Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T18:36:04.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Sheet-Forming Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

R. H. Wagoner
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
J.-L. Chenot
Affiliation:
Ecole des Mines de Paris
Get access

Summary

Sheet-metal forming is one of the most important manufacturing processes for mass production in industry. It is inexpensive in large quantity production, but a great deal of time and expense are devoted to the design and production of reliable stamping dies. Since the mid-1970s, important advances have been made in the development of computer simulation codes for deformation modeling during sheet-metal forming.

Typical sheet-forming operations carried out in standard presses are characterized by quasi-static loading, principal loading by in-plane tension (with some bending influence), irregularly shaped and continuously changing contact surfaces, and large relative movements of material on the contacting surfaces. Nearly all FEM nodes in the sheet mesh will come into contact with the tooling at some stage of the simulation. (This contrasts with forming or bulk forming, in which the majority of mesh nodes are internal.) Therefore, sheet forming is in general much more dependent on friction and contact than most other forming operations. It is essential to handle contact and friction accurately and consistently in sheet-forming analysis; otherwise, large errors can accumulate. Furthermore, contact algorithms must be sufficiently stable that small perturbations do not induce numerical divergence and instability into the techniques.

Current numerical research focuses on whole-part analysis by FEM. The principal obstacles remain stability, time, knowledge of physical boundary conditions and friction, and limited experimental verification. While contact is more complex for sheet forming, the process offers some simulation advantages in terms of the possibility of neglecting through-thickness stresses and, in some cases, bending stresses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×