Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T04:23:17.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Diafiltration at the limiting flux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Greg Foley
Affiliation:
Dublin City University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Diafiltration (DF) is the removal of low molecular weight solutes, such as salts, from a solution of a high molecular weight solute, such as a protein. The basis of the separation is that the high molecular weight solute (‘macrosolute’), or particle, does not pass through the membrane but the low molecular weight ‘microsolute’ does. It is somewhat similar to dialysis but, in the latter, a dialysing fluid flows counter-currently on the permeate side, providing a mass transfer driving force that enhances removal of the microsolute. Dialysis is discussed briefly towards the end of this chapter.

There are many ways to perform DF and in this chapter a number of different approaches are examined. Throughout the analyses presented, the solution is assumed to be composed of two solutes; a macrosolute whose concentration is denoted by cA and a microsolute whose concentration is denoted by cB. Complete rejection of the macrosolute is assumed throughout and the microsolute is assumed to have a rejection coefficient of zero. An additional and important assumption is that the flux is determined by the macrosolute concentration only. Furthermore, the flux is assumed to be at the limiting value as given by the limiting flux model. The one exception to this is in Section 6.4.3, where a more complex, essentially empirical, model for the flux is used. The most notable feature of that model is that the flux depends on the concentrations of both the macrosolute and the microsolute.

Type
Chapter
Information
Membrane Filtration
A Problem Solving Approach with MATLAB
, pp. 152 - 193
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Paulen, R., Fikar, M., Kovacs, Z. and Czermak, P. (2011). Process optimization with time-dependent water adding for albumin production. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 50, 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, P., Lundblad, J. and Mitra, G. (1976). Solute separation by diafiltration. Separation Science, 11, 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheryan, M. (1998). Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook, 2nd Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Paulen, R., Foley, G., Fikar, M., Kovacs, Z. and Czermak, P. (2011). Minimizing the process time for ultrafiltration/diafiltration under gel polarization conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 380, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, G. (2006). Ultrafiltration with variable volume diafiltration: a novel approach to water saving in diafiltration processes. Desalination, 199, 220–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulen, R., Fikar, M., Foley, G., Kovacs, Z. and Czermak, P. (2012). Optimal feeding strategy of diafiltration buffer in batch membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science, 411, 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
These data were obtained by one of my students, Colin Barr, as part of his undergraduate research project. The work was done using Baker's yeast suspensions and a tubular ceramic membrane.
Barba, D.Beolchini, F. and Veglio, F. (1998). Water saving in a two stage diafiltration for the production of whey protein concentrates. Desalination, 199, 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipnizki, F., Boelsmand, J. and Madsen, R.F. (2002). Concepts of industrial scale diafiltration systems. Desalination, 144, Special Issue, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, R.F. (2001). Design of sanitary and sterile UF and diafiltration plants. Separation and Purification Technology, 22, Special Issue, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takaci, A., Zikic-Dosenovic, T. and Zavargo, Z. (2009). Mathematical model of variable volume diafiltration with time dependent water adding. Engineering Computations, 26, 857–867.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×