Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:28:45.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

40 - The ubiquitin/proteasome pathway in neoplasia

from Part 2.6 - Molecular pathways underlying carcinogenesis: other pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Robert C. A. M. van Waardenburg
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
Mary-Ann Bjornsti
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham AL, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

The regulated biosynthesis, folding, trafficking, and degradation of proteins are essential for normal cell growth. Central to processes that regulate protein homeostasis are the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and related ubiquitin-like (UBL) protein conjugation systems, dysregulation of which is associated with neoplastic transformation and cancer (1–5). Ubiquitin conjugation is a reversible post-translational modification, whereby the C-terminal Gly residue of ubiquitin is covalently linked to a primary amino group in a target protein. As shown in Figure 40.1, ubiquitin is a small, 76-amino-acid protein that shares a characteristic ubiquitin-fold structure with a growing number of related UBLs, which include SUMO, NEDD8, ISG15. The post-translational modification of hundreds of proteins by ubiquitin or UBLs has profound effects on all cellular processes. Thus, malfunctions in the UPS and UBL conjugation pathways are emerging as critical factors in the development of human disease, including cancer. Here we provide a brief overview of the UPS and then focus on recent advances in the therapeutic targeting of these pathways.

The ubiquitin proteasome pathway

Ubiquitin conjugation (or ubiquitylation) is accomplished by an ATP-dependent cascade of enzymatic activities (Figure 40.2; 1,3,6–8). Ubiquitin is first synthesized as an inactive precursor that is cleaved by a ubiquitin isopeptidase to yield the mature di-Gly C-terminus. The mature form of ubiquitin is then adenylated by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (UAE or E1), to form a high-energy thioester linkage with the E1 active-site Cys. In a transthiolation step, ubiquitin is then transferred to the active site Cys of an Ub-conjugating enzyme or E2. The E2-ubiquitin complex then binds to an E3 ligase enzyme and substrate to effect the transfer of ubiquitin to the acceptor Lys in the substrate protein. As described below, multiple rounds of ubiquitylation can produce chains, which affects a wide range of cellular processes. The de-ubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) catalyze the removal of ubiquitin from protein substrates, as well as the recycling and editing of ubiquitin chains. A similar enzymatic cascade is involved in the selective conjugation of UBLs, as in the SUMOylation and NEDDylation pathways. For the most part, the E1, E2, and E3 constituents are selective for ubiquitin or a specific UBL. However, some exceptions to this rule and the functional cross-talk of ubiquitin, NEDD8, and SUMO are highlighted below.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 473 - 480
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedford, L, Lowe, J, Dick, LR, Mayer, RJ, Brownell, JE. Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation and the ubiquitin-proteasome system as drug targets. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2011;10:29–46.CrossRef
Hoeller, D, Dikic, I. Targeting the ubiquitin system in cancer therapy. Nature 2009;458:438–44.CrossRef
Pickart, CM, Eddins, MJ. Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2004;1695:55–72.CrossRef
Hershko, A, Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annual Review of Biochemistry 1998;67:425–79.CrossRef
Petroski, MD. The ubiquitin system, disease, and drug discovery. BMC Biochemistry. 2008;9:S7.
Lipkowitz, S, Weissman, AM. RINGs of good and evil: RING finger ubiquitin ligases at the crossroads of tumour suppression and oncogenesis. Nature Reviews Cancer 2011;11:629–43.CrossRef
Schulman, BA, Harper, JW. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: the apex for downstream signalling pathways. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology 2009;10:319–31.CrossRef
Silverman, JS, Skaar, JR, Pagano, M. SCF ubiquitin ligases in the maintenance of genome stability. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2012;37:66–73.CrossRef
Shimizu, Y, Okuda-Shimizu, Y, Hendershot, LM. Ubiquitylation of an ERAD substrate occurs on multiple types of amino acids. Molecular Cell 2010;40:917–26.CrossRef
Ikeda, F, Dikic, I. Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals. “Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects” review series. EMBO Reports 2008;9:536–42.CrossRef
Dikic, I, Wakatsuki, S, Walters, KJ. Ubiquitin-binding domains: from structures to functions. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology 2009;10:659–71.CrossRef
Ikeda, F, Crosetto, N, Dikic, I. What determines the specificity and outcomes of ubiquitin signaling? Cell 2010;143:677–81.
Peschard, P, Fournier, TM, Lamorte, L, et al. Mutation of the c-Cbl TKB domain binding site on the Met receptor tyrosine kinase converts it into a transforming protein. Molecular Cell 2001;8:995–1004.CrossRef
Schmidt, MH, Furnari, FB, Cavenee, WK, Bogler, O. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling intensity determines intracellular protein interactions, ubiquitination, and internalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2003;100:6505–10.CrossRef
Chen, Q, Xie, W, Kuhn, DJ, et al. Targeting the p27 E3 ligase SCF(Skp2) results in p27- and Skp2-mediated cell-cycle arrest and activation of autophagy. Blood 2008;111:4690–9.CrossRef
Clague, MJ, Urbe, S. Ubiquitin: same molecule, different degradation pathways. Cell 2010;143:682–5.CrossRef
Ulrich, HD. Conservation of DNA damage tolerance pathways from yeast to humans. Biochemical Society Transactions 2007;35:1334–7.CrossRef
Tatham, MH, Geoffroy, MC, Shen, L, et al. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nature Cell Biology 2008;10:538–46.CrossRef
Cohen, P, Tcherpakov, M. Will the ubiquitin system furnish as many drug targets as protein kinases? Cell 2010;143:686–93.
Edelmann, MJ, Nicholson, B, Kessler, BM. Pharmacological targets in the ubiquitin system offer new ways of treating cancer, neurodegenerative disorders and infectious diseases. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine 2011;13:e35.
Borissenko, L, Groll, M. 20S proteasome and its inhibitors: crystallographic knowledge for drug development. Chemical Reviews 2007;107:687–717.CrossRef
Kupperman, E, Lee, EC, Cao, Y, et al. Evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in preclinical models of human cancer. Cancer Research 2010;70:1970–80.CrossRef
Yang, Y, Kitagaki, J, Dai, RM, et al. Inhibitors of ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a new class of potential cancer therapeutics. Cancer Research 2007;67:9472–81.CrossRef
Xu, GW, Ali, M, Wood, TE, et al. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of leukemia and multiple myeloma. Blood 2010;115:2251–9.CrossRef
Kitagaki, J, Yang, Y, Saavedra, JE, et al. Nitric oxide prodrug JS-K inhibits ubiquitin E1 and kills tumor cells retaining wild-type p53. Oncogene 2009;28:619–24.CrossRef
Brownell, JE, Sintchak, MD, Gavin, JM, et al. Substrate-assisted inhibition of ubiquitin-like protein-activating enzymes: the NEDD8 E1 inhibitor MLN4924 forms a NEDD8-AMP mimetic in situ. Molecular Cell 2010;37:102–11.CrossRef
Soucy, TA, Smith, PG, Milhollen, MA, et al. An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer. Nature 2009;458:732–6.CrossRef
Lin, JJ, Milhollen, MA, Smith, PG, Narayanan, U, Dutta, A. NEDD8-targeting drug MLN4924 elicits DNA rereplication by stabilizing Cdt1 in S phase, triggering checkpoint activation, apoptosis, and senescence in cancer cells. Cancer Research 2010;70:10 310–20.
van Wijk, SJ, Timmers, HT. The family of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s): deciding between life and death of proteins. FASEB Journal 2010;24:981–93.CrossRef
Ye, Y, Rape, M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology 2009;10:755–64.CrossRef
van Wijk, SJ, de Vries, SJ, Kemmeren, P, et al. A comprehensive framework of E2-RING E3 interactions of the human ubiquitin-proteasome system. Molecular Systems Biology 2009;5:295.
Frescas, D, Pagano, M. Deregulated proteolysis by the F-box proteins SKP2 and beta-TrCP: tipping the scales of cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 2008;8:438–49.CrossRef
Harper, JW, King, RW. Stuck in the middle: drugging the ubiquitin system at the e2 step. Cell 2011;145:1007–9.CrossRef
Tsukamoto, S, Takeuchi, T, Rotinsulu, H, et al. Leucettamol A: a new inhibitor of Ubc13-Uev1A interaction isolated from a marine sponge, Leucetta aff. microrhaphis. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2008;18:6319–20.
Doil, C, Mailand, N, Bekker-Jensen, S, et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 2009;136:435–46.CrossRef
Ceccarelli, DF, Tang, X, Pelletier, B, et al. An allosteric inhibitor of the human Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Cell 2011;145:1075–87.CrossRef
Fang, S, Jensen, JP, Ludwig, RL, Vousden, KH, Weissman, AM.Mdm2 is a RING finger-dependent ubiquitin protein ligase for itself and p53. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000;275:8945–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassilev, LT, Vu, BT, Graves, B, et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 2004;303:844–8.CrossRef
Dickens, MP, Fitzgerald, R, Fischer, PM. Small-molecule inhibitors of MDM2 as new anticancer therapeutics. Seminars in Cancer Biology 2010;20:10–18.CrossRef
Ding, K, Lu, Y, Nikolovska-Coleska, Z, et al. Structure-based design of spiro-oxindoles as potent, specific small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2006;49:3432–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, SJ, Gruschow, S, Williams, DH, et al. Isolation and structure elucidation of Chlorofusin, a novel p53-MDM2 antagonist from a Fusarium sp. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2001;123:554–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Issaeva, N, Bozko, P, Enge, M, et al. Small molecule RITA binds to p53, blocks p53-HDM-2 interaction and activates p53 function in tumors. Nature Medicine 2004;10:1321–8.CrossRef
Tsukamoto, S, Yoshida, T, Hosono, H, Ohta, T, Yokosawa, H. Hexylitaconic acid: a new inhibitor of p53-HDM2 interaction isolated from a marine-derived fungus, Arthrinium sp. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2006;16:69–71.CrossRef
Yang, Y, Ludwig, RL, Jensen, JP, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of HDM2 ubiquitin ligase activity stabilize and activate p53 in cells. Cancer Cell 2005;7:547–59.CrossRef
Smith, MA, Gorlick, R, Kolb, EA, et al. Initial testing of JNJ-26854165 (Serdemetan) by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 2011;59:329–32.CrossRef
Achanta, G, Modzelewska, A, Feng, L, Khan, SR, Huang, P. A boronic-chalcone derivative exhibits potent anticancer activity through inhibition of the proteasome. Molecular Pharmacology 2006;70:426–33.
Silverman, JS, Skaar, JR, Pagano, M. SCF ubiquitin ligases in the maintenance of genome stability. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2012;37:66–73.CrossRef
Skaar, JR, Pagano, M. Control of cell growth by the SCF and APC/C ubiquitin ligases. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2009;21:816–24.CrossRef
Aghajan, M, Jonai, N, Flick, K, et al. Chemical genetics screen for enhancers of rapamycin identifies a specific inhibitor of an SCF family E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nature Biotechnology 2010;28:738–42.CrossRef
Orlicky, S, Tang, X, Neduva, V, et al. An allosteric inhibitor of substrate recognition by the SCF(Cdc4) ubiquitin ligase. Nature Biotechnology 2010;28:733–7.CrossRef
Ito, T, Ando, H, Suzuki, T, et al. Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity. Science 2010;327:1345–50.CrossRef
Kessler, BM, Edelmann, MJ. PTMs in conversation: activity and function of deubiquitinating enzymes regulated via post-translational modifications. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 2011;60:21–38.CrossRef
Kimura, Y, Tanaka, K.Regulatory mechanisms involved in the control of ubiquitin homeostasis. Journal of Biochemistry 2010;147:793–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komander, D, Clague, MJ, Urbe, S. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology 2009;10:550–63.CrossRef
Raasi, S, Varadan, R, Fushman, D, Pickart, CM. Diverse polyubiquitin interaction properties of ubiquitin-associated domains. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 2005;12:708–14.CrossRef
Nicholson, B, Suresh Kumar, KG. The multifaceted roles of USP7: new therapeutic opportunities. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 2011;60:61–8.CrossRef
Colland, F, Formstecher, E, Jacq, X, et al. Small-molecule inhibitor of USP7/HAUSP ubiquitin protease stabilizes and activates p53 in cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2009;8:2286–95.CrossRef
Colombo, M, Vallese, S, Peretto, I, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 9-oxo-9H-indeno[1,2-b]pyrazine-2,3-dicarbonitrile analogues as potential inhibitors of deubiquitinating enzymes. Chemistry and Medicinal Chemistry 2010;5:552–8.CrossRef
Niendorf, S, Oksche, A, Kisser, A, et al. Essential role of ubiquitin-specific protease 8 for receptor tyrosine kinase stability and endocytic trafficking in vivo. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2007;27:5029–39.CrossRef
Fang, Y, Fu, D, Shen, XZ. The potential role of ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolases in oncogenesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2010;1806:1–6.CrossRef
Mullally, JE, Fitzpatrick, FA. Pharmacophore model for novel inhibitors of ubiquitin isopeptidases that induce p53-independent cell death. Molecular Pharmacology 2002;62:351–8.CrossRef
Li, Z, Melandri, F, Berdo, I, et al. Delta12-Prostaglandin J2 inhibits the ubiquitin hydrolase UCH-L1 and elicits ubiquitin-protein aggregation without proteasome inhibition. Biochemica Biophysica Research Communications 2004;319:1171–80.CrossRef
Koharudin, LM, Liu, H, Di Maio, R, et al. Cyclopentenone prostaglandin-induced unfolding and aggregation of the Parkinson disease-associated UCH-L1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010;107:6835–40.CrossRef
Liu, Y, Lashuel, HA, Choi, S, et al. Discovery of inhibitors that elucidate the role of UCH-L1 activity in the H1299 lung cancer cell line. Chemistry Biology 2003;10:837–46.CrossRef
Mermerian, AH, Case, A, Stein, RL, Cuny, GD. Structure-activity relationship, kinetic mechanism, and selectivity for a new class of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) inhibitors. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2007;17:3729–32.CrossRef
Kapuria, V, Peterson, LF, Fang, D, et al. Deubiquitinase inhibition by small-molecule WP1130 triggers aggresome formation and tumor cell apoptosis. Cancer Research 2010;70:9265–76.CrossRef
Pham, LV, Tamayo, AT, Li, C, et al. Degrasyn potentiates the antitumor effects of bortezomib in mantle cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo: therapeutic implications. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2010;9:2026–36.CrossRef
Choi, YS, Jeon, YH, Ryu, KS, Cheong, C. 60th residues of ubiquitin and Nedd8 are located out of E2-binding surfaces, but are important for K48 ubiquitin-linkage. FEBS Letters 2009;583:3323–8.CrossRef
Corneliscu, G, Marquardt, JL, Ottiger, M, Bax, A.Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute crystalline phase. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1998;120:6836–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekiyama, N, Ikegami, T, Yamane, T, et al. Structure of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-interacting motif of MBD1-containing chromatin-associated factor 1 bound to SUMO-3. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2008;283:35 966–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×