Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T19:44:30.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

61 - Follow-up

from SECTION 5 - Discharge and Follow-up From Cardiothoracic Critical Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

J. Griffiths
Affiliation:
John Radcliffe Hospital
S.J. Brett
Affiliation:
Imperial College
Andrew Klein
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Alain Vuylsteke
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Samer A. M. Nashef
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Although mortality and survival are easy to understand and measure, survival alone is an incomplete endpoint for the recovery from critical illness or major surgery. Therefore, patient outcome from critical care treatment is not only described in terms of longer term survival (‘mortality’ outcomes), but also incorporates quality of life and neuropsychological and functional status (‘nonmortality’ outcomes). Assessment of these broader long-term outcome measures requires organized long-term follow-up that often extends to 12 months after hospital discharge. Critical care follow-up clinics have highlighted the variety of physical, psychological and psychosocial complaints experienced by patients as they recover from their critical care experience and treatment.

Patients requiring more than a 2- to 3-day critical care stay after cardiothoracic surgery tend to experience similar long-term outcomes as noncardiac patients. This chapter focuses on some of these long-term, patient-centred outcomes.

Mortality

In the United Kingdom, the mortality at critical care discharge exceeds 20%, and at hospital discharge, it exceeds 30%. Longer term survival rates are commonly represented by a Kaplan–Meier survival curve.

A very simplistic survival curve for a critical care population shows a very high initial mortality that gradually diminishes with time. The effects of critical illness and the underlying pathophysiological process on mortality are no longer present when the survival curve parallels that of a comparable patient cohort. The survival time corresponding to any proportion of the patient cohort is easily calculated, and survival curves of different cohorts can be compared.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×