Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributor List
- Foreword by Herman E. Daly
- Foreword by Jan Szargut
- Preface
- Introduction
- PART I FOUNDATIONS
- PART II PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES
- 4 Materials Separation and Recycling
- 5 An Entropy-Based Metric for a Transformational Technology Development
- 6 Thermodynamic Analysis of Resources Used in Manufacturing Processes
- 7 Ultrapurity and Energy Use: Case Study of Semiconductor Manufacturing
- 8 Energy Resources and Use: The Present Situation, Possible Sustainable Paths to the Future, and the Thermodynamic Perspective
- PART III LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS AND METRICS
- PART IV ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, SOCIAL SYSTEMS, INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS, AND ECOSYSTEMS
- Appendix: Standard Chemical Exergy
- Index
- References
5 - An Entropy-Based Metric for a Transformational Technology Development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributor List
- Foreword by Herman E. Daly
- Foreword by Jan Szargut
- Preface
- Introduction
- PART I FOUNDATIONS
- PART II PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES
- 4 Materials Separation and Recycling
- 5 An Entropy-Based Metric for a Transformational Technology Development
- 6 Thermodynamic Analysis of Resources Used in Manufacturing Processes
- 7 Ultrapurity and Energy Use: Case Study of Semiconductor Manufacturing
- 8 Energy Resources and Use: The Present Situation, Possible Sustainable Paths to the Future, and the Thermodynamic Perspective
- PART III LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS AND METRICS
- PART IV ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, SOCIAL SYSTEMS, INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS, AND ECOSYSTEMS
- Appendix: Standard Chemical Exergy
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Discussion about sustainable development should start with a rigorous definition of what sustainability is in the context of utilization of natural, human, and manufactured resources. A necessary next step in implementing any such definition should be a selection of metrics for measuring a departure of a given system from sustainability thus defined. However, two main interrelated weaknesses of most efforts devoted to formulating definitions and establishing sustainability metrics have been quite visible. First, sustainability is often defined in only a somewhat qualitative manner across several disciplines, and, second, as a consequence, too many and too diverse sets of proposed metrics have been introduced – without any consensus among the proposers. Thus proclaiming a sustainable development analysis as a well-structured discipline would be premature. In general, it has been assessed that “sustainable development has broad appeal and little specificity” [1] Hence my position would be that this field of inquiry in general cannot yet be interpreted as a coherent “science of sustainability,” although a need for establishing such a science (science of sustainability) has already been promoted [2].
Reasons for that state of affairs are multiple (and inevitably involve a significant level of misconceptions among participants in this notoriously transdisciplinary domain). Let us illustrate this statement by a prominent example of the Bruntdland definition of sustainable development. This definition has inspired most of the early development in this field and still is the one most cited. However, it can hardly be described as precise and rigorous.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Thermodynamics and the Destruction of Resources , pp. 133 - 162Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
and , “Characterizing and measuring sustainable development,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 13.1–13.28 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Eds. “Toward a Science of Sustainability: Report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference, Airlie Center, Warenton, Virginia, November 29, 2009–December 2, 2009.” CID Working Paper No. 196. Center for International Development at Harvard University. May 2010.
, Statement of Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy, before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, March 5, 2009, DOE. Available at http://www.energy.gov/news/print2009/6964.htm (accessed November 10, 2009).
, “Building on the legacy of Professor Keenan. Entropy and intrinsic property of matter,” in Meeting the Entropy Challenge, edited by , , and (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 2008), pp. 124–140.Google Scholar
and , “Challenges to sustainability indicators,” in Sustainability Indicators. A Scientific Assessment, edited by T. Hak, B. Moldan, and A.L. Dahl (Scope 67, Island Press, Washington, D.C., Covelo, London, 2007), Chap. 1, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies, Commission on Sustainable Development, 9th Session, Background Paper No. 3, 2001; available at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd/csd9_indi_bp3.pdf.
, UNDP Report (2008); available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDI_2008_EN_Tables.pdf
, R. The Wellbeing of Nations: A Country by Country Index of Quality of Life and the Environment (Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2001).Google Scholar
2008 Environmental Performance Index, Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy and CIESIN Columbia University; available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/epi/downloads.html.
, , , , , , , , , , and , “Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9266–9271 (2002); M. Wackernagel and W. Rees, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “The genuine progress indicator 2006. A tool for sustainable development, redifining progress.” Available at http://www.rprogress.org/publications/2007/GPI202006.pdf.
, “An almost practical step toward sustainability,” Resources Policy 19, 162–172 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and , Environmental Performance Index(Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT, 2008).Google Scholar
Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies, UN Commission on Sustainable Development, 9th Session, Background Paper No. 3 (DESA/DSD/2001/3, 2001), p. 2.
“EEA core set of indicators – Guide,” EEA Tech. Rep. 1/2005 (EEA, Luxembourg, 2005).
“Measuring progress towards a more sustainable Europe,” 2008 Monitoring Rep. (EUROSTAT, Luxembourg, 2008).
“Indicators for sustainable energy development” (International Atomic Energy Agency and International Energy Agency).
“Human development report 2009” (UNDP, New York, 2009).
, , , , , and . Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2008 ed. (Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA, 2008).Google Scholar
, , and , Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes, 1st ed. (Hemisphere, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
and , “Industrial and ecological cumulative exergy consumption of the United States via the 1997 input–output benchmark model,” Energy 32, 1560–1592 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Preliminary thoughts on the application of thermodynamics to the development of sustainability criteria, ISSST 2009 – The International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology, IEEE, Phoenix, AZ, May 18–20, CD Edition.
and , Thermodynamics: Foundations and Applications (Macmillan, New York, 1991; Dover, Mineola, NY, 2005).Google Scholar
, “Water resources,” in Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather edited by S.H. Schneider (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996), vol. 2.Google Scholar
, , , , , and , “Estimated use of water in the US in 2000,” U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268, released March 2004, revised February 2005 (U.S. Department of the Interior, Reston, VA, 2005).
; http://esa.un.org/unpp/p2k0data.asp
, Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (DOE/EIA-0383, Washington, D.C., 2006).
and , “Application of the thermoeconomic approach to the analysis and optimization of a vapo-compression desalting system,”ASME J. Eng. Power92, 17–26 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Thermoeconomic considerations of sea water demineralization,” in Principles of Desalination, 2nd ed., Part A, (Academic, New York, 1980), Chap. 1, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
, “The minimum work requirement for distillation processes,” Exergy Intl. J. 2, 15–23 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Second law analysis of separation processes of mixtures,” Proc. ASME Adv. Energy Syst. Div. 39, 537–543 (1999).Google Scholar
, “The second law quality of energy transformation in a heat exchanger,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 33, 295–300 (1990).Google Scholar
and , “Application of the thermoeconomic approach to the analysis and optimization of a vapor-compression desalinating system, J. Eng. Power 92, 17–26 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Thermoeconomic considerations of sea water demineralization,” in Principles of Desalination (Academic, New York, 1980), pp. 1–54Google Scholar
, , and , “Energy performance enhancements of a 950 m3/d seawater reverse osmosis unit in Grand Cayman,” Desalination 135, 195–204 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , Desalination: Current Technologies and Future Solutions (Siemens, 2009, personal communication).Google Scholar
and , “Calculation of some thermodynamic properties of sea salt solutions at elevated temperatures from data on NaCl solutions,” J. Chem. Eng. Data 10, 254–260 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Thermo-economics of saline water conversion,” I&EC Proc. Design Develop. 4, 195–206 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , loc. cit.; Desalination. A National Perspective (National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 2008).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by