Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:20:01.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and the practice of sociolinguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Nikolas Coupland
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Nikolas Coupland
Affiliation:
University of Wales College of Cardiff
Get access

Summary

Theory and practice

Theory and practice are terms that are often set in opposition to each other, but not for very good reasons. This is a book about theory, but it is not a book that is, one might say, ‘couched in abstractions with little relevance to the real world of language use’. Who needs theory, if that's what theory is? On the contrary, theory is about what we see and experience in the social world of language, and about how we impute meaning to actions. As language users, we are all theorists, although the discipline of sociolinguistics has particular responsibilities in fostering, through its theory, awareness of what happens at the interface between language and society, and in reviewing what we know and what we have not yet adequately explained. So this is actually a book about practice too – practices of using language and practices of interpreting language in society.

My main task in the chapter is to set the scene for the nineteen chapters that follow; I introduce the chapters and the structure of the volume in the second half of this chapter. Before that it may be useful to comment in quite general terms on ‘theory’, and then on ‘sociolinguistic theory’, the object of debate in this volume, and its historical status in the field. That will lead to an overview of the types of theory that sociolinguistics has aligned with to date, and might profitably align with in the future. This is a necessary debate in itself, especially if it is right to observe that sociolinguistics has entered a phase where ‘theory is everywhere’ and that this is radically influencing what sociolinguistics is and what it does. But we are also arguably in a phase where discussion of what counts as theory, and why it matters in so many practical regards, is still generally lacking. In other words, we need to keep revisiting some basic metatheoretical questions about sociolinguistics, following a line of reflexive commentary started by Figueroa over twenty years ago. Figueroa (1994) set out the different principles and assumptions that supported the research of three of the ‘founding fathers’ of sociolinguistics, Labov, Gumperz, and Hymes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sociolinguistics
Theoretical Debates
, pp. 1 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, B., and Mast, J. L.. 2006. Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.). 2014. Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter (ed.). 2012. Space in Language and Linguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 1977. Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist 77, 2: 290–311.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, Adrian, and Creese, Angela (eds.). 2014. Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, David. 2014. Social Class in Applied Linguistics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2012. Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers’ stories in Belgium. In Wodak, R. (ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 55–96.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2015. Pierre Bourdieu and language in society. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 153, King's College London. Available at www.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/groups/ldc/publications/workingpapers/.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Rampton, Ben. 2011. Language and superdiversity: A position paper. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 70, King's College. Available at www.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/groups/ldc/publications/workingpapers/.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First published 1978 as part of Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter. 2005. History and Social Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Harvey, Penelope, Rampton, Ben, and Richardson, Kay. 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1995/2009. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1997. Introduction. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1–12.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 1998. What is sociolinguistic theory?Journal of Sociolinguistics 2, 1: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001a. Dialect stylisation in radio talk. Language in Society 30, 3: 345–375.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001b. Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and social theory. In Coupland, Nikolas, Sarangi, Srikant, and Candlin, Christopher N. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman, 1–26.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2010a. The authentic speaker and the speech community. In Llamas, Carmen and Watts, Dominic (eds.), Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 99–112.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (ed.). 2010b. Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. Language, society and authenticity: Themes and perspectives. In Lacoste, Véronique, Leimgruber, Jakob, and Breyer, Thiemo (eds.), Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 14–39.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. Forthcoming. Labov, vernacularity and sociolinguistic change. Journal of Sociolinguistics.
Coupland, Nikolas, and Jaworksi, Adam (eds.) 2009a. The New Sociolinguistics Reader. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, and Jaworski, Adam (eds.). 2009b. Sociolinguistics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. 6 vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Sarangi, Srikant, and Candlin, Christopher N. (eds.). 2001. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1995/2003. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duchêne, Alexandre, and Heller, Monica (eds.). 2011. Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro, and Goodwin, Charles (eds.). 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2003. Elephants in the room. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7, 3: 392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 4: 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Esther. 1994. Sociolinguistic Metatheory. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua. 1965. Yiddish in America: Socio-linguistic Description and Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2002. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Landman, Todd, and Schram, Sanford. 2012. Important next steps in phronetic social science. In Flyvbjerg, Bent, Landman, Todd, and Schram, Sanford (eds.), Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, Ofelia, Fishman, Gella S., and Fishman, Joshua (eds.). 2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language: Cultural Autonomy and Fishmanian Sociolinguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter, Number 213.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1996. In Defence of Sociology: Essays, Interpretations and Rejoinders. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, and Powesland, Peter F.. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine, and Coupland, Nikolas (eds.). 1991. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans. 1998. Review of Singh, R. (ed.), 1996. Towards a Critical Sociolinguistics. Benjamins, John. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 30: 241–253.
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn 1992. What's Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrington, Austin (ed.). 2005. Modern Social Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2011. Paths to Postnationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Hazen, Kirk (eds.). 2014. Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1980/1996. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin, 269–293.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. (ed.), Regimes of Language. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, 35–84.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Machin, David. 2010. Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Machin, David. 2013. The Sociolinguistics of Space and Semiotic Landscapes. Semiotix (online edition, available at Semioticon.com).
Johnson, Sally, and Ensslin, Astrid (eds.). 2007. Language in the Media: Representations, Identities, Ideologies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. Normann, and Møller, Janus. 2014. Polylingualism and languaging. In Leung, Constant and Street, Brian V. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, 67–83.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2012. Role of language and place in language policy. In Chapelle, Carol A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford and New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2007. Socio-economic class. In Llamas, Carmen and Stockwell, Peter (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 51–61.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore, and Coupland, Nikolas (eds.). 2011. Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1935. World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina W. 2011. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory,. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai. 2015. Fighters, Girls and Other Identities: Sociolinguistics in a Martial Arts Club. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai, Karrebæk, Marha Sif, and Møller, Janus Spindler (eds.). 2015. Everyday Languaging: Collaborative Research on the Language Use of Children and Youth.
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. New York: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend and Deumert, Ana. 2009. Critical sociolinguistics: Approaches to language and power. In Mesthrie, Rajend, Swann, Joan, Deumert, Ana, and Leap, William L., Introducing Sociolinguistics,. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 309–342.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, and Gordon, Matthew. 2002. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation,. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, and Milroy, James. 1992. Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle. 2010. Has God gone global? Religion, language and globalization. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 323–345.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1998. Review of Singh 1996. Journal of Pragmatics 30, 6: 771–773.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1952. The Social System. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2010. Language as a Local Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2012. Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari, Kelly-Holmes, Helen, Jaffe, Alexandra, and Coupland, Nikolas. 2016. Sociolinguistics from the Periphery: Small Languages in New Circumstances.
Rampton, Ben. 2006. Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1994. Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F., and Caterino, Brian (eds.). 2006. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research and Method. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schutt, Russell K. 2014. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research,. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, P. R., Hanks, W. F., and Hofbauer, C. L. (eds.), The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society, 193–247.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra (ed.). 1996. Towards a Critical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1996. Critical theory and the legacy of twentieth-century Marxism. In Turner, Bryan S. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 53–82.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1996. Introduction. In Turner, B. S. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–19.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 2001. Metaculture: How Culture Moves through the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Glyn. 1992. Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wilson, William J., and Chadda, Anmol. 2009. The role of theory in ethnographic research. Ethnography 10, 4: 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2000. Does sociolinguistics need social theory? Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium, Bristol, 27 April.
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 2012. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2013. Community commitment and social responsibility. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change,. Malden, MA, and Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, 557–575.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×