Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T04:14:24.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 - Critical studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

BEFORE SHAKESPEARE

Janette Dillon’s Cambridge Introduction to Early English Theatre is a nicely judged, sensibly structured, lucidly written introduction to medieval and early Renaissance drama, complete with a variety of illustrations and quotations from all kinds of relevant documents helpfully set off in shaded boxes. Every now and then Dillon judiciously breaks away from her main narrative to focus for a couple of pages on an exemplary piece of representative dramatic entertainment: Mankind (1465–70), The Death of Herod (1450–75), Tamburlaine Parts One and Two (1587–8), The Masque of Blackness (1605). These case studies are supplemented by shorter considerations of other plays: for example, The Lady of May (1578–9), King Lear (1605–6) and A Game at Chess (1624). The chronological arc of the book is only just noticeable as Dillon prefers to deal with her subject-matter under a number of mutually illuminating thematic links: genre and tradition, instruction and spectacle, actors and audiences, and the like. Overall it’s a lively, entertaining and stimulating mix, modelled, one might say, on the very material under consideration.

For we learn that this material is not easily pegged or sharply demarcated. It’s slippery stuff. There is an essential blurring of boundaries, categories, binaries and chronologies. The indispensable term here is the sixteenth-century mot juste, ‘mingle-mangle’. The history of early English theatre, Dillon claims, is far more mingled (and much less mangled) than we have up to now been led to believe. For one thing, the dramatic past continued into the dramatic present in all manner of ways. Continuities abounded. Indoor theatres, for instance, were mainly conversions of halls originally designed for other purposes. (It’s instructive to learn, by the way, that in 1525 there were more active playhouses than at any time in Elizabeth’s reign.)

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 359 - 383
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×