Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T04:15:24.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Transcription, accumulation, storage, recruitment, and degradation of maternal mRNA in mammalian oocytes

from Section 3 - Developmental biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

Santhi Potireddy
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Dasari Amarnath
Affiliation:
Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Keith E. Latham
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Alan Trounson
Affiliation:
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Roger Gosden
Affiliation:
Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Cornell University, New York
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The mammalian oocyte is a remarkable cell, providing for a diverse range of essential functions to initiate each new life. Unique demands at the start of embryogenesis are met by equally unique capacities in the oocyte. These include the ability to undergo early oocyte activation and blocks to polyspermy upon fertilization, suppressing cell death after successful fertilization, supporting early nuclear reprogramming and remodeling events that enable production of a totipotent genome (a capacity that underlies cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer), temporal regulation of the cell cycle, continuous provision of macromolecules required for cellular physiology and organization, and eventually transcriptional activation of the embryonic genome with the correct array of genes being activated. The reservoir of stored maternal mRNAs deposited in the oocyte provides the driving force behind these processes, as temporally regulated recruitment and translation of stored mRNAs provides for the dynamic production of different proteins at the correct times when they are needed. This chapter reviews the dynamic regulation of gene transcription, genome silencing, and maternal mRNA storage during oogenesis, and the subsequent mechanisms that enable regulated use of these mRNAs during oocyte maturation and after fertilization.

Gene transcription

The transition of primordial follicles to antral follicles and subsequent ovulation of high quality oocytes that are capable of undergoing successful fertilization and development to term are accompanied by stage-specific changes in mRNA expression [1]. Oocytes obtained from mouse primordial follicles display a pattern distinct from oocytes obtained from other stages. Of the 11660 mRNAs detected in these oocytes, 5020 genes display a twofold change in relative abundance, with 50% of genes up- or down-regulated in their level of expression at the transition from primordial to primary follicles. This phenomenal change in the oocyte transcriptome coincides with a dramatic reorganization of follicle structure and initiation of development of growth in primary follicles. The second biggest change in the oocyte transcriptome is observed between the secondary and small antral follicle stages, and noticeably affects genes involved in microtubule-based processes. The overall transition from secondary to large antral follicles coincides with acquisition of oocyte meiotic and developmental competence, including the ability to form a meiotic spindle [2, 3].

Type
Chapter
Information
Biology and Pathology of the Oocyte
Role in Fertility, Medicine and Nuclear Reprograming
, pp. 154 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pan, H, O’Brien, MJ, Wigglesworth, K, et al. Transcript profiling during mouse oocyte development and the effect of gonadotropin priming and development in vitro. Dev Biol 2005; 286: 493–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickramasinghe, D, Albertini, DF. Centrosome phosphorylation and the developmental expression of meiotic competence in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1992; 152: 62–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matzuk, MM, Burns, KH, Viveiros, MM, et al. Intercellular communication in the mammalian ovary: oocytes carry the conversation. Science 2002; 296: 2178–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De La Fuente, R, Viveiros, MM, Burns, KH, et al. Major chromatin remodeling in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes is dispensable for global transcriptional silencing but required for centromeric heterochromatin function. Dev Biol 2004; 275: 447–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inoue, A, Nakajima, R, Nagata, M, et al. Contribution of the oocyte nucleus and cytoplasm to the determination of meiotic and developmental competence in mice. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1377–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De La Fuente, R, Viveiros, MM, Wigglesworth, K, et al. ATRX, a member of the SNF2 family of helicase/ATPases, is required for chromosome alignment and meiotic spindle organization in metaphase II stage mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 2004; 272: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreu-Vieyra, CV, Chen, R, Agno, JE, et al. MLL2 is required in oocytes for bulk histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation and transcriptional silencing. PLoS Biol 2010; 8: pii: e100453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, RP, Ratzan, WJ, Freudzon, M, et al. Cyclic GMP from the surrounding somatic cells regulates cyclic AMP and meiosis in the mouse oocyte. Development 2009; 136: 1869–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaccari, S, Weeks, JL, 2nd, Hsieh, M, et al. Cyclic GMP signaling is involved in the luteinizing hormone-dependent meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 2009; 81: 595–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, M, Su, YQ, Sugiura, K, et al. Granulosa cell ligand NPPC and its receptor NPR2 maintain meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes. Science 2010; 330: 366–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawahara, M, Wu, Q, Takahashi, N, et al. High-frequency generation of viable mice from engineered bi-maternal embryos. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25: 1045–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obata, Y, Hiura, H, Fukuda, A, et al. Epigenetically immature oocytes lead to loss of imprinting during embryogenesis. J Reprod Dev 2011; 57: 327–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucifero, D, Mann, MR, Bartolomei, MS, et al. Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 839–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, YS, Latham, KE, Vandevoort, CA. Effects of in vitro maturation on gene expression in rhesus monkey oocytes. Physiol Genomics 2008; 35: 145–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tafuri, SR, Wolffe, AP. Xenopus Y-box transcription factors: molecular cloning, functional analysis and developmental regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 9028–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, K, Tanaka, KJ, Aoki, K, et al. Visualization of the reconstituted FRGY2-mRNA complexes by electron microscopy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 306: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skabkin, MA, Kiselyova, OI, Chernov, KG, et al. Structural organization of mRNA complexes with major core mRNP protein YB-1. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: 5621–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, R, Sheth, U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol Cell 2007; 25: 635–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eulalio, A, Behm-Ansmant, I, Izaurralde, E. P bodies: at the crossroads of post-transcriptional pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8: 9–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, JD, Sonenberg, N. Regulation of cap-dependent translation by eIF4E inhibitory proteins. Nature 2005; 433: 477–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchet-Poyau, K, Courchet, J, Le Hir, H, et al. Identification and characterization of human Mex-3 proteins, a novel family of evolutionarily conserved RNA-binding proteins differentially localized to processing bodies. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: 1289–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flemr, M, Ma, J, Schultz, RM, et al. P-body loss is concomitant with formation of a messenger RNA storage domain in mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 2010; 82: 1008–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swetloff, A, Conne, B, Huarte, J, et al. Dcp1-bodies in mouse oocytes. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20: 4951–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, J, Hecht, NB, Schultz, RM. Expression of MSY2 in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 2001; 65: 1260–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, L, Baibakov, B, Dean, J. A subcortical maternal complex essential for preimplantation mouse embryogenesis. Dev Cell 2008; 15: 416–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yurttas, P, Vitale, AM, Fitzhenry, RJ, et al. Role for PADI6 and the cytoplasmic lattices in ribosomal storage in oocytes and translational control in the early mouse embryo. Development 2008; 135: 2627–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medvedev, S, Pan, H, Schultz, RM. Absence of MSY2 in mouse oocytes perturbs oocyte growth and maturation, RNA stability, and the transcriptome. Biol Reprod 2011; 85: 575–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, JD. CPEB: a life in translation. Trends Biochem Sci 2007; 32: 279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potireddy, S, Vassena, R, Patel, BG, et al. Analysis of polysomal mRNA populations of mouse oocytes and zygotes: dynamic changes in maternal mRNA utilization and function. Dev Biol 2006; 298: 155–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potireddy, S, Midic, U, Liang, CG, et al. Positive and negative cis-regulatory elements directing postfertilization maternal mRNA translational control in mouse embryos. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010; 299: C818–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnard, DC, Cao, Q, Richter, JD. Differential phosphorylation controls Maskin association with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E and localization on the mitotic apparatus. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 7605–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dostie, J, Ferraiuolo, M, Pause, A, et al. A novel shuttling protein, 4E-T, mediates the nuclear import of the mRNA 5′ cap-binding protein, eIF4E. EMBO J 2000; 19: 3142–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, A, Prigge, A, Wickens, M. Translational repression by deadenylases. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 28506–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, X, Nerlick, S, An, W, et al. Xenopus germline nanos1 is translationally repressed by a novel structure-based mechanism. Development 2011; 138: 589–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braat, AK, Yan, N, Arn, E, et al. Localization-dependent oskar protein accumulation; control after the initiation of translation. Dev Cell 2004; 7: 125–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigott, CR, Mikolajek, H, Moore, CE, et al. Insights into the regulation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase and the interplay between its domains. Biochem J 2012; 442: 105–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Moor, CH, Richter, JD. The Mos pathway regulates cytoplasmic polyadenylation in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 6419–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, R, Barnard, D, Richter, JD. Differential mRNA translation and meiotic progression require Cdc2-mediated CPEB destruction. EMBO J 2002; 21: 1833–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pique, M, Lopez, JM, Foissac, S, et al. A combinatorial code for CPE-mediated translational control. Cell 2008; 132: 434–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakahata, S, Kotani, T, Mita, K, et al. Involvement of Xenopus Pumilio in the translational regulation that is specific to cyclin B1 mRNA during oocyte maturation. Mech Dev 2003; 120: 865–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, JD. Breaking the code of polyadenylation-induced translation. Cell 2008; 132: 335–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNicol, MC, Cragle, CE, MacNicol, AM. Context-dependent regulation of Musashi-mediated mRNA translation and cell cycle regulation. Cell Cycle 2011; 10: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tay, J, Richter, JD. Germ cell differentiation and synaptonemal complex formation are disrupted in CPEB knockout mice. Dev Cell 2001; 1: 201–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peset, I, Vernos, I. The TACC proteins: TACC-ling microtubule dynamics and centrosome function. Trends Cell Biol 2008; 18: 379–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, MR, Leidal, AM, Smibert, CA. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. EMBO J 2004; 23: 150–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeske, M, Meyer, S, Temme, C, et al. Rapid ATP-dependent deadenylation of nanos mRNA in a cell-free system from Drosophila embryos. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 25124–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baez, MV, Boccaccio, GL. Mammalian Smaug is a translational repressor that forms cytoplasmic foci similar to stress granules. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 43131–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, R, Richter, JD. Further analysis of cytoplasmic polyadenylation in Xenopus embryos and identification of embryonic cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14: 7867–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, B, Hwang, S, McLaughlin, J, et al. Timely translation during the mouse oocyte-to-embryo transition. Development 2000; 127: 3795–803.Google ScholarPubMed
Varnum, SM, Wormington, WM. Deadenylation of maternal mRNAs during Xenopus oocyte maturation does not require specific cis-sequences: a default mechanism for translational control. Genes Dev 1990; 4: 2278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, W, Goldman, AL, Babak, T, et al. SMAUG is a major regulator of maternal mRNA destabilization in Drosophila and its translation is activated by the PAN GU kinase. Dev Cell 2007; 12: 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, YQ, Sugiura, K, Woo, Y, et al. Selective degradation of transcripts during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 2007; 302: 104–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, D, Patrizio, P. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes at different maturational stages and after in vitro maturation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 455.e1–9; discussion 55.e9–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, W, Sweet, TJ, Chamnongpol, S, et al. Co-translational mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2009; 461: 225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouget, C, Papin, C, Boureux, A, et al. Maternal mRNA deadenylation and decay by the piRNA pathway in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 2010; 467: 1128–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giraldez, AJ, Mishima, Y, Rihel, J, et al. Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science 2006; 312: 75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E, Sheets, MD, Imboden, SB, et al. Limiting Ago protein restricts RNAi and microRNA biogenesis during early development in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 1121–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J, Melton, C, Suh, N, et al. Genome-wide analysis of translation reveals a critical role for deleted in azoospermia-like (Dazl) at the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 755–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svoboda, P. Why mouse oocytes and early embryos ignore miRNAs?RNA Biol 2010; 7: 559–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohnishi, Y, Totoki, Y, Toyoda, A, et al. Small RNA class transition from siRNA/piRNA to miRNA during pre-implantation mouse development. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38: 5141–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassena, R, Han, Z, Gao, S, et al. Tough beginnings: alterations in the transcriptome of cloned embryos during the first two cell cycles. Dev Biol 2007; 304: 75–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, GM, Cram, DS, Song, B, et al. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes following in vivo or in vitro maturation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1138–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×