Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T19:22:07.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Scouts, sappers, and miners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Michael K. Shepard
Affiliation:
Bloomsburg University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Forewarned is forearmed.

Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quixote

APOPHIS

On an otherwise quiet summer day in June 2004, a trio of astronomers (Roy Tucker, David Tholen, and Fabrizio Bernardi) discovered yet another near-Earth asteroid – an Aten – designated 2004 MN4. Astrometric observations were automatically entered into the Minor Planet Center's database in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which are uploaded daily to the NASA Sentry Program and the European Space Agency's NEODyS risk page. These are automated programs that plow through all asteroid observations, compute orbits, and look for potential collision threats in the future.

For asteroid 2004 MN4, both the Sentry and NEODyS programs flagged an April 13, 2029 close approach. Too close. As observations continued to accumulate throughout the rest of 2004, the probability of impact with the Earth on that date climbed. Two days before Christmas 2004, astronomers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory estimated the probability of a 2029 impact at nearly 3%. Based on its absolute magnitude, estimates for its size were in the 400 m range. An impact with an asteroid this big would be bad, not extinctionlevel bad, but certainly one of the greater environmental catastrophes to be suffered by civilization in recorded history.

Only four days later, precovery images of 2004 MN4, dating from March 2004, had been found. When incorporated into the orbital calculations, they effectively ruled out an impact in 2029. Arecibo radar observations made in late January 2005 definitively ruled out a collision in 2029, but placed its passage to be within the range of our orbiting geostationary satellites, some 30,000 km above the Earth's surface. The orbit was now known well enough for numbering and naming, and in July 2005, 2004 MN4 became known as 99942 Apophis, named for an early Egyptian god of destruction.

Continued analysis of the orbit showed that there was a slight chance that, during the 2029 encounter, Apophis would be deflected into an orbit that would collide with Earth in 2036, but additional radar observations in January 2013 – this time from Goldstone – definitively ruled this out.

Type
Chapter
Information
Asteroids
Relics of Ancient Time
, pp. 283 - 311
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asteroid Redirect Mission controversy: http://www.spacenews.com/article/civil-space/41466asteroid-mission-causes-big-stir-among-small-bodies-scientists
Asteroid redirect mission news: http://news.yahoo.com/incredible-technology-grab-asteroid-park-near-earth-105723196.html
Findings from SBAG 9, July 10–11, 2013: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/sbag/findings/index.shtml#sbag9
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/doc/palermo.html
Impact consequences: http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/
NEO groups: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/groups.html
NEO statistics: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/
Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI):. http://sservi.nasa. gov/
Torino Scale: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/torino_scale.html
Water on Mars with Phoenix: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/news/phoenix-20080620.html
ATLAS system: http://www.fallingstar.com/home.php
Canadian NEOSSat: http://neossat.ca/
Catalina Sky Survey: http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/css/
LINEAR: http://www.ll.mit.edu/mission/space/linear/
LSST: http://www.lsst.org/lsst/
NEOWISE: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/profile.cfm?Sort=Chron&StartYear=2010&EndYear=2019&MCode=WISE
Pan-STARRS: http://pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/public/home.html
SPACEWATCH: http://spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu/
Asteroid Redirect: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/asteroids/initiative/#. U9qyGvldV8E
NEOCAM: http://neocam.ipac.caltech.edu/
Sentinal program: https://b612foundation.org/
Deep Space Industries, Inc.: http://deepspaceindustries.com/
Planetary Resources: http://www.planetaryresources.com/
Minor Planet Center: http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/
NEODyS: http://newton.dm.unipi.it/neodys/
NEO Office and overview: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/asteroids/overview/index.html#.U9wHd_ldV8E
and http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/756164main_03-RL_June18_Rev3b.pdf
NEO Sentry Risk: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/
SENTRY: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/overview.cfm
JPL Small Body Browser: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi
NEOWISE study of numbers of PHAs: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php? release=2012-138
neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news146.html, news164.html
neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news148.html
neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news149.html
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-017)
D., Yeomans. Near-Earth Objects. Finding Them Before They Find Us (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Threats from Space: A Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and Mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II). Hearing before Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives. One hundred thirteenth Congress. First Session. Tues Mar 19, 2013 and Weds Apr 10, 2013. Serial No 113-14 and 113-17. (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013).
R. P., Binzel. The Torino impact hazard scale. Planet. Space Sci., 48 (2002) 297–303.Google Scholar
D. T., Britt, G. J., Consolmagno. Stony meteorite porosities and densities: A review of the data through 2001. Meteor. Planet. Sci., 38 (2003) 1161–1180.Google Scholar
D. T., Britt, D., Yeomans, K., Housen, G., Consolmagno. Asteroid density, porosity, and structure. In Asteroids III, eds. W., F. Bottke Jr., A., Cellino, P., Paolicchi, R. P., Binzel (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 2002), pp. 485–500.Google Scholar
H., Campins et al. Water ice and organics on the surface of the asteroid 24 Themis. Nature, 464 (2010) 1320–1321.Google Scholar
S. R., Chesley, P. W., Chodas, A., Milani, G. B., Valsecchi, D. K., Yeoman. Quantifying the risk posed by potential Earth impacts. Icarus, 159 (2002) 423–432.Google Scholar
J. B., Evans, F. C., Shelly, G. H., Stokes. Detection and discovery of near-Earth asteroids by the LINEAR Program. Lincoln Laboratory J., 14 (2003) 199–220.Google Scholar
A. W., Harris. The rotation rates of very small asteroids: Evidence for “Rubble Pile” structure. LPSC XXVII (1996) 493–494.
A. H., Harris, What Spaceguard did. Nature, 453 (2008) 1178–1179.Google Scholar
W. H., Hartmann, A., Sokolov. Evaluating space resources in the context of Earth impact hazards: Asteroid threat or asteroid opportunity. In Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids, ed. T., Gehrels (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1994), pp. 1213–1224.
Z., Ivezic et al. LSST Science Requirements Document, LPM-17 (2011). http://www.lsst.org/files/docs/SRD. pdf.
M. T., Mellon et al. Ground ice at the Phoenix Landing Site: Stability state and origin. J. Geophys. Res., 114 (2009) E00E07, doi: 10.1029/2009JE003417.Google Scholar
National Research Council of the National Academies. Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies. Final Report (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010).
O. P., Popova et al. Cheylabinsk airburst, damage assessment, meteorite recovery, and characterization. Science, 342 (2013) 1069–1073.Google Scholar
A. S., Rivkin, J. P., Emery. Detection of ice and organics on an asteroidal surface. Nature, 464 (2010) 1322–1323.Google Scholar
M. K., Shepard et al. A radar survey of M- and X-class asteroids II. Summary and synthesis. Icarus, 208 (2010) 221–237.Google Scholar
J. S., Stuart. A near-Earth asteroid population estimate from the LINEAR Survey. Science, 294 (2001) 1691–1693.Google Scholar
P. R., Weismann, W. F., Bottke, Jr., H. F., Levison. Evolution of comets into asteroids. In Asteroids III, eds. W., F. Bottke Jr., A., Cellino, P., Paolicchi, R. P., Binzel (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 2002), pp. 669–686.Google Scholar
D. K., Yeomans et al. Estimating the mass of asteroid 253 Mathilde from tracking data during the NEAR flyby. Science, 278 (1997) 2106–2109.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×