Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:15:40.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - European human rights case law and the rights of homosexuals, foreigners and immigrants in Austria

from Part II - LEGAL MOBILISATION AND THE POLITICAL CONTEXT OF IMPLEMENTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Kerstin Buchinger
Affiliation:
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute
Barbara Liegl
Affiliation:
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute
Astrid Steinkellner
Affiliation:
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute
Get access

Summary

After regaining its full sovereignty through the Austrian State Treaty in 1955, Austria joined the Council of Europe (CoE) as its fifteenth member state on 16 April 1956. Accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR or the Convention) was politically undisputed and perceived as a mere act of European solidarity. Both the government and the judiciary were of the opinion that fundamental rights were already sufficiently guaranteed within the domestic legal order. Therefore, the ratification of the Convention was not considered to have any substantial consequences. It came as a surprise when soon afterwards, a relatively large number of applications were lodged against Austria before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or the Court).

Austria was the first state to fully incorporate the ECHR into its constitutional legal order. This created a high level of awareness of the legal and practical implications of the Convention within Austrian society, as well as the influence exerted by the Strasbourg Court. From 1985 to 2007 about ninety decisions and judgments of the ECtHR were issued against Austria that pertained to the core civil and political rights of members of marginalised groups, including foreigners, ethnic or religious minorities and homosexuals. These comprised rulings on Articles 8 to 11 and 14 of the ECHR as well as judgments on the rights of the abovementioned groups under the other provisions of the Convention.

Type
Chapter
Information
The European Court of Human Rights
Implementing Strasbourg's Judgments on Domestic Policy
, pp. 97 - 121
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×