Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T04:24:54.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Two Films from Hong Kong

Parody and Allegory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Leo Ou-Fan Lee
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Nick Browne
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Paul G. Pickowicz
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Vivian Sobchack
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Esther Yau
Affiliation:
Occidental College, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

“Films from Hong Kong” – the phrase establishes an almost immediate association with mass entertainment. For years the Hong Kong film industry was dominated by two tycoons: Run Run Shaw (Shao Yifu) and Raymond Chow (Zhou Wenhuai), whose moneymaking “factory productions” have become trademarks for what may be called typical Hong Kong movies. Roughly, I would divide them into two basic subgenres – the “hardcore” gong fu, or martial arts, movie in a pseudohistorical setting or its contemporary counterpart, the gangster film whose obvious mass appeal is violence, and the “softcore” sexual or romantic comedy featuring a beautiful actress/songstress singing the obligatory number of songs. In the United States, the two types of film often form a double-feature presentation at the local Chinese cinema on a Saturday night. (It was in fact on such a typical evening in San Francisco's Chinatown that I discovered Rouge [Yanzhi kou, 1987], one of the surprises of artistic filmmaking disguised as a “softcore” comedy, a film I will discuss in this essay.)

It is not my intention here to give a conventional sociological analysis of these two subgenres as typical products of Hong Kong's urban popular culture. In recent years, the Hong Kong film has undergone some drastic transformations, and no simple catchall phrase like “popular entertainment” or the usual division between the “low-brow” commercial movie and the “high-brow” art film is likely to do justice to its complexities of form and content.

Type
Chapter
Information
New Chinese Cinemas
Forms, Identities, Politics
, pp. 202 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×