Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:25:24.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Elke Krahmann
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, B., Military Professionalization and Political Power (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1972).Google Scholar
Adams, W., ‘The Military-Industrial Complex and the New Industrial State’, in Pursell, C. W., Jr. (ed.) The Military-Industrial Complex (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
Alexandra, A., Baker, D.-P. and Caparini, M. (eds.), Private Military and Security Companies. Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations (London: Routledge, 2008).
Altheide, D. L., and Michalowski, R. S., ‘Fear in the News: A Discourse of Control’, The Sociological Quarterly, 40, no. 3 (1999), 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. G., ‘British Rearmament and the “Merchants of Death”: The 1935–36 Royal Commission on the Manufacture of and Trade in Armaments’, Journal of Contemporary History, 29, no. 1 (1994), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. M., McGuiness, J. J. and Spicer, J. S., From Chaos to Clarity: How Current Cost-Based Strategies Are Undermining the Department of Defense (Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Acquisitions University Press, September 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquina, H., and Bekke, H., ‘Governance and Interaction: Public Tasks and Private Organisations’, in Koiman, J. (ed.) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions (London: Sage, 1993), pp. 159–70.Google Scholar
Arnold, G., Mercenaries: The Scourge of the Third World (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, D. D., ‘Privatizing Military Training’, Foreign Policy in Focus, 5, no. 17 (2000), 1–3.Google Scholar
Avant, D. D., The Market for Force. The Consequences of Privatizing Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, D., ‘From Mercenary to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War’, International Organization, 54, no. 1 (2000), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, D., ‘Privatizing Military Training: A Challenge to US Army Professionalism’, in Snider, D. M. and Watkins, G. L. (eds.) The Future of The Army Profession (Boston, MA: Mc-Graw-Hill, 2002), pp. 179–96.Google Scholar
Avant, D., and Lebovic, J., ‘U.S. Military Attitudes toward Post-Cold War Missions’, Armed Forces & Society, 27, no.1 (2000), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, D., and Sigelman, L., ‘What Does Private Security in Iraq Mean for US Democracy at Home?’, Research Paper, January 2008.
Baldwin, D., ‘The Concept of Security’, Review of International Studies, 23, no. 1 (1997), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, N., ‘Appendix 1: The United Kingdom’, in Ball, N. and Leitenberg, M. (eds.) The Structure of the Defense Industry (London: Croom Helm, 1983), pp. 344–61.Google Scholar
Barnett, C., Britain and Her Army, 1509–1970 (London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Beaumont, R. A., ‘Quantum Increase: The MIC in the Second World War’, in Cooling, B. F. (ed.) War, Business, and American Society. Historical Perspectives on the Military-Industrial Complex (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1977), pp. 118–32.Google Scholar
Beaver, D. R., ‘The Problem of American Military Supply, 1890–1920’, in Cooling, B. F. (ed.) War, Business, and American Society. Historical Perspectives on the Military-Industrial Complex (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1977), pp. 73–92.Google Scholar
Beck, U., ‘The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology in the Second Age of Modernity’, British Journal of Sociology, 51, no. 1 (2000), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., ‘The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited’, Theory, Culture & Society, 19, no. 4 (2002), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., ‘War Is Peace: On Post-National War’, Security Dialogue, 36, no. 1 (2005), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, I., and Gooch, J., ‘Introduction’, in Beckett, I. and Gooch, J. (eds.) Politicians and Defence. Studies in the Formulation of British Defence Policy 1845–1970 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1981), pp. vii–xv.Google Scholar
Belkin, A., ‘“Don't Ask, Don't Tell”: Does the Gay Ban Undermine the Military's Reputation?Armed Forces & Society, 34, no. 2 (2007), 276–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M., ‘Defence Industry Privatization: The British Case’, NATO Colloquium, Brussels, 29–30 June 1994.Google Scholar
Bellamy, I., ‘Accounting for Army Recruitment: White and Non-white Soldiers and the British Army’, Defence and Peace Economics, 14, no. 4 (2003), 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghan, V. R., Der erste Weltkrieg (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2003).Google Scholar
Bergman, A., ‘The Nordic Militaries: Forces for Good?’ in Elliott, L. and Cheeseman, G. (eds.) Forces for Good: Cosmopolitan Militaries in the Twenty-first Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), pp. 168–86.Google Scholar
Bird, S. M., ‘UK Statistical Indifference to its Military Casualties in Iraq’, The Lancet, 367 (4 March 2006), 713–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, P., ‘Competition and Collaboration in the Provision of Public Services: The Case of the UK Defence Sector’, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Service, 3, no. 1 (2003), 13–24.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Republican Cosmopolitanism’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12, no. 3 (2004), 336–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Jr., C. M., ‘Providing the Soldier with the Right Stuff’, Army, 55, no. 10 (2005), 44.Google Scholar
Bondy, H. J., ‘Postmodernism and the Source of Military Strength in the Anglo West’, Armed Forces & Society, 31, no. 1 (2004), 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bontrup, H.-J., and Zdrowomyslaw, N., Die Deutsche Rüstungsindustrie. Vom Kaiserreich bis zur Bundesrepublik (Heilbronn: Distel Verlag, 1988).Google Scholar
Booth, B., Kestnbaum, M. and Segal, D. R., ‘Are Post-Cold War Militaries Postmodern?Armed Forces & Society, 27, no. 3 (2001), 319–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, K. B., ‘Candid Voices – Military Readiness: Effects of Outsourcing Repairs’, Air Force Journal of Logistics, 24, no. 4 (2000), 24–7.Google Scholar
Brereton, J. M., The British Soldier. A Social History from 1661 to the Present Day (London: The Bodley Head, 1986).Google Scholar
Broad, R., Conscription in Britain 1939–1964 (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Brooks, D.Messiahs or Mercenaries? The Future of International Military Services’, International Peacekeeping, 7, no. 4 (2000), 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C., ‘Cosmopolitanism, World Citizenship and Global Civil Society’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 3, no. 1 (2000), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzoska, M., ‘The Erosion of Restraint in West German Arms Transfer Policy’, Journal of Peace Research, 26, no. 2 (1989), 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzoska, M., ‘The Federal Republic of Germany’, in Ball, N. and Leitenberg, M. (eds.) The Structure of the Defense Industry (London: Croom Helm, 1983), pp. 111–39.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M., ‘Federalism and Individual Sovereignty’, Cato Journal, 15, nos. 2–3 (1995), 259–71.Google Scholar
Bulmahn, T., Bevölkerungsbefragung 2008: Sicherheits- und verteidigungspolitisches Meinungsklima in Deutschland (Strausberg: SOWI, November 2008).Google Scholar
Bulmahn, T., ‘Das sicherheits- und verteidigungspolitische Meinungsbild in Deutschland’, SOWI.NEWS, no. 1 (2006), 1–11.Google Scholar
Bulmahn, T., Fiebig, R. and Sender, W., Sicherheits- und verteidigungspolitisches Meinungsklima in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Strausberg: SOWI, April 2008).Google Scholar
Bures, O., ‘Private Military Companies: A Second Best Peacekeeping Option?International Peacekeeping, 12, no. 4 (2005), 533–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, J., ‘The Military Obligation of Citizens since Vietnam’, Parameters, 31, no. 2 (2001), 48–60.Google Scholar
Burk, J., ‘Patriotism and the All-Volunteer Force’, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 12, no. 2 (1984), 229–41.Google Scholar
Burk, J., ‘Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations’, Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 29, no. 1 (2002), 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, P., ‘An Unreformed Army? 1815–1868’, in Chandler, D. (ed.) The Oxford History of the British Army (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 161–86.Google Scholar
Camm, F., Expanding Private Production of Defense Services (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1996).Google Scholar
Carter, A., ‘Liberalism and the Obligation to Military Service’, Political Studies, 46, no. 1 (1998), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavadias, J., ‘Contract Administration in a Performance-Based Acquisitions Environment Is Serious Business’, Defense Acquisition Review, 39, no. 3 (2004–5), 325–35.Google Scholar
Cerny, P., ‘Neomedievalism, Civil War and the New Security Dilemma: Globalisation as Durable Disorder’, Civil Wars, 1, no. 1 (1998), 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D. (ed.) The Oxford History of the British Army (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
Chesterman, S.,‘“We Can't Spy … If We Can't Buy!”: The Privatization of Intelligence and the Limits of Outsourcing “Inherently Governmental Functions”’, The European Journal of International Law, 19, no. 5 (2008), 1055–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, S., and Lehnardt, C. (eds.) From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRef
Chung, R., ‘The Cosmopolitan Scope of Republican Citizenship’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6, no. 1 (2003), 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilliers, J., and Mason, P. (eds.) Peace, Profit or Plunder? The Privatisation of Security in War-torn African Societies (Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies, 1999).
Clarke, M., ‘Memorandum Submitted on the Foreign and Security Policy Aspects of the Strategic Defence Review’, Eighth Report: The Strategic Defence Review, Volume II – Minutes of Evidence & Memoranda, HC 138-I (London: The Stationery Office, 10 September 1998).Google Scholar
Cohen, E. A., Citizens and Soldiers. The Dilemmas of Military Service (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Cohen, E. A., ‘Twilight of the Citizen-Soldier’, Parameters, 31, no. 2 (2001), 23–8.Google Scholar
,Confederation of European Security Services, Panoramic Overview of Private Security Industry in the 25 Member States of the European Union (2004), at: www.coess.org.Google Scholar
Cook, F. J., ‘The Warfare State’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 351, no. 1 (1964), 102–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, A., and Ron, J., ‘The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action’, International Security, 27, no. 1 (2002), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooling, B. F. (ed.) War, Business, and American Society. Historical Perspectives on the Military-Industrial Complex (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1977).
Crock, S., Armistead, T. F., Bianco, A., and Forest, S. A., ‘Outsourcing War’, Business Week, 3849 (15 September 2003), 68–78.Google Scholar
Cunningham, H., The Volunteer Force. A Social and Political History 1859–1908 (London: Croom Helm, 1975).Google Scholar
Danchev, A., ‘The Army and the Home Front 1939–1945’, in Chandler, D. and Beckett, I. (eds.) The Oxford History of the British Army (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 298–315.Google Scholar
Dandeker, C., ‘On “The Need to be Different”: Recent Trends in Military Culture’, in Strachan, H. (ed.) The British Army. Manpower and Society into the Twenty-First Century (London: Frank Cass, 2000), pp. 173–87.Google Scholar
Dandeker, C., ‘The United Kingdom: The Overstretched Military’, in Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A., and Segal, D. R. (eds.) The Postmodern Military (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
Dandeker, C., and Freedman, L., ‘The British Armed Services’, The Political Quarterly, 73, no. 4 (2002), 465–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Defense Contract Audit Agency, Audit Report No. 3311–2002K11010001 (Houston, 13 May 2004).
Delanty, G., ‘Cosmopolitanism and Violence: The Limits of Global Civil Society’, European Journal of Social Theory, 4, no. 1 (2001), 41–52.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K., Burrell, S. A., and Kann, R. A. (eds.) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organizations in the Light of Historical Experiences (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957).
BundeswehrVerband, Deutscher, Umfrage zur Berufszufriedenheit – Zusatzbericht zur Mitgliederbefragung des Deutschen BundeswehrVerbandes, Vol. I (Passau, 26 April 2007).Google Scholar
Dickinson, L. A., ‘Public Law Values in a Privatized World’, The Yale Journal of International Law, 31, no. 1 (2006), 383–426.Google Scholar
Diedrich, H.-P., ‘The Public-Private Partnership for NH90 Simulator-Based Flight Training’, RUSI Defence Systems (2006), 104–6.Google Scholar
Dinter, H., ‘Wehrpflicht, Freiwilligenarmee und allgemeine Dienstpflict – Aktuelle Argumentationslinien’, in Werkner, I.-J. (ed.) Die Wehrpflicht und ihre Hintergründe. Sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur aktuellen Debatte (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004), pp. 109–29.Google Scholar
Dorman, A., ‘The United Kingdom’, in Elliott, L. and Cheeseman, G. (eds.) Forces for Good: Cosmopolitan Militaries in the Twenty-first Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), pp. 237–49.Google Scholar
Downes, C. J., ‘To Be or Not to Be a Profession: The Military Case’, Defense Analysis, 1, no. 3 (1985), 147–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drews, I.-I., ‘Private Military Companies: The New Mercenaries? – An International Law Analysis’, in Jäger, T. and Kümmel, G. (eds.) Private Military and Security Companies. Changes, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 331–43.Google Scholar
Driver, S., and Martell, L., Blair's Britain (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Edgerton, D., Warfare State. Britain, 1920–1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Edmonds, M., ‘Defense Privatisation: From State Enterprise to Commercialism’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13, no. 1 (1999), 114–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, T., and Forster, A., Out of Step. The Case for Change in the British Armed Forces (London: DEMOS, 2007).Google Scholar
Eighmey, J., ‘Why Do Youth Enlist? Identification of Underlying Themes’, Armed Forces & Society, 32, no. 2 (2006), 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbe, M., ‘Werte verwerten? Zum Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Führung und Ökonomisierung am Beispiel der Balanced Scorecard’, in Richter, G. (ed.) Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr: Sachstand, Konzeptionen und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Elliott, L., ‘Cosmopolitan Ethics and Militaries as “Forces for Good”’, in Elliott, L. and Cheeseman, G. (eds.) Forces for Good: Cosmopolitan Militaries in the Twenty-first Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Elliott, L., and Cheeseman, G. (eds.) Forces for Good: Cosmopolitan Militaries in the 21st Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004).
Elsea, J. K., and Serafino, N. M., Private Security Contractors in Iraq: Background, Legal Status and Other Issues (Washington DC: CRS Report for Congress, 11 July 2007).Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, H. C., ‘The Problem of the Munitions Industry’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 174, no. 1 (1934), 121–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwistle, T., and Martin, S., ‘From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research’, Public Administration, 83, no.1 (2005), 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, S. I., ‘Brass Ponders Mixed Blessings of Privatization’, National Defense, 83, no. 544 (1999), 12.Google Scholar
Farrar-Hockley, A., ‘The Post-War Army 1945–1963’, in Chandler, D. and Beckett, I. (eds.) The Oxford History of the British Army (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 316–42.Google Scholar
Feaver, P., and Kohn, R. H. (eds.) Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).
Ferris, S. P., and Keithly, D. M., ‘Outsourcing the Sinews of War: Contractor Logistics’, Military Review, 81, no. 5 (2001), 72–83.Google Scholar
Fine, R., ‘Cosmopolitanism and Violence: Difficulties of Judgement’, The British Journal of Sociology, 57, no. 1 (2006), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, G. Q., ‘Conscription and Equity in Western Democracies, 1940–75’, Journal of Contemporary History, 33, no. 1 (1998), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreign, and Commonwealth Office, Private Military Companies: Options for Regulation, HC 577 (London: The Stationery Office, 12 February 2002).Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, J., ‘The Privatization of Industry in Historical Perspective’, Journal or Law and Society, 16, no. 1 (1989), 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, A., ‘Breaking the Covenant: Governance of the British Army in the Twenty-first Century’, International Affairs, 82, no. 6 (2006), 1043–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, P., ‘British War Policy and the Crisis of Liberalism in May 1915’, Journal of Modern History, 54, no. 1 (1982), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredland, E., and Kendry, A., ‘The Privatisation of Military Force: Economic Virtues, Vices and Government Responsibility’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13, no. 1 (1998), 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein Gesellschaft, Freiherr vom (ed.) Der Fahneneid. Die Stellung des Soldaten in Staat und Gesellschaft. Ein Cappenberger Gespräch (Cologne: Grote, 1970).
Friar, A., ‘Why Training for Service Contract Management Is Mission Essential’, Defense Acquisition Review, 39, no. 2 (2004), 267–77.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Gansler, J. S., The Defense Industry (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Garcia-Perez, I. K., ‘Contractors on the Battlefield in the 21st Century’, Army Logistician, 31, no. 6 (1999), 40–3.Google Scholar
Gareis, S. B., ‘Soldat für den Weltfrieden: Der Wandel der Bundeswehr von der Verteidigungs- zur Einsatzarmee’, SOWI.NEWS, no. 2 (2005), 1.Google Scholar
Gareis, S. B., ‘Wehrstrukturen und Multinationalität’, in Werkner, I.-J. (ed.) Die Wehrpflicht und ihre Hintergründe (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004), pp. 179–97.Google Scholar
Geis, A., ‘Der Funktions- und Legitimationswandel der Bundeswehr und das “freundliche Desinteresse” der Bundesbürger’ in Schoch, B., Heinemann-Grüder, A., Hippler, J., Weingardt, M. and Munz, R. (eds.) Friedensgutachten 2007 (Berlin: LIT, 2007), pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
Geise, J. P., ‘Republican Ideals and Contemporary Realities’, The Review of Politics, 46, no. 1, (1984), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillard, E.–C., ‘Business Goes to War: Private Military/Security Companies and International Humanitarian Law’, International Review of the Red Cross, 88, no. 863 (2006), 525–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimesi, T., Jindra, R., Siedschlag, A. and Tannheimer, T., National Threat Perception: Survey Results from Germany, Garnet Working Paper No. 18.6 (May 2007).
Glassner, R., and Schetter, C., ‘Der deutsche Beitrag zum Aufbau Afghanistans seit 2001: Bundeswehreinsatz und ziviles Engagement’, in Schoch, B., Heinemann–Grüder, A., Hippler, J., Weingardt, M. and Munz, R. (eds.) Friedensgutachten 2007 (Berlin: LIT, 2007), pp. 63–74Google Scholar
Gordon, M. R., and Trainor, B. E., Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq (New York: Pantheon, 2006).Google Scholar
Gramm, C., ‘Bekleidungsgesellschaft und öffentliche Vergabe – Zur Entscheidung des OLG Düsseldorf vom 30. April 2003’, Unterrichts blätter für die Wehrverwaltung (UBWV), no. 8 (2003), 281–5.Google Scholar
Graves, R. H., ‘Seeking Defense Efficiency’, Defense Acquisitions Review, 36, no. 4 (2001), 47–60.Google Scholar
Großeholz, C., ‘Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr im Meinungsbild der Soldatinnen und Soldaten’, in Richter, G. (ed.) Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr: Sachstand, Konzeptionen und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., and Rees, J., ‘Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective’, Law & Policy, 19, no. 4 (1997), 363–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., The Inclusion of the Other (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace: A Two Hundred Years’ Historical Remove', in Habermas, J., The Inclusion of the Other (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999), pp. 165–201.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., The Postnational Constellation (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Harmes, A., ‘Neoliberalism and Multilevel Governance’, Review of International Political Economy, 13, no. 5 (2006), 725–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, K., ‘Military Outsourcing: UK Experience’, Research Paper, Centre for Defence Economics, University of York (undated).
Hartmann, W., Geist und Haltung des Deutschen Soldaten im Wandel der Gesellschaft. Vom Kaiserheer zur Bundeswehr (Limburg a.d. Lahn: C. A. Starke Verlag, 1998).Google Scholar
Hayek, F., The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge and Paul Kegan, 1944).Google Scholar
Held, D., Democracy and the Global Order: From the Nation State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Oxford: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Held, D., ‘Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty’, Legal Theory, 8, no. 2 (2002), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helwig, R. D., ‘Privatization of Utility Systems’, The Air Force Comptroller, 34 (2000), 14–17.Google Scholar
Herrera, R. A., ‘Self–Governance and the American Citizen as Soldier, 1775–1861’, The Journal of Military History, 65, no. 1 (2001), 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasury, HM, Competing for Quality: Buying Better Public Services, Cm 1730 (London: HMSO, 1991).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., Leviathan, edited by Tuck, R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Hogan, M. J., A Cross of Iron. Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, I., Civic Republicanism (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H. M., ‘Private Security Forces and African Stability: The Case of Executive Outcomes’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 36, no. 2 (1998), 307–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P., The Soldier and the State. The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Huntington, S., ‘The Defense Establishment: Vested Interests and the Public Interest’, in Carey, O. L. (ed.) The Military–Industrial Complex and U.S. Foreign Policy (Pullman: Washington State University Press, 1969), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Hussain, A., and Ishaq, M., ‘Public Attitudes towards a Career in the British Armed Forces’, Defense & Security Analysis, 21, no. 1 (2005), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isenberg, D., Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008).Google Scholar
Janowitz, M., ‘The All–Volunteer Military as a “Sociopolitical” Problem’, Social Problems, 22, no. 3 (1975), 432–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janowitz, M., The Professional Soldier. A Social and Political Portrait (New York: Free Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Jessop, B., ‘The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in its Primary Functions, Scale, and Modes of Coordination’, Social Policy & Administration, 33, no. 4 (1999), 348–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B., ‘Governance Failure’, in Stoker, Gerry (ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 11-32.Google Scholar
Jessop, B., ‘Post–Fordism and the State’, in Amin, A. (ed.) Post Fordism. A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 251–79.Google Scholar
Kaldor, M., New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kaldor, M., Rethinking British Defence Policy and its Economic Implications, Sussex European Institute, Working Paper, no. 8, February 1995.
Kamlet, M. S., Mowery, D. C. and Su, T.–T., ‘Upsetting National Priorities? The Reagan Administration's Budgetary Strategy’, The American Political Science Review, 82, no. 4 (1988), 1293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., Perpetual Peace. A Philosophical Essay (London: Allen & Unwin, 1903).Google Scholar
Karsten, P., ‘The US Citizen–Soldier's Past, Present, and Likely Future’, Parameters, 31, no. 2 (2001), 61–73.Google Scholar
Keller, J., ‘Streitkräfte und ökönomisches Kalkül: Top oder Flop? Grundsätzliche Überlegungen zu einer Ökonomisierung der Bundeswehr’, in Richter, G. (ed.) Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr: Sachstand, Konzeptionen und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Kelty, R., and Segal, D. R., ‘The Civilianization of the US Military: Army and Navy Case Studies of the Effects of Civilian Integration on Military Personnel’, in Jäger, T. and Kümmel, G. (eds.) Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 213–39.Google Scholar
Kestnbaum, M., ‘Citizenship and Compulsory Military Service: The Revolutionary Origins of Conscription in the United States’, Armed Forces & Society, 27, no. 1 (2000), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kier, E., ‘Homosexuals in the U.S. Military: Open Integration and Combat Effectiveness’, International Security, 23, no. 2 (1998), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, C., Corporate Soldiers and International Security. The Rise of Private Military Companies (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D., ‘Government and Industry: Problematic Partnering’, RUSI Defence Systems, 7, no. 2 (2004), no pages, at: http://rusi.org/go.php?structureID=articles_defence&ref=P4198C021618F9Google Scholar
Kitchen, M., A Military History of Germany from the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1975).Google Scholar
Klingenberg, W., ‘Mobilität der Streitkräfte’, Europäische Sicherheit, 54, no. 10. (2005).Google Scholar
Koistinen, P. A. C., The Military–Industrial Complex. A Historical Perspective (New York: Praeger, 1980).Google Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘Conceptualising Security Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict, 38, no. 1 (2003), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘From State to Non-state Actors: The Emergence of Security Governance’, in Krahmann, E. (ed.) New Threats and New Actors in International Security (New York: Palgrave, 2005), pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘National, Regional and Global Governance: One Phenomenon or Many?Global Governance, 9, no. 3 (2003), 323–46.Google Scholar
Krahmann, E., National Threat Perception: Survey Results from the UK, Garnet Working Paper No. 18.10 (May 2007).
Krahmann, E., ‘The New Model Soldier and Civil–Military Relations’, in Alexandra, A., Baker, D.-P. and Caparini, M. (eds.) Private Military and Security Companies. Ethics, Policies and Civil–Military Relations (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 247–65.Google Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘Regulating Military and Security Services in the European Union’, in Bryden, A. and Caparini, M. (eds.) Private Actors and Security Governance (Münster: LIT, 2006), pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘Regulating Private Military Companies: What Role for the EU?Contemporary Security Policy, 26, no. 1 (2005), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘Security: Collective Good or Commodity?European Journal of International Relations, 14, no. 3 (2008), 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmann, E., ‘United Kingdom: Punching Above Its Weight’, in Kirchner, E. J. and Sperling, J. (eds.) Global Security Governance. Competing Perceptions of Security in the 21st Century (London: Routledge, 2007), pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Kümmel, G., ‘The Winds of Change: The Transition from Armed Forces for Peace to New Missions for the Bundeswehr and Its Impact on Civil–Military Relations’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 26, no. 2 (2003), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, G., and Leonhard, N., ‘Casualties and Civil–Military Relations: The German Polity between Learning and Indifference’, Armed Forces & Society, 31, no. 4 (2005), 513–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, T. S., Uneasy Balance: Civil–Military Relations in Peacetime America since 1783 (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Lapp, R. E., ‘The Military–Industrial Complex: 1969’, in Carey, O. L. (ed.) The Military–Industrial Complex and U.S. Foreign Policy (Pullman: Washington State University Press, 1969), pp. 42–54.Google Scholar
Levi, M., ‘The Institution of Conscription’, Social Science History, 20, no. 1 (1996), 133–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, I., ‘Consumer Culture and the Commodification of Policing and Security’, Sociology, 33, no. 2 (1999), 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longhurst, K., ‘Resisting Change: The Politics of Conscription in Contemporary Germany’, in Joenniemi, P. (ed.) The Changing Face of European Conscription (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Longhurst, K., ‘Why Aren't the Germans Debating the Draft? Path Dependency and the Persistence of Conscription’, German Politics, 12, no. 2 (2003), 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, G., ‘Reform of UK Defense Procurement and State/Industry Relationships during the 1980s and 1990s’, Defense Analysis, 15, no. 1 (1999), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N., The Prince (London: Penguin Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Majone, G., ‘From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance’, Journal of Public Policy, 17, no. 2 (1997), 139–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makin, K., ‘UK MOD: Raising its Game as a PFI Customer’, RUSI Defence Systems, 7, no. 1 (2004), 97–9.Google Scholar
Mandel, R., Armies without States: The Privatization of Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar
Manker, Jr., J. E., and Williams, K. D., ‘Contractors in Contingency Operations: Panacea or Pain?Air Force Journal of Logistics, 28, no. 3 (2004), 14–16.Google Scholar
Mannitz, S., ‘Weltbürger in Uniform oder dienstbare Kämpfer? Konsequenzen des Auftragswandels für das Soldatenbild der Bundeswehr’, in Schoch, B., Heinemann–Grüder, A., Hippler, J., Weingardt, M. and Munz, R. (eds.) Friedensgutachten 2007 (Berlin: LIT, 2007), pp. 98–109.Google Scholar
Markusen, A., ‘The Case Against Privatizing National Security’, Governance, 16, no. 4 (2003), 471–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R., and Parker, J., ‘Prime Contracting in Major Defense Contracts’, Defense Analysis, 15, no. 1 (1999), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynor, J., Republicanism in a Modern World (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003).Google Scholar
McNaugher, T. L., ‘Weapons Procurement. The Futility of Reform’, International Security, 12, no. 2 (1987), 63–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiers, F.–J., ‘Germany's Defence Choices’, Survival, 47, no. 1 (2005), 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melman, S., ‘Pentagon Capitalism’, in Pursell, C. W., Jr. (ed.) The Military–Industrial Complex (New York: Harper & Row, 1977), pp. 37–70.Google Scholar
Michaels, J. D., ‘Beyond Accountability: The Constitutional, Democratic, and Strategic Problems with Privatizing War’, Washington University Law Quarterly, 82, no. 3 (2004), 1001–127.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., ‘Considerations on Representative Government’, in On Liberty and Other Essays, edited with an introduction by Gray, J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical, Vol. I (London: Parker, 1859).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., On Liberty with The Subjection of Women and Chapters on Socialism, edited by Collini, S. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Molander, E. A., ‘Historical Antecedents of Military–Industrial Criticisms’, in Cooling, B. Franklin (ed.) War, Business, and American Society. Historical Perspectives on the Military–Industrial Complex (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1977), pp. 171–87.Google Scholar
Moskos, C. C., ‘Toward a Postmodern Military: The United States as a Paradigm’, in Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A. and Segal, D. R. (eds.) The Postmodern Military (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 14–31.Google Scholar
Moskos, C. C., ‘Towards a Postmodern Military?’ in Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A. and Segal, D. R. (eds.) The Postmodern Military (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A. and Segal, D. R., ‘Armed Forces after the Cold War’, in Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A. and Segal, D. R. (eds.) The Postmodern Military. Armed Forces after the Cold War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Moskos, C. C., ‘What Ails the All–Volunteer Force: An Institutional Perspective’, Parameters, 31, no. 2 (2001), 29–47.Google Scholar
Myers, F., ‘British Trade Unions and the End of Conscription: The Tripartite Committee of 1950–56’, Journal of Contemporary History, 31, no. 3 (1996), 509–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navias, M. S.Terminating Conscription? The British National Service Controversy 1955–56’, Journal of Contemporary History, 24, no. 2 (1989), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. L., ‘The Warfare State: History of a Concept’, in Pursell, C. W., Jr. (ed.) The Military–Industrial Complex (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
Newbold, S. E., ‘Competitive Sourcing and Privatization: An Essential USAF Strategy’, Air Force Journal of Logistics, 23, no. 1 (1999), 28–34.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C., For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, edited by Cohen, J. (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Padgett, S., ‘Political Economy: The German Model under Stress’, in Padgett, S., Paterson, W. E. and Smith, G. (eds.) Developments in German Politics 3 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003), pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Parker, D., and Hartley, K., Transaction Costs, Relational Contracting and Public–Private Partnerships: A Case Study of UK Defence, 18 April 2001, Centre for Innovation Research, Ashton University, and Centre for Defence Economics, University of York.Google Scholar
Percy, S., Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersohn, U., ‘Die Nutzung privater Militärfirmen durch US–Streitkräfte und Bundeswehr’, SWP–Studie, no. 36 (Berlin, December 2006).
Pettit, P., Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997).Google Scholar
Pierre, A., The Global Politics of Arms Sales (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, J., ‘Conclusion: Governance beyond State Strength’, in Pierre, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 242–6.Google Scholar
Pierre, J., ‘Introduction: Understanding Governance’, in Pierre, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Pilisuk, M., and Hayden, T., ‘Is there a Military–Industrial Complex?’, in Pursell, C. W., Jr. (ed.) The Military–Industrial Complex (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), pp. 51–80.Google Scholar
Pint, E. M., Bondawella, J. R., Cave, J., Hart, R., and Keyser, D., Public–Private Partnerships Background Papers for the U.S.–U.K. Conference on Military Installations, Assets, Operations and, Services (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001).Google Scholar
Portugall, G. ‘Das kontinuierliche Verbesserungsprogramm (KVP) in der Bundeswehr – Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Bestandsaufnahme’, in Richter, G. (ed.) Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr: Sachstand, Konzeptionen und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 211–32.Google Scholar
Portugall, G., ‘Die Bundeswehr und das Privatisierungsmodell der “Öffentlich–Privaten–Partnerschaft” (ÖPP)’, in Richter, G. (ed.) Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr: Sachstand, Konzeptionen und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 141–58.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., and Weingast, B. R., ‘Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, no. 4 (1997), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathmell, A., Oliker, O., Kelly, T. K., Brannan, D., and Crane, K., Developing Iraq's Security Sector. The Coalition Provisional Authority's Experience (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Reeves, S. V., The Ghosts of Acquisition Reform: Past, Present and Future (Washington DC: The Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defence University, 1999).Google Scholar
Reppy, J., ‘The United States’, in Ball, N. and Leitenberg, M. (eds.) The Structure of the Defense Industry (London: Croom Helm, 1983), pp. 21–49.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W., ‘Foreword: Governance and Networks’, in Stoker, G. (ed.) The New Management of British Local Governance (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), pp. xii–xxvi.Google Scholar
Richter, G., ‘Privatization in the German Armed Forces’ in Jäger, T. and Kümmel, G. (eds.) Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 165–76.Google Scholar
Riedle, J., ‘General–Instandhaltung für alle’, Instandhaltung, no. 2 (2006), 20–1.Google Scholar
Roe Smith, M., ‘Military Arsenals and Industry before World War I’, in Cooling, B. F. (ed.) War, Business, and American Society. Historical Perspectives on the Military–Industrial Complex (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1977), pp. 24–42.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N., ‘Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space’, in Pierre, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 169–200.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.–J., The Social Contract and Other Later Writings, edited by Gourvitch, V. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Rubin, G. R., ‘United Kingdom Military Law: Autonomy, Civilianisation, Juridification’, Modern Law Review, 65, no. 1 (2002), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M. J., ‘Liberalism and Republicanism: Friends or Foes? A Reply to Richard Dagger’, The Review of Politics, 61, no. 2 (1999), 209–14.Google Scholar
Sandel, M., Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Sarkesian, S. C., Williams, J. A., and Bryant, F. B., Soldiers, Society, and National Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1995).Google Scholar
Sassoli, M., ‘Legislation and Maintenance of Public Order and Civil Life by Occupying PowersThe European Journal of International Law, 16, no. 4 (2005), 661–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, C., ‘Private Security and Military Companies under the International Law of Armed Conflict’, in Jäger, T. and Kümmel, G. (eds.) Private Military and Security Companies. Changes, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 345–60.Google Scholar
Schmid, J., ‘Mehrfache Desillusionierung und Ambivalenz: Eine sozialpolitische Bilanz’, in Wewer, G. (ed.) Bilanz der Ära Kohl: Christlich–liberale Politik in Deutschland 1982–1998 (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1998), pp. 89–111.Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A., ‘Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance’, Global Governance, 8, no. 3 (2002), 281–304.Google Scholar
Segal, D. R., Recruiting for Uncle Sam: Citizenship and Military Manpower Policy (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1989).Google Scholar
Shields, P. M., ‘The Burden of the Draft: The Vietnam Years’, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 9, no. 3 (1981), 215–28.Google Scholar
Simkins, P., ‘The Four Armies 1914–1918’, in Chandler, D. and Beckett, I. (eds.) The Oxford History of the British Army (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 235–55.Google Scholar
Singer, P. W., Corporate Warriors. The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Singer, P. W., ‘Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International Security’, International Security, 26, no. 3 (2001–2), 186–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R., ‘Defence Procurement and Industrial Structure in the U.K,’ International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, no 2. (1990), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W., ‘Cosmopolitan Citizenship. Virtue, Irony and Worldliness’, European Journal of Social Theory, 10, no. 1 (2007), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snider, D. M., and Watkins, G. L., ‘The Future of Army Professionalism: A Need for Renewal and Redefinition’, Parameters, 30, no. 3 (2000), 5–20.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. C., ‘The Citizen–Soldier Tradition and Gender Integration of the U.S. Military’, Armed Forces & Society, 29, no. 2 (2003), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, R. C., Citizen–Soldiers and Manly Warriors (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).Google Scholar
Spackman, M., ‘Public–Private Partnerships: Lessons from the British Approach’, Economic Systems, 26, no. 3 (2002), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearin, C., ‘American Hegemony Incorporated: The Importance and Implications of Military Contractors in Iraq’, Contemporary Security Policy, 24, no. 3 (2003), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, J., and Tossutti, L., National Threat Perception: Survey Results from the United States, Garnet Working Paper no. 18.11 (May 2007).
Spiers, E. M., The Late Victorian Army 1868–1902 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Stanhope, H., The Soldiers. An Anatomy of the British Army (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1979).Google Scholar
Starks, G. L., ‘Public and Private Partnerships in Support of Performance–Based Logistics Initiatives – Lessons Learned from Defense Logistic Agency Partnerships’, Defense Acquisition Review, 39, no. 3 (2004–5), 305–15.Google Scholar
Stenning, P. C., ‘Powers and Accountability of Private Police’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, no. 3 (2000), 325–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, H., ‘The Civil–Military “Gap” in Britain’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 26, no. 2 (2003), 47–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, H., ‘Making Strategy: Civil–Military Relations after Iraq’, Survival, 48, no. 3 (2006), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zi, Sun, The Art of War (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Taulbee, J. L., ‘Mercenaries, Private Armies and Security Companies in Contemporary Policy’, International Politics, 37, no. 4 (2000), 433–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T., ‘Contractor on Deployed Operations and Equipment Support’, Defence Studies, 4, no. 2 (2004), 184–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T., and Hayward, K., The U.K. Defence Industrial Base (London: Brassey's, 1989).Google Scholar
Thaa, W., ‘“Lean Citizenship”’: The Fading Away of the Political in Transnational Democracy', European Journal of International Relations, 7, no. 4 (2001), 503–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,The Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Thomson, J. E., Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns. State–building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Thornton, R., ‘A Welcome “Revolution”? The British Army and the Changes of the Strategic Defence Review’, Defence Studies, 3, no. 3 (2003), 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiron, R., ‘Public–Private Ventures Could Ease the Pains of Privatization’, National Defense, 85, no. 570 (2001), 36.Google Scholar
Tomforde, M., ‘Motivation and Self-Image among German Peacekeepers’, International Peacekeeping, 12, no. 4 (2005), 576–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, C., ‘Legends of the British Armaments Industry 1890–1914: A Revision’, Journal of Contemporary History, 5, no. 4 (1970), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B. S., ‘Cosmopolitan Virtue, Globalization and Patriotism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 19, nos. 1–2 (2002), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, J. E., ‘The Military Industrial Firm – Private Enterprise Revised’, Policy Analysis, 29 (9 November 1983).Google Scholar
Uttley, M., Civilian Contractors on Deployed Military Operations: United Kingdom Policy and Doctrine (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, September 2005).Google Scholar
Uttley, M., Contractors on Deployed Operations: United Kingdom Policy and Doctrine (Darby, PA: Diane Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Uttley, M., ‘Private Contractors on Deployed Operations: The United Kingdom Experience’, Defence Studies, 4, no. 2 (2004), 145–65.Google Scholar
Uttley, M., ‘Public–Private Partnerships in United Kingdom Defence’, RUSI Defence Systems, 9, no.2 (2006), 82–84.Google Scholar
Walker, W., and Gummett, P., ‘Britain and the European Armaments Market’, International Affairs, 65, no. 3 (1989), 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, I., ‘Foes and Friends?Foreign Policy, 90 (1993), 149–50.Google Scholar
Walsh, K., ‘Competition and Public Service Delivery’, in Steward, J. and Stoker, G. (eds.) Local Government in the 1990s (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995), pp. 28–48.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Political Writings, edited by Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Weidenbaum, M. L., ‘The Military–Industrial Complex: An Economic Analysis’, in Carey, O. L. (ed.) The Military–Industrial Complex and U.S. Foreign Policy (Pullman: Washington State University Press, 1969), pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
Werkner, I.–J., ‘Die Wehrpflict – Teil der politischen Kultur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland?’ in Werkner, I.–J. (ed.) Die Wehrpflicht und ihre Hintergründe. Sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur aktuellen Debatte (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004), pp. 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, N., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Williams, P. D., British Foreign Policy under New Labour, 1997–2005 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wochnik, L., ‘Das kontinuierliche Verbesserungsprogramm (KVP) als Instrument der Gestaltung organisatorischen Wandels’, in Richter, G. (ed.) Die ökonomische Modernisierung der Bundeswehr: Sachstand, Konzeptionen und Perspektiven (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007), pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, T., and Ramsbotham, O., ‘Cosmopolitan Peacekeeping and the Globalization of Security’, International Peacekeeping, 12, no. 2 (2005), 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, T., Kelty, R. and Segal, D. R., ‘Propensity to Serve and Motivation to Enlist among American Combat Soldiers’, Armed Forces & Society, 32, no. 3 (2006), 353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, R., and Winter, T., Sexing the Soldier. The Politics of Gender and the Contemporary British Army (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Zamparelli, S. J., ‘Competitive Sourcing and Privatization: What Have We Signed Up For?Air Force Journal of Logistics, 23, no. 3 (1999), 8–19.Google Scholar
Zangl, B., and Zürn, M., ‘The Effects of Denationalization on Security in the OECD World’, Global Society, 13, no. 2 (1999), 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zugbach, R., and Ishaq, M., ‘Managing Race Relations in the British Army’, Defense Analysis, 16, no. 2 (2000), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Elke Krahmann, Brunel University
  • Book: States, Citizens and the Privatisation of Security
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139042727.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Elke Krahmann, Brunel University
  • Book: States, Citizens and the Privatisation of Security
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139042727.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Elke Krahmann, Brunel University
  • Book: States, Citizens and the Privatisation of Security
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139042727.010
Available formats
×