Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T11:47:06.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2014

James G. Keenan
Affiliation:
Loyola University, Chicago
J. G. Manning
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Uri Yiftach-Firanko
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Legal Practice in Egypt from Alexander to the Arab Conquest
A Selection of Papyrological Sources in Translation, with Introductions and Commentary
, pp. 562 - 598
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, F. F. and Johnson, A. C. (1926). Municipal Administration in the Roman Empire. Princeton.Google Scholar
Abbott, N. (1938). The Kurrah Papyri from Aphrodito in the Oriental Institute. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 15. Chicago.Google Scholar
Achelis, H. and Flemming, J. (1904). Die ältesten Quellen des orientalischen Kirchenrechts II: Die syrische Didaskalia. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur. Neue Folge, x. Band, 2. Heft. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Adams, B. (1964). Paramone und verwandte Texte: Studien zum Dienstvertrag im Rechte der Papyri. Neue Kölner rechtswissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 35. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2003). Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allam, S. (1985). “Bemerkungen zur Abstandschrift,” Enchoria 13: 1–5.Google Scholar
Allam, S. (1991). “Glossen zu einem schiedsrichterlichen Verfahren,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 47: 1–9.Google Scholar
Allam, S. (1992). “Observations on civil jurisdiction in late Byzantine and early Arabic Egypt,” in Life in a Multi-Cultural Society: Egypt from Cambyses to Constantine and Beyond. Ed. Johnson, J. H.. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 51. Chicago. Pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Allam, S. (1994a). “The agreement after judgement,” in Acta Demotica. Acts of Fifth International Conference for Demotists. Pisa, 4th–8th September 1993. Egitto e Vicino Oriente 17. Pisa. Pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Allam, S. ed. (1994b) Grund und Boden in Altägypten (Rechtliche und sozio-ökonomische Verhältnisse). Akten des internationalen Symposions Tübingen 18.–20. Juni 1990. Untersuchungen zum Rechtsleben im Alten Ägypten 2. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Allam, S. (2008). “Regarding the EISAGOGEUS (εἰσαγωγεύς) at Ptolemaic law courts,” JEgH 1: 3–19.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. (2002). The Heqanakht Papyri. Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Egyptian Expedition 27. New York.Google Scholar
Alston, R. (1995). Soldier and Society in Roman Egypt: A Social History. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, R. (2001). “Urban population in late Roman Egypt and the end of the Ancient World,” in Debating Roman Demography. Ed. Scheidel, W.. Leiden. Pp. 161–204.Google Scholar
Alston, R. (2002). The City in Roman and Byzantine Egypt. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amelotti, M. (1966). Il testamento romano attraverso la prasi documentale, vol. 1: Le forme classiche di testamento. Florence.Google Scholar
Amelotti, M. and Luzzatto, G. I. (1972). Le costituzioni giustinianee nei papiri e nelle epigrafi. Milan.Google Scholar
Amelotti, M. and Migliardi Zingale, L. (1985). Le costituzioni giustinianee nei papiri e nelle epigrafi. 2nd edn. Milan.Google Scholar
Amundsen, D. W. and Ferngren, G. B. (1978). “The forensic role of physicians in Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 52: 336–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Anagnostou-Cañas, B. (1991). Juge et sentence dans l’Égypte romaine. Paris.Google Scholar
Anagnostou-Cañas, B. (2000). “La documentation judiciaire pénale dans l’Égypte romaine,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome: Antiquité 112: 753–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, C. A. R. (1990). Ptolemaic Legal Texts from the Theban Area. Catalogue of Demotic Papyri in the British Museum 4. London.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. (1996). Women and Law in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. (1997). “The guardianship of women in Roman Egypt,” in Akten des 21. internationalen Papyrologenkongresses, Berlin 13–19.8.1995, vol. 1. Stuttgart. Pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. (1998). “Paternal power in late antiquity,” JRS 88: 147–65.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. (1999a). “Die römische Vormundschaft und das Volljährigkeitsalter in Ägypten,” ZPE 126: 202–04.Google Scholar
Arjava, A. (1999b). “Eine Freilassung aus der väterlichen Gewalt, CPR vi 78,” Tyche 14: 15–22.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2002). The Mind of Ancient Egypt: History and Meaning in the Time of the Pharaohs. New York.Google Scholar
Austin, M. M. (2006). The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest: A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation. 2nd edn. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzarello, G. (2012). Il dossier della “domus divina” in Egitto. Archiv für Papyrisforschung Beiheft 32. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, E. C. (1956). Jurisdiction in Roman Egypt. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1977). “Prices in ‘sales on delivery’,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 18: 85–96.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1982). “Religious conversion and onomastic change in early Byzantine Egypt,” BASP 19: 105–24. Reprinted as chapter 8 in Bagnall (2003).Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1985). “The camel, the wagon, and the donkey in Later Roman Egypt,” BASP 22: 1–6. Reprinted as chapter 16 in Bagnall (2003).Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1987). “Conversion and onomastics: a reply,” ZPE 69: 243–50. Reprinted as chapter 9 in Bagnall (2003).Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1989). “Official and private violence in Roman Egypt,” BASP 26: 201–16. Reprinted as chapter 5 in Bagnall (2003).Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1991). “Response to Hans-Albert Rupprecht,” in Symposion 1990. Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte = Papers on Greek and Hellenistic Legal History. Ed. Gargarin, M.. Cologne. Pp. 149–52.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1993a). “Slavery and society in late Roman Egypt,” in Law, Politics and Society in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Ed. Halperin, B. and Hobson, D.. Sheffield. Pp. 220–40. Reprinted as chapter 1 in Bagnall (2003).Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1993b). Egypt in Late Antiquity. Princeton.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (1995). Reading Papyri, Writing Ancient History. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (2003). Later Roman Egypt: Society, Religion, Economy and Administration. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. ed. (2007). Egypt in the Byzantine World, 300–700. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. ed. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. (2011). Everyday Writing in the Greco-Roman East. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. and Cribiore, R. (2006). Women’s Letters from Ancient Egypt, 300 BC–AD 800. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. and Derow, P., eds. (2004). The Hellenistic Period: Historical Sources in Translation. New edn. New Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. and Frier, B. (1994). The Demography of Roman Egypt. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. and Mitthof, F. (2004). “Order to send a person,” in Gedenkschrift Ulrike Horak (P.Horak). Ed. Pintaudi, R.. Papyrologica Florentina 34. Florence. Pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S. and Worp, K. A. (1978). “Ten consular dates,” ZPE 28: 221–30.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1963). “Crime and criminals in Graeco-Roman Egypt,” Aegyptus 43: 256–63.Google Scholar
Banaji, J. (2007). Agrarian Change in Late Antiquity: Gold, Labour, and Aristocratic Dominance. 2nd rev. edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bataille, A. (1952). Les Memnonia: Recherches de papyrologie et d’épigraphie grecques sur la nécropole de la Thèbes d’Égypte aux époques hellénistique et romaine. Cairo.Google Scholar
Beaucamp, J. (1992). Le statut de la femme à Byzance (4e–7e siècle), vol. 2: Les pratiques sociales. Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherche d’histoire et civilisation de Byzance. Monographie 6. Paris.Google Scholar
Beaucamp, J. (2007). “Byzantine Egypt and imperial law,” in Bagnall (2007), pp. 271–87.
Behrend, D. (1970). Attische Pachturkunden. Vestigis 12. Munich.Google Scholar
Belhmer, H. ed. (1996). Shenute von Atripe: De Iudicio (Torino, Museo Egizio, Cat. 63000, Cot. iv). Turin.Google Scholar
Bell, H. I. (1924). “The episcopalis audientia in Byzantine Egypt,” Byzantion 1: 139–44.Google Scholar
Bell, H. I. (1929). “The administration of Egypt under the ‘Umayyad Khalifs,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 28: 278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamasco, M. (1995). “Le didaskalikai nella ricerca attuale,” Aegyptus 75: 95–167.Google Scholar
Berger, A. (1911). Die Strafklauseln in den Papyrusurkunden: ein Beitrag zum gräko-ägyptischen Obligationenrecht. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Berger, A. (1953). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Berrendonner, C. (2006). “Les prisonniers de guerre romains durant le conflit samnite,” in Guerre et diplomatie romaines. Ed. Caire, E. and Pittia, S.. Aix-en-Provence. Pp. 157–73.Google Scholar
Bickerman, E. (1930). “Beiträge zur antiken Urkundengeschichte ii,” Archiv 9: 24–46.Google Scholar
Bickerman, E. (1933). “Testificatio Actorum. Eine Untersuchung über antike Niederschriften zu Protokoll,” Aegyptus 13: 333–55.Google Scholar
Bieżuńska-Małowist, I. (1977). L’esclavage dans l’Egypte gréco-romain. Seconde partie: période romaine. Trans. Wolf, J.. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Bingen, J. (1978). “The third-century B.C. land-leases from Tholthis,” ICS 3: 74–80. Reprinted in Bingen (2006), pp. 206–12.Google Scholar
Bingen, J. (2006). Hellenistic Egypt: Monarchy, Society, Economy, Culture. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Biscottini, M. (1966). “L’archivio di Tryphon, tessitore di Oxyrhynchos,” Aegyptus 46: 60–90; 186–92.Google Scholar
Bogaert, R. (1983). “Les kollybistikai trapezai dans l’Egypte gréco-romaine,” Anagennesis 3: 21–64. Reprinted in Bogaert (1994), pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Bogaert, R. (1984). “Les banques affermées ptolémaïques,” Historia 33: 181–98. Reprinted in Bogaert (1994), pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Bogaert, R. (1994). Trapezitica Aegyptiaca: Recueil de recherches sur la banque en Égypte gréco-romaine. Papyrologica Florentina 25. Florence.Google Scholar
Boswinkel, E. and Pestman, P. W. (1978). Textes grecs, démotiques et bilingues. Textes grecs et démotiques. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xix. Leiden.Google Scholar
Boswinkel, E. and Pestman, P. W. (1982). Les archives privées de Dionysios, fils de Kephalas. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxii. Leiden.Google Scholar
Botta, A. F. (2009). The Aramaic and Egyptian Legal Traditions at Elephantine. An Egyptological Approach. London.Google Scholar
Botti, G. (1957). “Papyri demotici dell'epoca imperiale da Tebtunis,” in Studi di onore de Aristide Calderini e Roberto Paribeni. Vol. II. Milan. Pp. 75–86.Google Scholar
Botti, G. (1967). L’archivio demotico da Deir el-Medineh. Catalogo del Museo Egizio di Torino. Serie prima – monumenti e testi I. Florence.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. K. (2001). “Some Romans in Augustan Alexandria,” in Alexandrian Studies II in Honour of Mostafa el-Abbadi. BSAA 46 [2000]. Cairo. Pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. K. and Rathbone, D. W. (1992). “Cities and administration in Roman Egypt.” JRS 82: 107–27.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. K. and Rogan, E., eds. (1999). Agriculture in Egypt from Pharaonic to Modern Times. Proceedings of the British Academy 96. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2004). “On captives under the Principate,” Phoenix 58: 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashear, W. (1980). Ptolemäische Urkunden aus Mumienkartonage. BGU xiv. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bremen, R. (1996). The Limits of Participation: Women and Civic Life in the Greek East in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology 15. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Brinker, A. A., Muhs, B. P. and Vleeming, S. P. (2005). A Berichtigungsliste of Demotic Documents. Studia Demotica VII a–b. Leuven.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1982). “The rise and function of the Holy Man in Late Antiquity,” in Society and the Holy in Late Antiquity. Berkeley. Pp. 103–52.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1995). Authority and the Sacred: Aspects of the Christianization of the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bryen, A. Z. (2008). Violence, Law, and Society in Roman and Late Antique Egypt. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bryen, A. Z. (2013). Violence in Roman Egypt: A Study in Legal Interpretation. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, W. W. (1970). The Roman Law of Slavery: The Condition of the Slave in Private Law from Augustus to Justinian. Cambridge, MA. Reprint of 1908 Cambridge University Press edition.Google Scholar
Bülow-Jacobsen, A. (1986). “Orders for arrest,” ZPE 66: 93–98.Google Scholar
Bülow-Jacobsen, A. and Ebbesen, S. (1971). “Five Copenhagen papyri,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 6: 1–41.Google Scholar
Bürge, A. (1999). Römisches Privatrecht: Rechtsdenken und gesellschaftliche Verankerung: eine Einführung. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Burkhalter, F. (1990). “Archives locales et archives centrales en Égypte romaine,” Chiron 20: 191–216.Google Scholar
Burns, K. (2010). Into the Archive: Writing and Power in Colonial Peru. Durham, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, S. (1998). Ancient African Civilizations: Kush and Axum. Princeton.Google Scholar
Butler, C., ed. (1898–1904). Palladius, Lausiac History. Texts and Studies 6. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cadell, H. (1967). “Nouveaux fragments de la correspondance de Kurrah ben Sharik,” Recherches des Papyrologie 4: 107–60.Google Scholar
Cadell, H. (1983). “Sur quelques cas de grève dans l’Égypte lagide,” JESHO 26: 22–32.Google Scholar
Cadell, H. (1994). “Vocabulaire de l’irrigation: la Septante et les papyrus,” in Les problèmes institutionnels de l’eau en Egypte ancienne et dans l’antiquité méditerranéenne: Colloque AIDEA Vogüé 1992. Ed. Menu, B.. Cairo. Pp. 103–17.Google Scholar
Calderini, A. (1922). “Sei esemplari di un’ unica scheda di censimento romano,” Aegyptus 3: 341–45.Google Scholar
Calderini, A. (1953). “Apatores,” Aegyptus 33: 358–69.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. (1994). The Roman Army 31 BC – AD 337. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrié, J.-M. (1998). “Archives municipales et distributions alimentaires dans l’Égypte romaine,” in La mémoire perdue: recherches sur l’administration romaine. Ed. C. Moatti. Collections de l’École Française de Rome 243. Pp. 271–302.
Caspers, P. (1954). Der Güte- und Schiedsgedanke im kirchlichen Zivilgerichtsverfahren: Eine kirchenrechtliche Untersuchung über das Wesen der episcopalis audientia. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Cenival, F. (1972). “Une vente d’esclaves de l’époque d’Artaxercès III (P.Inv.Sorbonne Nos 1276 et 1277),” Rev. d’Ég. 24: 31–39.Google Scholar
de Cenival, F. (1973). Cautionnements démotiques du début de l’époque ptolémaïque (P. Dem. Lille 34 à 96). Paris.Google Scholar
de Cenival, F. (1987). “Répertoire journalier d’un bureau de notaire de l’époque ptolémäique en démotique (P. dem. Lille 120),” Enchoria 15: 1–9.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. (1991). Final Judgments: Duty and Emotion in Roman Wills 200 B.C.–A.D. 250. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Chankowski, V. (2008). “Banking in the city. Reflections on the Greek papers,” in Pistoi dia tèn technèn: Bankers, Loans and Archives in the Ancient World. Ed. Verboven, K., Vandorpe, K., and Chankowski, V.. Studia Hellenistica 44. Leuven. Pp. xxix–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Cheshire, W. (1987). “A dictionary of Demotic toponyms,” in Aspects of Demotic Lexicography: Acts of the Second International Conference for Demotic Studies, Leiden, 19–21 September 1984. Ed. Vleeming, S. P.. Studia Demotica I. Leiden. Pp. 131–34.Google Scholar
Choat, M. and Gardiner, I. (2006). “P.Lond.Copt. i 123: another letter to Apa Johannes?ZPE 156: 157–64.Google Scholar
Christensen, T. (1998). “SB xiv 11355 – a reedition: copy of a census-return,” Archiv 44: 29–37.Google Scholar
Christensen, T. (2002). The Edfu Nome Surveyed: P.Haun. inv. 407 (119–118 BC). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clackson, S. (1995). “Four Coptic papyri from the Patermouthis archive in the British Library,” BASP 32: 97–116.Google Scholar
Clackson, S. (2000). Coptic and Greek Texts Relating to the Hermopolite Monastery of Apa Apollo. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clackson, S. (2010). “Coptic or Greek? Bilingualism in the papyri,” in Papaconstantinou (2010), pp. 73–104.
Clarysse, W. (1979). “Egyptian estate-holders in the Ptolemaic period,” in State and Temple Economy in the Ancient Near East: Proceedings of the International Conference Organized by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven from the 10th to the 14th of April 1978. Ed. Lipinski, E.. Vol. 2. OLA 6. Leuven. Pp. 731–43.Google Scholar
Clarysse, W. (1993). “Egyptian scribes writing Greek,” Cd’É 68: 186–201.Google Scholar
Clarysse, W. (2003). “Tomoi Synkollēsimoi,” in Ancient Archives and Archival Traditions: Concepts of Record-keeping in the Ancient World. Ed. Brosius, M.. Oxford. Pp. 344–59.Google Scholar
Clarysse, W. (2010). “Bilingual papyrological archives,” in Papaconstantinou (2010), pp. 47–72.
Clarysse, W. and Vandorpe, K. (1998). “The Ptolemaic apomoira,” in Le culte du souverain dans l’Égypte ptolémaïque au IIIe siècle avant notre ère. Actes du colloque international, Bruxelles, 10 mai 1995. Ed. Melaerts, H.. Studia Hellenistica 34. Leuven. Pp. 5–42.Google Scholar
Cockle, H. M. (1981). “Pottery manufacture in Roman Egypt: a new papyrus,” JRS 71: 87–97.Google Scholar
Cockle, W. E. H. (1984). “State archives in Graeco-Roman Egypt from 30 bc to the reign of Septimius Severus,” JEA 70: 106–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. (1996). “A notice of birth of a girl,” in Classical Studies in Honor of David Sohlberg. Ed. Katzoff, R. et al. Ramat Gan. Pp. 385–98.Google Scholar
Coles, R. A. (1966). Reports of Proceedings in Papyri. Papyrologica Bruxellensia 4. Brussels.Google Scholar
Comfort, H. (1934a). “Late Byzantine land-leases ἐϕ’ őσov χρóvov βoúλɛı,” Aegyptus 14: 80–88.Google Scholar
Comfort, H. (1934b). “The crops of an indiction in late Byzantine land-leases,” Aegyptus 14: 429–46.Google Scholar
Cowey, J. M. S. and Maresch, K. (2001). Urkunden des Politeuma der Juden von Herakleopolis (144/3–133/2 v. Chr.) (P.Polit.Iud.). Papyri aus den Sammlungen von Heidelberg, Köln, München und Wien. Sonderreihe Papyrologica Coloniensia 29. Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, D. J. (1971). Kerkeosiris: An Egyptian Village in the Ptolemaic Period. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Criscuolo, L. (2004). “Papiri tolemaici dell’Università Cattolica di Milano,” Simblos: scritti di storia antica 4: 7–23.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. (1902). Coptic Ostraca from the Collections of the Egypt Exploration Fund, the Cairo Museum and Others. London.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. (1905). Catalogue of the Coptic Manuscripts in the British Museum. London.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. (1912). Koptische Rechtsurkunden des achten Jahrhunderts aus Djême (Theben). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. (1939a). A Coptic Dictionary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. (1939b). Varia Coptica. Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Daniel, R. W. (2010). Architectural Orientation in the Papyri. Papyrologica Coloniensia 34. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Daris, S. (1991). Il lessico latino nel greco d’Egitto. 2nd edn. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Dautzenberg, V. (1971). Die Gesetze des Codex Theodosianus und des Codex Justinianus für Ägypten im Spiegel der Papyri. Diss. jur. Cologne.Google Scholar
Davies, R. W. (1973). “The investigation of some crimes in Roman Egypt,” Ancient Society 4: 199–212.Google Scholar
De Neeve, P. W. (1983). “Remissio mercedis,” ZSS 100: 296–339.Google Scholar
Depauw, M. (1997). A Companion to Demotic Studies. Papyrologica Bruxellensia 28. Brussels.Google Scholar
Depauw, M. (1999). “Demotic witness-copy-contracts,” Rev.d’Ég. 50: 67–105.Google Scholar
Depauw, M. (2000). The Archive of Teos and Thabis from Early Ptolemaic Thebes (P. Brux. dem. inv. E. 8252–8256). Monographies Reine Élisabeth, vol. 8. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Depauw, M. (2002). “Two notes on the Demotic participle or how i.ir became theologically relevant,” Lingua Aegyptia 10: 101–21.Google Scholar
Depauw, M. (2003). “Autograph confirmation in Demotic private contracts,” Cd’É 78: 66–111.Google Scholar
Descat, R. (2011). “Labour in the Hellenistic economy: slavery as a text case,” in The Economies of Hellenistic Societies, Third to First Centuries BC. Ed. Archibald, Z. H., Davies, J. K., and Gabrielsen, V.. Oxford. Pp. 207–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devauchelle, D. (1983). Ostraca démotiques du Musée du Louvre I: Reçus. Bibliothèque d’Étude 92. Cairo.Google Scholar
Devauchelle, D. (1986). “Pap. dém. Amiens 1 et 2,” Enchoria 14: 57–65.Google Scholar
Devauchelle, D. (1987). “Le papyrus démotique Louvre E 9416: une vente de terrain,” BIFAO 87: 161–65.Google Scholar
Diethart, J. M. and Worp, K. A. (1986). Notarsunterschriften im byzantinischen Ägypten. Mitteilungen aus der Papyrussammlung der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek 16. Vienna.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J. H. F. (2008). Philae and the End of Ancient Egyptian Religion: A Study of Religious Transformation (298–642 CE). Leuven.Google Scholar
Dinkler, E. (1967). “Zum Problem der Ethik bei Paulus – Rechtsnahme und Rechtsverzicht,” in Dinkler, , Signum Crucis: Aufsätze zum Neuen Testament und zur christlichen Archäologie. Tübingen. Pp. 204–40.Google Scholar
Doepp, S. (1998). Lexikon der antiken christlichen Literatur. Freiburg.Google Scholar
Donahue, C. (2006). “Comparative law before the Code Napoléon,” in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Ed. Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R.. Oxford. Pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Donker van Heel, K. (1990). The Legal Manual of Hermopolis [P. Mattha]: Text and Translation. Uitgaven vanwege de stichtung “Het Leids Papyrologisch Instituut” 11. Leiden.Google Scholar
Donker van Heel, K. (1994). “The lost battle of Peteamonip son of Petehorresne,” in Acta Demotica. Acts of Fifth International Conference for Demotists. Pisa, 4th–8th September 1993. EVO 17. Pp. 115–24.
Donker van Heel, K. (1995). Abnormal Hieratic and Early Demotic Texts Collected by the Theban Choachytes in the Reign of Amasis: Papyri from the Louvre Eisenlohr Lot. Leiden.Google Scholar
Donker van Heel, K. (1998). “Use of land in the Kushite and Saite Periods (Egypt, 747–656 and 664–525 bc),” in Landless and Hungry? Access to Land in Early and Traditional Societies. Proceedings of a Seminar Held in Leiden, 20 and 21 June, 1996. Ed. B. Haring and R. de Maaijer. CNWS Publications 67. Leiden. Pp. 90–102.
Drexhage, H.-J. (1989). “Zu den Überstellungsbefehlen aus dem römischen Ägypten (1–3 Jh. n. Chr.),” in Migratio et Commutatio: Studien zur Alten Geschichte und deren Nachleben. Festschrift Th. Pekary. St. Katharinen. Pp. 102–18.Google Scholar
Drexhage, H. (1991). Preise, Mieten / Pachten, Kosten und Löhne im römischen Ägypten bis zum Regierungsantritt Diokletians. St Katharinen.Google Scholar
Drexhage, H. (2004). “Zu den Berufsbezeichnungen mit den Suffix -ής in der litterarischen, papyrologischen und epigraphischen Überlieferung,” Münstersche Beiträge zur Antiken Handelsgeschichte 23.1: 18–40.Google Scholar
Drexhage, H.-J., Konen, H., and Ruffing, K. (2002). Die Wirtschaft des römischen Reiches (1.–3. Jahrhundert): eine Einführung. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duttenhöfer, R. (1996). “Ein ptolemäischer Eselkauf mit neuer eponymer Priestertitulatur,” Cd’É 71: 297–309.Google Scholar
Duttenhöfer, R. ed. (2002). Griechische Urkunden der Papyrussammlung zu Leipzig (P. Lips. II). Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Amir, M. (1959). A Family Archive from Thebes: Demotic Papyri in the Philadelphia and Cairo Museums from the Ptolemaic Period. Cairo.Google Scholar
Erdmann, W. (1941). “Ehescheidung in Rechte der gräko-ägyptischen Papyri,” ZSS 61: 44–57.Google Scholar
Ernst, W. (1997). “Gattungskauf und Lieferungskauf im römischen Recht,” ZSS 114: 272–344.Google Scholar
Evans Grubbs, J. (2002). Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood. London.Google Scholar
Eyre, C. (1997). “Peasants and ‘modern’ leasing strategies in ancient Egypt,” JESHO 40: 367–90.Google Scholar
Eyre, C. (1999). “The village economy in pharaonic Egypt,” in Bowman and Rogan (1999), pp. 33–60.
Eyre, C. (2004). “How relevant was personal status to the functioning of the rural economy in pharaonic Egypt?” in La dépendance rurale dans l’antiquité égyptienne et proche-orientale. Ed. B. Menu. Cairo. Pp. 157–86.
Faraguna, M. (2000). “A proposito degli archivi nel mondo greco: terra e registrazioni fondiarie,” Chiron 30: 65–115.Google Scholar
Farber, J. (1990). “Family financial disputes in the Patermouthis archive,” BASP 27: 111–22.Google Scholar
Feissel, D. and Gascou, J. (2000). “Documents d’archives romains inédits du moyen Euphrate (IIIe s. après J.-C.): iii. Actes divers et lettres (P. Euphr. 11 à 17),” Journal des Savants: 157–208.
Felber, H. (1997a). Demotische Ackerpachtverträge der Ptolemäerzeit. Untersuchungen zu Aufbau, Entwicklung und inhaltlichen Aspekten einer Gruppe von demotischen Urkunden. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 58. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Felber, H. (1997b). “Die Daten in den demotischen Ackerpachtverträgen der Ptolemäerzeit und das landwirtschaftliche Jahr,” in Akten des 21. Internationalen Papyrologenkongresses, Berlin, 13.–19. 8. 1995. Ed. Kramer, B. et al. Archiv Beiheft 3. Vol. 1. Stuttgart. Pp. 281–89.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. D., ed. (1961). Historia Monachorum in Aegypto. Brussels.Google Scholar
Fikhman, I. F. (1970). “On the structure of the Egyptian large estate in the sixth century,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Papyrology. Ed. Samuel, D. H.. American Studies in Papyrology 12. Toronto. Pp. 127–32.Google Scholar
Fikhman, I. F. (1991). “Esclaves et colons en Égypte Byzantine,” Analecta Papyrologica 3: 7–17. Reprinted in Fikhman (2006), pp. 281–91.Google Scholar
Fikhman, I. F. (2000). “Quelques rémarques sur P. Oxy. lxiii 4353,” in Timai Ioannou Triantaphyllopoulou. Ed. Velissaropoulou-Karakosta, J., Troianos, S. N., Bourdara, K. A., Stathopoulos, M. P., and Klamaris, N.. Athens. Pp. 381–88.Google Scholar
Fikhman, I. F. (2006). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im spätantiken Ägypten: Kleine Schriften Itzhak F. Fikhman. Ed. Jördens, A. with Sperling, W.. Historia Einzelschriften 192. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fischer-Bovet, C. (2011). “Counting the Greeks in Egypt. Immigration in the first century of Ptolemaic rule,” in Demography and the Graeco-Roman World: New Insights and Approaches. Ed. Holleran, C. and Pudsey, A.. Cambridge. Pp. 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, H. (2002). Wörterbuch der griechischen Wörter in den Koptischen Dokumentarischen Texten. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foti Talamanca, G. (1979). Ricerche sul processo nell’Egitto greco-romano, vol. 2.1: L’introduzione del giudizio 1. Milan.Google Scholar
Foti Talamanca, G. (1984). Ricerche sul processo nell’Egitto greco-romano, vol. 2.2: L’introduzione del giudizio 2. Naples.Google Scholar
Fournet, J.-L. (1989). “Les emprunts du grec à l’égyptien,” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 84: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournet, J.-L. (2009). “The multilingual environment of Late Antique Egypt: Greek, Latin, Coptic, and Persian documentation,” in Bagnall (2009), pp. 418–51.
Fournet, J.-L. and Gascou, J. (2004). “Liste des pétitions sur papyrus des Ve –VIIe siècles,” in La pétition à Byzance. Ed. Feissel, D. and Gascou, J.. Paris. Pp. 141–96.Google Scholar
Francisci, P. de (1915–1918). “Per la storia dell’episcopalis audientia fino alla Nov. xxx di Valentiniano,” Annali della Facoltà die Giurisprudenza della Università Perugia 30: 45–90.Google Scholar
Frantz-Murphy, G. (1981). “A comparison of the Arabic and earlier Egyptian contract formularies, part i: The Arabic contracts from Egypt (3rd/9th–5th/11th centuries,” JNES 40: 203–25, 355–56.Google Scholar
Frantz-Murphy, G. (1985). “A comparison of the Arabic and earlier Egyptian contract formularies, part ii: Terminology in the Arabic warranty and the idiom of clearing/cleaning,” JNES 44: 99–114.Google Scholar
Frantz-Murphy, G. (1988a). “A comparison of Arabic and earlier Egyptian contract formularies, part iii: The idiom of satisfaction,” JNES 47: 105–12.Google Scholar
Frantz-Murphy, G. (1988b). “A comparison of Arabic and earlier Egyptian contract formularies, part iv: Quittance formulas,” JNES 47: 269–80.Google Scholar
Frantz-Murphy, G. (2001). Arabic Agricultural Leases and Tax Receipts from Egypt, 148–427 A.H./765–1035 A.D. Corpus Papyrorum Raineri XXI. Vienna.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. (1972). Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2008). Writing Greek Law. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagos, T. (2008). “Compromissum,” BASP 45: 59–67.Google Scholar
Gagos, T. and Sijpesteijn, P. J. (1996). “Towards an explanation of the typology of the so-called ‘orders to arrest’,” BASP 33: 77–97.Google Scholar
Gagos, T. and van Minnen, P. (1994). Settling a Dispute: Towards a Legal Anthropology of Late Antique Egypt. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (1970). Social Status and Legal Privilege in the RomanEmpire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (1996). Ideas of Slavery from Aristotle to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gascou, J. (1985). “Les grands domaines, la cité et l’état en Égypte byzantine,” Travaux et Mémoires 9: 1–96. Reprinted in Gascou (2008), pp. 125–213.Google Scholar
Gascou, J. (1989). “Les codices documentaires égyptiens,” in Les débuts du codex. Ed. A. Blanchard. Bibliologia 9. Pp. 71–101. Reprinted in Gascou (2008), pp. 351–76.
Gascou, J. (2008). Fiscalité et société en Égypte byzantine. Paris.Google Scholar
Gascou, J. (2009). “Procès-verbal d’audience du juge Ammonios,” ZPE 170: 149–55.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, J. (1989). L’église dans l’empire romain (IVe–Ve siècles). 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Geens, K. (2008). “Financial archives of Graeco-Roman Egypt,” in Pistoi dia tèn technèn: Bankers, Loans and Archives in the Ancient World. Ed. Verboven, K., Vandorpe, K. and Chankowski, V.. Studia Hellenistica 44. Leuven. Pp. 133–51.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1913). “Altes und neues aus der byzantinisch-ägyptischen Verwaltungsmisere, vernehmlich im Zeitalter Justinians,” Archiv 5: 346–77.Google Scholar
George, M., ed. (2005). The Roman Family in the Empire: Rome, Italy and Beyond. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerke, F. (1931). Die Stellung des ersten Clemensbriefes innerhalb der Entwicklung der altchristlichen Gemeindeverfassung und des Kirchenrechts. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur iv. Reihe ii, 47. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Giradet, K. (1975). Kaisergericht und Bischofsgericht: Studien zu den Anfängen des Donatistenstreites (313–315) und zum Prozeß des Athanasius von Alexandrien (328–346). Bonn.Google Scholar
Glancy, J. A. (2002). Slavery in Early Christianity. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanville, S. R. K. (1939). Catalogue of Demotic Papyri in the British Museum, vol. 1: A Theban Archive of the Reign of Ptolemy I, Soter. London.Google Scholar
Godlewski, W. (1986). Le monastère de St Phoibammon. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Goehring, J. E. (1999). Ascetics, Society, and the Desert: Studies in Early Egyptian Monasticism. Harrisburg, PA.Google Scholar
Gonis, N. (2000). “A late Byzantine land lease from Oxyrhynchus: P.Oxy xvi 1968 revised,” Tyche 15: 93–102.Google Scholar
Gonis, N. (2002). “Studies on the aristocracy of Late Antique Oxyrhynchus,” Tyche 17: 85–97.Google Scholar
Gonis, N. (2005). “Some curious prescripts (native languages in Greek dress?),” BASP 42: 41–44.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1990). The Oriental, the Ancient, and the Primitive: Systems of Marriage and the Family in the Pre-Industrial Societies of Eurasia. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gounaropoulou, L. and Hatzopoulos, M. B., eds. (1998). Epigraphes katô Makedonias (metaxu tou Vermiou orous kai tou Axiou potamou), vol. 1: Epigraphes Beroias. Athens.Google Scholar
Green, M. (1985). “A private archive of Coptic letters and documents from Teshlot,” Oudheidkundige Mededelingen uit het Rijksmuseum van Oudheden te Leiden 64: 61–122.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P. (1896). Revenue Laws of Ptolemy Philadelphus, Edited from a Greek Papyrus in the Bodleian Library, with a Translation, Commentary, and Appendices. With an introduction by the Rev. J. P. Mahaffy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S. (1906). The Hibeh Papyri Part I. London.Google Scholar
Grohmann, A. (1934). Arabic Papyri in the Egyptian Library, vol. 1: Protocols and Legal Texts. Cairo.Google Scholar
Grohmann, A. (1950). “Einige bemerkenswerte Urkunden aus der Sammlung der Papyrus Erzherzog Rainer an der Nationalbibliothek zu Wien,” Archiv Orientální 18: 80–119.Google Scholar
Grohmann, A. (†) and Khoury, R. G. (1995). Chrestomathie de la papyrologie arabe: documents relatifs à la vie privée, sociale et administrative dans les premiers siècles islamiques. Handbuch der Orientalistik, Abtg. 1, vol. 2/2. Leiden.Google Scholar
Grunert, S. (1980). “Ägyptische Erscheinungsformen des Privateigentums zur Zeit der Ptolemäer: Grundeigentum,” Altorientalische Forschungen 7: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, S. (1994). “Zur Definition ‘Eigentum’,” in Grund und Boden in Altägypten (Rechtliche und sozio-ökonomische Verhältnisse). Akten des internationalen Symposions Tübingen 18.–20. Juni 1990. Ed. Allam, S.. Tübingen. Pp. 389–95.Google Scholar
Guglielmi, W. (1977). “Flachs,” in LexÄg ii. Pp. 256–57.
Haenel, G. (1840). De constitutionibus quas Iacobus Sirmondus Parisiis A. MDCXXXI. edidit. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Haensch, R. (1994). “Die Bearbeitungsweisen von Petitionen in der Provinz Aegyptus,” ZPE 100: 487–546.Google Scholar
Haensch, R. (1997). “Zur Konventsordnung in der Provinz Aegyptus und den übrigen Provinzen des römischen Reiches,” in Akten des 21. Internationalen Papyrologenkongresses, Berlin, 13.–19. 8. 1995. Ed. Kramer, B., Luppe, W., Maehler, H., and Poethke, G.. Vol. 1. Archiv Beiheft 3. Stuttgart. Pp. 320–91.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, D. (1979). “Marci Aurelii in Ägypten nach der Constitutio Antoniniana,” BASP 16: 47–59.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, D. (1986). “Flurbereinigung in Theadelphia?,” ZPE 65: 93–100.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, U. (1979). “Das Formular der Überstellungsbefehle im römischen Ägypten,” BASP 16: 61–74.Google Scholar
Hannig, R. (2003). Ägyptisches Wörterbuch I: Altes Reich und Erste Zwischenzeit. Hannig-Lexica 4. Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt 98. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. (1995). Negotiating Daily Life in Traditional China: How Ordinary People Used Contracts 600–1400. New Haven.Google Scholar
Haran, M. (1996). “Codex, pinax and writing slat,” Scripta Classica Israelica 15: 212–22.Google Scholar
Harper, K. (2011). Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275–425. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, J. (1999). Law and Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, A. R. W. (1968). The Law of Athens I: The Family and Property. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heinen, H. (1994). “Papyri und Archäologie,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Papyrologists 23–29 August 1992. Ed. Bülow-Jacobsen, A.. Copenhagen. Pp. 156–59.Google Scholar
Heinen, H. (2006). “Amtsärztliche Untersuchung eines toten Sklaven. Überlegungen zu P. Oxy. iii 475,” in Medicina e società nel mondo antico. Atti del convegno di Udine (4–5 ottobre 2005). Ed. Marcone, A.. Florence. Pp. 194–202.Google Scholar
Hengstl, J. (1972). Private Arbeitsverhältnisse freier Personen in den hellenistischen Papyri bis Diokletian. Bonn.Google Scholar
Hengstl, J. (1978a). Griechische Papyri aus Ägypten als Zeugnisse des öffentlichen und privaten Lebens. Zurich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengstl, J. (1978b). “Die athanatos-Klausel,” in Actes du XVe Congrès International de Papyrologie, Brussels, 29 August–3 September 1977. Part 4. Pap. Brux. 19. Brussels. Pp. 231–39.Google Scholar
Hengstl, J. (1983). “Einige juristische Bemerkungen zu drei ‘Töpferei-Mieturkunden’,” in Studi in onore di Arnaldo Biscardi, vol. 4. Milan. Pp. 663–73.Google Scholar
Hennig, D. (1967). Untersuchungen zur Bodenpacht im ptolemäisch-römischen Ägypten. Munich.Google Scholar
Herrmann, E. (1980). Ecclesia in Re Publica: Die Entwicklung der Kirche von pseudostaatlicher zu staatlich inkorporierter Existenz. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J. (1958). Studien zur Bodenpacht im Recht der graeco-aegyptischen Papyri. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und Antiken Rechtsgeschichte 41. Munich.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J. (1975). “Verfügungsermächtigungen als Gestaltungselemente verschiedener griechischer Geschäftstypen,” in Symposion 1971: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte. Ed. Wolff, H. J.. Akten der Gesellschaft für griechische und hellenistische Rechtsgeschichte 1. Cologne. Pp. 321–32.Google Scholar
Hickey, T. M. (2001). A Public “House” but Closed: “Fiscal Participation” and Economic Decision Making on the Oxyrhynchite Estate of the Flavii Apiones. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hickey, T. M. (2007). “Aristocratic landholding and the economy of Byzantine Egypt,” in Bagnall (2007), pp. 288–308.
Hickey, T. M. (2008). “An inconvenient truth? P.Oxy. 18.2196, the Apion estate, and fiscalité in the Late Antique Oxyrhynchite,” BASP 45: 87–100.Google Scholar
Hickey, T. M. (2012). Wine, Wealth, and the State in Late Antique Egypt: The House of Apion at Oxyrhynchus. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, D. W. (1993). “The impact of law on village life in Roman Egypt,” in Law, Politics and Society in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Ed. Halpern, B. and Hobson, D. W.. Sheffield. Pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Hohlweg, A. (1971). “Bischof und Stadtherr im frühen Byzanz,” Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 20: 51–62.Google Scholar
Hölbl, G. (2001). A History of the Ptolemaic Empire. London.Google Scholar
Honigman, S. (2003). “Politeumata and ethnicity in Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt,” Ancient Society 33: 61–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, T. (1994). Emperors and Lawyers, with a Palingenesia of Third-Century Imperial Rescripts 193–305 A.D. London.Google Scholar
Hoogendijk, F. A. J. (1994). “Het ‘Nestnêphis-proces’. Een strijd tussen Egyptische priesters in de 1e eeuw n. Chr.” Hermeneus 66: 255–62.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. (1980). “Brother-sister marriages in Roman Egypt,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 303–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, S. (2007). “Brother-sister marriage in Roman Egypt: A curiosity of humankind or a widespread family strategy?,” JRS 97: 21–49.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. R. (1952). Saïte Demotic Land Leases. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 28. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. R. (1973). “Notes on Demotic leases of property,” JNES 32: 152–60.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. R. and Jasnow, R. (1997). Oriental Institute Hawara Papyri: Demotic and Greek Texts from an Egyptian Family Archive in the Fayum (Fourth to Third Centuries B.C.). Oriental Institute Publications 113. Chicago.Google Scholar
Husson, G. (1983). Oikia: le vocabulaire de la maison privée en Égypte d’après les papyrus grecs. Paris.Google Scholar
Jasnow, R. (2003a). “Egypt: New Kingdom,” in A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law. Ed. Westbrook, R., vol. 1. Leiden. Pp. 289–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasnow, R. (2003b). “Third Intermediate Period,” in A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law. Ed. Westbrook, R., vol. 2. Leiden. Pp. 777–818.Google Scholar
Jernstedt, P. V. (1959). Koptskije Teksty Gosudarstwenogo Ermitasha. Moscow.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C. (1936). Roman Egypt to the Reign of Diocletian: An Economic Survey of Rome, vol. 2. Ed. Frank, T.. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. (1951). “Review of Johnson and West, Byzantine Egypt: Economic Studies,” JHS 71: 271–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602: A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. (1990). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. 4th edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (1985). “P. Prag. I 34: Ein Arbeitsvertrag,” ZPE 75: 164–66.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (1990). Vertragliche Regelungen von Arbeiten im späten griechischsprachigen Ägypten, mit Editionen von Texten der Heidelberger Papyrus-Sammlung, des Istituto Papirologico “G. Vitelli,” des Ägyptischen Museums zu Kairo und des British Museum, London (P. Heid. v). Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (1992). “Μίσθωσις τῶν ἔργων: ein neuer Vertragstyp,” in Proceedings of the xix International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo 2–9 September 1989. Ed. El-Mosallamy, A. H. S., vol. 2. Cairo. Pp. 259–70.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (1995). “Sozialstrukturen im Arbeitstierhandel des kaiserzeitlichen Ägypten,” Tyche 10: 37–100.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (1997). “P. Bodl. I 82: Ein πρoχρεíα-Vertrag,” ZPE 116: 81–84.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (1999). “Die Agrarverhältnisse im spätantiken Ägypten,” Laverna 10: 114–52.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (2000). “Registrierungsgesuch aus Oxyrhynchos (sog. Geburtsanzeige),” in Papyri in honorem Johannis Bingen octogenarii. Ed. Melaerts, H.. Studia Varia Bruxellensia ad Orbem Graeco-Latinum Pertinentia 5. Leuven. Pp. 389–400.Google Scholar
Jördens, A. (2004). “Griechische Texte aus Ägypten,” in Texte aus der Umwelt des Alten Testaments. Neue Folge, vol. 1. Gütersloh. Pp. 338–40.Google Scholar
Jörs, P. (1915). “Erzrichter und Chrematisten,” ZSS 36: 230–339.Google Scholar
Jörs, P. (1918). “Erzrichter und Chrematisten,” ZSS 39: 52–118.Google Scholar
Jung, J. H. (1982). “Die Rechtsstellung der römischen Soldaten. Ihre Entwicklung von den Anfängen Roms bis auf Diokletian,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii.14. Pp. 882–1013.
Kaimio, J. (1979). The Romans and the Greek Language. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 64. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kaplony-Heckel, U. (1963). Die demotischen Tempeleide. 2 vols. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 6. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kaplony-Heckel, U. (1964). Die demotischen Gebelên-Urkunden der Heidelberger Papyrus-Sammlung. Veröffentlichungen aus der Heidelberger Papyrus-Sammlung, neue Folge 4. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kaplony-Heckel, U. (2001). “Theben-Ost iii. Die r-rḫ=w-Tempel-Quittungen und ähnliche Texte. Erster Teil: Allgemeiner Teil und Texte Nr. 18–25,” ZÄS 128: 24–40.Google Scholar
Karabacek, J., Krall, J., and Wessely, C. (1894). Führer durch die Ausstellung Papyrus Erzherzog Rainer. Vienna.Google Scholar
Käsemann, E. (1964). “Sätze heiligen Rechts im Neuen Testament,” in Käsemann, , Exegetische Versuche und Besinnungen, vol. 2. Göttingen. Pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1971). Das römische Privatrecht, vol. 1. Munich.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1975). Das römische Privatrecht, vol. 2. Munich.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. (1996). Das römische Zivilprozessrecht. Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, Abt. 10, Teil 3, Bd. 4, 2. Revised and enlarged edn. by Hackl, K.. Munich.Google Scholar
Katzoff, R. (1970). “BGU 19 and the law of representation in succession,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Papyrology, Ann Arbor, 13–17 August 1968. American Studies in Papyrology 7. Toronto. Pp. 239–42.Google Scholar
Katzoff, R. and Schaps, D., eds. (2005). Law in the Documents of the Judaean Desert. Leiden.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1970). “Two loans from Tebtunis,” BASP 7: 77–86.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1975). “On law and society in Late Roman Egypt,” ZPE 17: 237–50.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1978). “The Case of Flavia Christodote: Observations on PSI I 76,” ZPE 29: 191–209.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1981). “On village and polis in Byzantine Egypt,” in Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Papyrology, New York, 24–31 July 1980. American Studies in Papyrology 23. Chico, CA. Pp. 479–85.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1985). “Notes on absentee landlordism at Aphrodito,” BASP 22: 137–69.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1989). “Roman criminal law in a Berlin papyrus codex (BGU iv 1024–1027),” Archiv 35: 15–23.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1994). “The will of Gaius Longinus Castor,” BASP 31: 101–07.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (1995). “The Aphrodito murder mystery: a return to the scene of the crimes,” BASP 32: 57–63.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (2000). “Egypt,” in Cambridge Ancient History, vol 14. Cambridge. Pp. 612–37.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (2001). “‘Die Binnenwanderung’ in Byzantine Egypt,” Greek, Roman & Byzantine Studies 42: 57–82.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (2003). “Deserted villages: from the ancient to the medieval Fayyum,” BASP 40: 119–39.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (2008). “‘Tormented voices’: P.Cair.Masp. I 67002,” in Les Archives de Dioscore d’Aphrodité cent ans après leur découverte. Histoire et culture dans l’Égypte byzantine. Ed. Fournet, J.-L.. Paris. Pp. 171–80.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. (2009a). “History of the discipline,” in Bagnall (2009), pp. 59–78.
Keenan, J. G. (2009b). “Egypt’s ‘special place’,” in Jesuit Education and the Classics. Ed. Benda, F., Byrne, S., and Cueva, E.. Newcastle upon Tyne. Pp. 157–72.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. and Shelton, J. C. (1976). The Tebtunis Papyri IV. London.Google Scholar
Kehoe, D. P. (1995). “Legal institutions and the bargaining power of the tenant in Roman Egypt,” Archiv 41: 232–62.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. (2002). “The Repression of Violence in the Roman Principate.” D.Phil thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. (2011). Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kister, M. (2002). “From Philotas to Hillel: ‘betrothal’ contracts and their violation,” Scripta Classica Israelica 21: 57–60.Google Scholar
Klauser, T. (1962). “Bischöfe auf dem Richterstuhl,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 5: 172–74.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, J. S. (2006). The Tenants in the Vineyard: Ideology, Economics, and Agrarian Conflict in Jewish Palestine. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Koenen, L. (1993). “The Ptolemaic king as a religious figure,” in Images and Ideologies: Self-definition in the Hellenistic World. Ed. Bulloch, A., Gruen, E. S., Long, A. A., and Stewart, A.. Berkeley. Pp. 25–115.Google Scholar
Kolendo, J. (1987). “Les romains prisonniers de guerre des barbares au ier et au iie siècles,” Index. Quaderni camerti di studi romanistici. International Survey of Roman Law 15: 227–34.Google Scholar
Kraemer, R. S. (2004). Women’s Religion in the Graeco-Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Krall, J. (1895). Koptische Texte, vol. 1: Rechtsurkunden, Corpus Papyrorum Raineri Archiducis Austriæ ii. Vienna.Google Scholar
Krause, J.-U. (1995). Witwen und Waisen im römischen Reich, vol. 3: Rechtliche und soziale Stellung von Weisen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Krause, J.-U. (1996). Gefängnisse im römischen Reich. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Krause, M. (1956). Apa Abraham von Hermonthis. Ein oberägyptischer Bischof um 600. 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, Berlin, Humboldt Universität.Google Scholar
Krause, M. (1958). “Zum Recht der koptischen Urkunden,” Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 53: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, M. (1969). “Die Testamente der Äbte des Phoibammon-Klosters in Theben,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo 25: 57–67.Google Scholar
Krause, M. (1984). “Koptologie und Papyrologie,” in Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia (Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1983), vol. 2. Naples. Pp. 735–53.Google Scholar
Kreller, H. (1919). Erbrechtliche Untersuchungen auf Grund der gräko-ägyptischen Papyrusurkunden. Leipzig. Reprinted Darmstadt 1970.Google Scholar
Kreuzsaler, C. and Urbanik, J. (2008). “Humanity and inhumanity of law: the case of Dionysia,” JJurPap 38: 119–55.Google Scholar
Kruit, N. (1992a). ‘The meaning of various words related to wine: some new interpretations,” ZPE 90: 265–76.Google Scholar
Kruit, N. (1992b). “Local customs in the formulas of sales of wine for future delivery (a supplement to P.Heid. v),” ZPE 94: 167–84.Google Scholar
Kruse, T. (2002). Der königliche Schreiber und die Gauverwaltung. Untersuchungen zur Verwaltungsgeschichte Ägyptens in der Zeit von Augustus bis Philippus Arabs (30 v. Chr.–245 n. Chr.). Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete. Beihefte 11. Munich.Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. H., ed. (1956). Letters and Sermons of Besa, in Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 157–58. 2 vols. Scriptores Coptici 21–2. Leuven.Google Scholar
Kupiszewski, H. (1953–54). “The iuridicus Alexandreae,” JJurPap 7/8: 187–204.Google Scholar
La’da, C.A. (2007). “The Meaning of the Demotic Designations rmt Pr-iy-lq, rmt Yb and rmt Swn,” in Akten des 23. Internationalen Papyrologen-Kongresses, Wien, 22.–28. Juli 2001. Ed. B. Palme. Pap. Vind. I. Vienna. Pp. 369–80.Google Scholar
Łajtar, A. (2006). Deir el-Bahari in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods: A Study of an Egyptian Temple Based on Greek Sources. J Jur Pap. Supplements 4. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Lammeyer, J. (1933). “Die ‘audientia episcopalis’ in Zivilsachen der Laien im römischen Kaiserrecht und in den Papyri,” Aegyptus 13: 193–202.Google Scholar
Lefort, L.-T. (1950). Concordance du Nouveau Testament sahidique, vol. 1: Les mots d’origine grecque. Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 124, Subsidia 1. Louvain.Google Scholar
Lenger, M.-T., ed. (1964). Corpus des Ordonnances des Ptolémées (C.Ord. Ptol.). Mémoires, Académie royale de Belgique 2nd series, vol. 57/5. Reissued with corrections in 1980. Brussels.Google Scholar
Lerouxel, F. (2006). “Les femmes sur le marché du crédit en Égypte romaine (30 avant J.–C.–284 après J.-C.): une approche néo-institutionnaliste,” Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques 37: 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerouxel, F. (2008). “La banque privée romaine et le marché du crédit dans les tablettes de Murecine et les papyrus d’Égypte romaine,” in Pistoi dia tèn technèn: Bankers, Loans and Archives in the Ancient World. Studies in Honour of Raymond Bogaert. Ed. Verboven, K., Vandorpe, K., and Chankowski, V.. Studia Hellenistica 44. Leuven. Pp. 169–98.Google Scholar
Lerouxel, F. (forthcoming). “Le rôle de la bibliothèque des acquêts (bibliothêkê enktêseôn) dans la diminution des coûts de transaction sur le marché du crédit en Égypte romaine,” in Legal Documents in Ancient Societies 2: Transaction Costs in the Ancient World. Ed. Ratzan, D., Kehoe, D., and Yiftach-Firanko, U.. Colloquium Held at the Center for Hellenic Studies, Washington DC, 27–28.9.2009.Google Scholar
Levy, E. (1925). Der Hergang der römischen Ehescheidung. Weimar.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (1945). “The meaning of σὺν ἡμιολίᾳ and kindred expressions in loan contracts,” TAPA 76: 126–39. Reprinted in Lewis (1995), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (1983). Life in Egypt under Roman Rule. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (1986). Greeks in Ptolemaic Egypt. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (1993). “The demise of the Demotic document: when and why,” JEA 79: 276–81. Reprinted in Lewis (1995), pp. 351–56.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (1995). On Government and Law in Roman Egypt: Collected Papers of Naphtali Lewis. American Studies in Papyrology 33. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, M. (1957). Demotic Ostraca from Medinet Habu. Oriental Institute Publications 80. Chicago.Google Scholar
Lippert, S. (2004). Ein demotisches juristisches Lehrbuch: Untersuchungen zu Papyrus Berlin P 23575 rto. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 66. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Lippert, S. (2008). Einführung in die altägyptische Rechtsgeschichte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lippert, S. and Schentuleit, M. (2006a). Demotische Dokumente aus Dime, vol. 1: Ostraka. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Lippert, S. and Schentuleit, M. (2006b). Demotische Dokumente aus Dime, vol. 2: Quittungen. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Lippert, S. and Schentuleit, M. (2010). Demotische Dokumente aus Dime, vol. 3: Urkunden. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Litinas, N. (1999). “P.Lond. iii 1128: sale of a donkey,” ZPE 124: 195–204.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, S. R. (1994). “The procedure of execution and the prosbolê,” New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity 7: 197–232.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. B. (1983). “The Late Period, 664–323 bc,” in Ancient Egypt: A Social History. Ed. Trigger, B. G., Kemp, B. J., O’Connor, D., and Lloyd, A. B.. Cambridge. Pp. 279–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüddeckens, E. (1960). Ägyptische Eheverträge. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 1. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Lüderitz, G. (1994). “What is politeuma?” in Studies in Early Jewish Epigraphy. Ed. van Henten, J. W. and van der Horst, P. W.. Leiden. Pp. 183–225.Google Scholar
Łukaszewicz, A. (2003). “Quelques observations sur les chrématistes de Syène (P.Eleph. DAIK 1),” in Symposion 1999: Akten der Gesellschaft für Griechische und Hellenistische Rechtsgeschichte 14. Cologne. Pp. 433–42.Google Scholar
MacCoull, L.S.B. (1991). “Law, Coptic,” in The Coptic Encyclopedia, vol. 5. Ed. Atiya, A. A.. New York. Pp. 1428–31.Google Scholar
MacCoull, L.S.B. (1992). “A Cinderella Story from Byzantine Egypt: P.Cair. Masp. i 67089 and iii 67294,” Byzantion 62: 380–88.Google Scholar
MacCoull, L.S.B. (2009). Coptic Legal Documents: Law as Vernacular Text and Experience in Late Antique Egypt. Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. (1986). “Judicial savagery in the Roman Empire,” Chiron 16: 147–66. Reprinted as chapter 20 in MacMullen (1990).Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. (1990). Changes in the Roman Empire: Essays in the Ordinary. Princeton.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (2005). “Greek, Egyptian and Roman law,” JJurPap 35: 121–40.Google Scholar
Maffi, A. (1992). Ricerche sul postliminium. Milan.Google Scholar
Mairs, R. and Martin, C. J. (2008–09). “A bilingual ‘sale’ of liturgies from the archive of the Theban choachytes: P. Berlin 5507, P. Berlin 3098 and P. Leiden 413,” Enchoria 31: 22–67.Google Scholar
Malinine, M. (1967). “Partage testamentaire d’une propriété familiale (Pap. Moscou No. 123),” Rev.d’Ég. 19: 67–85.Google Scholar
Malouta, M. (2007). “The terminology of fatherlessness in Roman Egypt: ἀπάτωρ and χρηματίζων μητρός,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Papyrology, Helsinki, 1–7 August, 2004. Ed. Frösén, J., Purola, T., and Salmenkivi, E.. Vol. 2. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 122. Helsinki. Pp. 615–24.Google Scholar
Malouta, M. (2009). “Fatherlessness and formal identification in Roman Egypt,” in Growing up Fatherless in Antiquity. Ed. Hübner, S. and Ratzan, D.. Cambridge. Pp. 120–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manca Masciadri, M. and Montevecchi, O. (1984). I contratti di baliatico. Milan.Google Scholar
Mandalake, A. (2007). “The Cretan politeuma in Hellenistic Egypt,” (in Greek) in Yearbook of the Research Center for the History of Greek Law 40. Athens. Pp. 56–83.Google Scholar
Manigk, A. (1910). Gläubigerbefriedigung durch Nutzung: Ein Institut der antiken Rechte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Manning, J. G. (1999). “The auction of Pharaoh,” in Gold of Praise: Studies in Honor of Edward F. Wente. Ed. Larsen, J. and Teeter, E.. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 58. Chicago. Pp. 277–84.Google Scholar
Manning, J. G. (2002/03). “A Ptolemaic agreement concerning a donkey with an unusual warranty clause. The strange case of P. Dem. Princ. 1 (inv. 7524),” Enchoria 28: 46–61.Google Scholar
Manning, J. G. (2003a). Land and Power in Ptolemaic Egypt: The Structure of Land Tenure. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. G. (2003b). “Demotic law,” in A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law, vol. 2. Ed. Westbrook, R.. Leiden. Pp. 819–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J. G. (2010). The Last Pharaohs: Egypt under the Ptolemies, 305–30 BC. Princeton.Google Scholar
Marek, C. (2006). Die Inschriften von Kaunos. Vestigia 55. Munich.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, T. (2005). “Security for debt in the Demotic papyri,” JJurPap 35: 141–67.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, T. (2006). “Heqanakhte and the origins of hemiolion,” JJurPap 36: 125–36.Google Scholar
Markiewicz, T. (2008). “Bocchoris the lawgiver – or was he really?” JEgH 1: 309–30.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (1986). “A Demotic land lease from Philadelphia: P.BM 10560,” JEA 72: 159–73.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (1996). “The Demotic texts,” in B. Porten et al., The Elephantine Papyri in English: Three Millennia of Cross-Cultural Continuity and Change. Leiden. Pp. 277–385.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (2005). “Review of T. Q. Mrsich, Rechtsgeschichtliches zur Ackerverpachtung auf Tempelland nach demotischem Formular,” Bibliotheca Orientalis 62: 489–95.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (2009a). “How to write a Demotic legal document,” in Actes du IXe Congrès International des Études Démotiques. Ed. Widmer, G. and Devauchelle, D.. Bibliothèque d’étude 147. Cairo. Pp. 195–222.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. (2009b). Demotic Papyri from the Memphite Necropolis in the Collections of the National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden, the British Museum and the Hermitage Museum. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Mattha, G. (1945). Demotic Ostraca from the Collections at Oxford, Paris, Berlin, Vienna and Cairo. Cairo.Google Scholar
Mattha, G. and Hughes, G. R. (1975). The Demotic Legal Code of Hermopolis West. Bibliothèque d’étude 45. Cairo.Google Scholar
Mazza, R. (2001). L’archivo degli Apioni: terra, lavaro e proprietà senatoria nell’Egitto tardoantico. Bari.Google Scholar
Mazza, R. (2007). “Gli affitti fondiari dell’Ossirinchite nell’età tardoantica,” in Akten des XXIII. Internationalen Papyrologenkongresses, Wien, 22.–28. Juli 2001. Ed. Palme, B.. Vienna. Pp. 439–46.Google Scholar
Meeks, D. (1972). Le grande texte des donations au temple d’Edfou. Bibliothèque d’ètude 59. Cairo.Google Scholar
Mees, A. W. (2002). Organisationsformen römischer Töpfer-Manufakturen. Mainz.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1974). “A propos de la tutelle dative des femmes dans l’Égypte romaine,” in Akten des XIII internationalen Papyrologenkongresses, Marburg/Lahn, 2–6 August 1971. Munich. Pp. 263–92.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1975). “Chrématistes et laocrites,” in Le monde grec: pensée, littérature, histoire, documents. Hommages à Claire Préaux. Ed. Bingen, J., Cambier, G., and Nachtergael, G.. Brussels. Pp. 699–708.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1979). “Chrématistes et laocrites,” in Symposion 1974. Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte. Gargnano am Gardasee, 5.–8. Juni 1974. Cologne. Pp. 375–91. Reprinted in Mélèze Modrzejewski (2011a), pp. 79–192.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1981). “La structure juridique du marriage grec,” in Scritti in onore di Orsolina Montevecchi. Ed. Bresciani, E.. Bologna. Pp. 231–68.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1988). “‘La loi des Égyptiens’: le droit grec dans l’Égypte romaine,” in Proceedings of the XVIII. International Congress of Papyrology, Athens 25–31 May 1986. Ed. Mandilaras, B., vol. 2. Athens. Pp. 383–99.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1989). “Entre la cité et le fisc: le statut grec dans l’Égypte romaine,” Symposion 1982: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Santander, 1.–4. September 1982). Cologne. Pp. 241–80.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (1995). “Law and justice in Ptolemaic Egypt,” in Legal Documents of the Hellenistic World: Papers from a Seminar. Ed. M. J. Geller and H. Maehler. London. Pp. 1–19.
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (2001). “The Septuagint as nomos: how the Torah became a ‘civic law’ for the Jews of Egypt,” in Critical Studies in Ancient Law, Comparative Law, and Legal History: Essays in Honour of Alan Watson. Ed. Cairns, J. W. and Robinson, O. F.. Oxford. Pp. 183–99.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (2003). “Droit et justice dans l’Égypte des premiers Lagides,” in L’Orient méditerranéen, de la mort d’Alexandre au Ier siècle avant notre ère. Ed. Le Dinahet, M.-T.. Nantes. Pp. 281–302. Reprinted in Mélèze Modrzejewski (2011a), pp. 111–39.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (2005a). “La fiancée adultère. A propos de la pratique matrimoniale du judaïsme hellénisé à la lumière du dossier du politeuma juif d’Hérakléopolis (144/3–133/2 av. n.è.),” in Marriage: Ideal – Law – Practice. Proceedings of a Conference Held in Memory of Henryk Kupiszewski. Ed. Służewska, Z. and Urbanik, J.. JJurPap Supplement 5. Warsaw. Pp. 141–60. Reprinted in Mélèze Modrzejewski (2011b), pp. 231–49.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (2005b). “What is Hellenistic law? The documents of the Judaean desert in the light of the papyri from Egypt,” in Katzoff and Schaps (2005), pp. 7–21.
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (2011a). Droit et justice dans le monde grec et hellénistique. JJurPap supplement 10. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Mélèze Modrzejewski, J. (2011b). Un peuple de philosophes: Aux origines de la condition juive. Paris.Google Scholar
Menu, B. (1988a). “Les actes de vente en Égypte ancienne, particulièrement sous les rois kouchites et saïtes,” JEA 74: 165–81. Reprinted in Menu, Recherches sur l’histoire juridique, économique et sociale de l’ancienne Égypte, vol. 2. Cairo, 1998. Pp. 305–32.Google Scholar
Menu, B. (1988b). “L’Évolution du droit contractual en Égypte ancienne et la notion de vente à la fin du Moyen Empire,” reprinted in Recherches sur l’histoire juridique, économique et sociale de l’ancienne Égypte, vol. 2. Cairo, 1998. Pp. 289–304.Google Scholar
Merklein, A. (1967). Das Ehescheidungsrecht nach den Papyri der byzantinischen Zeit. PhD dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Erlangen. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Mertens, P. (1958). Les services de l’état civil et le contrôle de la population à Oxyrhynchos. Brussels.Google Scholar
Metzger, H. (1974). Nachrichten aus dem Wüstensand: Eine Sammlung von Papyruszeugnissen. Zurich.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. (2004). Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migliardi Zingale, L. (1992). Vita privata e pubblica nei papiri d’Egitto: Silloge di documenti greci e latini dal I al IV secolo d.C. Turin.Google Scholar
Migliardi Zingale, L. (1997). I testamenti romani nei papiri e nelle tavolette d’Egitto: Silloge di documenti dal I al IV secolo d.C. 3rd edn. Turin.Google Scholar
Miller, G. P., ed. (2010). Economics of Ancient Law. Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitteis, L. (1891). Reichsrecht und Volksrecht in den östlichen Provinzen des römischen Kaiserreichs. Mit Beiträgen zur Kenntnis des griechischen Rechts und der spätrömischen Rechtsentwicklung. Leipzig. Reprinted Hildesheim 1963.Google Scholar
Mitteis, L. and Wilcken, U. (1906). “P. Lips. 13,” Archiv für Papyrusforschung 3: 106–12.Google Scholar
Möller, G. (1921). “Ein ägyptischer Schuldschein der zweiundzwanigsten Dynastie,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil-hist. Klasse: 298–304.
Monson, A. (2005). “Sacred land in Ptolemaic and Roman Tebtunis,” in Tebtunis und Soknopaiu Nesos: Leben im römerzeitlichen Fajum. Akten des Internationalen Symposions vom 11. bis 13. Dezember 2003 in Sommerhausen bei Würzburg. Ed. Lippert, S. L. and Schentuleit, M.. Wiesbaden. Pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
Monson, A. (2012). From the Ptolemies to the Romans: Political and Economic Change in Egypt. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montevecchi, O. (1947). “Ricerche di sociologia nei documenti dell’Egitto greco-romano, vi. Denunce di nascita di greco-egizi,” Aegyptus 27: 3–24.Google Scholar
Montevecchi, O. (1975). “L’epikrisis dei greco-egizi,” in Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Papyrologists, Oxford, 24–31 July 1974. London. Pp. 227–32.Google Scholar
Montevecchi, O. (1988). La papirologia. Reprinted with corrections with an appendix. Milan.Google Scholar
Montserrat, D. (1996). Sex and Society in Graeco-Roman Egypt, London.Google Scholar
Montserrat, D., Fantoni, G., and Robinson, P. (1994). “Varia descripta Oxyrhynchita,” BASP 31: 11–80.Google Scholar
Mooren, L. (1977). La hiérarchie de cour ptolémaïque: Contribution à l’étude des institutions et des classes dirigeantes à l’époque hellénistique. Leuven.Google Scholar
Mosiek, U. (1965). “Das altkirchliche Prozeßrecht im Spiegel der Didaskalie,” Österreichisches Archiv für Kirchenrecht 16: 183–209.Google Scholar
Mourgues, J.-L. (1995). “Les formules ‘rescripsi,’ ‘recognovi’ et les étapes de la rédaction des souscriptions impériales sous le Haut-Empire romain,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome. Italie et Méditerranée 107: 255–300.Google Scholar
Mrsich, T. Q. (1994). “Zum unbeurkundeten ägyptischen Verpachts-Geschäft griechisch-römischer Zeit,” in Grund und Boden in Altägypten (rechtliche und sozio-ökonomische Verhältnisse): Akten des internationalen Symposions Tübingen 18.–20. Juni 1990. Ed. Allam, S.. Tübingen. Pp. 177–87.Google Scholar
Mrsich, T. Q. (2003). Rechtsgeschichtliches zur Ackerverpachtung auf Tempelland nach demotischem Formular. Vienna.Google Scholar
Muhs, B. (2002). “Clear title, public protests and P.Brux.Dem. 4,” in Acts of the Seventh International Conference of Demotic Studies, Copenhagen, 23–27 August 1999. Ed. Ryholt, K.. Copenhagen. Pp. 259–72.Google Scholar
Muhs, B. (2005a). “The grapheion and the disappearance of Demotic contracts in early Roman Tebtunis and Soknopaiou Nesos,” in Tebtunis und Soknopaiu Nesos: Leben im römerzeitlichen Fajum, Akten des internationalen Symposions von 11. bis 13. Dezember 2003 in Sommerhausen bei Würzburg. Ed. Lippert, S. and Schentuleit, M.. Wiesbaden. Pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Muhs, B. (2005b). Tax Receipts, Taxpayers, and Taxes in Early Ptolemaic Thebes. Oriental Institute Publications 126. Chicago.Google Scholar
Müller, B. J. (1968). Ptolemaeus II. Philadelphus als Gesetzgeber. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Müller, H. G. (1985). Untersuchungen zur Misthôsis von Gebäuden im Recht der graeco-aegyptischen Papyri. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Nims, C. F. (1958). “A Demotic ‘document of endowment’ from the time of Nectanebo I,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Kairo 16: 237–46.Google Scholar
Nur el-Din, M. A. A. (1974). The Demotic Ostraca in the National Museum of Antiquities at Leiden. Leiden.Google Scholar
Oates, J. F. (1963). “The status designation Persês tês epigonês,” Yale Classical Studies 18: 1–129.Google Scholar
Oates, J. F. (1969). “A Rhodian auction sale of a slave girl,” JEA 55: 191–210.Google Scholar
Oates, J. F. (1972). “A sailor’s discharge and the consuls of A.D. 209,” Phoenix 30: 282–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. F. (1988). “Sale of a donkey,” BASP 25: 129–35.Google Scholar
Oréal, E. (1999). “Contact linguistique. Le cas du rapport entre le grec at le copte,” Lalies: actes des sessions de linguistique et de littérature 19: 289–306.Google Scholar
Palme, B. (2003). “Pflichten und Risiken des Bürgen in byzantinischen Gestellungsbürgschaften,” in Symposion 1999: Akten der Gesellschaft für Griechische und Hellenistische Rechtsgeschichte 14. Ed. G. Thür and F. J. Fernández Nieto. Pp. 531–55.
Palme, B. (2006). “Römische Militärgerichtsbarkeit in den Papyri,” in Symposion 2003: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte. Ed. Rupprecht, H.-A.. Vienna. Pp. 375–408.Google Scholar
Palme, B. (2008). “Law and courts in Late Antique Egypt,” in Aspects of Law in Late Antiquity Dedicated to A. M. Honoré. Ed. Sirks, B.. Oxford. Pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
Palme, B. (2009). “The range of documentary texts: types and categories,” in Bagnall (2009), pp. 358–94.
Papaconstantinou, A. (2002a). “Theia oikonomia. Les actes thébains de donation d’enfants ou la gestion monastiques de la pénurie,” in Mélanges Gilbert Dagron. Travaux et Mémoires 14. Paris. Pp. 511–26.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, A. (2002b). “Notes sur les actes de donation d’enfant au monastère thébain de Saint-Phoibammon,” JJurPap 32: 83–105.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, A. ed. (2010). The Multilingual Experience in Egypt from the Ptolemies to the ‘Abbasids. Farnham, Surrey.Google Scholar
Parker, R. A. (1940). “A late Demotic gardening agreement: Medinet Habu ostracon 4038,” JEA 26: 84–113.Google Scholar
Parker, R. A. (1964). “A Demotic property settlement from Deir el Ballas,” JARCE 3: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, O. (1982). Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pavlovskaja, A. I. (1972). “Die Sklaverei im hellenistischen Ägypten,” in Die Sklaverei in hellenistischen Staaten im 3.-1.Jh. v. Chr. Übersetzung von M. Bräuer-Pospelova, I. Neander und R. Pollach. Ed. Bräuer, H. and Vogt, J.. Wiesbaden. Pp. 171–275.Google Scholar
Pavlovskaja, A. I. (1992). Die Sklaverei im römischen Ägypten, in Marinovic, L. P., Golubcova, E. S., Sifman, I. S. and Pavlovskaja, A. I., Die Sklaverei in den östlichen Provinzen des römischen Reiches im 1.–3. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart. Pp. 165–270.Google Scholar
Peachin, M. (2007). “Petition to a centurion from the NYU Papyrus Collection,” in Papyri in Memory of P. J. Sijpesteijn (P. Sijp.). Ed. Sirks, A. J. B. and Worp, K. A. with the assistance of R. S. Bagnall and R. P. Salomons. American Studies in Papyrology 40. Oakville, CT. Pp. 79–97.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. (2007). “Translating for Ptolemy: patriotism and politics in the Greek Pentateuch?,” in Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers. Ed. Rajak, T., Pearce, S., Aitken, J., and Dines, J.. Berkeley. Pp. 165–89.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1961). Marriage and Matrimonial Property in Ancient Egypt: A Contribution to Establishing the Legal Position of the Woman. Pap.Lugd.Bat. ix. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1965). “Les archives privées de Pathyris à l’époque ptolémaïque. La famille de Pétéharsemtheus, fils de Panebkhounis,” in Pap.Lugd.Bat. XIV. Leiden. Pp. 47–105.
Pestman, P. W. (1966). “Review of U. Kaplony-Heckel, Die demotischen Gebelên-Urkunden der Heidelberger Papyrus-Sammlung,” Cd’É 41: 313–20.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1969). “The law of succession in ancient Egypt,” in Essays on Oriental Laws of Succession in Ancient Egypt. Leiden. Pp. 58–77.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1971). “Loans bearing no interest?” JJurPap 16–17: 7–29.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1981a). L’archivio di Amenothes figlio di Horos (P. Tor. Amenothes). Testi demotici e greci relativi ad una famiglia di imbalsamatori del secondo sec. a. C. Catalogo del Museo egizio di Torino. Serie prima – monumenti e testi 5. Milan.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1981b). “Nahomsesis, una donna d’affari di Pathyris. L’archivio bilingue di Pelaias, figlio di Eunus,” in Scritti in onore di O. Montevecchi. Ed. Bresciani, E. et al. Bologna. Pp. 295–315.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1983). “Some aspects of Egyptian law in Graeco-Roman Egypt: title-deeds and ὑπάλλαγμα,” in Egypt and the Hellenistic World. Ed. Van ’t Dack, E., Van Dessel, P., and van Gucht, W.. Studia Hellenistica 27. Leuven. Pp. 281–302.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1985a). “Ventes provisoires de biens pour sûreté de dettes: ‘onai en pistei’ à Pathyris et à Krokodilopolis,” in Textes et études de papyrologie grecque, démotique et copte. Ed. Pestman, P. W.. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxiii. Leiden. Pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1985b). “Le démotique comme langue juridique,” in Textes et études de papyrologie grecque, démotique et copte. Ed. Pestmen, P. W.. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxiii. Leiden. Pp. 198–203.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1985c). “The competence of Greek and Egyptian tribunals according to the decree of 118 B.C,” BASP 22: 265–69.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1985d). “Registration of Demotic contracts in Egypt. P. Par. 65; 2nd cent. B.C.,” in Satura Roberto Feenstra sexagesimum quintum annum aetatis complenti ab alumnis collegis amicis oblata. Ed. Ankum, J., Spruit, J. E., and Wubbe, F. B. J.. Fribourg. Pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1987). “‘Public protests’ in the Demotic family archive of Pchorchonsis,” in Miscel·lània Papirologica Ramon Roca-Puig. Ed. Janeras, S.. Barcelona. Pp. 271–81.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1990). The New Papyrological Primer. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1992). Il processo di Hermias e altri documenti dell’archivio dei choachiti (P. Tor. Choachiti). Catalogo del Museo Egizio di Torino, Serie Prima-Monumenti e Testi, vol. 6. Turin.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1993). The Archive of the Theban Choachytes (Second Century B.C.): A Survey of the Demotic and Greek Papyri Contained in the Archive. Studia Demotica 2. Leuven.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1994a). “Drafts of Demotic notarial documents,” in The Unbroken Reed: Studies in the Culture and Heritage of Ancient Egypt in Honour of A. F. Shore. Ed. Eyre, C., Leahy, A., and Montagno Leahy, L.. London. Pp. 243–67.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1994b). The New Papyrological Primer. 2nd edn. rev. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1994c). Les papyrus démotiques de Tsenhor (P. Tsenhor). Les archives privées d’une femme égyptienne du temps de Darius Ier. Studia Demotica 4. Leuven.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1995a). “Haronnophris and Chaonnophris: two indigenous pharaohs in Ptolemaic Egypt (205–186 B.C.),” in Hundred-Gated Thebes: Acts of a Colloquium on Thebes and the Theban Area in the Graeco-Roman Period. Ed. Vleeming, S. P.. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxvii. Leiden. Pp. 101–37.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W. (1995b). “Appearance and reality in written contracts: evidence from bilingual family archives,” in Legal Documents of the Hellenistic World: Papers from a Seminar. Ed. Geller, M. and Maehler, H.. London. Pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
Pestman, P. W., Quaegebeur, J., and Vos, R. L. (1977). Recueil de textes démotiques et bilingues. 3 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Petsas, P., Gounaropoulou, M. L., Hatzopoulos, M. B., and Paschidis, P., eds. (2000). Inscriptions du sanctuaire de la Mère des Dieux Autochtone de Leukopétra (Macédoine). Meletemata 28. Athens.Google Scholar
Phang, S. E. (2001). The Marriage of Roman Soldiers (13 BC–AD 235): Law and Family in the Imperial Army. Leiden.Google Scholar
Piccolo, M. (2003). “Osservazione ad alcuni papiri dell’archivio di Tryphon,” Aegyptus 83: 197–213.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. H. (1972). Three Demotic Papyri in the Brooklyn Museum: A Contribution to the Study of Contracts and Their Instruments in Ptolemaic Egypt. Oslo.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. H. (1983). “Review of P. W. Pestman, Recueil de Textes démotiques,” Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 69: 197–99.Google Scholar
Pierce, R. H. (1995). “A sale of an Alodian slave girl,” Symbolae Osloenses 70: 148–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietowska, M. (1975). La skêpê dans l’Égypte ptolemaïque. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Plöchl, W. M. (1953). Geschichte des Kirchenrechts, vol. 1. Vienna.Google Scholar
Poethke, G. (1969). Epimerismos: Betrachtungen zur Zwangspacht in Ägypten während der Prinzipatzeit. Brussels.Google Scholar
Porten, B. (1996). The Elephantine Papyri in English: Three Millennia of Cross-Cultural Continuity and Change. Leiden.Google Scholar
Porten, B. and Farber, J. (1996). “The Greek texts,” in Porten (1996), pp. 386–568.
Préaux, C. (1939). L’économie royale des Lagides. Brussels.Google Scholar
Préaux, C. (1962). “Acte de divorce du Brooklyn Museum (P.Brooklyn gr. 4),” Cd’É 37: 323–33.Google Scholar
Préaux, C. (1978). Le monde hellénistique: La Grèce et l’Orient de la mort d’Alexandre à la conquête romaine de la Grèce (323–146 av. J.-C.). 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Preisigke, F. (1906). “Ein Sklavenkauf des 6. Jahrhunderts (P. Gr. Str. Inv. Nr. 1404),” Archiv 3: 415–24.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, F. (1949). “The Greek sale by auction,” in Scritti in onore di Contardo Ferrini pubblicati in occasione della sua Beatifcazione, vol. 4. Milan. Pp. 284–343.
Pringsheim, F. (1950). The Greek Law of Sale. Weimar.Google Scholar
Quack, J. (1999). “Review of H. Felber, Demotische Ackerpachtverträge der Ptolemäerzeit,” Archiv 45: 134–37.Google Scholar
Quack, J. (2005). Einführung in die altägyptische Literaturgeschichte III: Die demotische und gräko-ägyptische Literatur. Einführungen und Quellentexte zur Ägyptologie 3. Munster.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. (2013). “Zu einigen demotischen Gruppen umstrittener Lesung order problematischer Ableitung,” in Aspects of Demotic Orthography: Acts of an International Colloquium held in Trier, 8 November 2010. Ed. Vleeming, S. P.. Studia Demotica XI. Leuven. Pp. 99–116.Google Scholar
Ranke, H. (1935). Die ägyptischen Personennamen I: Verzeichnis der Namen. Glückstadt.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (1999). “For next to God you are my salvation: reflections on the rise of the holy man in late antiquity,” in The Cult of Saints in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Contribution of Peter Brown. Ed Howard-Johnston, J. and Hayward, P. A.. Oxford. Pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
Rappaport, U. (1969). “Les Iduméens en Égypte,” Revue Philologique 43: 73–82.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. W. (1991). Economic Rationalism and Rural Society in Third-century A.D. Egypt: The Heroninos Archive and the Appianus Estate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. W. (1993). “Egypt, Augustus and Roman taxation,” Cahiers du Centre Glotz 4: 99–112.CrossRef
Rathbone, D. W. (2001a). “Poverty and population in Roman Egypt,” in Poverty in the Roman World. Ed. Atkins, M. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge. Pp. 100–14.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. W. (2001b). “The ‘Muziris’ Papyrus (SB xviii 13167): financing Roman trade with India,” in Alexandrian Studies II in Honor of Mostafa el-Abbadi. Alexandria. Pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. W. (2007a). “Mêchanai (waterwheels) in the Roman Fayyum,” in New Archaeological and Papyrological Researches on the Fayyum. Ed. Capasso, M. and Davoli, P.. Lecce. Pp. 251–62.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. W. (2007b). “Misthoprasia: the lease-sale of ships,” in Akten des 23. Internationalen Papyrologen-Kongresses. Wien, 22.–28. Juli 2001. Ed. Palme, B.. Vienna. Pp. 587–93.Google Scholar
Ray, J. D. (1994). “Literacy and language in Egypt in the Late and Persian periods,” in Literacy and Power in the Ancient World. Ed. Bowman, A. K. and Woolf, G.. Cambridge. Pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
Rea, J. R. (1972). The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, vol. 40. London.Google Scholar
Reich, N. J. (1914). Papyri juristischen Inhalts in hieratischer und demotischer Schrift aus dem British Museum. Vienna.Google Scholar
Reinach, T. (1920). “Un code fiscal de l’Égypte romaine: le Gnomon de Idiologue (suite),” Nouvelle Revue Historique du Droit Français et Étranger 44: 5–134.Google Scholar
Remijsen, S. and Clarysse, W. (2008). “Incest or adoption? Brother–sister marriage in Roman Egypt revisited,” JRS 98: 53–61.Google Scholar
Rémondon, R. (1961). “Soldats de Byzance d’après un papyrus trouvé à Edfou,” RechPap 1: 41–93.Google Scholar
Revillout, E. (1900). “Textes coptes. Extraits de la correspondance de St. Pésunthius évêque de Coptos et de plusieurs documents analogues (juridiques ou économiques),” Révue égyptologique 9: 133–77.Google Scholar
Revillout, E. (1902). “Textes coptes. Extraits de la correspondance de St. Pésunthius évêque de Coptos et de plusieurs documents analogues (juridiques ou économiques),” Révue égyptologique 10: 34–47.Google Scholar
Revillout, E. (1914). “Textes coptes. Extraits de la correspondance de St. Pésunthius évêque de Coptos et de plusieurs documents analogues (juridiques ou économiques),” Révue égyptologique 14: 22–32.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (1998). “rmpou und rmpshire. Zwei Komposita jüngerer Bildungsweise im koptischen Ostrakonbrief Ägyptisches Museum der Universität Leipzig Inv.-Nr. 1611,” ZÄS 125: 56–62.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (1999). “Spätkoptische Rechtsurkunden neu bearbeitet: BM Or. 4917(15) und P.Med.Copto inv. 69.69,” JJurPap 29: 85–92.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (2000). “Spätkoptische Rechtsurkunden neu bearbeitet (ii): Die Rechtsurkunden des Teschlot-Archivs,” JJurPap 30: 95–148.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (2002a). “Alte Isoglossen im Rechtswortschatz koptischer Urkunden,” Lingua Ægyptia 10: 389–99.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (2002b). Rechtssemantik und forensische Rhetorik: Untersuchungen zu Wortschatz, Stil und Grammatik der Sprache koptischer Rechtsurkunden. Kanobos 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (2002c). “Koptische Mietverträge über Gebäude und Teile von Gebäuden,” JJurPap 32: 113–68.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (2003). “Spätkoptische Rechtsurkunden neu bearbeitet (iii): P.Lond.Copt. i 487, Arabische Pacht in koptischem Gewand,” JJurPap 33: 213–30.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (2004). “O.Crum Ad. 15 and the emergence of Arabic words in Coptic legal documents,” in Sijpesteijn and Sundelin (2004), pp. 97–114.
Richter, T. S. (2005). “What’s in a story? Cultural narratology and Coptic child donation documents,” JJurPap 35: 237–64.Google Scholar
Richter, T. S. (forthcoming). Pacht nach koptischen Quellen: Beiträge zur Rechts-, Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte Ägyptens in byzantinischer und früharabischer Zeit. Warsaw.
Riedel, W. (1900). Die Kirchenrechtsquellen des Patriarchats Alexandrien. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Riedel, W. and Crum, W. E. (1904). The Canons of Athanasius of Alexandria – the Arabic and Coptic Versions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rochette, B. (1994). “Traducteurs et traductions dans l’Égypte gréco-romaine,” Cd’É 69: 313–22.Google Scholar
Rochette, B. (1996). “Sur le bilinguisme dans l’Égypte gréco-romaine,” Cd’É 71: 153–68.Google Scholar
Rotman, Y. (2000). “Formes de la non-liberté dans la campagne byzantine aux VIIe–XIe siècles,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 112: 499–510.Google Scholar
Rotman, Y. (2009). Byzantine Slavery and the Mediterranean World. Trans. Todd, J. M.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rouillard, G. (1928). L’administration civile de l’Égypte byzantine. Paris.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. (1999). “Ascetics as mediators and as teachers,” in The Cult of Saints in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Contribution of Peter Brown. Ed. Howard-Johnston, J. and Hayward, P. A.. Oxford. Pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
Rowlandson, J. (1981). “Sales of land in their social context,” in Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Papyrology, New York, 24–31 July 1980. American Studies in Papyrology 23. Chico. Pp. 371–78.Google Scholar
Rowlandson, J. (1996). Landowners and Tenants in Roman Egypt: The Social Relations of Agriculture in the Oxyrhynchite Nome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rowlandson, J. ed. (1998). Women and Society in Greek and Roman Egypt: A Sourcebook. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowlandson, J. (1999). “Agricultural tenancy and village society in Roman Egypt,” in Bowman and Rogan (1999), pp. 139–58.
Rowlandson, J. (2005). “The organisation of public land in Roman Egypt,” in L’agriculture institutionnelle en Égypte ancienne: état de la question et perspectives interdisciplinaires. Ed. Moreno García, J. C.. Lille. Pp. 173–96.Google Scholar
Rowlandson, J. and Takahashi, R. (2009). “Brother–sister marriage and inheritance strategies in Greco-Roman Egypt,” JRS 99: 104–39.Google Scholar
Ruffing, K. (1999). Weinbau im Römischen Ägypten. St. Katharinen.Google Scholar
Ruffini, G. (2008). Social Networks in Byzantine Egypt. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1967). Untersuchungen zum Darlehen im Recht der graeco-aegyptischen Papyri der Ptolemäerzeit. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und Antiken Rechtsgeschichte 51. Munich.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1971). Studien zur Quittung im Recht der graeco-ägyptischen Papyri. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und Antiken Rechtsgeschichte 57. Munich.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1984). “Rechtsübertragung in den Papyri. Zur Entwicklung von Parachoresis und Ekchoresis,” in Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Kunkel. Frankfurt am Main. Pp. 365–90.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1985). “Zum Ehegattenerbrecht nach den Papyri,” BASP 21: 291–95.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1986). “Zur Frage der Frauentutel im römischen Ägypten,” in Festschrift für Arnold Kränzlein. Ed. Wesener, G.. Graz. Pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1989). “Erwin Seidl als Papyrologe,” in Akademische Gedachnisfeier für Professor Dr. Erwin Seidl 1905–1987 am 9. Dezember 1988. Cologne. Pp. 8–15.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1992). “Zur Antichrese in den griechischen Papyri bis Diokletian,” in Proceedings of the XIX International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo 2–9 September 1989, vol. 2. Ed. El-Mosallamy, A. H. S.. Cairo. Pp. 271–89.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1994). Kleine Einführung in die Papyruskunde. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1995). “Die dinglichen Sicherungsrechte nach der Praxis der Papyri – Eine Übersicht über den urkundlichen Befund,” in Collatio Iuris Romani. Études dédiées à Hans Ankum, vol. 2. Amsterdam. Pp. 425–36.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (1997). “Zwangsvollstreckung und dingliche Sicherheiten in den Papyri der ptolemäischen und römischen Zeit,” in Symposion 1995: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Korfu 1.–5. September 1995). Ed. Thür, G. and Vélissaropoulos-Karakostas, J.. Cologne. Pp. 291–302.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (2007a). “Urkundsformular und Wirklichkeit – Bemerkungen zur praktischen Bedeutung einer Urkundsklausel,” in Worte des Rechts – Wörter zu Rechtsgeschichte: Festschrift für D. Werkmüller zum 70. Geburtstag. Ed. Buchholz, S. and Lück, H.. Berlin. Pp. 283–96.Google Scholar
Rupprecht, H.-A. (2007b). “Ludwig Mitteis (1859–1920),” in Hermae: Scholars and Scholarship in Papyrology. Ed. Capasso, M.. Pisa. Pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
Russel, N., trans. (1980). The Lives of the Desert Fathers. Kalamazoo.Google Scholar
Sachers, E. (1932). “Tabellio,” in Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Zweite Reihe, Bd 4. Pp. 1847–63.Google Scholar
Salomons, R. P. (2006). “Testamentaria,” ZPE 156: 217–41.Google Scholar
Sanna, M. V. (2001). Nuove ricerche in tema di postliminium e redemptio ab hostibus. Cagliari.Google Scholar
Sarris, P. (2006). Economy and Society in the Age of Justinian. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. (1995). “Incest revisited: three notes on the demography of sibling marriage in Roman Egypt,” BASP 32: 143–55.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (1996). Measuring Sex, Age and Death in the Roman Empire: Studies in Ancient Demography. JRA Suppl. 21. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2005). “Real slave prices and the relative cost of slave labor in the Greco-Roman world,” Ancient Society 35: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schentuleit, M. (2001). “Die spätdemotische Hausverkaufsurkunde P. BM 262. Ein bilingues Dokument aus Soknopaiu Nesos mit griechischen Übersetzungen,” Enchoria 27: 127–54.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1931). “Coptic Law,” The Juridical Review 43: 211–40.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1932). “Koptisches Recht. Eine Studie auf Grund der Quellen und Abhandlungen,” Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft 25: 250–96.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1938). “Prolegomena to the study of Coptic law,” Archives d’histoire du droit oriental 2: 340–64.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A.(1964). “The interrelation of Coptic and Greek papyri: P.Bu. and P.BM inv. nos. 2017 and 2018,” in Studien zur Papyrologie und antiken Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Festschrift Friedrich Oertel. Bonn. Pp. 107–19.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1968). “The Budge Papyrus of Columbia University,” JARCE 7: 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1970). “The fate of imperial legislation in late Byzantine Egypt,” in Legal Thought in the United States of America under Contemporary Pressures. Ed. Hazard, J. N. and Wagner, W. J.. Brussels. Pp. 41–60.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1971). “The courts are no more,” in Studi in onore di Edoardo Volterra, vol. 1. Milan. Pp. 469–502.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. (1975). Review of Amelotti and Luzzatto 1972, inGnomon 47: 582–87.Google Scholar
Scholl, R. (1990). Corpus der ptolemäischen Sklaventexte. 3 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Scholl, R. (1995). “Zum ptolemäischen Sklavenrecht,” in Legal Documents of the Hellenistic World. Ed. Gellner, M. J. and Maehler, H. in collaboration with A. D. E. Lewis. London. Pp. 149–72.Google Scholar
Scholl, R. (2001). “‘Freilassung unter Freunden’ in römischen Ägypten,” in Fünfzig Jahre Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei an der Mainzer Akademie 1950–2000. Stuttgart. Pp. 159–69.Google Scholar
Schöllgen, G. (1998). Die Anfänge der professionalisierung des Klerus und das kirchliche Amt in der Syrischen Didaskalie. Münster.Google Scholar
Schubart, W. (1913). “Alexandrinische Urkunden aus der Zeit des Augustus,” Archiv 5: 35–131.Google Scholar
Schubert, P. (1990). Les archives de Marcus Lucretius Diogenes et textes apparentés. Papyrologische Texte und Abhandlungen 39. Bonn.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. (1964). “Une famille de chepteliers au IIIe s. p.C.,” Rech.Pap. 3: 49–96.Google Scholar
Schweizer, C. (1991). Hierarchie und Organisation der römischen Reichskirche in der Kaisergesetzgebung vom vierten bis zum sechsten Jahrhundert. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Seidl, E. (1951). Einführung in die ägyptische Rechtsgeschichte bis zum Ende des Neuen Reiches. Glückstadt.Google Scholar
Seidl, E. (1962). Ptolemäische Rechtsgeschichte. 2nd edn. Glückstadt.Google Scholar
Seidl, E. (1968). Ägyptische Rechtsgeschichte der Saiten- und Perserzeit. 2nd edn. Glückstadt.Google Scholar
Seidl, E. (1973a). Rechtsgeschichte Ägyptens als römischer Provinz. St. Augustin.Google Scholar
Seidl, E. (1973b). Bodennutzung und Bodenpacht nach den demotischen Texten der Ptolemäerzeit. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Philosophisch-Historische Klasse Sitzungsberichte 291: 2. Vienna.Google Scholar
Selb, W. (1967). “Episcopalis audientia von der Zeit Konstantins bis zur Nov. xxxv Valentians iii,” ZSS 84: 162–217.Google Scholar
Sethe, K. and Partsch, J. (1920). Demotische Urkunden zum ägyptischen Bürgschaftsrechte vorzüglich der Ptolemäerzeit. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. A. (1996). “Women without guardians: an updated list,” BASP 33: 117–31.Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. A. (1998). “Not at a loss for words: the economic power of literate women in late antique Egypt,” TAPA 128: 189–203.Google Scholar
Sijpesteijn, P. J. (1965). “Die χωρὶς κυρίου χρηματίζουσαι δικαίῳ τέκνων in den Papyri,” Aegyptus 45: 171–89.Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. A. (1985). “Five Byzantine papyri from the Michigan collection,” ZPE 62: 133–49.Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. A. (2007). “The Arab conquest of Egypt and the beginning of Muslim rule,” in Bagnall (2007), pp. 437–59.
Sijpesteijn, P. M. and Clackson, S. (2009). “A mid-eighth-century trilingual tax demand-note related to the monastery of Apa Apollo at Bawit,” in Monastic Estates in Late Antique and Early Islamic Egypt: Ostraca, Papyri, and Essays in Memory of Sarah Clackson (P. Clackson). Ed. Boud’hors, A., Clackson, J., Louis, C., and Sijpesteijn, P. M.. Cincinnati. Pp. 102–19.Google Scholar
Sijpesteijn, P. M. and Sundelin, L., eds. (2004). Papyrology and the History of Early Islamic Egypt. Leiden.Google Scholar
Simon, D. (1969). Untersuchungen zum justinianischen Zivilprozeß. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 54. Munich.Google Scholar
Simon, D. (1971). “Zur Zivilgerichtsbarkeit im spätbyzantinischen Ägypten,” Revue internationale des droits de L’Antiquité 18: 623–57.Google Scholar
Simon, D. (1987). “Hans Julius Wolff†,” Gnomon 59: 83–84.Google Scholar
Sirks, A. J. B. (2008). “The colonate in Justinian’s reign,” JRS 98: 120–43.Google Scholar
Sirks, A. J. B. (2011). “In memoriam Pieter Willem Pestman, 1933–2010,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 79: 189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. S. (1995). “Marriage and the family in ancient Egypt. I. Marriage and family law,” in Legal Documents of the Hellenistic World: Papers from a Seminar. Ed. Geller, M. J. and Maehler, H.. London.Google Scholar
Smolders, R. (2005). “Soterichos and Didymos,” .
Sosin, J. (2004). “Half again more,” Archiv 50: 42–44.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, W. (1906). “Demotische Miszellen,” Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l’archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes 28: 187–204.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, W. (1906/8). Die demotischen Denkmäler 30601–31270, 50001–50022 II: Die demotischen Papyrus. Catalogue général des antiquités égyptiennes du Musée du Caire. Strassburg.Google Scholar
Stadler, M. (2004). “Rechtskodex von Hermupolis (P. Kairo JE 89.127–30+89.137–43),” in Texte zum Rechts- und Wirtschaftsleben. Ed. Janowski, B. and Wilhelm, G.. Gütersloh. Pp. 185–207.Google Scholar
Stein, A. (1968). “Wo trugen die korinthischen Christen ihre Rechtshändel aus?” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 59: 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, A. (1984). “Gerichtsbarkeit, kirchliche, 1.1,” Theologische Realenzyklopädie 12: 479–506.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1986). “Obituary (Arthur Schiller),” in Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller. Ed. Bagnall, R. S. and Harris, W. V.. Leiden. Pp. xv–xviii.Google Scholar
Steinacker, H. (1927/1975). Die antiken Grundlagen der frühmittelalterlichen Privaturkunde. Grundriss der Geschichtswissenschaft, Ergänzungsband 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1925). “Neue Urkunden zum byzantinischen Libellprozesse,” in Abhandlungen zur antiken Rechtsgeschichte: Festschrift für Gustav F. Hanausek. Graz. Pp. 36–51.Google Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1929/30). “Zur Lehre von der episcopalis audientia,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 39: 660–68.Google Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1944). “Zur Frage der Gliederung des Libellprozesses,” in Festschrift für L. Wenger zu seinem 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von Freunden, Fachgenossen und Schulern, vol. 1. Munich. Pp. 180–203.Google Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1950). “Audientia episcopalis,” Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 1: 915–17.Google Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1952). “Was beweisen die Papyri für die praktische Geltung des justinianischen Gesetzgebungswerkes?,” Aegyptus 32: 131–37.Google Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1955). Das Recht der koptischen Urkunden. Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft 10.4.2. Munich.Google Scholar
Stern, L. (1878). “Sahidische Inschriften,” Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 16: 9–28.Google Scholar
Straus, J. A. (1988). “L’esclavage dans l’Égypte romaine,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii.10.1. Pp. 841–911.Google Scholar
Straus, J. A. (2004). L’achat et la vente des esclaves dans l’Égypte romaine: Contribution papyrologique à l’étude de l’esclavage dans une province orientale de l’Empire romain. Munich.Google Scholar
Struve, V. (1955). “The significance of certain Demotic papyri of the State Museum of Fine Arts named after Pushkin for the history and culture of Ptolemaic Egypt,” in Reports of the Soviet Delegations at the X International Congress of Historical Science in Rome. Moscow. Pp. 32–57.Google Scholar
Swarney, P. R. (1970). The Ptolemaic and Roman Idios Logos. American Studies in Papyrology 8. Toronto.Google Scholar
Tacoma, L. (1998). “Replacement parts for an irrigation machine of the Divine House at Oxyrhynchos,” ZPE 120: 123–30.Google Scholar
Talbot, A.-M., ed. (1996). Holy Women of Byzantium: Ten Saints’ Lives in English Translation. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1916a). Das Strafrecht im Rechte der Papyri. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1916b). “Die Patria potestas im Recht der Papyri,” ZSS 37: 177–230. Reprinted in Taubenschlag (1959), vol. 2, pp. 261–321.Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1929). “Materna potestas im gräko-ägyptischen Recht,” ZSS 49: 115–28. Reprinted in Taubenschlag (1959), vol. 2, pp. 323–37.Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1930). “Geschichte der Rezeption des römischen Privatrechts in Ägypten,” in Studi in onore di P. Bonfante. Pp. 367–440. Reprinted in Taubenschlag (1959), vol. 1, pp. 181–289.
Taubenschlag, R. (1937). “Prozesse aus Pacht-, Miet-, Dienst- und Werkverträgen in den griechischen Papyri,” Archiv 12: 187–93. Reprinted in Taubenschlag (1959), vol. 2, pp. 461–69.Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1940/41). “The legislation of Justinian in the light of the papyri,” Byzantion 15: 280–95. Reprinted in Taubenschlag (1959), vol. 2, pp. 69–89.Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1955). The Law of Greco-Roman Egypt in the Light of the Papyri 332 B.C.–640 A.D. 2nd edn. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Taubenschlag, R. (1959). Opera minora, vol. 1: Allgemeiner Teil, vol. 2: Spezieller Teil. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, G. (2002). “Lo spettacolo in età ellenistica e tardo antica nella documentazione epigrafica e papiracea,” in Dal restauro dei materiali allo studio dei testi: Aspetti della ricerca papirologica. Ed. Capasso, M.. Lecce. Pp. 87–187.Google Scholar
Tenger, B. (1993). Die Verschuldung im römischen Ägypten (1.–2. Jh. n. Chr.). St. Katharinen.Google Scholar
Thirion, M. (1988). “Notes d’onomastique: contribution à une révision du Ranke PN (sixième série),” Rev.d’Ég. 39: 131–46.Google Scholar
Thissen, H.-J. (1986). “Koptische Kinderschenkungsurkunden. Zur Hierodulie im christlichen Ägypten,” Enchoria 14: 117–28.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. D. (1998). “P.Ryl. iv 654: the Latin heading,” Cd’É 73: 125–34.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J. (1988). Memphis under the Ptolemies. Princeton. (2nd rev. edn. 2012.)Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J.(1994). “Literacy and power in Ptolemaic Egypt,” in Literacy and Power in the Ancient World. Ed. Bowman, A. K. and Woolf, G.. Cambridge. Pp. 67–83.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J. (2009). “The multilingual environment of Persian and Ptolemaic Egypt: Egyptian, Aramaic, and Greek documentation,” in Bagnall (2009), pp. 395–417.
Thompson, H. (1934). A Family Archive from Siut from Papyri in the British Museum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Thompson Crawford, D. J. (1984). “The Idumaeans of Memphis and the Ptolemaic Politeumata,” in Atti del xvii Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia (Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1983), vol. 3. Naples. Pp. 1069–75. (See also Thompson, D. J.)Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language. Chicago.Google Scholar
Till, W. C. (1953). “Der griechisch-koptische Wiener Papyrus K 4912,” Aegyptus 33: 193–208.Google Scholar
Till, W. C. (1958). Die koptischen Rechtsurkunden der Papyrussammlung der österreichischen Nationalbibliothek. Vienna.Google Scholar
Till, W. C. (1964). Die koptischen Rechtsurkunden aus Theben. Vienna.Google Scholar
Timbie, J. (1991). “Melitian schism,” in The Coptic Encyclopedia. Ed. A. S. Atiya. Vol. 5. Pp. 1584–85.
Torallas Tovar, S. (2004a). “La practica forense en el Egipto romano,” in Homenaje a Pedro Laín Entralgo. Ed. Gil, L.. Madrid. Pp. 183–200.Google Scholar
Torallas Tovar, S. (2004b). “Egyptian lexical interference in the Greek of Byzantine and Early Islamic Egypt,” in Sijpesteijn and Sundelin (2004), pp. 63–98.
Torallas Tovar, S. (2006). “Violence in the process of arrest and imprisonment in Late Antique Egypt,” in Violence in Late Antiquity: Perceptions and Practices. Ed. Drake, H. A.. Aldershot, UK. Pp. 103–12.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991a). Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991b). “Divorce Roman style: how easy and how frequent was it?” in Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. Ed. B. Rawson. Pp. 31–46.
Turpin, W. (1991). “Imperial subscriptions and the administration of justice,” JRS 81: 101–18.Google Scholar
Uebel, F. (1968). Die Kleruchen Ägyptens unter den ersten sechs Ptolemäern. Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Klasse für Sprachen, Literatur und Kunst 3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Urbanik, J. (2002). “D. 24.2.4: . . . Pater tamen eius nuntium mittere posse: l’influsso della volontà del padre sul divorzio dei sottoposti,” in Euergesias Charin: Studies Presented to Benedetto Bravo and Ewa Wipszycka by Their Disciples. Ed. Derda, T., Urbanik, J., and Węcowski, M.. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Urbanik, J. (2005). “A priestly divorce in the seventh century Palestine: various legal orders at work (the case of P. Nessana iii 57, a. 689),” in Marriage: Ideal – Law – Practice: Proceedings of a Conference Held in Memory of Henryk Kupiszewski. Ed. Służewska, Z. and Urbanik, J.. Warsaw. Pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
Urbanik, J. (2007). “Compromesso o processo? Alternativa risoluzione dei conflitti e tutela dei diritti nella prassi della tarda antichità,” in Symposion 2005: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte. Ed. Thür, G. and Cantarella, E.. Vienna. Pp. 377–97.Google Scholar
Urbanik, J. (2010). “P.Cairo Masp. I 67120 recto and the liability for latent defects in the late antique slave sales: or back to epaphe,” JJurPap 40: 219–47.Google Scholar
Uxkull-Gyllenband, W. (1934). Der Gnomon des Idios Logos. Zweiter Teil: Der Kommentar (BGU V). Berlin.Google Scholar
van den Boorn, G. P. F. (1988). The Duties of the Vizier: Civil Administration in the Early New Kingdom. London.Google Scholar
van der Kooij, A. (2007). “The Septuagint of the Pentateuch and Ptolemaic rule,” in The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance. Ed. Knoppers, G. N. and Levinson, B. M.. Winona Lake, IN. Pp. 289–300.Google Scholar
van der Vliet, J. (2002). “Pisenthios de Coptos (569–632): moine, évêque et saint. Autour d’une novelle édition de ses archives,” in Autour de Coptos. Ed. M.-F. Boussac. Topoi. Orient Occident Supplement 3: 61–72.
van Groningen, B. A. (1950). A Family Archive from Tebtunis. Pap.Lugd.Bat. vi. Leiden.Google Scholar
van Haelst, J. (1958). “De nouvelles archives: Anastasia, propriétaire à Oxyrhynchos,” Cd’É 33: 237–42.Google Scholar
van Haelst, J. (1966). “De nouvelles archives: Anastasia, propriétaire à Oxyrhynchos,” in Atti del’XI Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia, Milano, 2–8 settembre 1965. Milan. Pp. 586–90.Google Scholar
van Minnen, P. (2000). “Prisoners of war and hostages in Graeco-Roman Egypt,” JJurPap 30: 155–63.Google Scholar
van Minnen, P. (2003). “Dioscorus and the law,” in Learned Antiquity: Scholarship and Society in the Near East, the Greco-Roman World, and the Early Medieval West. Ed. Macdonald, A. A., Twomey, M. W., and Reinik, G. J.. Leuven. Pp. 115–33.Google Scholar
van Minnen, P. (2007). “The millennium of Papyrology (2001–)?,” in Akten des 23. Internationalen Papyrologenkongresses, Wien, 22.–28. Juli 2001. Ed. Palme, B.. Vienna. Pp. 703–14.Google Scholar
van ’t Dack, E. (1988). Ptolemaica Selecta. Études sur l’armée et l’administration lagides. Studia Hellenistica 29. Leuven.Google Scholar
Vandoni, M. (1964). Feste pubbliche e private nei documenti greci. Varese.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (1995a). “City of many a gate, harbour for many a rebel: historical and topographical outline of Greco-Roman Thebes,” in Hundred-Gated Thebes: Acts of a Colloquium on Thebes and the Theban Area in the Graeco-Roman Period. Ed. Vleeming, S. P.. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxvii. Leiden. Pp. 203–39.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (1995b). Breaking the Seal: Sealing-Practices in Greco-Roman and Byzantine Egypt Based on Greek, Demotic and Latin Papyrological Evidence. Leiden.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (1997). “Seals in and on the papyri of Greco-Roman and Byzantine Egypt,” in Archives et sceaux du monde hellénistique. Torino, Villa Gualino 13–16 Gennaio 1993. Ed. M.-F. Boussac and A. Invernizzi. Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Supplement 29. Pp. 231–91.
Vandorpe, K. (1998). “Interest in Ptolemaic loans of seed-corn in the ‘House of Hathor’ (Pathyris),” in Egyptian Religion: The Last Thousand Years. Studies Dedicated to the Memory of Jan Quaegebeur. Ed. Clarysse, W., Schoors, A., and Willems, H.. Part 2. OLA 85. Pp. 1459–68.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2000a). “The Ptolemaic epigraphe or harvest tax (shemu),” Archiv 46: 169–232.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2000b). “Two agoranomic loans with Demotic summary (Pathyris: P. Cairo 31023 and 31028; verso of P. Lond. iii 1205),” in Papyri in honorem Johannis Bingen octogenarii. Ed. Melaerts, H.. Leuven. Pp. 195–204.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2002a). The Bilingual Family Archive of Dryton, His Wife Apollonia and Their Daughter Senmouthis (P. Dryton). Collectanea Hellenistica 4. Brussels.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2002b). “Apollonia, a businesswoman in a multicultural society (Pathyris, 2nd–1st centuries B.C.),” in Le rôle et le statut de la femme en Égypte hellénistique, romaine et byzantine. Ed. Melaerts, H. and Mooren, L.. Studia Hellenistica 37. Leuven. Pp. 325–36.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2004). “A Greek register from Pathyris’ notarial office: loans and sales from the Pathyrite and Latopolite nomes,” ZPE 150: 161–86.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2008). “Persian soldiers and Persians of the epigone: social mobility of soldiers-herdsmen in Upper Egypt,” Archiv 54: 87–108.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. (2009a). “Archives and dossiers,” in Bagnall (2009), pp. 216–55.
Vandorpe, K. (2009b). “The Ptolemaic period,” in A Companion to Ancient Egypt. Ed. Lloyd, A. B.. Chichester. Pp. 159–79.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. and Clarysse, W. (1998). “A Greek winery for sale in a Fayyum Demotic Papyrus,” in The Two Faces of Graeco-Roman Egypt: Greek and Demotic and Greek-Demotic Texts and Studies Presented to P. W. Pestman. Ed. Verhoogt, A. M. F. W. and Vleeming, S. P.. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxx. Leiden. Pp. 127–39.Google Scholar
Vandorpe, K. and Waebens, S. (2010). Reconstructing Pathyris’ Archives: A Multicultural Community in Hellenistic Egypt. Collectanea Hellenistica 3. Brussels.Google Scholar
Veïsse, A.-E. (2004). Les “revoltes égyptiennes.” Recherches sur les troubles intérieurs en Égypte du regne de Ptolémée III Éuergete à la conquête romaine. Studia Hellenistica 41. Leuven.Google Scholar
Verhoogt, A. M. F. W. (1998). Menches, Komogrammateus of Kerkeosiris: The Doings and Dealings of a Village Scribe in the Late Ptolemaic Period (120–110 B.C.). Pap.Lud.Bat. 29. Leiden.Google Scholar
Verhoogt, A. M. F. W. (2004). Review of Wolff (2002) inClassical Review 54/1: 224–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vischer, L. (1955). Die Auslegungsgeschichte von 1.Kor. 6.1–11. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Vismara, G. (1937). Episcopalis audientia: L’attività giurisdizionale del vescovo per la risoluzione delle controversie private tra laici nel diritto romano e nella storia del diritto italiano fino al secolo nono. Milan.Google Scholar
Vivian, T. (2005a). “Holy men and businessmen: monks as intercessors in fourth-century Egypt,” in Vivian, T., Words to Live By: Journeys in Ancient and Modern Egyptian Monasticism. Kalamazoo. Pp. 323–49.Google Scholar
Vivian, T. (2005b). “Sixteen letters to Nepheros and his community,” in Vivian, T., Words to Live By: Journeys in Ancient and Modern Egyptian Monasticism. Kalamazoo. Pp. 351–75.Google Scholar
Vleeming, S. P. (1981). “La phase initiale du démotique ancien,” Cd’É 56: 31–48.Google Scholar
Vleeming, S. P. (1991). The Gooseherds of Hou (Pap. Hou): A Dossier Relating to Various Agricultural Affairs from Provincial Egypt of the Early Fifth Century B.C. Studia Demotica 3. Leuven.Google Scholar
Vleeming, S. P. (1994). Ostraka Varia: Tax Receipts and Legal Documents on Demotic, Greek and Greek-Demotic Ostraka Chiefly of the Early Ptolemaic Period from Various Collections. Pap.Lugd.Bat. 26. Leiden.Google Scholar
Vleeming, S. P. (1998). “A demotic Doppelurkunde,” in The Two Faces of Graeco-Roman Egypt: Greek and Demotic and Greek-Demotic Texts and Studies Presented to P. W. Pestman. Ed. Verhoogt, A. M. F. W., Pestman, P. W., and Vleeming, S. P.. Pap.Lugd.Bat. xxx. Leiden. Pp. 155–70.Google Scholar
Vogelsang-Eastwood, G. (2000). “Textiles,” in Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology. Ed. Nicholson, P. T. and Shaw, I.. Cambridge. Pp. 269–76.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1940). La conception du mariage d’après les juristes romains. Padua. Reprinted in Volterra (1991), pp. 3–68.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1948). “Quelques observations sur le mariage des filiifamilias,”Revue internationale des droits de l’Antiquité 1: 213–42. Reprinted in Volterra (1991). Pp. 97–126.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1966). “Il senatoconsulto orfiziano e la sua applicazione in documenti egiziani del iii secolo d. C.,” in Atti dell’ xi Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia, Milano 2–8 settembre 1965. Milan. Pp. 551–85.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1975). “Precisazioni in tema di matrimonio classico,” Bulletino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano «Vittorio Scialoja» 78: 245–70. Reprinted in Volterra (1991), pp. 355–80.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1980). “Ancora sulla struttura del matrimonio classic,” in De iustitia et iure: Festgabe Urlich von Lübtow. Berlin. Pp. 147–53. Reprinted in Volterra, Scritti giuridici, vol. 5: Le Fonti. Naples (1993). Pp. 599–605.Google Scholar
Volterra, E. (1991). Scritti giuridici, vol. 3: Famiglia e successioni. Naples.Google Scholar
von Druffel, E. (1915/1970). Papyrologische Studien zum byzantinischen Urkundenwesen im Anschluß an P.Heidelberg 311. Munich.Google Scholar
von Reden, S. (2007). Money in Ptolemaic Egypt from the Macedonian Conquest to the End of the Third Century BC. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. L. (1938). Taxation in Egypt from Augustus to Diocletian. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wångstedt, S. V. (1954). Ausgewählte demotische Ostraka aus der Sammlung des Victoria-Museums zu Uppsala und der Staatlichen Papyrussammlung zu Berlin. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Wångstedt, S. V. (1965). Die demotischen Ostraka der Universität zu Zürich. Bibliotheca Ekmaniana 62. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Waszynski, S. (1905). Die Bodenpacht. Agrargeschichtliche Papyrusstudien, vol. 1: Die Privatpacht. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1966). “The identity of Sarapio, Socrates, Longus, and Nilus in the will of C. Longinus Castor,” TheIrish Jurist 1: 313–15.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1971). The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wenger, L. (1922). “Ein christliches Freiheitszeugnis in den ägyptischen Papyri,” in Festgabe Albert Ehrhard. Ed. Koeniger, A. M.. Bonn. Pp. 451–78.Google Scholar
Wenger, L. (1925). “Neue Libellpapyri,” in Raccolta Giacomo Lumbroso. Aegyptus Suppl. B III. Milan. Pp. 325–34.Google Scholar
Wenger, L. (1939). Review of Schiller (1938). Archiv 13: 281–82.Google Scholar
Westermann, W. L. (1929). Upon Slavery in Ptolemaic Egypt. New York.Google Scholar
Whitehorne, J. (2004). “Petitions to the centurion: a question of locality?” BASP 41: 155–69.Google Scholar
Wilcken, U. (1908). “Zu den Florentiner und Leipziger Papyri,” Archiv 4: 423–86.Google Scholar
Wilcken, U. (1913). “Zu den Brautgeschenken in P. Lips. 41,” Archiv 9: 186–88.Google Scholar
Wilcken, U. (1920). “Papyrus-Ukunden,” Archiv 6: 403–06.Google Scholar
Wilfong, T. G. (2002). Women of Jeme: Lives in a Coptic Town in Late Antique Egypt. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. (2005). “The Jewish family in Judaea from Pompey to Hadrian: the limits of Romanization,” in George (2005), pp. 159–82.CrossRef
Winlock, H. E. and Crum, W. E. (1926). The Monastery of Epiphanius at Thebes.Part 1. New York.Google Scholar
Wipszycka, E. (2007). “The institutional church,” in Bagnall (2007), pp. 331–49.
Witt, P. D. (1977). The Judicial Function of the Strategos in the Roman Period. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1948). “Registration of conveyances in Ptolemaic Egypt,” Aegyptus 28: 17–96.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1956). “Zur Romanisierung des Vertragsrechts der Papyri,” ZSS 63: 1–28.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1957). “Die Grundlagen des griechischen Vertragsrechts,” ZSav 74: 26–72.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1960). “Plurality of laws in Ptolemaic Egypt,” Revue internationale des droits de l’Antiquité 7: 191–223.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1961). “Zur Rechtsnatur der misthosis,” in Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Altgriechenlands und des hellenistisch-römischen Ägypten. Freiburg. Pp. 129–54.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1962). Das Justizwesen der Ptolemäer. Munich.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1970). Das Justizwesen der Ptolemäer. 2nd edn. Munich.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1978). Das Recht der griechischen Papyri Ägyptens in der Zeit der Ptolemäer und des Prinzipats, vol. 2: Organisation und Kontrolle des privaten Rechtsverkehrs. Munich.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1983). “Neue Juristische Urkunden vii – Neues Material zum Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht der Papyri,” ZSS 100: 444–53.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (1998). Vorlesungen über juristische Papyruskunde. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. J. (2002). Das Recht der griechischen Papyri Ägyptens in der Zeit der Ptolemaeer und des Prinzipats, vol. 1: Bedingungen und Triebkräfte der Rechtsentwicklung. Ed. Rupprecht, H.-A.. Munich.Google Scholar
Worp, K. (1994). “A checklist of bishops in Byzantine Egypt,” ZPE 100: 283–318.Google Scholar
Worp, K. (2000). “A Note on P. Oxy. III 475.20,” ZPE 133: 190.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2002). “Deeds of last will in Graeco-Roman Egypt,” BASP 39: 149–64.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2003). Marriage and Marital Arrangements: A History of the Greek Marriage Document in Egypt, 4th century BCE – 4th century CE. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 93. Munich.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2005). “Judaean desert marriage documents and ekdosis in the Greek law of the Roman period,” in Katzoff and Schaps (2005), pp. 67–84.
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2007). “The rise of the hypomnema as a lease contract,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Papyrology, Helsinki, 1–7 August 2004. Ed. Frösen, J. et al. Vol. 2. Helsinki. Pp. 1051–61.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2008a). “The cheirographon and the privatization of scribal activity in early Roman Oxyrhynchos,” in Symposion 2007: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte. Ed. Harris, E. and Thür, G.. Vienna. Pp. 325–40.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2008b). “Who killed the double document in Ptolemaic Egypt?” Archiv 54: 203–18.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (2009). “Law in Graeco-Roman Egypt: Hellenization, fusion, Romanization,” in Bagnall (2009), pp. 541–60.
Yiftach-Firanko, U. (forthcoming). “The grammatikon: transaction-costs in first-century ce Tebtynis,” in Legal Documents in Ancient Societies, Seminar II: Transaction Costs in the Ancient World: July 27–28, 2009. Washington, DC.
Youtie, H. C. (1975a). “APATORES: law vs. custom in Roman Egypt,” in Le monde grec: Hommages à Claire Préaux. Ed. Bingen, J. et al., Brussels. Pp. 723–40. Reprinted in Youtie, Scriptiunculae Posteriores (1981), vol. 1. Bonn.Google Scholar
Youtie, H. C. (1975b). “Notes on subscriptions,” ZPE 18: 213–23.Google Scholar
Zahrnt, M. (1988). “Antinoopolis in Ägypten. Die hadrianische Gründung und ihre Privilegien in der neueren Forschung,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii.10.1. Pp. 669–706.Google Scholar
Zauzich, K.-T. (1968). Die ägyptische Schreibertradition in Aufbau, Sprache und Schrift der demotischen Kaufverträge aus ptolemäischer Zeit. 2 vols. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 19. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Zauzich, K.-T. (1983). “Demotische Texts römischer Zeit,” in Das Römisch-Byzantinische Ägypten: Akten des internationalen Symposions 26.–30. September 1978 in Trier. Ed. G. Grimm, H. Heinen, and E. Winter. Aegyptiaca Treverensia 2. Mainz. Pp. 77–80.
Zilliacus, H. (1956). “Zu Stil und Wortschatz der byzantinischen Urkunden und Briefe,” Mitteilungen aus der Papyrussammlung der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek 5: 157–65.Google Scholar
Zilliacus, H. (1967). Zur Abundanz der spätgriechischen Gebrauchssprache. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, C. (1995). “The hapless recruit Psois and the mighty anchorite, Apa John,” BASP 32: 183–94.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works cited
  • Edited by James G. Keenan, Loyola University, Chicago, J. G. Manning, Yale University, Connecticut, Uri Yiftach-Firanko, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Book: Law and Legal Practice in Egypt from Alexander to the Arab Conquest
  • Online publication: 05 May 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139050869.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works cited
  • Edited by James G. Keenan, Loyola University, Chicago, J. G. Manning, Yale University, Connecticut, Uri Yiftach-Firanko, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Book: Law and Legal Practice in Egypt from Alexander to the Arab Conquest
  • Online publication: 05 May 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139050869.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works cited
  • Edited by James G. Keenan, Loyola University, Chicago, J. G. Manning, Yale University, Connecticut, Uri Yiftach-Firanko, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Book: Law and Legal Practice in Egypt from Alexander to the Arab Conquest
  • Online publication: 05 May 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139050869.017
Available formats
×