Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:08:10.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Advantage, mutual vs. reciprocal

from A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Jon Mandle
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
David A. Reidy
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Get access

Summary

Rawls treats social cooperation as voluntary activity between citizens of a common polity that generates beneits for cooperators. Fair social cooperation is regulated by public rules and procedures that all can freely accept as appropriate. Rawls’s principles of justice apply to the basic institutional structures of society that deine the fair terms of social cooperation. An accurate representation of the fundamental idea of society as a fair system of cooperation is thus essential to understanding the overall character of Rawls’s theory. Rawls maintains that justice as fairness adopts an understanding of social cooperation that is animated by an idea of reciprocity or reciprocal advantage. He locates reciprocity between an idea of impartiality and an idea of mutual advantage. The contrast between these ideas lies in the different relation citizens engaged in cooperation can stand both to one another and to the beneits that cooperation generates.

Reciprocity assumes that citizens in a well-ordered society view each other as free and equal persons who are jointly committed to establishing fair terms of cooperation. Each citizen is concerned to advance her own good through cooperation but this concern is tempered by an acknowledgement of the reasonable claims of others. So each citizen need not extract the maximum benefit from a scheme of social cooperation that they can secure via rational bargaining in order for a scheme to be fair. Reciprocity requires both that all contribute to social cooperation and that social cooperation be beneicial to all. However, the benchmark for assessing whether cooperation beneits all is an equal division of social beneits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×