Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Sign languages in the world
- 3 Sign languages in contact
- 4 Variation and change in sign languages
- 5 Discourse analysis and sign languages
- 6 Language policy and planning in Deaf communities
- 7 Language attitudes in Deaf communities
- Index
- References
4 - Variation and change in sign languages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Sign languages in the world
- 3 Sign languages in contact
- 4 Variation and change in sign languages
- 5 Discourse analysis and sign languages
- 6 Language policy and planning in Deaf communities
- 7 Language attitudes in Deaf communities
- Index
- References
Summary
All human languages vary in both time and space as well as according to the linguistic environment in which a particular form is used. For example, the ASL sign DEAF has three main forms. It can be produced with a movement from ear to chin (the citation or dictionary form), from chin to ear or by contacting the check once (both non-citation forms). Even though the form of DEAF varies from signer to signer, and even within the signing of the same signer, the variation we observe is not random. Rather, signers’ choices among the three forms of DEAF are systematically constrained by a range of linguistic and social influences, or factors. For example, compared to signers in other parts of the United States, signers in Boston, Massachusetts use the citation form of DEAF more often. In contrast, signers in Kansas, Missouri, and Virginia tend to prefer non-citation forms. Indeed, a study of variation in the sign DEAF showed that signers in these states used non-citation forms of DEAF 85 percent of the time, more than twice the rate of signers in Boston (Bayley, Lucas, and Rose 2000: 92).
The region of the country where a signer lives is not the only influence on the choice of a form of DEAF. For example, although ASL signers in Boston generally used more citation forms of DEAF than signers in other areas of the United States, Boston signers aged 55 and older are far less likely to choose a non-citation form of DEAF than are younger signers. Bayley et al. (2000) reported that Boston signers aged 55 and older used the citation form of DEAF 76 percent of the time. In contrast, signers between the ages of 26 and 55 used the citation form 54 percent of the time, and signers between the ages of 14 and 26 used the citation form only 46 percent of the time. In addition, variation can be affected by linguistic factors. To continue with the example of DEAF, Lucas (1995) and Bayley et al. (2000) found that signers were very likely to use a non-citation form of DEAF when it was part of a compound, as in DEAF^CULTURE or DEAF^WORLD. However, when DEAF was a predicate adjective, as in PRO.1 DEAF (‘I am deaf’), signers were more likely to choose the citation form.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities , pp. 61 - 94Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, , and (1975) A good rule of thumb: Variable phonology in American Sign Language. In and (eds.), Analyzing Variation in Language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) The quantitative paradigm. In and (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn (pp. 85–107). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
, , and (2000) Variation in American Sign Language: The case of DEAF. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (1993) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2009) Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85: 278–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1974) Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50: 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965) Appendix D: Sign language dialects. In , , and , A Dictionary of American Sign Language (pp. 313–319). Silver Spring, MD: Linstok.Google Scholar
(2000) Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, , , and (2013) Variation in handshape and orientation in British Sign Language: The case of the “1” hand configuration. Language and Communication 33: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2010) Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In (ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 499–518). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A bend in the road: Subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish after 30 years of sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 624–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and (2011) The LIS corpus project: A discussion of sociolinguistic variation in the lexicon. Sign Language Studies 11: 328–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011) Chi, cosa, dove, perché e quando: la distribuzione dei segni wh- in LIS. In , , and (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e deimensioni di variazione nella LIS (pp. 127–144). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2015) Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh-signs. Linguistics 53: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) Another piece for the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11: 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2013) Quantitative analysis. In , , and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1980) Variation in the group and in the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space (pp. 1–36). New York: Academic. Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Quantitative analysis. In (ed.), American Dialect Research (pp. 223–249). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995) On the choice of relative pronouns in English. American Speech 70: 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) A preliminary examination of pink extension: Suggestions regarding its constraints, occurrence and function. In (ed.), Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
and (2002) Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(3): 103–116.Google Scholar
(2009) Getting off the Goldvarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effect variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1969) Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45: 715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989) American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 195–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Sociolinguistic variation in ASL: The case of DEAF. In (ed.), Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities (vol. I, pp. 3–25). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1996) Multicultural Aspects of Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
(2007) Variation and modality. In and (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods, and Applications (pp. 145–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Methods for studying sign languages. In , , and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 280–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005) Variation in ASL: The role of grammatical function. Sign Language Studies 6: 38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2010) Variation in ASL. In (ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 451–475). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011) Variation in sign languages: Recent research on ASL and beyond. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2013) The incorporation of African American English into Black ASL. International Journal of Bilingualism.
, , , and (2001) Lexical variation in African American and white American Sign Language. American Speech 76: 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2002) Location variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 2: 407–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001) Sociolinguistic Variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2001) Sociolinguistic variation. In (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages (pp. 61–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007) Variation in ASL: Two hands or one? Paper presented at the Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation 36, University of Pennsylvania.
, , , , and (2013) The effect of new technologies on sign language research. Sign Language Studies 13: 541–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1992) Language Contact in the American Deaf Community. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (2011) The Hidden Treasure of Black ASL: Its History and Structure. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (2011) Variable subject expression in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23: 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2012) Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
, , and (2012) “You want WHAT on your pizza?!”: Videophone and video relay service as potential forces on lexical standardization of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 12: 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1998) Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (1996) Sociolinguistic factors in sign language research. In , , , , and (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory and Analysis (pp. 229–240). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
(1980) “Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish and termino en español”: Towards a typology of code-switching. Linguistics 18: 581–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Sign language contact and interference: ASL and LSM. Language in Society 37: 161–187.Google Scholar
(2014) Sociolinguistic statistics: The intersection between statistical models, empirical data, and sociolinguistic theory. In , , and (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIV: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (pp. 261–275). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
, , and (2005) Goldvarb X: A Variable Rule Application for Macintosh and Windows [computer program]. Toronto and Ottawa: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2010) Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian, and New Zealand sign languages. In (ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 476–498). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2013) Building the British Sign Language Corpus. Language Documentation and Conservation 7: 136–154.Google Scholar
and (2013) Sociolinguistic variation and change in sign languages. In , , and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 503–522). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , , , , and (2009) Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 21: 193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1968) Field Techniques in an Urban Dialect Study. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2011) Lexical variation and change in British Sign Language (BSL): Evidence for dialect levelling? Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE), Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Germany.
(1960) Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication System of the American Deaf. Occasional Paper Number 8. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
(2006) Analysing Sociological Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19: 101–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974) The Social Stratification of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1969) A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1989) Structural variability in language development: Final nasals in vernacular Black English. In and (eds.), Language Change and Variation (pp. 301–332). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Identifying and interpreting linguistic variables. In (ed.), American Dialect Research (pp. 193–221). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Dialect in society. In (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 107–126). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, , , and (2002) Variable subject presence in ASL narratives. Sign Language Studies 3: 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by