Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T01:50:48.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Temporal niches, ecosystem function and climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

Susanne Schwinning
Affiliation:
Texas State University
Gordon A. Fox
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Colleen K. Kelly
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Colleen K. Kelly
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Michael G. Bowler
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Gordon A. Fox
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter differs from the main current of this volume – the identification and quantification of coexistence mechanisms associated with temporal niche dynamics – in exploring the ramifications of these processes for ecosystem ecology. The intimate link between niches and ecosystem function has long been recognised, at least in the general sense that more species, representing a greater diversity of ‘life-styles’, make more complete use of available resources and thus achieve higher levels of productivity (e.g. Preston 1948, Odum 1953, MacArthur 1955, May 1975). This broadly stated principle has been unpacked in numerous models that are more specific, for example in resource-ratio niche theory (Tilman 1982) and various forms of spatial niche theories (Loreau 1998). However, the role of temporal niches in the ecosystem context is somewhat less well developed, but critical to understanding ecological responses to climate change.

Two main features characterise worldwide, anthropogenic climate change: a general warming trend that is strongest at low latitudes and weakest at high latitudes, and complex changes in precipitation patterns, currently predicted to include reductions in precipitation at the poleward fringe of the subtropical dry belt at midlatitudes (IPCC 2007, Scheff and Frierson 2012). Both temperature and precipitation shifts, as well as their interactions, have the potential to alter environmental heterogeneity. For example, the onset of spring/summer growing seasons could be advanced (Menzel et al. 2006) and the frequency and amplitude of extreme hydrological events such as drought and flooding increased (Huntington 2006). Both temperature trends and precipitation variability are important factors in structuring temporal niches, for example by functioning as triggers of life-history events (Kelly et al., this volume, Venable and Kimball, this volume) or by controlling competitive interactions through their effects on primary production (Haxeltine and Prentice 1996). Simultaneous changes in seasonal temperature and precipitation patterns may have complex effects on populations and their interactions. Predicting such effects, and their feedbacks on climate, is one of the premiere challenges of earth system science and, in our opinion, cannot be adequately tackled without a more complete understanding of temporal niche dynamics and its role in ecosystem function.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, D. I. (1972). Edaphic aridity as a factor in angiosperm evolution. American Naturalist 106, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, D. I. and Raven, P. H. (1985). Origins of the Cordilleran flora. Journal of Biogeography 12, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A. B., Buchmann, N. et al. (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters 9, 1146–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barua, D., Butler, C., Tisdale, T. E. and Donohue, K. (2012). Natural variation in germination responses of Arabidopsis to seasonal cues and their associated physiological mechanisms. Annals of Botany 109, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becerra, J. X. (2005). Timing the origin and expansion of the Mexican tropical dry forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 10919–10923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckage, B. and Gross, L. J. (2006). Overyielding and species diversity: what should we expect?New Phytologist 172, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg, S. P. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Box, E. O. (1996). Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. H. and Strauss, S. (2011). More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108, 5302–5307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Matulich, K. L., Hooper, D. U. et al. (2011). The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany 98, 572–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Palmer, M. A. and Collins, S. L. (2002). Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415, 426–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Duffy, J. E. et al. (2006). Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443, 989–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Wright, J. P., Cadotte, M. W. et al. (2007). Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 18123–18128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, F. S., Sala, O. E., Burke, I. C. et al. (1998). Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity – Experimental evidence and a research agenda for the future. Bioscience 48, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, P. (1994). Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theoretical Population Biology 45, 227–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, P., Pacala, S. and Neuhauser, C. (2001). Environmental niches and ecosystem functioning. In Kinzig, A., Pacala, S. and Tilman, D. (eds), The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 213–245.Google Scholar
Chesson, P. L. and Warner, R. R. (1981). Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive-systems. American Naturalist 117, 923–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couvreur, T. L. P., Porter-Morgan, H., Wieringa, J. J. and Chatrou, L. W. (2011). Little ecological divergence associated with speciation in two African rain forest tree genera. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, 296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawson, T. E. (1993). Hydraulic lift and water-use by plants: implications for water-balance, performance and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia 95, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dieckmann, U. and Doebeli, M. (1999). On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400, 354–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doak, D. F., Bigger, D., Harding, E. K. et al. (1998). The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. American Naturalist 151, 264–276.Google ScholarPubMed
Doebeli, M. and Dieckmann, U. (2003). Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornara, D. A. and Tilman, D. (2009). Ecological mechanisms associated with the positive diversity-productivity relationship in an N-limited grassland. Ecology 90, 408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, M. E. and Justice, K. E. (1972). Reinterpretation of invalidation of principle of competitive exclusion. Nature 236, 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, A. and Loreau, M. (2009). The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 40, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. (1994). The role of plasticity in exploiting environmental heterogeneity. In Caldwell, M. M. and Pearcy, R. W. (eds), Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Hampe, A. and Petit, R. J. (2005). Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecology Letters 8, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C. (1996). BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hector, A., Bazeley-White, E., Loreau, M., Otway, S. and Schmid, B. (2002). Overyielding in grassland communities: testing the sampling effect hypothesis with replicated biodiversity experiments. Ecology Letters 5, 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hector, A., Hautier, Y., Saner, P. et al. (2010). General stabilizing effects of plant diversity on grassland productivity through population asynchrony and overyielding. Ecology 91, 2213–2220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herben, T., Novakova, Z., Klimesova, J. and Hrouda, L. (2012). Species traits and plant performance: functional trade-offs in a large set of species in a botanical garden. Journal of Ecology 100, 1522–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrand, H., Bennett, D. M. and Cadotte, M. W. (2008). Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89, 1510–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, D. U., Adair, E. C., Cardinale, B. J. et al. (2012). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J. et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. E., Pennington, R. T. and Antonelli, A. (2013). Neotropical plant evolution: assembling the big picture. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 171, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, T. G. (2006). Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 319, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, M. A. (1997). Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC (2007). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isbell, F. I., Polley, H. W. and Wilsey, B. J. (2009). Biodiversity, productivity and the temporal stability of productivity: patterns and processes. Ecology Letters 12, 443–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, I. and Seehausen, O. (2012). Thermal adaptation and ecological speciation. Molecular Ecology 21, 782–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, C. K. and Bowler, M. G. (2002). Coexistence and relative abundance in forest tree species. Nature 417, 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, C. K. and Bowler, M. G. (2005). A new application of storage dynamics: differential sensitivity, diffuse competition and temporal niches. Ecology 86, 1012–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, C. K., Bowler, M. G., Joy, J. B. and Williams, J. N. (2010). Fractional abundance and the ecology of community structure. ArXiv 1008.2527v1.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. K., Bowler, M. G.Pybus, O. G. and Harvey, P. H. (2008). Phylogeny, niches and relative abundance in natural communities. Ecology 89, 962–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D. (1994). The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 465–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavorel, S., Díaz, S. and Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2007). Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? In Canadell, J., Pataki, D. and Pitelka, L. (eds), Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasky, J. R., Des Marais, D. L., McKay, J. K. et al. (2012). Characterizing genomic variation of Arabidopsis thaliana: the roles of geography and climate. Molecular Ecology 21, 5512–5529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loera, I., Sosa, V. and Ickert-Bond, S. M. (2012). Diversification in North American arid lands: niche conservatism, divergence and expansion of habitat explain speciation in the genus Ephedra. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 65, 437–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M. (1998). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 5632–5636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M. (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M. (2004). Does functional redundancy exist?Oikos 104, 606–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M., Mouquet, N. and Gonzalez, A. (2003). Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100, 12765–12770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losos, J. B. (2008a). Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity between species. Ecology Letters 11, 995–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losos, J. B. (2008b). Rejoinder to Wiens (2008): phylogenetic niche conservatism, its occurrence and importance. Ecology Letters 11, 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. and Levins, R. (1967). Limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist 101, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquard, E., Weigelt, A., Temperton, V. M. et al. (2009). Plant species richness and functional composition drive overyielding in a six-year grassland experiment. Ecology 90, 3290–3302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 81–120.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Menzel, A., Sparks, T. H., Estrella, N. et al. (2006). European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12, 1969–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, S. E. and Nash, D. J. (2012). Quaternary Environmental Change in the Tropics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouquet, N., Moore, J. L. and Loreau, M. (2002). Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecology Letters 5, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S. (1998). Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology 12, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norberg, J., Swaney, D. P., Dushoff, J. et al. (2001). Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: a theoretical framework. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 11376–11381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obeso, J. R. (2002). The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist 155, 321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1953). Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
Philippi, T. and Seger, J. (1989). Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, F. W. (1948). The commonness and rarity of species. Ecology 29, 254–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queenborough, S. A., Burslem, D. F. R. P., Garwood, N. J. and Valencia, R. (2009). Taxonomic scale-dependence of habitat niche partitioning and biotic neighbourhood on survival of tropical tree seedlings. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276, 4197–4205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rymer, P. D., Manning, J. C., Goldblatt, P., Powell, M. P. and Savolainen, V. (2010). Evidence of recent and continuous speciation in a biodiversity hotspot: a population genetic approach in southern African gladioli (Gladiolus; Iridaceae). Molecular Ecology 19, 4765–4782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, V., Anstett, M. C., Lexer, C. et al. (2006). Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheff, J. and Frierson, D. (2012). Twenty-first-century multimodel subtropical precipitation declines are mostly midlatitude shifts. Journal of Climate 25, 4330–4347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluter, D. (2001). Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, M. W., Brigham, C. A., Hoeksema, J. D. et al. (2000). Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122, 297–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwinning, S. and Parsons, A. J. (1996). Analysis of the coexistence mechanisms for grasses and legumes in grazing systems. Journal of Ecology 84, 799–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D. (1996). Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77, 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80, 1455–1474.Google Scholar
Valente, L. M., Savolainen, V. and Vargas, P. (2010). Unparalleled rates of species diversification in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277, 1489–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Kloet, S. P. and Hill, N. M. (2000). Bacca quo vadis: regeneration niche differences among seven sympatric Vaccinium species on headlands of Newfoundland. Seed Science Research 10, 89–97.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H. (1992). The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, B. H. (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A. (1999). Is ‘sampling effect’ a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships?Oikos 87, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, B. H., Bakker, F. T., Bellstedt, D. U. et al. (2011). Consistent phenological shifts in the making of a biodiversity hotspot: the Cape flora. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoby, M. and Wright, I. J. (2006). Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. N. and Kelly, C. K. (2013). Deconstructing the signal: phylogenetic structure, elevation change and the implications for species coexistence. Evolutionary Ecology Research In press.
Woodward, F. I. and Kelly, C. K. (1997). Plant functional types: towards a definition by environmental constraints. In Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. and Woodward, F. I. (eds), Plant Functional Types. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
Wright, I. J., Clifford, H. T., Kidson, R. et al. (2000). A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69, 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yachi, S. and Loreau, M. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 1463–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yachi, S. and Loreau, M. (2007). Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. Ecology Letters 10, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H. and Reich, P. B. (2012). Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology 100, 742–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×