus class compositions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

Barbara Kroll
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge
Get access

Summary

Writing is frequently a difficult skill for any language user, which is to say that writing presents a fairly challenging task for both native and nonnative speakers. For English as a second language (ESL) students, it seems fair to say that writing academic papers is particularly difficult. ESL students must learn to create written products that demonstrate mastery over contextually appropriate formats for the rhetorical presentation of ideas as well as mastery in all areas of language, a Herculean task given the possibilities for error. It is partially the multiplicity of skills involved which contributes to the overall difficulty of writing. Collins and Gentner (1980) make the following observation about native-speaker writing:

Much of the difficulty of writing stems from the large number of constraints that must be satisfied at the same time. In expressing an idea the writer must consider at least four structural levels: overall text structure, paragraph structure, sentence structure (syntax), and word structure.…Clearly the attempt to coordinate all these requirements is a staggering job. (p. 67).

If various aspects of writing are seen as “structural levels” that must be coordinated, it is reasonable to hypothesize that success may vary from level to level. For example, one particular student might exhibit greater mastery over sentence structure while another might exhibit greater mastery over overall text structure. Further, because of the particular difficulty that ESL students may have with the code of English (as partially predicted by principles of cognitive theory; McLaughlin 1987: 133–142), extending the amount of time allotted to producing an essay might affect the level of mastery exhibited on any or all of the levels identified by Collins and Gentner.

Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Writing (Cambridge Applied Linguistics)
Research Insights for the Classroom
, pp. 140 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×