Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T00:02:20.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The benefits for developing countries of accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement: the case of Chinese Taipei

from PART II - Expanding the scope of the Agreement on Government Procurement: accession and coverage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Chang-Fa Lo
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University
Sue Arrowsmith
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Robert D. Anderson
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Introduction

On 9 December 2008, the World Trade Organization (WTO) Committee on Government Procurement adopted the accession of the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (Chinese Taipei) to the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA). After completing the relevant domestic legislative procedures, Chinese Taipei delivered its accession document to the WTO in June 2009 and formally became the forty-first signatory to the GPA on 15 July 2009.

Accession to the GPA could be a difficult decision for many developing countries. This is mainly due to the fear that the accession could lead to economic losses in their countries and negatively affect the development of their industries. Many developing countries might have reservations about whether there will be recognizable benefit to gain. Chinese Taipei faced similar difficulties when it had to make a decision about participating in the GPA.

However, looking back on the decision, it must be said that the decision to accede to the GPA was the right one for Chinese Taipei. Although it is not easy to quantify the economic gains arising from the accession to the GPA comprehensively, speaking generally, it could be fairly argued that the accession has been beneficial to Chinese Taipei from many perspectives.

This chapter will examine the factors contributing to Chinese Taipei's accession to the GPA, the commitments made by Chinese Taipei under the GPA, and the qualitative benefits to Chinese Taipei as a result of its accession.

Type
Chapter
Information
The WTO Regime on Government Procurement
Challenge and Reform
, pp. 140 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×