Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T23:10:11.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Argentina

Corporate governance of private and public companies

from C - The Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Andreas M. Fleckner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Klaus J. Hopt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Get access

Summary

General information on corporate governance

Definition of corporate governance

Argentina's legal and regulatory framework does not provide a definition of corporate governance. Decree No. 677/2001 – the backbone of the corporate governance regime enacted on May 22, 2001 – refers to the relevance of adequate corporate governance practices. The decree also outlines the need of enacting a regulatory framework establishing principles such as “full disclosure,” “transparency,” “efficiency,” “investors' protection,” “equal treatment among investors,” and “protection of the entities and financial intermediaries' stability.”

It goes on to characterize “corporate governance practices” as principles, and qualifies such practices as “good” or “adequate.” Pursuing such good practices, the decree sets forth a series of principles, duties, and rules – to be explained in detail below – that are considered to fit the required standard.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Corporate Governance
A Functional and International Analysis
, pp. 958 - 1012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vítolo, D., “‘Corporate Governance’ en la nueva dinámica societaria a partir de la Sarbanes-Oxley Act de los Estados Unidos. Difusión y reflexiones,” in Embid Irujo, J. and Vítolo, D. (eds.), Sociedades Comerciales. Los administradores y los socios. Gobierno corporativo (Santa Fe: Rubinzal Culzoni Editores, 2004), pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
Luchinsky, R., El sistema del gobierno societario. Corporate Governance en el derecho argentino (Buenos Aires: Lexis Nexis Argentina, 2006), p. 1.Google Scholar
Gagliardo, M., Administración y representación de sociedades comerciales (Buenos Aires: Lexis Nexis and Abeledo-Perrot, 2007).Google Scholar
Halperín, I. and Otaegui, J., Sociedades anónimas, 2nd edn. (Buenos Aires: Depalma, 1998), pp. 461–462Google Scholar
Cabanellas de las Cuevas, G., Derecho Societario Los órganos sociales (Buenos Aires: Heliasta, 1996), p. 538Google Scholar
Sasot Betes, M. and Sasot, M., Sociedades anónimas. El órgano de administración (Buenos Aires: Ábaco, 1980), pp. 112 et seqGoogle Scholar
Fargosi, H., “El vínculo director-sociedad anónima,” LL (2001-A), 885.
Otaegui, J., Administración Societaria (Buenos Aires: Ábaco, 1979), p. 134.Google Scholar
Richard, E. and Muiño, O., Derecho societario (Buenos Aires: Astrea, 1997), p. 229.Google Scholar
Odriozola, C., “¿Reforma del régimen de responsabilidad de los directores o necesidad de una adecuada interpretación?” LL (1982-B), 711 et seq.
Rovira, A., “La remuneración de los directores,” in García Tejero, N. (ed.), El directorio en las sociedades anónimas (Buenos Aires: Ad-hoc, 1999), p. 211.Google Scholar
Zaldívar, E., Manovil, R., Rovira, A., and Ragazzi, G., Cuadernos de Derecho Societario, vol. II, 2nd part (Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot/Macchi, 1976), pp. 532–534.Google Scholar
den Toom, M., “Acciones sociales de responsabilidad ut singuli: las acciones derivadas,” in García Tejero, N. (ed.), El directorio en las sociedades anónimas (Buenos Aires: Ad-hoc, 1999), pp. 299 et seq.Google Scholar
Halperín, and Otaegui, , Sociedades anónimas, p. 557.
Rivera, J., Institutiones de derecho concursal, vol. II (Santa Fe: Rubinzal-Culzoni, 1997), p. 369.Google Scholar
Fowler Newton, E., Tratado de Auditoría, 3rd edn. (Buenos Aires: La Ley, 2004), p. 222.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×