Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:07:42.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Imperial legacies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Alfred J. Rieber
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

The wars and revolutions of the first two decades of the twentieth century that destroyed imperial rule have long been treated by historians as a series of ruptures in modern European history. Borderlands broke away from the imperial centers of power. Some followed the siren calls of national self-determination; elsewhere local warlords took regional control. The dynastic idea was dead or dying. The logic and structures of long-established internal markets and networks of transportation and communication were disrupted. The imperial armies disintegrated and their officer corps dispersed; in many cases former comrades-in-arms faced one another across disputed borders. New men, often from the margins of society or the military, rose to power, promoting new ideologies, or radical versions of the old. In the immediate postwar years, the peoples of the borderlands appeared to have taken their revenge for decades or centuries of imperial rule.

Placing too much emphasis on rupture, however, means running the risk of underestimating the legacies of imperial rule and ignoring the persistent factors that confronted the new ruling elites of the successor states. In this chapter historical legacy is employed to mean those elements of institutional, ideological, and cultural structures and practices that survived the demise of imperial rule. They show up most clearly in the nature of leadership and patterns of policy making, as well as in the policies themselves. Legacy in historical context is different from its legalistic meaning as something bequeathed to a successor without manifesting any alteration in its essential features. Historical change being what it is, legacy cannot be the literal equivalent of sameness. Burdened with legacies of imperial rule, the successors could not inscribe their solutions to the problems posed by persistent factors on a clean slate.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Struggle for the Eurasian Borderlands
From the Rise of Early Modern Empires to the End of the First World War
, pp. 532 - 614
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gatrell, Peter, A Whole Empire Walking. Refugees in Russia during World War I (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1999), p. 3Google Scholar
Rogger, Hans, Jewish Policies and Right Wing Politics in Imperial Russia (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1986);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klier, John D. and Lambroza, Shlomo (eds.), Pogroms. Anti-Jewish Violence in Modern Russian History (Cambridge University Press, 1992)
Lohr, Eric, Nationalizing the Russian Empire. The Campaign against Enemy Aliens during World War I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Fuller, Jr. Willliam C., The Foe Within. Fantasies of Treason and the End of Imperial Russia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
von Hagen, Mark, War in a European Borderland. Occupations and Occupation Plans in Galicia and Ukraine, 1914–1918 (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2007), pp. 6–7Google Scholar
Cornwall, Mark, “Morale and Patriotism in the Austro-Hungarian Army,” in Horne, John (ed.), State, Society and Mobilization in Europe During the First World War (Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 176;Google Scholar
Rechter, David, “Galicia in Vienna. Jewish Refugees in the First World War,” Austrian History Yearbook 28 (1997): 113–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonyel, Salaki Ramsdan, The Ottoman Armenians. Victims of Great Power Diplomacy (London: K. Rustem, 1987)Google Scholar
Adanir, Fikret and Kaiser, Hilmar, “Migration, Deportation, and Nation-Building. The Case of the Ottoman Empire,” in Laboutte, René (ed.), Migrations et migrants dans une perspective historique. Permanences et innovations (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2000), pp. 281–84Google Scholar
Akçam, Taner, A Shameful Act. The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006);Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard G. (ed.), The Armenian Genocide in Perspective (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1986)
Hovannisian, Richard, Armenia on the Road to Independence 1918 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967), pp. 48–55;Google Scholar
Melson, Robert, Revolution and Genocide. On the Origins of the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust (University of Chicago Press, 1992);Google Scholar
Somakian, Manoug, Empires in Conflict. Armenia and the Great Powers, 1895–1920 (London: Tauris, 1995), pp. 93–94;Google Scholar
Dadian, Vahakn N., The History of the Armenian Genocide. Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia and the Caucasus (Providence, RI: Berghahn, 1995)Google Scholar
Reynolds, Michael A., Shattering Empires. The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1908–1918 (Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor, Looking Toward Ararat. Armenia in Modern History (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1993), pp. 106–15Google Scholar
Priedite, Aija, “Latvian Refugees and the Latvian Nation State during and after World War One,” in Baron, Nick and Gatrell, Peter (eds.), Homelands. War, Population, and Statehood in Eastern Europe and Russia, 1918–1924 (London: Anthem, 2004), pp. 35–53Google Scholar
Stevenson, David, Cataclysm. The First World War as Political Tragedy (New York: Basic Books, 2004), esp. pp. 104–17, 289–92Google Scholar
Bakhturina, A. Iu., Okrain rossiikskoi imperii. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i natsional’naia politika v gody pervoi mirovoi voiny (1914–1917 gg.) (Moscow: Rosspen, 2004)Google Scholar
Renzi, William A., “Who Composed ‘Sazonov’s Thirteen Points’? A Re-Examination of Russia’s War Aims of 1914,” American Historical Review 88(2) (April 1983): 347–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamov, E. A. (ed.), Konstantinopol i prolivy po sekretnym documentam. Ministerstva inostrannykh del (Moscow: Litizdat NKID, 1925), Doc. 15, p. 222
Linke, Horst Günther, Das Zarische Russland und der Erst Weltkrieg. Diplomatie und Kriegsziele, 1914–1917 (Munich: Fink Verlag, 1982)Google Scholar
Smith, C. Jay, The Russian Struggle for Power, 1914–1917. A Study of Russian Foreign Policy during the First World War (New York: Philosophical Library, 1956), pp. 46–48Google Scholar
Malone, Gifford D., “War Aims toward Germany,” in Russian Diplomacy and Eastern Europe, 1914–1917 (New York: Kings Crown Press, 1963), pp. 139–42Google Scholar
Corrigan, H. S. W., “German–Turkish Relations and the Outbreak of War in 1914. A Re-Assessment,” Past and Present 36 (April 1967): 144–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeekin, Sean, The Russian Origins of the First World War (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiukov, V. S., “Mirovaia voina politika Rossii v 1914–15 godakh,” in Ignat’ev, A. V. et al., Istoriia vneshnei politiki Rossii. Konets XIX–nachala XX veka (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 1997), pp. 463–79Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard, “The Allies and Armenia, 1915–18,” Journal of Contemporary History 3(1) (January 1968): 145–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamov, E. A. (ed.), Razdel Aziatskoi Turtsii po sekretnym dokumentam ministerstva inostrannykh del (Moscow: Ministerstvo inostrannykh del SSSR, 1924), pp. 157, 163–64
Sladkovskii, M. I., Istoriia torgovo-ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii s Kitaem (do 1917) (Moscow: Nauka, 1974), p. 347;Google Scholar
Lensen, George Alexander, “Japan and Russia. The Changing Relationships, 1875–1917,” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, New Series, 10(3) (October 1962): 345–47Google Scholar
Fischer, Fritz, Germany’s Aims in the First World War (New York: W. W. Norton, 1967), pp. 103–25, 231–36Google Scholar
Liulevicius, Vejas, War Land on the Eastern Front. Culture, National Identity and German Occupation in World War I (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammartino, Annemarie H., The Impossible Border. Germany and the East, 1914–1922 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010), esp. pp. 18–44Google Scholar
Vermes, Gabor, István Tisza. The Liberal Vision and Conservative Statecraft of a Magyar Nationalist (New York: East European Monographs, 1985), pp. 203, 212–13, 222–23, 229Google Scholar
Count Stephen Tisza, Prime Minister of Hungary. Letters (1914–1916), trans. de Bussy, Carvel (New York: Peter Lang, 1991), pp. 168–74Google Scholar
Rauchensteiner, Manfred, Der Tod des Doppeladlers. Österreich-Ungarn und der Erste Weltkrieg (Vienna: Verlag Styria, 1993), pp. 465–68Google Scholar
Crampton, Richard J., Bulgaria 1878–1918. A History (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1983), pp. 457–58Google Scholar
Wandycz, Piotr, The Lands of Partitioned Poland, 1795–1918 (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1974), p. 357Google Scholar
Wargelin, Clifford F., “A High Price for Bread. The First Treaty of Brest-Litovsk and the Break-up of Austria Hungary, 1917–1918,” International History Review 19(4) (November 1997): 767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Karl Friederich, Der Sturz der Mittelmächte (Munich: G. D. W. Callwey, 1921), p. 8Google Scholar
Kapp, Richard W., “Divided Loyalties. The German Reich and Austria-Hungary in Austro-German Discussions of War Aims, 1914–1916,” Central European History 17(2/3) (June–September 1984): 120–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conze, Werner, Polnische Nation und deutsche Politik in Ersten Weltkrieg (Cologne: Böhlau, 1958), p. 377Google Scholar
Aksakal, Mustafa, The Ottoman Road to War in 1914. The Ottoman Empire and the First World War (Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Michael, “Buffers, not Brethren. Young Turk Military Policy in the First World War and the Myth of Panturanism,” Past and Present 203 (May 2009): 137–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumpener, Ulrich, Germany and the Ottoman Empire, 1914–1918 (Princeton University Press, 1968), pp. 38–39, 113–22, 194–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferro, Marc, “La politique des nationalités du gouvernement provisoire (Février–Octobre 1917),” Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique 2(2) (April–June 1961): 131–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennan, George, Soviet–American Relations, vol. II: The Decision to Intervene (Princeton University Press, 1958);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Richard, Anglo-Soviet Relations, 1917–1921, 3 vols. (Princeton University Press, 1961–1972);Google Scholar
Morley, James, The Japanese Thrust into Siberia (New York: Columbia University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Dziewanowski, M. K., Joseph Piłsudski. A European Federalist, 1918–1922 (Stanford University Press, 1969), pp. 79–88Google Scholar
MacKinder, John Halford, Democratic Ideals and Reality. A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction (New York: Henry Holt, 1919), pp. 213, 200Google Scholar
Sanborn, Joshua, “Warlordism. Violence and Governance during the First World War and Civil War,” Contemporary European History 19(3) (August 2010): 195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieber, Alfred J., “Landed Property, State Authority, and Civil War,” Slavic Review 47(1) (Spring 1988): 31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riga, Lilian, “The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism. Rethinking the ‘Russian’ Revolutionary Elite,” American Journal of Sociology 114(3) (November 2008): 649–705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. Jay, Finland and the Russian Revolution (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1958);Google Scholar
Upton, Anthony, The Finnish Revolution 1917–18 (Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Ezergailis, Andrew, The 1917 Revolution in Latvia (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1974)Google Scholar
Kirby, David, The Baltic World, 1772–1993. Europe’s Northern Periphery in an Age of Change (London: Longman, 1995), p. 279Google Scholar
Senn, Alfred E., The Emergence of Modern Lithuania (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959)Google Scholar
Palij, Michael, The Ukrainian–Polish Defensive Alliance, 1919–1921. An Aspect of the Ukrainian Revolution (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1995), pp. 60–61Google Scholar
Krawchuk, Andrii, Christian Social Ethics in Ukraine. The Legacy of Andrei Sheptytsky (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1997);Google Scholar
Magocsi, Paul R. (ed.), Morality and Reality. The Life and Times of Andrei Sheptyts’kyi (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1989)
Kirimlı, Hakan, “Diplomatic Relations between the Ottoman Empire and the Ukrainian Democratic Republic, 1918–21,” Middle Eastern Studies 34(4) (October 1998): 202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipes, Richard, The Formation of the Soviet Union, rev. edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970), pp. 184–90Google Scholar
von Hagen, Mark, “The Russian Imperial Army and the Ukrainian National Movement in 1917,” Ukrainian Quarterly 54(3–4) (Fall–Winter 1998): 220–56Google Scholar
von Hagen, Mark, “‘I Love Russia, and/but I Want Ukraine,’ or How a Russian General became Hetman of the Ukrainian State, 1917–18,” Journal of Ukrainian Studies 29(1–2) (Summer–Winter 2004): 123–35Google Scholar
Hrytsak, Yaroslav, Narys istoriï Ukraiïny. Formuvannia modernoï ukraïns’koï natsiï XIX–XX stolittia (Kiev: Vyd-vo Heneza, 1996), pp. 127–34Google Scholar
Yekelchyk, Serhy, Ukraine. Birth of a Modern Nation (Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 79Google Scholar
Reshetar, Jr. John, The Ukrainian Revolution, 1917–1920 (Princeton University Press, 1952)Google Scholar
Gehrmann, Udo, “Germany and the Cossack Country,” Revolutionary Russia 5(2) (1992): 147–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holquist, Peter, Making War, Forging Revolution. Russia’s Continuum of Crisis, 1914–1921 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Krasnov, P. N., “Vsevelikoe voisko donskoe,” Arkhiv russkoi revoliutsii 5 (Berlin, 1922): 215Google Scholar
Kenez, Peter, Civil War in South Russia, 1919–1920 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1977), pp. 227–33, 240–44Google Scholar
Masaryk, T. G., The Making of a State. Memoirs and Observations, 1914–1918 (New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1927), pp. 86–87Google Scholar
Banac, Ivo, The National Question in Yugoslavia. Origins, History, Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), pp. 117–18, 124, 136Google Scholar
Djokić, Dejan, Pašić and Trumbić. The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (London: Haus, 2010), pp. 24, 33Google Scholar
Cornwall, Marc, “The Great War and the Yugoslav Grassroots. Popular Mobilization in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1914–18,” in Djokić, Dejan and Ker-Lindsay, James, New Perspectives on Yugoslavia. Key Issues and Controversies (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 27–45Google Scholar
Banac, Ivo, “South Slav Prisoners of War in Revolutionary Russia,” in Williamson, Samuel and Pastor, Peter (eds.), Essays on World War I. Origins and Prisoners of War (New York: Social Science Monographs, Brooklyn College Press, 1983), pp. 123–40Google Scholar
Mitrović, Andrej, Serbia’s Great War, 1914–1918 (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2007), pp. 167–69, 248–50, 260–61, 275, 303Google Scholar
Newman, John Paul, “Post-Imperial and Post-War Violence in the South Slav Lands, 1917–1923,” Contemporary European History 19(3) (August 2010): 251–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banac, Ivan, The National Question in Yugoslavia. Origins, History, Politics, corrected edn (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), pp. 115–40Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Edward James, Italy and the Yugoslavs (Boston, MA: Gorham Press, 1920)Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Christopher, Italy from Liberty to Fascism, 1870–1925 (London: Methuen, 1967), pp. 430, 581Google Scholar
Rachamimov, Alon, POWs and the Great War. Captivity on the Eastern Front (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 12–14, 32–33, 117, 124Google Scholar
Bradley, John F. N., The Czechoslovak Legion in Russia 1914–1920 (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1991)Google Scholar
Bullock, David, The Czech Legion 1914–1920 (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Sandor, Vincent, Carpatho-Ukraine in the Twentieth Century. A Political and Legal History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. 8–10Google Scholar
Miller, David, My Diary at the Conference of Paris, with Documents (New York: Appeal Printing, 1925), p. 227Google Scholar
Hitchens, Keith, Rumania, 1866–1947 (Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 271–79Google Scholar
Livezeanu, Irina, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995), pp. 52–59Google Scholar
Nagy, Zsuzsa L., “Peacemaking after World War I,” in Borsody, Stephen (ed.), The Hungarians. A Divided Nation (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988), p. 36.Google Scholar
Iordachi, Constantin, Citizenship, Nation and State Building. The Integration of Northern Dobrogea into Romania, 1873–1913, Carl Beck Papers, No. 1607 (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Center for Russian and East European Studies, 2002)Google Scholar
Illyés, Elemér, National Minorities in Romania. Change in Transylvania (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1982), pp. 22–23, 34–35, 56–57, 60–61Google Scholar
Carr, E. H., The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923, 3 vols. (New York: Macmillan, 1953), vol. III, pp. 72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowkes, F. B. M., “The Origins of Czechoslovak Communism,” in Banac, Ivo (ed.), The Effects of World War I. The Class War after the Great War: The Rise of Communist Parties in East Central Europe, 1918–1921 (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1983), pp. 58–60Google Scholar
Leidinger, Hannes’s articles in Zeitgeschichte 25 (1998): 333–42Google Scholar
Österreich, Verena Moritzin in Geschichte und Literatur 6 (1997): 385–403
Yanikdağ, Yücel, “Ottoman Prisoners of War in Russia, 1914–1922,” Journal of Contemporary History 34 (1999): 81Google Scholar
Hitchens, Keith, “The Russian Revolution and the Rumanian Socialist Movement, 1917–1918,” Slavic Review 27(2) (1968): 271–75Google Scholar
Swietochowski, Tadeusz, Russia and Azerbaizhan. A Borderland in Transition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 62–64Google Scholar
Mostashari, Firouzeh, On the Religious Frontier. Tsarist Russia and Islam in the Caucasus (London: Tauris, 2006), pp. 143–44Google Scholar
Lazarev, M. S., Kurdskii vopros (Moscow: Nauka, 1972)Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard, The Republic of Armenia, vol 1: The First Year, 1918–1919 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1971), p. 262Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald G., The Making of the Georgian Nation (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988), p. 187Google Scholar
Sef, S. E., Revoliutsiia 1917 goda v Zakavkazii. Dokumenty, materialy (Tiflis: Zakkniga, 1927), pp. 66–67Google Scholar
Brokgaus, F. A. and Efron, I. A. (eds.), Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’, vol. XVII (1896), p. 135
Erivan,” Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’, vol. XLI (1904), p. 14
Baberowski, Jörg, Der Feind ist überall. Stalinismus im Kaukasus (Munich: Deutsche Verlag-Anstadt, 2003), p. 138Google Scholar
Kazemzedeh, Firuz, The Struggle for Transcaucasia, 1917–1921 (New York: Philosophical Library, 1951), pp. 147–53, 157–62Google Scholar
Balaev, Aidyn, Azerbaizhanskoe national’noe dvizhenie v 1917–1918 (Baku: Elm, 1998)Google Scholar
Denikin, Anton Ivanovich, Ocherki russkoi smuty, 5 vols. (Paris: J. Povolozky, 1921–1924, vols. I, II, III)Google Scholar
Gökay, Bülent, A Clash of Empires. Turkey between Russian Bolshevism and British Imperialism, 1918–1923 (London: Tauris, 1997), pp. 81–88Google Scholar
Keddie, Nikki R., Qajar Iran and the Rise of Reza Khan, 1796–1925 (Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda, 1999), pp. 68–69Google Scholar
Chaqueri, Cosroe, The Soviet Socialist Republic of Iran, 1920–21. The Birth of the Trauma (Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press, 1994), pp. 88–89Google Scholar
Zirinsky, Michael P., “Imperial Power and Dictatorship. Britain and the Rise of Reza Shah, 1921–1926,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 24 (1992): 642–43Google Scholar
Reid, J. J., “Rebellion and Social Change,” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 13 (1981): 35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamian, Ervand, A History of Modern Iran (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 60–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Stephanie (ed.), “Reza Shah and the Paradoxes of Military Modernization in Iran, 1921–1941,” in The Making of Modern Iran. State and Society under Riza Shah, 1921–1941 (London: Routledge, 2003), pp. 37–64
Cronin, Stephanie, “Conscription and Popular Resistance in Iran, 1925–1941,” International Review of Social History 43(3) (December 1998): 451–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Vanessa, “Mudarris, Republicanism and the Rise to Power of Reza Khan, Sardar-I Sipah,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 21(2) (1994): 199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Jonathan, The Search for Modern China, 2nd edn (New York: W. W. Norton, 1999), pp. 305–6Google Scholar
Waldron, Arthur, “The Warlord,” American Historical Review 96(4) (October 1991): 1095–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Kung-chuan, A History of Chinese Political Thought, vol. 1: From the Beginnings to the Sixth Century A.D., trans. Mote, F. C. (Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Lary, Diana, “Warlord Studies,” Modern China 6 (October 1980): 439–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, Edward A., The Power of the Gun. The Emergence of Modern Chinese Warlordism (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Sheridan, James E., China in Disintegration. The Republican Era in Chinese History (New York: Free Press, 1975), pp. 98–101Google Scholar
Lee, Robert H. G., The Manchurian Frontier in Ch’ing History (Cambridge University Press, 1970), pp. 130–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, James and Tursun, Nabijan, “Political History and Strategies of Control, 1884–1978,” in Starr, S. Frederick (ed.), Xinjiang. China’s Muslim Borderland (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2004), pp. 68–71, quotation on p. 69Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, Pivot of Asia (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1950), pp. 52–69Google Scholar
Ewing, Thomas, “Russia, China, and the Origins of the Mongolian People’s Republic, 1911–1921,” Slavonic and East European Review 58 (July 1980): 409–13Google Scholar
Aziatskaia Rossiia, 3 vols. (St. Petersburg: A. F. Marks, 1914), vol. I, pp. 178–99, 383
Sergeev, O. I., Kazachestvo v russkom Dal’nem Vostoke v XVII–XIX vv (Moscow: Nauka, 1983)Google Scholar
Marks, Steven G., Road to Power. The Trans-Siberian Railroad and the Colonization of Asian Russia, 1850–1917 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), pp. 16–17Google Scholar
Svetachev, M. I., Imperialisticheskaia interventsiia v Sibirii i na Dal’nem Vostoke (1918–1922) (Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983), pp. 116, 179–80, 185–88, 200–4Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Imperial legacies
  • Alfred J. Rieber, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: The Struggle for the Eurasian Borderlands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337794.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Imperial legacies
  • Alfred J. Rieber, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: The Struggle for the Eurasian Borderlands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337794.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Imperial legacies
  • Alfred J. Rieber, University of Pennsylvania
  • Book: The Struggle for the Eurasian Borderlands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337794.007
Available formats
×