Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:54:48.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Spectrum assignment and fairness in femtocell networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

By
Mustafa Cenk Erturk ,
İsmail Güvenç ,
Sayandev Mukherjee  and
Huseyin Arslan
Edited by
Tony Q. S. Quek ,
Guillaume de la Roche ,
İsmail Güvenç  and
Marios Kountouris
Mustafa Cenk Erturk
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
İsmail Güvenç
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Sayandev Mukherjee
Affiliation:
NTT Docomo USA
Huseyin Arslan
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Tony Q. S. Quek
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Guillaume de la Roche
Affiliation:
Mindspeed Technologies
İsmail Güvenç
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Marios Kountouris
Affiliation:
SUPÉLEC (Ecole Supérieure d'Electricité)
Get access

Summary

Introduction and prior art

Frequency allocation for heterogeneous networks

In heterogeneous networks, frequency resources can be allocated to different tiers in a co-channel (shared-spectrum) or dedicated channel (split-spectrum) manner, or through a hybrid technique, which is a combination of the two approaches. In the co-channel approach shown in Figure 15.1(a), while the spectrum resources are fully reused in different tiers, cross-tier interference may cause crucial setbacks to the system. For example, macrocell users in the vicinity of closed subscriber group (CSG) femtocells are not allowed to connect to the femtocells, even if their link quality with these femtocells is good. Therefore, such macrocell users receive strong downlink interference from CSG femtocells and may fall into outage.

The split spectrum approach shown in Figure 15.1(b), on the other hand, partitions the allocated spectrum between multiple tiers. Each tier can use its own segment of resource and therefore there is no cross-tier interference [1]. However, the amount of bandwidth available to each tier is reduced. Hybrid methods as shown in Figure 15.1(c) use a mixture of co-channel and dedicated channel methods, and aim to reuse the spectrum resources whenever feasible. For example, in [2], the macrocell users are dedicated a component carrier (CC), referred as the “escape carrier,” which is not used by the femtocell network. Any macrocell mobile station (MMS) that is close by to a femtocell is scheduled within this escape carrier, if the interference observed from the femtocell network is above a threshold.

Type
Chapter
Information
Small Cell Networks
Deployment, PHY Techniques, and Resource Management
 , pp. 357 - 382
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] V., Chandrasekhar, J. G., Andrews, and A., Gatherer, “Femtocell networks: a survey,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 59–67, Sep. 2008.Google Scholar
[2] Nokia Siemens Networks, “Macro+HeNB performance with escape carrier,” 3GPP Standard Contribution (R1-101453), Feb. 2010.
[3] Z., Bharucha, A., Saul, G., Auer, and H., Haas, “Dynamic resource partitioning for downlink femto-to-macro-cell interference avoidance,” EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., vol. 2010, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2010.Google Scholar
[4] H. A., Mahmoud and I., Guvenc, “A comparative study of different deployment modes for femtocell networks,” in Proc. IEEE Indoor Outdoor Femtocells (IOFC) Workshop (co-located with PIMRC 2009), Tokyo, Japan, Sep. 2009, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[5] D., López-Pérez, A., Valcarce, A., Ladanyi, G., de la Roche, and J., Zhang, “Intracell handover for interference and handover mitigation in OFDMA two-tier macrocell-femtocell networks,” EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., vol. 2010, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2010.Google Scholar
[6] I., Demirdogen, I., Guvenc, and H., Arslan, “A simulation study of performance trade-offs in open access femtocell networks,” in Proc. IEEE Indoor Outdoor Femtocells (IOFC) Workshop (co-located with PIMRC 2010), Istanbul, Turkey, Sep. 2010, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[7] Samsung, “CSI measurement issue for macro–femto scenarios,” 3GPP Standard Contribution (R1-106051), Jacksonville, FL, Nov. 2010.
[8] InterDigital Communications, LLC, “eICIC macro-femto: time-domain muting and ABS,” 3GPP Standard Contribution (R1-105951), Jacksonville, FL, Nov. 2010.
[9] Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, “Details of almost blank subframes,” 3GPP Standard Contribution (R1-105335), Xian, China, Oct. 2010.
[10] A., Damnjanovic, J., Montojo, Y., Wei, T., Ji, T., Luo, M., Vajapeyam, T., Yoo, O., Song, and D., Malladi, “A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 10–21, June 2011.Google Scholar
[11] Samsung, “CSI measurement issue for macro-femto scenarios,” 3GPP Standard Contribution (R1-106051), Nov. 2010.
[12] D., Choi, P., Monajemi, S., Kang, and J., Villasenor, “Dealing with loud neighbors: the benefits and tradeoffs of adaptive femtocell access,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Nov.–Dec. 2008.Google Scholar
[13] I., Guvenc, M. R., Jeong, F., Watanabe, and H., Inamura, “A hybrid frequency assignment for femtocells and coverage area analysis for co-channel operation,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 880–2, Dec. 2008.Google Scholar
[14] V., Chandrasekhar, J. G., Andrews, T., Muharemovic, Z., Shen, and A., Gatherer, “Power control in two-tier femtocell networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4316–28, Aug. 2009.Google Scholar
[15] J. P. M., Torregoza, R., Enkhbat, and W.-J., Hwang, “Joint power control, base station assignment, and channel assignment in cognitive femtocell networks,” EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., vol. 2010, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2010.Google Scholar
[16] K., Huang, V., Lau, and Y., Chen, “Spectrum sharing between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks: transmission-capacity trade-off,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. (JSAC), vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1256–67, Sep. 2009.Google Scholar
[17] M., Dianati, X., Shen, and S., Naik, “A new fairness index for radio resource allocation in wireless networks,” in Proc. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), vol. 2, New Orleans, LA, Mar. 2005, pp. 712–17.Google Scholar
[18] D. C. R., Jain and W., Hawe, “A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer system,” DEC Technical Report 301, 1984.Google Scholar
[19] D., Bertsekas and R., Gallager, Data Networks. Prentice-Hall, 1987.Google Scholar
[20] A., Kumar and J., Kleinberg, “Fairness measures for resource allocation,” in Proc. 41st Annual Symp. on Found. of Comp. Sci., Redondo Beach, CA, 2000, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
[21] X., Gao, T., Nandagopal, and V., Bharghavan, “Achieving application level fairness through utility-based wireless fair scheduling,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), vol. 6, San Antonio, TX, Nov. 2001, pp. 3257–61.Google Scholar
[22] S., Sesia, M., Baker, and I., Toufik, LTE: The UMTS Long Term Evolution: From Theory to Practice. Wiley-Blackwell, July 2011.Google Scholar
[23] S., Mukherjee, “UE coverage in LTE macro network with mixed CSG and open access femto overlay,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Commun. (ICC), June 2011.Google Scholar
[24] V., Chandrasekhar and J. G., Andrews, “Spectrum allocation in two-tier networks,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3059–68, Oct. 2009.Google Scholar
[25] I., Guvenc, “Capacity and fairness analysis of heterogeneous networks with range expansion, and interference coordination,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1084–7, Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
[26] 3GPP TR 36.814 Release 9 2 V9.0.0 (2010-03), “Technical specification group radio access network; evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects (release 9),” Mar. 2010.
[27] M., Erturk, H., Aki, I., Guvenc, and H., Arslan, “Fair and QoS-oriented spectrum splitting in macrocell-femtocell networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2010, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×