Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T17:19:35.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography and references

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

R. S. Clymo
R. S. Clymo
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Reporting Research
A Biologist's Guide to Articles, Talks, and Posters
 , pp. 317 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alley, M 2003 The Craft of Scientific Presentations. Berlin, Springer. 241 pp.Google Scholar
Barrass, R 1978 Scientists Must Write. London, Chapman and Hall. 175 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, V 1993 Communicating in Science 2nd Edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 78 pp.Google Scholar
Cargill, M, O’Connor, P 2009 Writing Scientific Research Articles. Chichester, Wiley–Blackwell. 173 pp.Google Scholar
Day, RA 1998 How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper 5th Edn. Westport, Connecticut, Oryx. 275 pp.Google Scholar
Dawson, MM, Dawson, BA, Overfield, JA 2010 Communication Skills for Biosciences. Chichester, Wiley–Blackwell. 169 pp.Google Scholar
Divan, A 2009 Communication Skills for the Biosciences. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 270 pp.Google Scholar
†Gopen, G, Swan, J 1990 The science of scientific writing. American Scientist 78: 550–558Google Scholar
†*Gowers, E, revised Greenbaum, S, Whitcut, J 1986 The Complete Plain Words 3rd Edn. London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 288 pp.Google Scholar
*Fowler, HW, Fowler, FG 1906 The King’s English 2nd Edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 370 pp.Google Scholar
*Fowler, HW, revised Gowers, E 1968 A Dictionary of Modern English Usage 2nd Edn. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 725 pp.Google Scholar
Gustavii, B 2003 How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 141 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, GM (ed.) 2003 How to Write a Paper 3rd Edn. London, BMJ Publishing. 176 pp.Google Scholar
†Harmon, JE, Gross, AG 2011 The Craft of Scientific Communication. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press. 240 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, S, Scott, J 2009 Study and Communication Skills for the Biosciences. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 235 pp.Google Scholar
†Kirkman, J 1980 Good Style for Scientific and Engineering Writing. London, Pitman. 131 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, JR, Bowen, JM, Matthews, RW 2000 Successful Scientific Writing 2nd Edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 235 pp.Google Scholar
*Partridge, E 1990 Usage and Abusage 3rd Edn. London, Penguin Books. 219 pp.Google Scholar
Peat, J, Elliott, E, Baur, L, Keena, V 2002 Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How. London, BMJ Publishing. 292 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Strunk, W, White, EB 2000 The Elements of Style 4th Edn. Boston, Massachusetts, Allyn and Bacon. 105 pp.Google Scholar
Turabian, KL, revised Grossman, J, Bennett, A 1996 A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations 6th Edn. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press. 308 pp.Google Scholar
*Turk, C, Kirkman, J 1982 Effective Writing. London, Spon. 257 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
†*Williams, JM 1990 Style: Towards Clarity and Grace. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press. 208 pp.Google Scholar
Aarnio, P and 561 others 1989 Measurement of the mass and width of the Z0‑particle from multihadronic final states produced in e+e− annihilations. Physics Letters B 231: 539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aad, G and 2925 others 2008 The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Journal of Instrumentation 3: 1–407. Google Scholar
Adkins, CJ 1987 An Introduction to Thermal Physics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 134 pp.Google Scholar
Akaike, H 1973 Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory267–281. Ed Csaki, F. Budapest, Akadémiai KiadóGoogle Scholar
Alder, K 2002 The Measure of All Things. London, Little, Brown. 466 pp.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2002 Editorial: Reflections on scientific fraud. Nature, London 419: 417, 419–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2008 Editorial: Working double blind. Should there be anonymity in peer review?Nature, London 451: 605–606, correction 453: 711Google Scholar
Bayes, TR 1763 An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 53: 370–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, VW, Ioannidis, JPA 2004 The Decameron of poor research. British Medical Journal 329: 1436–1440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biagioli, M 2003 Rights or rewards? In Scientific Authorship253–279. Eds Biagioli, M, Galison, P. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Bohannon, J 2013 Who’s afraid of peer review?Science 342: 60–65. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, V 1993 Communicating in Science 2nd Edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 78 pp.Google Scholar
Broad, W, Wade, N 1982 Betrayers of the Truth. London, Century Publishing. 256 pp.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution 2005 BS 5261-2: Copy Preparation and Proof Correction. Part 2. Specification for Typographic Requirements, Marks for Copy Preparation and Proof Correction, Proofing Procedure. London, British Standards Institution. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Buck, CE, Cavanagh, WG, Litton, CD 1996 Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Chichester, Wiley. 382 pp.Google Scholar
Bulley, M 2006 Clunky writing is proof positive of lazy thinking. The Times Higher Education Supplement. 2 June: 14
Bulmer, MG 1965 Principles of Statistics. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd. 214 pp.Google Scholar
Chicago University Press 2010 The Chicago Manual of Style: The Essential Guide for Writers, Editors, and Publishers 16th Edn. Chicago, Illinois, Chicago University Press. 1026 pp.Google Scholar
Cleveland, WS 1994 The Elements of Graphing Data. Summit, New Jersey, Hobart Press. 297 pp.Google Scholar
Cleveland, WS, McGill, R 1985 Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science 229: 828–833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, F 1990 Too Hot to Handle: The Story of the Race for Cold Fusion. London, WH Allen. 376 pp.Google Scholar
Clymo, RS 1995 Nutrients and limiting factors. Hydrobiologia 315: 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clymo, RS 2012 How many digits in a mean are worth reporting?ArXiv:1301.0170Google Scholar
Clymo, RS, Williams, MMR 2012 Diffusion of gases dissolved in peat pore water. Mires and Peat 10(6): 1–10Google Scholar
Colquhoun, D 2007 How to get good science. Physiology News 69: 12–14Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S 1998 The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 242 pp.Google Scholar
Copeland, BJ (ed.) 2006 Colossus. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 462 pp.Google Scholar
Darwin, C 1859 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London, John Murray. 498 pp.Google Scholar
Deichmann, U, Müller-Hill, B 1998 The fraud of Aberhalden’s enzymes. Nature, London 393: 109–111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delamothe, T, Smith, R 2004 OA publishing takes off. British Medical Journal 328: 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C 1938 Dr. O. Uplavici (1887–1938). Parasitology 30: 239–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, F 2004 A meeting with Enrico Fermi. Nature, London 2004 427: 297. ; with permission from Macmillan Publishers, (c) 2004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, FC, Steen, RG, Casadevall, A 2012 Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 247: 17028–17033. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farman, JC, Gardiner, BG, Shanklin, JD 1985 Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO/NO. Nature, London 315: 207–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, RP, Leighton, RB, Sands, M 1963 Chapter 22 (10 pp): Algebra. Lectures on Physics: Vol. 1: Mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat. Reading, Massachusetts, Addison–Wesley. 535 pp.Google Scholar
Fowler, HW, Fowler, FG 1906 The King’s English 2nd Edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 370 pp.Google Scholar
Fowler, HW, revised Gowers, E 1968 A Dictionary of Modern English Usage 2nd Edn. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 725 pp.Google Scholar
Frankel, F 2002 Envisioning Science: The Design and Craft of the Science Image. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press. 335 pp.Google Scholar
Fugh–Berman, AJ 2010 The haunting of medical Journals: how ghostwriting sold “HRT”. PloS (Public Library of Science) Medicine 7: e1000335. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galison, P 2003 The collective author. In Scientific Authorship324–355. Eds Biagioli, M, Galison, P. New York & London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardner, M 1981 Science. Good, Bad and Bogus. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 412 pp.Google Scholar
Garfield, S 2010 Just My Type. London, Profile Books. 352 pp.Google Scholar
Godlee, F, Jefferson, T (eds) 1999 Peer Review in Health Sciences. London, BMJ Books. 271 pp.Google Scholar
Gordon, JE 1968 The New Science of Strong Materials. London, Penguin Books. 269 pp.Google Scholar
Gould, SJ 1989 Wonderful Life. New York & London, Norton. 347 pp.Google Scholar
Gowans, CS 1976 Publications by Franz Moewus on the genetics of algae 310–332. In The Genetics of Algae Ed Lewin, RA. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Gowers, E, revised Greenbaum, S, Whitcut, J 1986 The Complete Plain Words 3rd Edn. London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. 288 pp.Google Scholar
Gratzer, W 2000 The Undergrowth of Science. Delusion, Self-deception, and Human Frailty. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 328 pp.Google Scholar
Grime, JP, Thompson, K, Hunt, R and 32 others 1997 Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation. Oikos 79: 259–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberg, F (undated) Bibliography 1946–1985. Minneapolis, Minnesota, Lyon Laboratories. 75 pp.
Hamming, R 1986 You and Your Research: Lecture at Bell Research Labs Colloquium. <> (6 Sept. 2013)
Hirsch, JE 2005 An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 16569–16572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, R 1988 Under the surface of the chemical article. Angewandte Chemie 27: 1593–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, M-K, Bero, LA 2002 How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. British Medical Journal 325: 1413–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, DH 2009 The way biomedical research is organised has dramatically changed over the past half-century: are the changes for the better?Neuron 64: 161–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R 1991 Trying an authorship index. Nature, London 352: 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, JPA 2005 Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2(8) e124. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) 2007 Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 996 pp.Google Scholar
Jacks, GV 1961 The summary. Soils and Fertilizers 24: 409–410Google Scholar
Johns, A 2003 The ambivalence of authorship in early modern Natural Philosophy. In Scientific Authorship67–90. Eds Biagioli, M, Galison, P. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, RV 1978 Most Secret War. British Scientific Intelligence 1939–1945. London, Hamish Hamilton. 556 pp.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 2002 Editorial: Next steps in the Schön affair. Science 298: 495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkman, J 1980 Good Style for Scientific and Engineering Writing. London, Pitman. 131 pp.Google Scholar
Knell, R 2013 Introductory R: A Beginner’s Guide to Data Visualisation and Analysis in R. Privately published by R. Knell. Available in e-book format.Google Scholar
Larivière, V, Archambault, É, Gingras, Y, Wallace, M 2008 The fall of uncitedness. Book of Abstracts of the 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators 279–282.
Lawrence, PA 2007 The mismeasurement of science. Current Biology 17(15): R583–R585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Läärä, E 2009 Statistics: reasoning on uncertainty, and the insignificance of testing null. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46: 138–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, S 1996 Fraud and the editor. In Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research 2nd Edn 240–256. Eds Lock, S, Wells, F. London, BMA Publishing.Google ScholarPubMed
Lock, S, Wells, F (eds) 1996 Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research 2nd Edn. London, BMA Publishing. 293 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Lozano, GA, Lariviere, V, Gingras, Y 2012 The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. ArXiv:1205.4328
Lundh, A, Hróbjartsson, A, Gøtzsche, PC 2012 Income from reprints creates a conflict of interests. British Medical Journal 245: 25.Google Scholar
Maddox, B 2002 Rosalind Franklin. The Dark Lady of DNA. London, HarperCollins. 380 pp.Google Scholar
Malmer, N 1997 Editorial. Oikos 77: 377Google Scholar
Margolis, HS, Barwood, GP, Huang, G, Klein, HA, Lea, SN, Szymaniec, K, Gill, P 2004 Hertz-level measurement of the optical clock frequency in a single 88Sr+ ion. Science 306: 1355–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, BS 1971 Units, Dimensional Analysis, and Physical Similarity. London, Van Nostrand Reinhold. 140 pp.Google Scholar
Mauas, PJD, Flamenco, E, Buccino, AP 2008 Solar forcing of the stream flow of a continental scale South American river. Physical Review Letters 101: 168501 1–3. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, MA 2007 Bayesian Methods for Ecology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 295 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlashan, ML 1971 Physico-Chemical Quantities and Units. Monographs for Teachers No. 15. London, Royal Institute of Chemistry. 117 pp.Google Scholar
Medawar, PB 1963 Is the scientific paper a fraud?The Listener 70: 377–378Google Scholar
Medawar, PB 1969 Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought. I. The Problem Stated. Jayne Lectures for 1968. London, Methuen. 76 pp.Google Scholar
Motulsky, H, Christopoulos, A 2004 Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 351 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, A 2010 WWDD (What would Darwin do?). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, Noorden R 2013 Brazilian citation scheme outed. Nature, London 500: 510–511. Google Scholar
Orwell, G 1946 Politics and the English Language. Horizon 13: 252–265Google Scholar
Park, R 2000 Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 230 pp.Google Scholar
Peat, J, Elliott, E, Baur, L, Keena, V 2002 Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How. London, BMJ Publishing. 292 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S 1994 The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. London, Penguin Books. 494 pp.Google Scholar
Press, WH, Flannery, BP, Teukolsky, SA, Vetterling, WT 1989 Numerical Recipes in PASCAL. The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 759 pp. [Published in FORTRAN, C, and C++ flavours too.]Google Scholar
Reich, ES 2009 The rise and fall of a physics fraudster. Physics World 22: 24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennie, D 1999 Misconduct and journal peer review. In Peer Review in Health Sciences90–99. Eds Godlee, F, Jefferson, T. London, BMJ Books.Google Scholar
Ritter, RM 2002 The Oxford Guide to Style. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 623 pp.Google Scholar
Roget, PM, revised Dutch, RA 1962 Thesaurus. London, Longman. 1309 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, JS, Hill, KP, Egilman, DS, Krumholz, HM 2008 Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib. Journal of the American Medical Association 299:1800–1812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossner, M, Yamada, KM 2004 What’s in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation. Journal of Cell Biology 166: 11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seglen, PO 1997 Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314: 498–502.
Smith, GCS, Pell, JP 2003 Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal 327: 1459–1461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, A, Bricmont, J 1998 Fashionable Nonsense. Postmodern Intellectuals = Abuse of Science. New York, Picador. 300 pp.Google Scholar
Sondheimer, E, Rogerson, A 1981 Numbers and Infinity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 172 pp.Google Scholar
Sprent, P 1969 Models in Regression and Related Topics. London, Methuen. 173 pp.Google Scholar
Strunk, W, White, EB 2000 The Elements of Style 4th Edn. Boston, Massachusetts, Allyn and Bacon. 105 pp.Google Scholar
Student, A 1908 The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Style Manual Committee, Council of Science Editors 2006 Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers 7th Edn. Reston, Virginia, CSE. 658 pp.Google Scholar
Topol, E and 975 others 1993 An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 329: 673–682Google Scholar
Truss, L 2003. Eats, Shoots & Leaves. London, Profile Books. 209 pp.Google Scholar
Tufte, ER 1986 The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Connecticut, Graphics Press. 197 pp.Google Scholar
Tufte, ER 1990 Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Connecticut, Graphics Press. 126 pp.Google Scholar
Velleman, PF, Hoaglin, DC 1981 Applications, Basics and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis. Boston, Massachusetts, Duxbury Press. 345 pp.Google Scholar
Venables, WN, Smith, DM, the R Development Core Team 2009 An Introduction to R 2nd Edn. (no place of publication), Network Theory. 137 pp.Google Scholar
Waterston, RH and 221 others 2002 Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature, London 420: 520–562Google ScholarPubMed
Wallace, ML, Larivière, V, Gingras, Y 2009 Modelling a century of citation distributions. Journal of Informatics 3: 269–303Google Scholar
Watson, JD, Crick, FHC 1953 A structure for deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature, London 171: 964–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, JD 1968 The Double Helix. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson. 226 pp.Google Scholar
Webb, T 2008 A bluffers guide to bibliometrics – or, how should we measure science. Bulletin of the British Ecological Society 39(3): 11–14Google Scholar
Webster, R 1997 Regression and functional relations. European Journal of Soil Science 48: 557–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R 2001 Statistics to support soil research and their presentation. European Journal of Soil Science 52: 331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R 2002 Analysis of variance, inference, multiple comparisons and sampling effects in soil research. European Journal of Soil Research 58: 74–82Google Scholar
Webster, R 2003 Let’s re-write the scientific paper. European Journal of Soil Science 54: 215–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieser-Jeunesse, C, Matt, D, De Cian, A 1998 Directed positioning of organometallic fragments inside a calix(4)arene cavity. Angewandte Chemie International Edition English 37: 2861–28643.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worlock, K 2013 <> (6 Sept. 2013)
Young, PA 1949 Personal error in penicillin assay. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy 4: 366–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography and references
  • R. S. Clymo, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Reporting Research
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107284234.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography and references
  • R. S. Clymo, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Reporting Research
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107284234.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography and references
  • R. S. Clymo, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Reporting Research
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107284234.016
Available formats
×