Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:14:59.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Religion in a liberal state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Gavin D'Costa
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Malcolm Evans
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Tariq Modood
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Julian Rivers
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

The role of religion in liberal societies raises deep questions about the moral basis and legitimacy of liberalism. This is because the legal and regulatory requirements of a liberal political order in many respects challenge religious practices and the ways in which religious beliefs are manifested. In the view of many religious people, it challenges their beliefs as well because of the internal connection between their beliefs and the way they seek to manifest and practise those beliefs. What is it that gives liberalism such authority and why are its beliefs and values so privileged?

The challenge, however, is not just to the basis of the authority of the liberal state, but also to religion within it and in particular whether a religion seeking a role in a liberal society can do so only if it is a liberalized form of that religion. If this is so, then it may be that being part of a liberal political order will have radical effects on the integrity of the beliefs held by those who espouse them by requiring that such beliefs should be held in a liberal way as a precondition of playing a part in the liberal order.

These are not just abstract, academic questions in normative jurisprudence and political philosophy but are also of current political importance and controversy. They have developed as an important part of the public agenda in Western societies at the moment. I give just a few examples of this:

  1. the debate in France about whether to ban the veil worn by Muslim women in public places – a law which has now been passed;

  2. debates in the UK arising out of the Equality Act 2010 about the rights of religious organizations to discriminate in recruitment in favour of those with sympathy for and in some cases belief in the doctrines and practices taught by that religion;

  3. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appiah, K. A. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aron, R. 1938. Introduction à la philosophie de l’histoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Audard, C. 2009. Qu’est-ce que le liberalisme?Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Barry, B. 1995. Justice and Impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1990. The Crooked Timber of Humanity, ed. Hardy, Henry and Murray, J.. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 2009. Enlightening, ed. Hardy, Henry and Holmes, Jennifer. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Burleigh, M. 2006. Sacred Causes. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. 1949. Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. 2002. Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. 1996. The Community of Rights. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. A. G. 2003. ‘The Brave New World of Sir John Laws’, Modern Law Review, 63, 159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Brieskorn, N., Reder, M., Ricken, F. and Schmidt, J. 2010. An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, S. 1999. Justice is Conflict. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Madison, J. 1961. ‘The Federalist X’, in Hamilton, A., Madison, J. and Jay, J., The Federalist. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1987. ‘Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16, 215–40.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plant, R. 2006. ‘Liberalism, Religion and the Public Sphere’, in Garnett, J., Grimley, M., Harris, A., Whyte, W. and Williams, S., eds., Redefining Christian Britain: Post 1945 Perspectives. London: SCM Press, 254–66.Google Scholar
Plant, R. 2009. The Neo-liberal State. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1995. Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1989. ‘The Contingency of a Liberal Community’, in Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press, 44–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1972. Le sursis. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. 1985. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Kennedy, E.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. 1998. Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Hoffmann, S.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stern, J. P. 1975. Hitler: The Führer and the People. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1985. ‘What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty?’, in Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Cambridge University Press, 211–29.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1981. Moral Luck. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 1999. ‘Introduction’, in I. Berlin, Concepts and Categories. London: Pimlico, xiii–xx.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×