Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T01:44:29.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Ultrasound imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

R. Nick Bryan
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Ultrasound (US) consists of high-frequency sound waves that are above the range of human hearing, at frequencies higher than 20 kHz. Medical ultrasound imaging is performed at much higher frequencies, typically in the MHz range. Ultrasound differs from other conventional imaging methods in important ways. First, unlike electromagnetic radiation, ultrasound waves are non-ionizing pressure waves. Second, the ultrasound signal is recorded in the reflection mode rather than the transmission mode used for x-ray and CT imaging. In ultrasound imaging, the imaged structures are not the sources that emit radiation. Instead, the sample is imaged by applying external acoustic energy to it. A “pulse echo” technique is used to create an image from longitudinal mechanical waves that interact with tissues of the body. The applied energy is reflected to the source by tissue inhomogeneities. The resulting signals carry information about their source as well as about the sample. Decoding these signals into an image requires separating the detected signal components due to the external source from those due to the sample.

Medical ultrasound imaging systems typically incorporate a piezoelectric crystal as the external signal source. This crystal vibrates in response to an oscillating electric current, producing longitudinal mechanical waves. The ultrasound signal propagates linearly through various media, including water and soft tissue, at an average speed of 1540 m/s, but does not propagate satisfactorily through bone or air. As a result, ultrasound is most suited for imaging soft tissues.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bushberg, JT, Seibert, JA, Leidholdt, EM, Boone, JM.Ultrasound. In: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002: 469–553.Google Scholar
Sehgal, CM.Physical principles and clinical applications of Doppler echography. In: John Sutton, MG, Oldershaw, PJ, Kotler, MN, eds. Textbook of Echocardiography and Doppler in Adults and Children, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996: 3–30.Google Scholar
,American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Consensus Report on Potential Bioeffects of Diagnostic Ultrasound. Executive summary and associated articles. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 503–632.Google Scholar
Lindner, JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004; 3: 527–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, AKW, Bunte, RM, Cohen, JD, et al. The antivascular action of physiotherapy ultrasound on a murine tumor: role of a microbubble contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 1901–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, WA, Blume, JD, Cormack, JB, Mendelson, EB, Madsen, EL. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology 2006; 239: 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) AJRAm J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phoon, CK. Imaging tools for the developmental biologist: ultrasound biomicroscopy of mouse embryonic development. Pediatr Res 2006; 60: 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, RD, Liang, HY, Shetty, R, Abraham, T, Wagner, KR.Myostatin does not regulate cardiac hypertrophy or fibrosis. Neuromuscul Disord 2007; 17: 290–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wirtzfeld, , Graham, KC, Groom, AC, et al. Volume measurement variability in three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound images of murine liver metastasis. Phys Med Biol 2006; 56: 2367–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×