Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:11:49.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Deliberate Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Susan L. Moffitt
Susan L. Moffitt
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

One of the great dangers in the unregulated use of advisory committees is that special interest groups may use their membership on such bodies to promote their private concerns.

House of Representatives Report 92–1017, April 25, 1972

It’s incumbent upon the members to listen carefully to the presentations from industry and to the Food and Drug Administration and neither act as advocates nor adversaries to the Agency or to the sponsors.

Statement by Chairman of the Pulmonary Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee, April 26, 1993

In 2010, American federal public committees offered upward of 70,000 people a seat at agency policymaking tables, at least in an advisory capacity. Looking at the estimates of public participation on federal committees over time, depicted in Figure 7.1, represents a remarkable testament to public access to American bureaucracy.

Yet, how public are federal advisory committees in the sense of reflecting the various publics that policy affects? The vision of full group representation as a means of expressing and legitimizing democracy consistently fails to materialize in practice. Participatory processes in government agencies, such as public committees, are vulnerable to similar limitations. Allegations abound that industry dominance on committees is not just an artifact of the past – such as the Business Advisory Council housed in the Department of Commerce in 1933 – but a persistent problem despite Federal Advisory Committee Act provisions. Estimates suggest approximately 38 percent of advisory committee members in 1985 hailed from private industry, for instance. The danger of dominance is real.

Type
Chapter
Information
Making Policy Public
Participatory Bureaucracy in American Democracy
 , pp. 170 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

U.S. General Accounting Office, Federal Advisory Committee Act: Views of Committee Members and Agencies on Federal Advisory Committee Issues (Washington, DC:GAO, 1998), p. 4Google Scholar
Schattsneider, E. E., The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America (New York: Thompson Learning, 1960)Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce L. R., The Advisers: Scientists in the Policy Process (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1992), pp. 42, 92–93Google Scholar
Balla, Steven J. and Wright, John R., “Interest Groups, Advisory Committees, and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy,” American Journal of Political Science, 45 (2001): 799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office, Federal Advisory Committee Act: Views of Committee Members and Agencies on Federal Advisory Committee Issues (Washington, DC:GAO, 1998)Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. and Funk, William F., “The Federal Advisory Committee Act and Good Government,” Yale Journal on Regulation 14(1997): 451–557Google Scholar
Steinbrook, Robert, “Science, Politics and Federal Advisory Committees,” New England Journal of Medicine 350 (2004): 1454–1460, p. 1457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, David, Public Advisory Boards in the Federal Government (Syracuse University, Doctoral dissertation, 1956), p. 105
U.S. General Accounting Office, Federal Advisory Committee Act: Views of Committee Members and Agencies on Federal Advisory Committee Issues (Washington, DC: GAO, 1998), p. 7Google Scholar
Gormley, William T. Jr., The Politics of Public Utility Regulation (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983)Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, “Complexity, Capacity and Capture,” in Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It, edited by Carpenter, Daniel and Moss, David (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 99–123Google Scholar
Vinovskis, Maris, Overseeing the Nation’s Report Card: The Creation and Evolution of the National Assessment Governing Board (Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board, 1998), p. 22Google Scholar
Jennings, John F., “An Interview with John F. Jennings,” in The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, edited by Jones, Lyle V. and Olkin, Ingram (Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Press, 2004), pp. 279–280Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), pp. 89–91Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2007), p. 9Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P., “Protection without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator,” American Political Science Review 98 (2004): 613–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office, Federal Advisory Committees: Additional Guidance Could Help Agencies Better Ensure Independence and Balance (Washington, DC: GAO, 2004), p. 40Google Scholar
Pines, Wayne L. and Cotton, Mary Ann N., “Preparing for an FDA Advisory Committee Meeting,” Drug Information Journal 31(1997): 35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David S., The Public Advisory Board in the Federal Government (Syracuse University, Doctoral Dissertation, 1954), pp. 65, 192, 415
Friedman, Robert S., “Representation in Regulatory Decision-Making: Scientific, Industrial and Consumer Inputs to the FDA,” Public Administration Review 38 (1978): 205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusmano, Michael K., “FDA Decisions and Public Deliberation: Challenges and Opportunities,” Public Administration Review 73 (2014): S115–S126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurie, Peter et al., “Financial Conflicts of Interest Disclosure and Voting Patterns at Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee Meetings,” Journal of the American Medical Association 295 (2006): 1921–1928CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, Bernard and Field, Marilyn J., Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education and Practice (Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2009)Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. and Fineberg, Harvey V., The Swine Flu Affair: Decision-Making on a Slippery Disease (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1978), p. 94, p.89Google ScholarPubMed
Balogh, Brian, Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power, 1945–1975 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patashnik, Eric, Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008), p. 21

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×