Adler-Nissen, Rebecca 2009 Behind the scenes of differentiated integration: circumventing national opt-outs in Justice and Home AffairsJournal of European Public Policy 16 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahrens, JoachimOhr, RenateZeddies, Götz 2006

Allemand, Frédéric 2005 The Impact of the EU Enlargement on Economic and Monetary Union: What Lessons can be Learnt from the Differentiated Integration Mechanisms in an Enlarged Europe?European Law Journal 5 586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allemand, MichaelBrandi Wohlgemuth, Clara 2007 Shall We Try New Methods to Make the EU-27 Work?FIPParisGoogle Scholar

Giuliano, Amato 2000

Andreani, Gilles 2002 What Future for Federalism?LondonCentre for European ReformGoogle Scholar

Areilza Carvajal, José M. deDastis Quecedo, Alfonso 1997 Flexibilidad y Cooperaciones Reforzadas: Nuevos Métodos para una Europa Nueva?Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 1 9Google Scholar

Barber, Tony 2009 Two-Speed Europe is the Dog that doesn't BarkFinancial Times 1Google Scholar

Barber, Tony 2010 Poland warns of Two-Speed EuropeFinancial Times 9Google Scholar

Baudenbacher, Carl 2004 The EFTA Court – An Example of the Judicialisation of International Economic LawEuropean Law Review 28 880Google Scholar

Baudenbacher, Carl 2005 The EFTA Court – An Actor in the European Judicial DialogueFordham International Law Journal 28 353Google Scholar

Beaumont, PaulLyons, CaroleWalker, Neil 2002 Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law?OxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Beneyto, José María 2009 Unity and Flexibility in the Future of the European Union: The Challenge of Enhanced CooperationMadridCEU EdicionesGoogle Scholar

Blanchet, Thérèse 2005 Le succès silencieux de dix ans d’Espace économique européen: un modèle pour l’avenir avec d’autres voisins?Johansson, MartinWahl, NilsBernitz, UlfLiber Amicorum in Honour of Sven Norberg: A European for all SeasonsBrusselsBruylant101Google Scholar

Boele-Woelki, Katharina 2009 To Be, or Not to Be: Enhanced Cooperation in International Divorce Law within the European UnionVictoria University Wellington, Law Review 780 779Google Scholar

Bribosia, Hervé 2000 Différenciation et avant-gardes au sein de l’UE. Bilan et perspectives du Traité d’AmsterdamCDE 1 57Google Scholar

Bribosia, Hervé 2001 Les coopérations renforcées au lendemain du Traité de NiceRevue du droit l’Union européenne 1 111Google Scholar

Bribosia, Hervé 2004 Les coopérations renforcées et les nouvelles formes de flexibilité en matière de défense dans la Constitution européenneRevue du droit l’Union européenne 4 647Google Scholar

Broberg, Morten 2011

Búrca, Gráinne de 2000 133

Búrca, Gráinne deScott, Joanne 2000 Constitutional Change in the EU: From Uniformity to Flexibility?OxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence 2004 Le droit communautaire dans tous ses états ou les désordres du IN et du OUTMélanges en hommage à Guy Isaac, ‘50 ans de droit communautaireUniversity of Toulouse121Google Scholar

Cameron, Fraser 2004 Widening and DeepeningCameron, FThe Future of Europe: Integration and EnlargementLondonRoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Caracciolo, Lucio 2010 Are We Already in a Two-Speed Europe?La RepubblicaRomeGoogle Scholar

Centre for Economic Policy Research 1995 Flexible Integration: Towards a More Effective and Democratic EuropeMonitoring European IntegrationLondonCEPRGoogle Scholar

Charlemagne (alias: Christoffersen, Keller-Noëllet, Piris) 1995 L’Equilibre entre les Etats MembresL’Equilibre européen. Etudes rassemblées et publiées en hommage à Niels Ersbøll, Secrétaire général du Conseil de l’UEBrusselsCouncil of the European UnionGoogle Scholar

Chevallier-Govers, Constance 2002 La création d’une police européenne grâce aux mécanismes de la coopération renforcéeHervouët, FNorel, PLa dynamique de la démarche communautaire dans la construction européenneParisLa documentation française295Google Scholar

Closa Montero, Carlos 2010 1

Club of Florence 1997 Europe: The Impossible Status QuoLondonMacmillanGoogle Scholar

Commissariat General du Plan 2004 Perspectives de la coopération renforcée dans l’UEParisLa documentation françaiseGoogle Scholar

Common Market Law Review Editorial 2011 Enhanced Cooperation: A Union à taille réduite or à porte tournanteCommon Market Law Review 48 317Google Scholar

Constantinesco, Vlad 1997 Les clauses de coopération renforcéeRevue trimestrielle de droit européen 83 751Google Scholar

Crivat, Liliana 1997 Mythes et réalités de l’intégration différenciée dans l’Union européenneEuropean Institute, University of GenevaGoogle Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre 1995 The Shaping of a European Constitution and the 1996 IGC: “Flexibility” as a Key ParadigmAussenwirtschaft 50 237Google Scholar

de Grauwe, Paul 2011

Dehousse, Renaud 2000

Delhey, Jan 2007 Do Enlargements Make the European Union Less Cohesive? An Analysis of Trust between EU NationalitiesJournal of Common Market Studies 45 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delors, Jacques 2000 Europe needs an avant-garde, but …Bulletin of the Centre for European Reform 14Google Scholar

Den Boer, MonicaGuggenbühl, AllanVanhoonacker, Sophie 1998 Coping with Flexibility and Legitimacy after AmsterdamMaastrichtEIPAGoogle Scholar

Dennewald, Jeannine 2010 L’espace judiciaire européen au lendemain du Traité de Lisbonne: état des lieux et perspectives de l’intégration différenciéeERA Forum 11 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deubner, Christian 1999

Deubner, Christian 2000

Dudzik, Slawomir 2003 Enhanced Cooperation between EU Member States: An Opportunity or a Threat to PolandBodnar, AdamThe Emerging Constitutional Law of the European Union: German and Polish PerspectivesBerlinSpringer239Google Scholar

Dyson, KennethMarcussen, Martin 2010 Transverse Integration in European Economic Governance: Between Unitary and Differentiated IntegrationJournal of European Integration 32 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyson, KennethSepos, Angelos 2010 Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated IntegrationBasingstokePalgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Edwards, GeoffreyPhillipart, Eric 1997 3.

Egeberg, MortenTrondal, Jarle 1999 Differentiated Integration in Europe: The Case of an EEA Country, NorwayJournal of Common Market Studies 33 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus Dieter 1984 How Flexible is Community Law? An Unusual Approach to the Concept of “Two SpeedsMichigan Law Review 82 1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus Dieter 1995

Ehlermann, Claus Dieter 1998 Differentiation, Flexibility, Closer Cooperation: The New Provisions of the Amsterdam TreatyEuropean Law Journal 4 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliassen, Kjell ASitter, Nick 2002

Epiney, Astrid 2000 Flexible Integration and Environment Policy in the EU – Legal AspectsHolzinger, KKnoepfel, PEnvironmental Policy in a European Union of Variable Geometry? The Challenge of the Next EnlargementBaselHelbing & Lichtenhahn Verlag39Google Scholar

Faegerlund, N 1997 The Special Status of the Åaland Islands in the European UnionHannikainen, LHorn, FAutonomy and Demilitarisation in International Law: The Åaland Islands in a Changing EuropeThe HagueKluwer Law International189Google Scholar

Fauchon, Pierre 2009 Rapport d’information du Sénat français sur les coopérations spécialisées: une voie de progrès de la construction européenneSénat 237 1Google Scholar

Fauchon, PierreSicard, François 2010

Gaja, Giorgio 1998 How Flexible is Flexibility under the Amsterdam TreatyCommon Market Law Review 35 855CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabbe, Heather 2003

Grabitz, Eberhard 1986 L’intégration différenciée de L’Intégration différenciéeBrusselsIEEGoogle Scholar

Grabitz, EberhardLangeheine, Bernd 1981 Legal Problems Related to a Proposed “Two-Tier System” of Integration within the European CommunityCommon Market Law Review 18 33Google Scholar

Grant, Charles 2001 France, Germany and a “Hard-Core” EuropeCentre for European Reform Bulletin 19Google Scholar

Grant, Charles 2005

Guillard, Christine 2007 L’intégration différenciée dans l’Union européenneBrusselsBruylantGoogle Scholar

Hanf, Dominik 2001 Flexibility Clauses in the Founding Treaties, from Rome to Nicede Witte, BHanf, DVos, EThe Many Faces of Differentiation in the EU LawAntwerpIntersentia3Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol 2001

Harmsen, Robert 1994 A European Union of Variable Geometry. Problems and PerspectivesNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly 45 109Google Scholar

Harstad, Bard 2006 Flexible Integration? Mandatory and Minimum Participation RulesScandinavian Journal of Economics 108 683CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedemann-Robinson, Martin 1999 The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice with Regard to the UK, Ireland and DenmarkO’Keeffe, DTwomey, PLegal Issues of the Amsterdam TreatyOxfordHart Publishing271Google Scholar

Jensen, Christian BSlapin, Jonathan B 2010

Joerges, ChristianMény, YvesWeiler, Joseph H. H 2000 What Kind of Constitution for what Kind of Polity? Responses to Joschka FischerFlorenceRobert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, European University InstituteGoogle Scholar

Junge, Kerstin 1999 Flexibility, Enhanced Cooperation and the Treaty of AmsterdamLondonKogan Page, European Dossier SeriesGoogle Scholar

Kempe, IrisVan Meurs, Wim 2001 Towards a Multi-Layered Europede Witte, BHanf, DVos, EThe Many Faces of Differentiation in the EU LawAntwerpIntersentiaGoogle Scholar

Kölliker, Alkuin 2001 Bringing Together or Driving Apart the Union? Towards a Theory of Differentiated IntegrationWest European Politics 24 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kölliker, Alkuin 2006 Flexibility and European Unification: The Logic of Differentiated IntegrationLanham, MDRowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Kortenberg, Helmut 1998 Closer Cooperation in the Treaty of AmsterdamCommon Market Law Review 35 833CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kowalski, Michael 2005 Comment on Daniel Thym – United in Diversity or Diversified in the Union?German Law Journal 6 1750Google Scholar

Kurpas, Sebastian 2006 From Threat to Opportunity – Making Flexible Integration WorkEuropean Policy Institutes Network 15Google Scholar

Lamoureux, François 2003 Projet de Constitution: de la nécessité d’organiser une “arrière-gardeRevue du droit l’Union européenne 4 807Google Scholar

Leben, Charles 2000 A Federation of Nation States or a Federal State?Jean Monnet Working Paper 7Google Scholar

Lipsius, Justus 1995 The 1996 IGCEuropean Law Review 20 235Google Scholar

Louis, Jean-Victor 2001 379

Maillet, Pierre 1995 Convergence et géométrie variable – L’organisation et le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne diversifiée est à repenserRevue du Marché Commun et de l’UE 386 145Google Scholar

Maillet, PierreVelo, Dario 1994 L’Europe à Géométrie Variable – Transition vers l’IntégrationParisEditions L’HarmattanGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 1996 Regulating EuropeLondonRoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 2009 Europe as the Would-Be World Power – The EU at FiftyCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 2009 Dilemmas of European Integration – The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by StealthOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Manin, Philippe 2008 La place de la diversité dans les traités sur l’Union européenneMélanges en l’honneur de Jean Charpentier: la France, l’Europe, le MondeParisEditions A. Pedone395Google Scholar

Manin, PhilippeLouis, Jean-Victor 1996 Vers une Europe différenciée? Possibilité et limiteParisEditions A. Pedone/TEPSAGoogle Scholar

Marciali, Sébastien 2007 La flexibilité du droit de l’Union européenneBrusselsBruylantGoogle Scholar

Martin, Philippe 1995 Free-Riding, Convergence, and Two-Speed Monetary Unification in EuropeEuropean Economic Review 39 1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, FKölliker, A. 1999

Missiroli, Antonio 1998 Coopération renforcée et flexibilité dans le deuxième pilier: un parcours d’obstacles?Lenzs, GL’UEO à 50 ansParisInstitut européen de sécurité de l’UEO37Google Scholar

Missiroli, Antonio 1998 Flexibility and Enhanced Cooperation after Amsterdam: Prospects for CFSP and the WEUThe International Spectator 3 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Missiroli, Antonio 2000

Monar, Jörg 1997 Schengen and Flexibility in the Treaty of Amsterdam: Opportunities and Risks of Differentiated Integration in EU Justice and Home AffairsDen Boer, MSchengen, Judicial Cooperation and Policy CoordinationMaastrichtEIPA9Google Scholar

Monar, Jörg 1998 Justice and Home Affairs in the Treaty of Amsterdam: Reform at the Price of FragmentationEuropean Law Review 23 320Google Scholar

Monar, Jörg 2010 Europe 2020’ Project. The Future of European GovernanceBrugesCollege of EuropeGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 2001 Federalism in the European Union: Rhetoric and RealityNicolaïdis, KalypsoHowse, RobertThe Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the USA and the EUOxford University Press161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 2008 157

Motoc, Iulia 2000

Neve, Jean-Emmanuel de 2007 The European Onion? How Differentiated Integration is Reshaping the EUJournal of European Integration 29 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, Johan P 2000

Ott, Andrea 2007 A Flexible Future for the EU: The Way Forward or a Way Out?Blockmans, SPrechal, SReconciling the Deepening and Widening of the EUThe HagueT. M. C. Asser Press133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ott, Andrea 2009 EU Constitutional Boundaries to Differentiation: How to Reconcile Differentiation with Integration?Ott, AVos, E50 Years of EU Integration: Foundations and PerspectivesThe HagueT. M. C. Asser Press113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philippart, Eric 2003 A New Mechanism of Enhanced Cooperation for the Enlarged European UnionNotre Europe, Research and European Issues 22Google Scholar

Philippart, EricEdwards, Geoffrey 1999 The Provisions on Closer Cooperation in the Treaty of Amsterdam – Politics of Multi-Faceted SystemsJournal of Common Market Studies 37 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philippart, EricSie Dhian Ho, Monika 2000 299

Philippart, EricSie Dhian Ho, Monika 2000

Pisani-Ferry, Jean 1995 447

Pisani-Ferry, Jean 1997

Pisani-Ferry, Jean 1997 Intégration à géométrie variable et organisation de la politique économique en EuropeEuro 39 27Google Scholar

Pons Rafols, Xavier 2001 Las Cooperaciones reforzadas en el Tratado de NizaRevista de Derecho Comunitario europeo 9 145Google Scholar

Priban, Jiri 2009 The Self-Referential European Polity, its Legal Context and Systemic Differentiation: Theoretical Reflections on the Emergence of the EU's Political and Legal AutopoiesisEuropean Law Journal 15 442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quermonne, Jean-Louis 1994

Rennie, David 2011 A New Two-Speed Europe could leave Britain BehindThe Guardian 4 www.guardian.co.ukGoogle Scholar

Rossolillo, Giulia 2009 A “Federal Core” in a Wider European Union. How Could the Core be Founded? How Could the Institutions of the Core be Structured? How to Structure its Relations with the Institutions of the Wider Union?The Federalist 51 58Google Scholar

Schoutheete, Philippe de 1990 The European Community and its Sub-systemsWallace, WThe Dynamics of European IntegrationLondonPinter108Google Scholar

Schoutheete, Philippe de 1999 Closer Cooperation: Political Background and Issues in the NegotiationMonar, JWessels, WThe Treaty of AmsterdamLondonPinterGoogle Scholar

Schrauwen, Annette 2002 Flexibility in Constitutions. Forms of Closer Cooperation in Federal and Non-Federal SettingsAmsterdamHogendorp Centre for European Constitutional StudiesGoogle Scholar

Serre, Françoise de la 1999 Une Europe ou Plusieurs?Politique Etrangère 1 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serre, Françoise de laWallace, Helen 1997 Les Coopérations renforcées: une fausse bonne idée?Notre Europe, Etudes et Recherches 2Google Scholar

Serre, Françoise de laWallace, Helen 1997

Shaw, Jo 1998 The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges of Flexibility and LegitimacyEuropean Law Journal 4 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, Jo 1998 Flexibility and Legitimacy in the Domain of the Treaty establishing the European CommunityDen Boer, MGuggenbühl, AVanhoonacker, SCoping with Flexibility and Legitimacy after AmsterdamMaastrichtIEAP85Google Scholar

Shaw, Jo 2000 337

Stephens, Philip 2011 All Aboard for a Two-speed EuropeFinancial Times 11Google Scholar

Stubb, Alexander 1995

Stubb, Alexander 1996 A Categorization of Differentiated IntegrationJournal of Common Market Studies 34 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stubb, Alexander 1998

Stubb, Alexander 2002 Negotiating Flexibility in the European UnionBasingstokePalgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tekin, FundaWessels, Wolfgang 2008

Thym, Daniel 2004 Asymmetry and European Constitutional LawUngleichzeitigkeit und Europäisches VerfassungsrechtBaden-BadenNomosGoogle Scholar

Thym, Daniel 2005 United in Diversity – The Integration of Enhanced Cooperation into the European Constitutional OrderGerman Law Journal 6 1731Google Scholar

Thym, Daniel 2006 The Political Character of Supranational DifferentiationEuropean Law Review 31 781Google Scholar

Tohidipur, Timo 2001 Expansion of Closer Cooperation as Contra-Indication to the Idea of European Integration: A Critique of Joschka Fischer's Speech and Giuliano Amato's Comment ThereonGerman Law Journal 2Google Scholar

Törö, Csaba 2005 The Latest Example of Enhanced Cooperation in the Constitutional Treaty: The Benefits of Flexibility and Differentiation in European Security and Defence Policy Decisions and their ImplementationEuropean Law Journal 11 641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tosato, Gian Luigi 2007 How to Relaunch Europe – The Reasons for FlexibilityThe International Spectator 42 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuytschaever, Filip 1998 L’incidence de la coopération renforcée sur les relations extérieures de la CommunautéLejeune, YLe traité d’Amsterdam. Espoirs et déceptionsBrusselsBruylantGoogle Scholar

Tuytschaever, Filip 1999 Differentiation in European Union LawOxfordHart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Usher, John A 1997 Variable Geometry or Concentric Circles: Patterns for the European UnionInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 46 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Usher, John A 1998 Flexibility and Enhanced CooperationHeukels, TBlokker, NBrus, MThe EU after Amsterdam – A Legal AnalysisThe HagueKluwer Law International253Google Scholar

Usher, John A 2002 Enhanced Cooperation or Flexibility in the Post-Nice EraArnull, AWincott, DAccountability and Legitimacy in the European UnionOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Van Raepenbusch, SeanDominik Hanf, 2001 65

Vibert, Frank 1996

Vigneron, PhilippeMollica, Maria R 2000 La différenciation dans l’Union economique et monétaireEuredia 2 197Google Scholar

Walker, Neil 1999

Wallace, Helen 2000 Flexibility: A Tool of Integration or a Restraint on Disintegration?Neunreither, KarlheinzWiener, AntjeAmsterdam and Beyond: Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for DemocracyOxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Helen 2000

Warleigh, Alex 2001 Flexible Integration – Which Model for the European Union?LondonSheffield Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Weatherill, Stephen 1999 If I’d Wanted You to Understand, I Would Have Explained it Better: What is the Purpose of the Provisions on Closer Cooperation Introduced by the Treaty of Amsterdam?O’Keefee, DTwomey, PLegal Issues of the Amsterdam TreatyOxfordHart Publishing21Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H 1999 The Constitution of Europe – Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? and other essays on European IntegrationCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, Michael 2002 Constituting Europe: Flexibility or FinalitéOxford Journal of Legal Studies 1 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte, Bruno de 2000 31

Witte Bruno de, Dominik HanfVos, Ellen 2001 The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU LawAntwerpIntersentiaGoogle Scholar

Zervakis, Peter 2006 Differentiated Integration”: An Alternative Path to Classical Integration?The Federalist 3 205Google Scholar

Zielonka, Jean 2000

Ziller, Jacques 2000 113