Book contents
27 - Music and rhetoric
from A - Models of music analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Summary
Rhetoric is the original metalanguage of discourse in the West. From the fifth century BCE until around 1800 it served the educated classes as the most prestigious and influential means of conceptualizing and organizing language, and articulating how it can best be effective, persuasive, and elegant. Given that rhetoric shares with music the structured unfolding of sound in time, aspects of performance and delivery, and even a rudimentary notion of the “work” (the oration in rhetoric, the composition in music), it was natural and even inevitable that analogies would be drawn between the two. Analogies between rhetoric and music were common even in antiquity: Quintilian, for example, pointed to the expressivity of music as a model for the orator. In later times it was rhetoric that more frequently served as a model for musicians. Although musico-rhetorical analogies occurred sporadically in the music theory of the medieval period, they began to play a more extensive role only in the sixteenth century, when musicians appropriated rhetoric, by then a central element in the humanistic education of the time, as a model for the teaching of musical composition. It was the theorists of a uniquely German musico-rhetorical tradition who imported the apparatus of rhetoric directly into music theory, in effect making it a metalanguage for music as well as for language by interpreting it as a model for musical composition. What distinguished this German effort in the long history of the interaction between rhetoric and music was precisely that it went beyond the mere drawing of analogies to a thoroughgoing attribution of specific musical substance to rhetorical terms and concepts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 845 - 879Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Ad C. Herennium. De ratione dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium), with Eng. trans. , Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1954Google Scholar
Musikalisches Frühlings-, Sommer-, Herbst-, und Winter-Gespräche, Mühlhausen, Pauli und Brückner, 1695–1701Google Scholar
La retorica, Milan, A. Mondadori, 1983; trans. as Rhetoric, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1989Google Scholar
Barockrhetorik: Untersuchungen zu ihren geschichtlichen Grundlagen, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1970Google Scholar
Musica Poetica, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1997; rev. from Handbuch der musikalischen Figurenlehre, Regensburg, Laaber, 1985Google Scholar
“The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-mémoire,” in The Semiotic Challenge, trans. , New York, Hill and Wang, 1988Google Scholar
“The Compositional Process in Music Theory, 1713–1850,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 1982– 3 (1984)Google Scholar
Ausführlicher Bericht vom Gebrauche der Con- und Dissonantien, Tractatus compositionis augmentatus in Die Kompositionslehre Heinrich Schützens in der Fassung seines Schülers Chr. Bernhard, ed. , 2nd edn., Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1963; trans.Google Scholar
Wordless Rhetoric: Musical Form and the Metaphor of the Oration, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studien zur musikalischen Figurenlehre im 16. Jahrhundert, Berlin, Triltsch und Huther, 1935Google Scholar
“Johann Mattheson and the Invention of the Affektenlehre,” in New Mattheson Studies, ed. and , Cambridge University Press, 1983Google Scholar
“Music, Rhetoric, and the Concept of the Affections: A Selective Bibliography,” Notes 30 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Loci Topici and Affect in Late Baroque Music: Heinichen’s Practical Demonstration,” Music Review 27 (1966)Google Scholar
Musica poetica, Rostock, S. Myliander, 1606; facs. Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1955; trans. as Musical Poetics, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1993Google Scholar
“Fugue and Rhetoric,” Journal of Music Theory, Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 21 (1977)Google Scholar
“Music and Rhetoric in Early Seventeenth-Century English Sources,” Musical Quarterly 66 (1980)Google Scholar
and , eds. and trans., Aesthetics and the Art of Musical Composition in the German Enlightenment: Selected Writings of Johann Georg Sulzer and Heinrich Christoph Koch, Cambridge University Press, 1995Google Scholar
, De inventione; De optimo genere oratorum; Topica, with Eng. trans. , Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1949Google Scholar
, De oratore, 2 vols., Books I and II trans. and , Book III trans. , Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1942–48Google Scholar
“Der rhetorische Formbegriff H. Chr. Kochs und die Theorie der Sonatenform,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, Bückeburg, Fürstliches Institut für Musikwissenschaftliche Forschung, 1918–27; Trossingen, Hohner-Stiftung, 1952–61; Wiesbaden, F. Steiner, 1962– 35 (1978)Google Scholar
Praecepta musicae poeticae, MS, 1563; ed. in Geschichts-Blätter für Stadt und Land Magdeburg 49–50 (1914–15)Google Scholar
“Zum Figur-Begriff der Musica poetica,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, Bückeburg, Fürstliches Institut für Musikwissenschaftliche Forschung, 1918–27; Trossingen, Hohner-Stiftung, 1952–61; Wiesbaden, F. Steiner, 1962– 16 (1959)Google Scholar
“Bach und die Tradition der Rhetorik,” in Alte Musik als ästhetische Gegenwart: Bach, Händel, Schütz. Bericht über den internationalen musik-wissenschaftlichen Kongreß Stuttgart 1985, vol. 1, ed. and , Kassel, Bärenreiter 1987Google Scholar
Allgemeine Geschichte der Musik, Göttingen, Schwickert, 1788; facs. Graz, Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1967Google Scholar
L’Age de l’éloquence: Rhétorique et “res literaria” de la Renaissance au seuil de l’époque classique, Geneva, Droz, 1980; reprint Paris, A. Michel, 1994Google Scholar
Ausf ührliche Redekunst nach Anleitung der Griechen und Römer wie auch der neuern Ausländer, Leipzig, Breitkopf, 1736; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1973Google Scholar
“Rhetoric and Fugue: An Analytical Application,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 1979– 12 (1990)Google Scholar
review of Wordless Rhetoric: Musical Form and the Metaphor of the Oration by , Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 38 (1994)Google Scholar
Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1980Google Scholar
“The Source for Bach’s Musical Offering: The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian,” Journal of the American Musicological Society, University of Chicago Press, et al., 1948– 33 (1980)Google Scholar
“Ciceronians versus Aristotelians on the Ricercar as Exordium, from Bembo to Bach,” Journal of the American Musicological Society, University of Chicago Press, et al., 1948– 32 (1979)Google Scholar
“Circulatio-Tradition, Maria lactans, and Josquin as Musical Orator,” Acta Musicologica, International Musicological Socety, Basel, Bärenreiter et al., 1928– 56 (1984)Google Scholar
“Rhetorik und rhetorische Symbolik in der Musik um 1800: Vom Weiterleben eines Prinzips,” Musiktheorie 3 (1988)Google Scholar
The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Theory in the Renaissance, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1976Google Scholar
Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. , , and , ed. and , Boston, Brill, 1998Google Scholar
Synopsis musicae novae, Strassburg, Kieffer, 1612; trans. as Synopsis of New Music, Colorado Springs, Colorado College Music Press, 1977Google Scholar
Der vollkommene Capellmeister, Hamburg, C. Herold, 1739; facs. Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1954, 1999; trans. and ed. as Johann Mattheson’s “Der vollkommene Capellmeister”, Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press, 1981Google Scholar
Harmonie universelle, Paris, S. Cramoisy, 1636–37; facs. Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1963 and 1986Google Scholar
The Emancipation of Music from Language: Departures from Mimesis in Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1986Google Scholar
“Ut oratoria musica: The Rhetorical Basis of Musical Mannerism” (1972), in Studies in the History of Italian Music, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1994Google Scholar
Phrynis Mitilenaeus, oder Satyrischer Componist, 3 vols., Dresden, J. C. Mieth and J. C. Zimmerman, 1696Google Scholar
, Institutio oratoria, 4 vols., with Eng. trans. , Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1920Google Scholar
German Music Theory in the Early Seventeenth Century, Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press, 1980Google Scholar
Der critische Musicus, Leipzig, B. C. Breitkopf, 1745; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1970Google Scholar
“Pathos and the Pathétique: Rhetorical stance in Beethoven’s C-minor Sonata, Op. 13,” Beethoven Forum 3 (1994)Google Scholar
“The Rhetorico-Musical Structure of the ‘Goldberg’ Variations: Bach’s Clavierübung IV and the Institutio oratoria of Quintilian,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 1982– 6 (1987)Google Scholar
Die Beziehungen zwischen Musik und Rhetorik im 16.–18. Jahrhundert, Würzburg, Triltsch, 1941; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1969Google Scholar
as “The Treatises of Christoph Bernhard,” Music Forum 3 (1973)
Praecepta der musicalischen Composition, MS 1708; new edn., ed. , Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1955Google Scholar
“Encounters with the Chromatic Fourth, or More on Figurenlehre,” Musical Times 126 (1985) andGoogle Scholar
“The Snares and Delusions of Musical Rhetoric: Some Examples from Recent Writings on J. S. Bach,” in Alte Musik: Praxis und Reflexion, ed. and , Winterthur, Amadeus, 1983Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by