Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T12:53:28.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The role of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services

from Part II - Measuring ecosystem services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Jan E. Vermaat
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Jacintha Ellers
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Matthew R. Helmus
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Jetske A. Bouma
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
Pieter J. H. van Beukering
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

All organisms respond to and change their environment to a greater or lesser degree. This interaction affects their survival and that of other organisms. Humankind is no different: it has responded to and altered its environment. For example, humans burn landscapes and domesticate plants and animals (Schleidt and Schalter, 2003; Archibald et al., 2012). However, unprecedented in the history of our earth is the extent of environmental changes brought about by this single species (Haberl et al., 2007; Rockström et al., 2009a; Klein Goldewijk et al., 2011). Our presence is identifiable everywhere on earth, thus, the current geological epoch has been dubbed the Anthropocene (Steffen et al., 2007) and humankind exploits all earth’s ecosystems, whether seemingly pristine like the vast ice fields of Antarctica and the high seas of the open ocean, or highly modified and regulated, like the terraced rice fields of Asia or dykes of the Netherlands.

Ecosystems provide us with a range of goods and perform services without which humans would go extinct. While some ecosystems have been optimized by humans to deliver and sustain a specific service, few services have been fully incorporated into a market economy whereas several are being depleted without societal appreciation (Fisher et al., 2008; Rockström et al., 2009a; Bateman et al., 2010). The notion of imminent depletion has led concerned scientists to draw up the MEA (MEA, 2005). The MEA analysed the present condition of the earth’s ecosystems as an integrated product of changes in biodiversity, environmental change, and their effect on ecosystem services. The assessment concluded that much of the gain in economic growth and human well-being over the last century has been possible because of large-scale exploitation of the services that natural ecosystems provide. The resulting degradation of ecosystems and loss of biodiversity is thought to diminish future use of ecosystem services and to endanger our planet’s sustainability. Rockström et al. (2009a) have framed this in the form of eight planetary boundary indicators that together depict a safe operating space for humankind (Figure 2.1). For many indicators the world is considered to be “close to the edge,” and among these biodiversity loss was judged to be the furthest outside the planetary boundary.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecosystem Services
From Concept to Practice
, pp. 25 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, L. G. G., Farley, S. D., Stricker, C. A., et al. (2010). Are inland wolf–ungulate systems influenced by marine subsidies of Pacific salmon?Ecological Applications, 20: 251–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrén, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71: 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, S., Staver, A. C., and Levin, S. A. (2012). Evolution of human-driven fire regimes in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109: 847–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., et al. (2002). Ecology – economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297: 950–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A. B., Buchmann, N., et al. (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 9: 1146–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateman, I. J., Mace, G. M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., and Turner, R. K. (2010). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental Resource Economics, 48: 177–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschta, R. L. and Ripple, W. J. (2012). The role of large predators in maintaining riparian plant communities and river morphology. Geomorphology, 157–158: 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Duffy, J. E., et al. (2006). Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature, 443: 989–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486: 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J., Gross, K., Fritschie, K., et al. (2013). Biodiversity simultaneously enhances the production and stability of community biomass, but the effects are independent. Ecology, 94: 1697–1707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Mulder, K., Liu, S., and Christopher, T. (2007). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecological Economics, 61: 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., Zylstra, M., et al. (2008). Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications, 18: 2050–2067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forseth, I. (2012). Terrestrial biomes. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10):11.Google Scholar
Haberl, H., Erb, K. H., Krausmann, F., et al. (2007). Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 12942–12947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, D. U., ChapinIII, F. S., Ewel, J. J., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75: 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Adair, E. C., Cardinale, B. J., et al. (2012). A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature, 486: 105–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., van Drecht, G., and de Vos, M. (2011). The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human/induced global land/use change over the past 12,000 years. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?Ecology Letters, 8: 468–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurance, W. F. and Edwards, D. P. (2011). The search for unknown biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108: 12971–12972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letourneau, A., Verburg, P. H., and Stehfest, E. (2012). A land-use systems approach to represent land-use dynamics at continental and global scales. Environmental Modelling and Software, 33: 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M. (2010). Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, G. M., Norris, K., and Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. C. and Cunjak, R. A. (2007). Stream flow, salmon and beaver dams: roles in the structuring of stream fish communities within an anadromous salmon dominated stream. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76: 1062–1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2004). Whole-lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial support of aquatic food webs. Nature, 427: 240–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, M. M., Heim, M., and Werner, D. (2003). Hydrologic and geomorphic effects of beaver dams and their influence on fishes. In Gregory, S. V., Boyer, K. and Gurnell, A. (eds), The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Symposium 37, pp. 213–233.Google Scholar
Quijas, S., Schmid, B., and Balvanera, P. (2010). Plant diversity enhances provision of ecosystem services: a new synthesis. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, W. V. and Miller, K. R. (1989). Keeping Options Alive, the Scientific Basis for Conserving Biodiversity. Washington DC: WRI, 130 pp.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (2010). The Economy of Nature (6th edition). New York: W. H. Freeman, 700 pp.Google Scholar
Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S. C., de Ruiter, P. C., and van de Koppel, J. (2004). Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science, 305: 1926–1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009a). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14: 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009b). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleidt, C. J. E. and Schalter, M. D. (2003). Coevolution of humans and canids, an alternative view of dog domestication: homo homini lupus?Evolution and Cognition, 9, 57–72.Google Scholar
Schulp, W. M., Lautenbach, S., and Verburg, P. H. (2014). Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: demand and supply of pollination in the European Union. Ecological Indicators, 36, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. M. and Smith, R. L. (2006). Elements of Ecology (6th edition). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., and McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?Ambio, 36: 614–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., and Thies, C. (2005). Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 8: 857–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, K. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. L. (2011). An experimental framework for ecosystem capital accounting in Europe. EEQA Technical Report 13/2011. EEA Copenhagen, 43 pp.
Willson, M. F. and Halupka, K. C. (1995). Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conservation Biology, 9: 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, E. C., Cooper, D. J., Hobbs, N. T., and Thompson, N. (2007). Hydrologic regime and herbivory stabilize an alternative state in Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Applications, 17: 1572–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×