Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T08:56:35.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Conversion or Conversation? A Note on Plato's Philosophical Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Timothy Chappell
Affiliation:
Open University
Douglas Cairns
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Fritz-Gregor Herrmann
Affiliation:
University of Wales Swansea
Terrence Penner
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access

Summary

Plato scholarship often tends to lead us in the direction of a very general choice about the nature of philosophical inquiry. The choice – which can emerge, for example, from thinking about the contrasts between the Republic and the Euthydemus – is one between two very different conceptions of what should be the product of the best philosophical activity: a choice, as we might crudely put it, between conversion and conversation.

No one (Richard Rorty and some other postmodernists possibly excepted) will deny that philosophy aims at the prizes of truth, understanding and wisdom. But there is a choice between conceptions of these ideals – a choice which not just the student of Plato, but anyone who wants to do philosophy, will apparently need to make.

The Phaedrus, the Phaedo, the Symposium, the Meno (at times) and above all, of course, the Republic present the conversional conception of the aim of philosophy. Republic 518C–D, for instance, is a passage that might have created the very concept of conversion:

‘But what our present argument shows,’ I said, ‘is that this inherent power in the soul of each of us, this instrument by means of which each of us learns, is like an eye that cannot turn from the darkness to light unless the whole body turns as well. In just that way, our power of understanding, and the entire soul with it, must have its whole scene shifted (periakteon einai, a studiedly theatrical image), to the point where the understanding becomes able steadily to contemplate Being and the utmost radiance of Being (tou ontos to phanotaton); and this, we say, is The Good.’

Type
Chapter
Information
Pursuing the Good
Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic
, pp. 320 - 327
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×