Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:54:41.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Macroeconomic Impact of Public Sector Enterprises: Some Further Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

R. Nagaraj
Affiliation:
Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research
Get access

Summary

Public sector enterprises (PSEs) have been getting a bad press these days. They are widely perceived as an important reason for the increasing fiscal imbalance in recent years and for the widespread, and allegedly growing, inefficiencies in the non-farm sectors of the economy. A gradual reduction in the role of the public sector, especially in the sphere of production, is, therefore, widely perceived to be an integral element in the policy reform to restore sustainable – if lower, but consistent with the economy's real resources – economic growth.

In the context of the recent stabilization efforts and structural adjustment in India, the Statement of Industrial Policy (24 July 1991) stated: ‘Public enterprises have shown a very low rate of return on capital invested. This has inhibited their ability to regenerate themselves in terms of new investment as well as in technology. The result is that many of the public enterprises have become a burden rather than being an asset to the Government’ (emphasis added).

The ‘Programme for Structural Reform’ submitted to the IMF on 11 November 1991 to secure its financial assistance for the ongoing reform process stated:

India's severely constrained budgetary circumstances create both the need and opportunity for rationalising the scope of public sector activity, and for placing greater reliance on the private sector for resource mobilisation and investment. Public enterprises have absorbed large amounts of budgetary support for their expansion or operations, but in many cases they have failed to generate adequate returns on the investment of public money and contributed significantly to the public sector saving gap and fiscal deficit.

(Reproduced in Reserve Bank of India Bulletin, April 1992, p. 789, emphasis added.)
Type
Chapter
Information
Two Decades of Market Reform in India
Some Dissenting Views
, pp. 187 - 196
Publisher: Anthem Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×