Works, ed. and tr. Harmon, A. M. et al. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (8 vols., London, 1913–67); ed. Macleod, M. D. (in progress, 4 vols, so far, Oxford, 1972–); tr. , H. W. and Fowler, F. G. (4 vols., Oxford, 1905);Google Scholar

(Ars poetica = Epistles 2.3)

Controversies and Suasoriae, ed. and tr. Winterbottom, Michael (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1974).Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H., The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (Oxford, 1953).Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H., The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (Oxford, 1953).Google Scholar

Aetia and other poems, ed. and tr. Trypanis, C. A. (LCL) (London, 1958);Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984), 174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahl, Frederick, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar

Alexiou, Margaret, The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition (Cambridge, 1974).Google Scholar

Alexiou, Margaret, The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition (Cambridge, 1974).Google Scholar

Alexiou, Margaret, The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition (Cambridge, 1974).Google Scholar

Alexiou, Margaret, The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition (Cambridge, 1974).Google Scholar

Allegoriae Homericae, ed. Buffiere, Fèlix (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar

ed. Allen, T. W. in Homeri, Opera (Oxford, 1912), V, pp. 1–92; ed. and tr. Evelyn-White, H. G. in Hesiod (LCL) (London, 1936), pp. 286–597.Google Scholar

Allen, T. W., Homer: The Origins and the Transmission (Oxford, 1924).Google Scholar

Allen, W. S., Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar

Allen, T. W., Homer: The Origins and the Transmission (Oxford, 1924).Google Scholar

Allen, W. S., Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar

Allen, T. W., Homer: The Origins and the Transmission (Oxford, 1924).Google Scholar

Allen, W. S., Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar

Allen, T. W., Homer: The Origins and the Transmission (Oxford, 1924).Google Scholar

Allen, W. S., Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar

Anderson, W. D., Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. D., Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. D., Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. D., Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Graham, Lucian: Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar

Anderson, Graham, Philostratus (London, 1986).Google Scholar

Anderson, Graham, Lucian: Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar

Anderson, Graham, Philostratus (London, 1986).Google Scholar

Annales, ed. with commentary Skutsch, Otto (Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar

Annales, ed. with commentary Skutsch, Otto (Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, An Introduction to Plato's Republic (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in Moravcsik, and Temko, (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below), pp. 1–28.

Annas, Julia, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in Moravcsik, and Temko, (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below)

Annas, Julia, An Introduction to Plato's Republic (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in Moravcsik, and Temko, (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below)

Annas, Julia, An Introduction to Plato's Republic (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in Moravcsik, and Temko, (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below)

Annas, Julia, An Introduction to Plato's Republic (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar

Apology, On Spectacles, ed. and tr. Glover, T. R. (LCL) (London, 1977).Google Scholar

Perihermēneias (On Style), ed. Radermarcher, Ludwig (Leipzig, 1901; rpt. Stuttgart, 1967); ed. with tr. and notes Roberts, W. R. (Cambridge, 1902) (tr. also in Aristotle, , Poetics, etc. LCL, London 1932); tr. with notes Grube, G. M. A. (Toronto, 1961); tr. Innes, D. C., in Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, Michael (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 171–215.Google Scholar

Arnhart, Larry, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar

Arnhart, Larry, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar

Arnhart, Larry, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar

Arnhart, Larry, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar

Arnim, Hans von (ed.), Stoicorum veterum fragmenta (4 vols., Leipzig, 1903–24; rpt. Dubuque, Iowa, 1964–5).Google Scholar

Arnim, Hans von, Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa (Berlin, 1898).Google Scholar

Arnim, Hans von, Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa (Berlin, 1898).Google Scholar

Ars grammatica, ed. Keil, Henricus, in Grammatici Latini (see above, Collections), I, pp. 299–529.

Ars rhetorica, ed. Hammer, Casper, in Rhetores Graeci (Leipzig, 1894), pp. 352–98;Google Scholar

Critical works, including the spurious Ars rhetorica, ed. Usener, Hermann and Radermacher, Ludwig (2 vols., Leipzig, 1899–1929); tr. Usener, Stephen (LCL) (in progress, 2 vols, so far, London, 1974–); ed. and tr. Aujac, Germaine (in progress, 2 vols, so far, Paris, 1978–);Google Scholar

Ars rhetorica, ed. and tr. with commentary, Calboli-Montefusco, Lucia (Bologna, 1979).Google Scholar

Atkins, J. W. H., Literary Criticism in Antiquity: A Sketch of its Development (2 vols., Cambridge, 1934; rpt. London, 1952).Google Scholar

Ayers, R. H., Language, Logic, and Reason in the Church Fathers (Hildesheim, 1979).Google Scholar

Ayers, R. H., Language, Logic, and Reason in the Church Fathers (Hildesheim, 1979).Google Scholar

Babut, Daniel, Plutarque et le Stoïcisme (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar

Babut, Daniel, Plutarque et le Stoïcisme (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar

Bailie, J., ‘Epistemologie presocratique et linguistique’, Etudes ptiilosophiques (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M., Rabelais and his World, tr. Iswolsky, H. (Bloomington, Indiana, 1984).Google Scholar

Baldwin, C. S., Ancient Rhetoric and Poetic (New York, 1924; rpt. 1959).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Barry, Studies in Aulus Gellius (Lawrence, Kansas, 1975).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Barry, Studies in Aulus Gellius (Lawrence, Kansas, 1975).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Barry, Studies in Aulus Gellius (Lawrence, Kansas, 1975).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Barry, Studies in Aulus Gellius (Lawrence, Kansas, 1975).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Barry, Studies in Aulus Gellius (Lawrence, Kansas, 1975).Google Scholar

Bareis, K. H., Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar

Bareis, K. H., Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar

Bareis, K. H., Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar

Bareis, K. H., Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar

Barker, Andrew, Greek Musical Writings; I: The Musician and his Art (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar

Barker, Andrew, Greek Musical Writings; I: The Musician and his Art (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar

Barker, Andrew, Greek Musical Writings; I: The Musician and his Art (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar

Barker, Andrew, Greek Musical Writings; I: The Musician and his Art (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan et al. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle; 4: Psychology and Aesthetics (London, 1979).Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan et al. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle; 4: Psychology and Aesthetics (London, 1979).Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan et al. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle; 4: Psychology and Aesthetics (London, 1979).Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan et al. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle; 4: Psychology and Aesthetics (London, 1979).Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D., Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study (Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D., Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study (Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar

Bausinger, Hermann, Formen der ‘Volkspoesie’ (2nd ed., Berlin, 1980).Google Scholar

Bausinger, Hermann, Formen der ‘Volkspoesie’ (2nd ed., Berlin, 1980).Google Scholar

Bausinger, Hermann, Formen der ‘Volkspoesie’ (2nd ed., Berlin, 1980).Google Scholar

Bausinger, Hermann, Formen der ‘Volkspoesie’ (2nd ed., Berlin, 1980).Google Scholar

Becker, Carl, Das Spätwork des Horaz (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar

Becker, Carl, Das Spätwork des Horaz (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar

Becker, Carl, Das Spätwork des Horaz (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar

Becker, Carl, Das Spätwork des Horaz (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar

Becker, Carl, Das Spätwork des Horaz (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Aristotle's concept of praxis in the Poetics’, Classical Journal, 79 (1983), 110–24Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983), 39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984), 121–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Aristotle's concept of praxis in the Poetics’, Classical Journal, 79 (1983)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Aristotle's concept of praxis in the Poetics’, Classical Journal, 79 (1983)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Aristotle's concept of praxis in the Poetics’, Classical Journal, 79 (1983)Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983)Google Scholar

Ben-Amos, Dan, ‘Analytical categories and ethnic genres’, in Ben-Amos, Dan (ed.), Folklore Genres (Austin, 1976)Google Scholar

Ben-Amos, Dan, ‘Analytical categories and ethnic genres’, in Ben-Amos, Dan (ed.), Folklore Genres (Austin, 1976), pp. 215–42Google Scholar

Ben-Amos, Dan, ‘Analytical categories and ethnic genres’, in Ben-Amos, Dan (ed.), Folklore Genres (Austin, 1976)Google Scholar

Ben-Amos, Dan, ‘Analytical categories and ethnic genres’, in Ben-Amos, Dan (ed.), Folklore Genres (Austin, 1976)Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. Palmer, E. (London, 1973).Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. Palmer, E. (London, 1973).Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. Palmer, E. (London, 1973).Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. Palmer, E. (London, 1973).Google Scholar

Bidez, Joseph, Vie de Porphyry (Ghent, 1913).Google Scholar

Bidez, Joseph, Vie de Porphyry (Ghent, 1913).Google Scholar

Birmelin, Ella, ‘Die kunsttheoretischen Gedanken in Philostrats Apollonios’, Philologus, 88 (1933), 149–80, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birmelin, Ella, ‘Die kunsttheoretischen Gedanken in Philostrats Apollonios’, Philologus, 88 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bompaire, Jacques, ‘Le pathos dans le Traité du Sublime’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 86 (1973), 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bompaire, Jacques, ‘Le pathos dans le Traité du Sublime’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 86 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome (London, 1977).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool, 1949).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome (London, 1977).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool, 1949).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome (London, 1977).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool, 1949).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome (London, 1977).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool, 1949).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome (London, 1977).Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F., Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire (Liverpool, 1949).Google Scholar

Boulanger, André, Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d'Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère (Paris, 1923).Google Scholar

Boulanger, André, Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d'Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère (Paris, 1923).Google Scholar

Bowersock, Glen, Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Bowersock, Glen, Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Bowersock, Glen, Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Bowersock, Glen, Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Bowersock, Glen, Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar

Brelich, Angelo, Guerre, agoni e culti nella Grecia arcaica (Bonn, 1961).Google Scholar

Brelich, Angelo, Guerre, agoni e culti nella Grecia arcaica (Bonn, 1961).Google Scholar

Brelich, Angelo, Guerre, agoni e culti nella Grecia arcaica (Bonn, 1961).Google Scholar

Brelich, Angelo, Guerre, agoni e culti nella Grecia arcaica (Bonn, 1961).Google Scholar

Bremer, J.M., Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar

Bremer, J.M., Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar

Bremer, J.M., Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar

Bremer, J.M., Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. et al., Varron; six exposés (Entretien Hardt, 9) (Geneva, 1963).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., ‘Philodemus, Peri poiēmatōn, Book IV’, Maia, 24 (1972), 342–4.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. et al., Varron; six exposés (Entretien Hardt, 9) (Geneva, 1963).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., ‘Philodemus, Peri poiēmatōn, Book IV’, Maia, 24 (1972).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. et al., Varron; six exposés (Entretien Hardt, 9) (Geneva, 1963).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., ‘Philodemus, Peri poiēmatōn, Book IV’, Maia, 24 (1972).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. et al., Varron; six exposés (Entretien Hardt, 9) (Geneva, 1963).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., ‘Philodemus, Peri poiēmatōn, Book IV’, Maia, 24 (1972).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. et al., Varron; six exposés (Entretien Hardt, 9) (Geneva, 1963).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., ‘Philodemus, Peri poiēmatōn, Book IV’, Maia, 24 (1972).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O., Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar

Brisson, Luc, Platon: Les mots et les mythes (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar

Brisson, Luc, Platon: Les mots et les mythes (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar

Brisson, Luc, Platon: Les mots et les mythes (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar

Brisson, Luc, Platon: Les mots et les mythes (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar

Brody, Jules, Boileau and Longinus (Geneva, 1958).Google Scholar

Brody, Jules, Boileau and Longinus (Geneva, 1958).Google Scholar

Brutus, ed. with commentary Douglas, A. E. (Oxford, 1966);Google Scholar

Brutus, Orator, ed. and tr. Hendrickson, G. L. (LCL) (London, 1939);Google Scholar

Buffière, Félix, Les mythes d'Homère et la pensée grecque (Paris, 1956).Google Scholar

Buffière, Félix, Les mythes d'Homère et la pensée grecque (Paris, 1956).Google Scholar

Bulloch, A. W. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I, pp. 541–621.

Bulloch, A. W. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.

Bulloch, A. W. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.

Bulloch, A. W. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.

Bulloch, A. W. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.

Bundy, M. W., ‘The theory of imagination in classical and medieval thought’, University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, 12, (1927)Google Scholar

Bundy, E.L., Studia Pindanca (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar

Bundy, E.L., Studia Pindanca (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar

Bundy, E.L., Studia Pindanca (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar

Bundy, E.L., Studia Pindanca (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar

Burger, Ronna, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar

Burger, Ronna, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar

Burger, Ronna, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar

Burger, Ronna, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, ‘Mythische Denken’, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos (Berlin, 1979)Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Greek Religion, tr. Raffan, J. (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. Bing, P. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, ‘Mythische Denken’, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos (Berlin, 1979), pp. 16–39.Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Greek Religion, tr. Raffan, J. (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. Bing, P. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, ‘Mythische Denken’, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos (Berlin, 1979)Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Greek Religion, tr. Raffan, J. (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. Bing, P. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, ‘Mythische Denken’, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos (Berlin, 1979)Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Greek Religion, tr. Raffan, J. (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. Bing, P. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P., The Art of Bacchylides (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P., The Art of Bacchylides (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P., The Art of Bacchylides (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P., The Art of Bacchylides (Cambridge, Mass., 1985).Google Scholar

Butcher, S. H., Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art (4th ed., London, 1907).Google Scholar

Butcher, S. H., Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art (4th ed., London, 1907).Google Scholar

Butcher, S. H., Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art (4th ed., London, 1907).Google Scholar

Butcher, S. H., Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art (4th ed., London, 1907).Google Scholar

Cairns, Francis, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

Cairns, Francis, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

Cairns, Francis, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

Cairns, Francis, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

Cairns, Francis, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry (Edinburgh, 1972).Google Scholar

Calame, Claude, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar

Calame, Claude, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar

Calame, Claude, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar

Calame, Claude, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar

Cameron, Alistair, Plato's Affair with Tragedy (Cincinnati, 1978).Google Scholar

Cameron, Alistair, Plato's Affair with Tragedy (Cincinnati, 1978).Google Scholar

Cameron, Alistair, Plato's Affair with Tragedy (Cincinnati, 1978).Google Scholar

Cameron, Alistair, Plato's Affair with Tragedy (Cincinnati, 1978).Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A., ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. A., ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964), 63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. A., ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. A., ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplan, Harry, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970), 160–95.Google Scholar

Caplan, Harry, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar

Caplan, Harry, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar

Caplan, Harry, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar

Caplan, Harry, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3)Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3), 1–27.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3)Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3)Google Scholar

Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, ed. and tr. Cooke, H. P. and Tredennick, Hugh (LCL) (London, 1938);Google Scholar

Cavazza, Franco, Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar

Cavazza, Franco, Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar

Cavazza, Franco, Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar

Cavazza, Franco, Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar

Cavazza, Franco, Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico (Florence, 1981).Google Scholar

Champlin, E. J., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. J., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. J., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. J., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. J., Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, Mass., 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chantraine, Pierre, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar

Chantraine, Pierre, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar

Chantraine, Pierre, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar

Chantraine, Pierre, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar

Clark, D. L., Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education (New York, 1957).Google Scholar

Clouds, ed. with commentary Sommerstein, A. H. (Warminster, 1982); Frogs, ed. with commentary Stanford, W. B. (London, 1963).Google Scholar

Cochrane, N. C., Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine (London, 1944).Google Scholar

Cochrane, N. C., Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine (London, 1944).Google Scholar

Coffey, Michael, Roman Satire (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Coffey, Michael, Roman Satire (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Coffey, Michael, Roman Satire (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Coffey, Michael, Roman Satire (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Coffey, Michael, Roman Satire (London, 1976).Google Scholar

Cole, Thomas, ‘Archaic truth’, Quaderni Urbinati, 13 (1983)Google Scholar

Cole, Thomas, ‘Archaic truth’, Quaderni Urbinati, 13 (1983), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Thomas, ‘Archaic truth’, Quaderni Urbinati, 13 (1983)Google Scholar

Cole, Thomas, ‘Archaic truth’, Quaderni Urbinati, 13 (1983)Google Scholar

Collingwood, R.G., ‘Plato's philosophy of art’, Mind, 34 (1925)Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G., ‘Plato's philosophy of art’, Mind, 34 (1925), 154–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collingwood, R.G., ‘Plato's philosophy of art’, Mind, 34 (1925)Google Scholar

Collingwood, R.G., ‘Plato's philosophy of art’, Mind, 34 (1925)Google Scholar

Colson, F. H., ‘Two examples of literary and rhetorical criticism in the Fathers’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1924), 364–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colson, F. H., ‘Two examples of literary and rhetorical criticism in the Fathers’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1924)Google Scholar

Commentarii in Hermogenem, ed. Rabe, Hugo (2 vols., Leipzig, 1893).Google Scholar

Commentarii in somnium Scipionis, ed. Willis, J. A. (Leipzig, 1963); tr. Stahl, W. H. (New York, 1952);Google Scholar

Commentarii in Vergilii carmina, ed. Thilo, Georg and Hagen, Hermann (3 vols., Leipzig, 1881–1901); ed. Rand, E. K. et al. (in progress, 3 vols, so far, American Philological Association, 1946–).Google Scholar

Commentarii in Vergilii carmina, ed. Thilo, Georg and Hagen, Hermann (3 vols., Leipzig, 1881–1901); ed. Rand, E. K. et al. (in progress, 3 vols, so far, American Philological Association, 1946–).Google Scholar

Comotti, Giovanni, La musica nella cultura greca e romana (Turin, 1979).Google Scholar

Comotti, Giovanni, La musica nella cultura greca e romana (Turin, 1979).Google Scholar

Comotti, Giovanni, La musica nella cultura greca e romana (Turin, 1979).Google Scholar

Comotti, Giovanni, La musica nella cultura greca e romana (Turin, 1979).Google Scholar

Conley, T.M., ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, T. M., ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979), 74–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, T.M., ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, T.M., ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Lane, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar

Cooper, Lane, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar

Cooper, Lane, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar

Cooper, Lane, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar

Cope, E. M., An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar

Cope, E. M., An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar

Cope, E. M., An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar

Cope, E. M., An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar

Cope, E. M., An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar

Corpus, ed. Scott, Walter (4 vols., Oxford, 1924–6).Google Scholar

Works, ed. Dekkers, E., Corpus Christianorum, series Latina, (Turnhout, 1954);Google Scholar

Coulter, J. A., The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar

Coulter, J. A., The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar

Crane, R. S. (ed.), Critics and Criticism: Ancient and Modern (Chicago, 1952).Google Scholar

Cratylus, ed. and tr. Fowler, H. N. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (London, 1937); commentary by Rijlaarsdam, J. C., Platan über die Sprache (Utrecht, 1978);Google Scholar

Cross, R. C., and Woozley, A.D., Plato's Republic: A Philosophical Commentary (London, 1964).Google Scholar

Cross, R. C., and Woozley, A.D., Plato's Republic: A Philosophical Commentary (London, 1964).Google Scholar

Cross, R. C., and Woozley, A.D., Plato's Republic: A Philosophical Commentary (London, 1964).Google Scholar

Cross, R. C., and Woozley, A.D., Plato's Republic: A Philosophical Commentary (London, 1964).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973), 3–25.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried, Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie (Berlin, 1932).Google Scholar

D'Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (London, 1931; rpt. New York, 1962).Google Scholar

D'Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (London, 1931; rpt. New York, 1962).Google Scholar

D'Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (London, 1931; rpt. New York, 1962).Google Scholar

D'Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (London, 1931; rpt. New York, 1962).Google Scholar

D'Alton, J. F., Roman Literary Theory and Criticism (London, 1931; rpt. New York, 1962).Google Scholar

Dalzell, Alexander, ‘C. Asinius Pollio and the early history of public recitation at Rome’, Hermathtna, 86 (1955)Google Scholar

Works, ed. Monroe, D. B. and Allen, T. W. (5 vols., Oxford, 1902–12).

De Dinarcho, ed. with commentary Marenghi, Gerardo (Florence, 1970);Google Scholar

De grammaticis et rhetoribus, ed. with commentary Corte, Francesco (3rd ed., Turin, 1968); ed. and tr. Rolfe, J. C., Suetonius (LCL) (London, 1914), II, pp. 394–449;Google Scholar

De inventione, De Optimo genere oratorum, Topica, ed. and tr. Hubbell, H. M. (LCL) (London, 1949);Google Scholar

De lingua Latina, ed. and tr. Kent, R. G. (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1951);Google Scholar

De natura deorum, Academica, ed. and tr. Rackham, Harris (LCL) (London, 1933);Google Scholar

De nuptiis Mercurii et Philologiae, ed. Willis, J. A. (Leipzig, 1983); tr. Stahl, W. H., Johnson, Richard, and Burge, E. L. (2 vols., New York, 1971–7); commentary by Shanzer, Danuta (Berkeley, 1987).Google Scholar

De oratore, ed. with commentary Wilkins, A. S. (3 vols., Oxford, 1888–92; rpt. Hildesheim, 1965); ed. with commentary Leeman, A. D. and Pinkster, Harm (in progress, Heidelberg, 1981–); ed. and tr. Sutton, E. W. and Rackham, Harris (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1948).Google Scholar

De principiis, ed. Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio (5 vols., Paris, 1978); tr. Butterworth, G. W. (London, 1936).Google Scholar

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge, Mass., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Thucydide, ed. with commentary Pavano, Giuseppe (Palermo, 1958); tr. With commentary Pritchett, W. K. (Berkeley, 1975);Google Scholar

De Thucydide, ed. with commentary Pavano, Giuseppe (Palermo, 1958); tr. With commentary Pritchett, W. K. (Berkeley, 1975);Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948), 241–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939), 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948).Google Scholar

DeLacy, Phillip, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar

Derbolav, Josef, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar

Derbolav, Josef, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar

Derbolav, Josef, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar

Derbolav, Josef, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. Johnson, Barbara (Chicago, 1981)Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. Johnson, Barbara (Chicago, 1981), pp. 61–171Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. Johnson, Barbara (Chicago, 1981)Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. Johnson, Barbara (Chicago, 1981)Google Scholar

Descat, Raymond, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981)Google Scholar

Descat, Raymond, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descat, Raymond, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981)Google Scholar

Descat, Raymond, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981)Google Scholar

Detienne, Marcel, Les maîtres de vérité dans la Gréce archaïque (2nd ed., Paris, 1973).Google Scholar

Detienne, Marcel, Les maîtres de vérité dans la Gréce archaïque (2nd ed., Paris, 1973).Google Scholar

Detienne, Marcel, Les maîtres de vérité dans la Gréce archaïque (2nd ed., Paris, 1973).Google Scholar

Detienne, Marcel, Les maîtres de vérité dans la Gréce archaïque (2nd ed., Paris, 1973).Google Scholar

Dialogus de oratoribus, ed. with commentary Gudeman, Alfred (2nd ed., Berlin, 1914);Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walther (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (6th ed., 3 vols., Zurich, 1951–2; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar

fragment(s), ed. Diels, Hermann and Kranz, Walther (see above, Collections), I, pp. 139–90.

fragment(s), ed. Diels, Hermann and Kranz, Walther (see above, Collections), I

Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walther (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (6th ed., 3 vols., Zurich, 1951–2; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar

Diller, Hans, ‘Probleme des Platonischen Ion’, Hermes, 83 (1955)Google Scholar

Diller, Hans, ‘Probleme des Platonischen Ion’, Hermes, 83 (1955), 171–87.Google Scholar

Diller, Hans, ‘Probleme des Platonischen Ion’, Hermes, 83 (1955), 171–87.Google Scholar

Diller, Hans, ‘Probleme des Platonischen Ion’, Hermes, 83 (1955)Google Scholar

Dingel, Joachim, Seneca und die Dichtung (Heidelberg, 1974).Google Scholar

Dingel, Joachim, Seneca und die Dichtung (Heidelberg, 1974).Google Scholar

Dingel, Joachim, Seneca und die Dichtung (Heidelberg, 1974).Google Scholar

Dingel, Joachim, Seneca und die Dichtung (Heidelberg, 1974).Google Scholar

Dingel, Joachim, Seneca und die Dichtung (Heidelberg, 1974).Google Scholar

Divinae institutiones, ed. Brandt, Samuel (Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, 19) (Vienna, 1890); tr. McDonald, M. F. (Washington, 1964).Google Scholar

Dorsch, T. S. (tr.), Classical Literary Criticism (Aristotle, On the Art of Poetry; Horace, On the Art of Poetry; Longinus, On the Sublime) (Penguin, 1965).Google Scholar

Dorter, Kenneth, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorter, Kenneth, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorter, Kenneth, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorter, Kenneth, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘A Ciceronian contribution to rhetorical theory’, Eranos, 55 (1957), 17–24.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973), 95–138.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘A Ciceronian contribution to rhetorical theory’, Eranos, 55 (1957).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘A Ciceronian contribution to rhetorical theory’, Eranos, 55 (1957).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘A Ciceronian contribution to rhetorical theory’, Eranos, 55 (1957).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘A Ciceronian contribution to rhetorical theory’, Eranos, 55 (1957).Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E., ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar

Drijepondt, H. L. F., Die Antike Theorie der Varietas: Dynamik und Wechsel in aufund ab als Charakteristikum vom Stil und Structur (Spudasmata, 37) (Hildesheim, 1979).Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald, and Todorov, Tzvetan, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. Porter, C. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald, and Todorov, Tzvetan, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. Porter, C. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald, and Todorov, Tzvetan, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. Porter, C. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald, and Todorov, Tzvetan, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. Porter, C. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar

Duret, Luc, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983), 1, 447–60.Google Scholar

Duret, Luc, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar

Duret, Luc, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar

Duret, Luc, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar

Duret, Luc, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar

Düring, Ingmar, Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretationen seines Denken (Heidelberg, 1966).Google Scholar

Düring, Ingmar, Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretationen seines Denken (Heidelberg, 1966).Google Scholar

Düring, Ingmar, Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretationen seines Denken (Heidelberg, 1966).Google Scholar

Düring, Ingmar, Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretationen seines Denken (Heidelberg, 1966).Google Scholar

Works, ed. with commentary Wickham, E. C. (3rded., 2 vols., Oxford, 1891–6);

fragment(s), ed. and tr. Warmington, E. H., The Remains of Old Latin (see above, Collections), III, pp. 2–423; ed. Krenkel, Werner (2 vols., Leiden, 1970).Google Scholar

fragment(s), ed. and tr. Warmington, E. H., The Remains of Old Latin (see above, Collections), II, pp. 46–156.

Eden, Kathy, Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition (Princeton, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eden, Kathy, Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition (Princeton, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eden, Kathy, Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition (Princeton, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, Lowell, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar

Edmunds, Lowell, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 96–111.Google Scholar

Edmunds, Lowell, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 96–111.Google Scholar

Edmunds, Lowell, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar

Egger, Emile, Essai sur I'histoire de la critique chez les grecs (Paris, 1849).Google Scholar

Egger, Emile, Essai sur I'histoire de la critique chez les grecs (Paris, 1849).Google Scholar

Elias, J. A., Plato's Defence of Poetry (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, J. A., Plato's Defence of Poetry (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, J. A., Plato's Defence of Poetry (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, J. A., Plato's Defence of Poetry (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellspermann, G.L., The Attitude of the Early Christian Latin Writers toward Pagan Literature and Learning (Catholic University of America Patristic Studies, 82) (Washington, 1949).Google Scholar

Ellspermann, G.L., The Attitude of the Early Christian Latin Writers toward Pagan Literature and Learning (Catholic University of America Patristic Studies, 82) (Washington, 1949).Google Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar

Else, G.F., Aristotle's Poetics: The Argument (Cambridge, Mass., 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., Plato and Aristotle on Poetry, ed. Burian, Peter (Chapel Hill, 1986).Google Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar

Else, G.F., Aristotle's Poetics: The Argument (Cambridge, Mass., 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., Plato and Aristotle on Poetry, ed. Burian, Peter (Chapel Hill, 1986).Google Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar

Else, G.F., Aristotle's Poetics: The Argument (Cambridge, Mass., 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., Plato and Aristotle on Poetry, ed. Burian, Peter (Chapel Hill, 1986).Google Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar

Else, G.F., Aristotle's Poetics: The Argument (Cambridge, Mass., 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Else, G.F., Plato and Aristotle on Poetry, ed. Burian, Peter (Chapel Hill, 1986).Google Scholar

Encomium of Helen and fragment(s), ed. Diels, Hermann and Kranz, Walther (see above, Collections), III, pp. 271–307; ed. Radermacher, Ludwig (see above, Collections), pp. 42–66; tr. Hook, Larue, in Isocrates (LCL) (London, 1945), III, pp. 55–7; tr. Kennedy, G. A., in Sprague, R. K. (ed.) (see above, Collections), pp. 30–67.Google Scholar

Epinician Odes and fragment(s), ed. Bowra, C. M. (2nd ed., Oxford, 1947); fragment(s), ed. Snell, Bruno and Maehler, Herweg (Leipzig, 1975);Google Scholar

Epistles, ed. and tr. Haines, C. R. (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1928).Google Scholar

Epistles, ed. with commentary Wilkins, A. S. (London, 1896); ed. with commentary Brink, C. O. (2 vols., Cambridge, 1971–82);Google Scholar

Epistulae, ed. Mynors, R. A. B. (Oxford, 1963); tr. Radice, Betty (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1975); commentary by Sherwin-White, A. N. (Oxford, 1966).Google Scholar

Epistulae morales, ed. and tr. Gummere, R. M. (LCL) (3 vols., London, 1917–25).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V., Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V. (ed.), Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V., Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V. (ed.), Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V., Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V. (ed.), Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V., Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V. (ed.), Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V., Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar

Erickson, K. V. (ed.), Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1974).Google Scholar

Etonian, Walter, ‘Simonides, Fr. 4d and P. Oxy. 2432’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 100 (1969).Google Scholar

Works, ed. and tr. Evelyn, H. G.-White (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (2 vols., London, 1919–21).Google Scholar

Works, ed. and tr. Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (12 vols., London, 1929–53).Google Scholar

Works, ed. and tr. Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (12 vols., London, 1929–53).Google Scholar

Fairweather, Janet, Seneca the Elder (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairweather, Janet, Seneca the Elder (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairweather, Janet, Seneca the Elder (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairweather, Janet, Seneca the Elder (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairweather, Janet, Seneca the Elder (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978), 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979), 441–58.Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979).Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979).Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979).Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979).Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979).Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F., Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus (Cambridge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F., Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus (Cambridge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F., Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus (Cambridge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F., Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus (Cambridge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Figueira, T.J., ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 112–58.Google Scholar

Figueira, T.J., ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar

Figueira, T.J., ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 112–58.Google Scholar

Figueira, T.J., ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. H., Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. H., Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. H., Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. H., Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut, Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis Platonischer Philosophie (Berlin, 1958)Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut, Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis Platonischer Philosophie (Berlin, 1958)Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut, Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis Platonischer Philosophie (Berlin, 1958)Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut, Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis Platonischer Philosophie (Berlin, 1958)Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar

Flashar, Hellmut (ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar

Foley, H.P., Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides (Ithaca, 1985).Google Scholar

Foley, H.P., Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides (Ithaca, 1985).Google Scholar

Foley, H.P., Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides (Ithaca, 1985).Google Scholar

Foley, H.P., Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides (Ithaca, 1985).Google Scholar

Fontenrose, Joseph, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar

Fontenrose, Joseph, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar

Fontenrose, Joseph, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar

Fontenrose, Joseph, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar

Ford, A. L., ‘The seal of Theognis’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 82–95.Google Scholar

Ford, A. L., ‘The seal of Theognis’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar

Ford, A. L., ‘The seal of Theognis’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 82–95.Google Scholar

Ford, A. L., ‘The seal of Theognis’, in Figueira, T.J. and Nagy, Gregory (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar

Forderer, Manfred, Zum Homerischen Margites (Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar

Forderer, Manfred, Zum Homerischen Margites (Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar

Forderer, Manfred, Zum Homerischen Margites (Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar

Forderer, Manfred, Zum Homerischen Margites (Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus on delivery’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985), 269–88.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus on delivery’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus on delivery’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus on delivery’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985).Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., ‘Theophrastus on delivery’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985).Google Scholar