Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:21:17.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Creative Construction

Assimilation, Specialization, and the Technology Life Cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Marco Iansiti
Affiliation:
Harvard University Business School
Gregory L. Richards
Affiliation:
Keystone Strategy
Geoffrey A. Manne
Affiliation:
International Center for Law and Economics (ICLE) and Lewis and Clark Law School
Joshua D. Wright
Affiliation:
George Mason University School of Law
Get access

Summary

Introduction and Overview

All too often, practitioners, pundits, and academics take a pessimistic view of the value and longevity of today's technologies. We all fall in love with new, apparently “disruptive” technologies, like Linux or on-line music distribution, and preach the death of established organizations and existing capabilities. However, the reality is often different and more subtle: The old mantra of “creative destruction” seldom applies in a holistic fashion. Old technologies and capabilities rarely disappear – they instead evolve and become the building blocks of tomorrow's innovations. They provide crucial, enduring value to established firms, new entrepreneurs, and consumers alike. This simple realization has crucial implications for managers and policy makers.

This chapter takes a new look at the innovation life cycle and its implications for competition and public policy. It draws from existing literature, case studies, and product innovation data to illustrate the workings of technological “assimilation,” namely, how technological innovations that were once marketed as individual products become integrated into broader platforms, which in turn provide the building blocks of further innovation. As we will illustrate through our examples, assimilation can take various forms and impact various levels of integration, such as the incorporation of capabilities into a new distribution platform, the licensing of complementary capabilities, and, in some cases, acquisitions of entire companies with complementary products or technology assets.

Type
Chapter
Information
Competition Policy and Patent Law under Uncertainty
Regulating Innovation
, pp. 166 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schumpeter, J. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Porcupine PressGoogle Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Levien, R.. 2004. The Keystone Advantage (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Porcupine PressGoogle Scholar
Abernathy, W. and Utterback, J.. 1978. Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review. 80: 40–47Google Scholar
Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Anderson, P. and Tushman, M.. 1990. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Foster, R. 1986. Innovation: The Attackers' AdvantageSummit BooksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Henderson, R. and Clark, K. B.. 1990. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandal, N. 1994. Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(1):160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C.. 1986. Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 822–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C.. 1994. Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. 1995, 2003. Diffusion of Innovations (The Free Press)
Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press)Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy. 15: 295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, N. and Scotchmer, S.. 2002. Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System? In Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 2 (MIT Press)Google Scholar
Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R.. 2001. The Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry [working draft]; Scotchmer, S. 2004. Innovation and Incentives (MIT Press)Google Scholar
Murray, F. and O'Mahony, S.. 2007. Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science. Organization Science, 18: 1006–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavitt, K. 1988. Uses and Abuses of Patent Statistics. In Raan, A. F. J. (ed). Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (Elsevier Science Publishers)Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
,OECD. 1995. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Oslo Manual. 2nd edition, DSTI, OECD / European Commission Eurostat, Paris
Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R.. 2001. The Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry [working draft]
Godin, B. 2002. The Rise of Innovation Surveys: Measuring A Fuzzy Concept. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Working Paper No. 16, OST, INRS/CIRST, Montréal, Canada
Chesbrough, H. and Teece, D. 1996. Organizing for Innovation: When Is Virtual Virtuous? Harvard Business Review. 8: 127–135Google Scholar
Iansiti, M. 1998. Technology Integration (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and O'Reilly, C. A.. 2002. Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 2000. Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: The Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context. Long Range Planning 33: 35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravorti, B. 2003. The Slow Pace of Fast Change: Bringing Innovations to Market in a Connected World (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Davila, T., Epstein, M. J., and Shelton, R.. 2006. Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It (Wharton School Publishing)Google Scholar
Foster, R. 1986. Innovation: The Attackers' Advantage Summit BooksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Abernathy, W. and Utterback, J.. 1978. Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review. 80: 40–47Google Scholar
Anderson, P. and Tushman, M.. 1990. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Christensen, C. 2004. Seeing What's Next: Using Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Henderson, R. and Clark, K. B.. 1990. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Khanna, T.. 1995. Technological Evolution, System Architecture and Obsolescence of Firm Capabilities. Oxford Journals: Industrial and Corporate Change, 4: 2Google Scholar
Fleming, L. and Sorensen, O.. 2004. Science as a Map in Technological Search. Strategic Management Journal 25: 909–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, L. and Sorensen, O.. 2004. Science as a Map in Technological Search. Strategic Management Journal 25: 909–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Pisano, G. 2006. Science Business: The Promise, The Reality, and the Future of Biotech. (Harvard Business School Press)
Iansiti, M. 1998. Technology Integration (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B.. 1997. Managing in the Age of Modularity. Harvard Business Review (June). 5: 84–93Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
Abernathy, W. and Utterback, J.. 1978. Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review. 80: 40–47Google Scholar
Dedrick, J. and West, J.. 2003. Why Firms Adopt Open Source Platforms: A Grounded Theory of Innovation and Standards Adoption. Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems MISQ Special Issue Workshop, Seattle, December, pp. 236–257Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Basberg, B. 1987. Patents and the Measurement of Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature. Research Policy, 16: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 4Google Scholar
Stuart, T. E. and Podolny, J. M.. 1996. Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, H. 1997. The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry. Small Business Economics 9:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundel, A. 1999. How Useful Are Patent Databases to SMEs as a Source of Technical Information? In Inzelt, A. and Hilton, J. (eds.), Technology Transfer: From Invention to Innovation, Nato ASI Series 4: Science and Technology Policy, Vol 19, pp. 195–206 (KluwerAcademic Publishers)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundel, A. and Kabla, I.. 2000. Patenting Strategies of European firms: An Analysis of Survey Data, in Allegrezza, S. and Serbat, H. (eds.), The Econometrics of Patents, Applied Econometrics Association seriesGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. 2002. “The Financing of Research and Development,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18, No. 1, pp. 35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. 2004. Patent Citations as Knowledge Flow Indicators. NBER
Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. 2002. “The Financing of Research and Development,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18, No. 1, pp. 35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkless, B. 2000. Invention Quality Measurement. Patent Valuation. The Methods That TRIZ Forgot
Hall, B. 2004. Patent Citations as Knowledge Flow Indicators. NBER
Arundel, A. 1999. How Useful Are Patent Databases to SMEs as a Source of Technical Information? In Inzelt, A. and Hilton, J. (eds.), Technology Transfer: From Invention to Innovation, Nato ASI Series 4: Science and Technology Policy, Vol 19, pp. 195–206 (KluwerAcademic Publishers)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, N. and Scotchmer, S.. 2002. Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System? In Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 2 (MIT Press)Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy. 15: 295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisano, G. 2006. Science Business: The Promise, The Reality, and the Future of Biotech. (Harvard Business School Press)
Iansiti, M. and Levien, R.. 2004. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3): 68–78Google ScholarPubMed
Gawer, A. and Cusumano, M. A.. 2004. What Does it Take to be a Platform Leader: Some Recent from Palm and NTT DoCoMo, Hitotsubashi Business Review, 52: 6–20Google Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Levien, R.. 2004. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3): 68–78Google ScholarPubMed
Gawer, A. and Cusumano, M. A.. 2004. What Does it Take to be a Platform Leader: Some Recent from Palm and NTT DoCoMo, Hitotsubashi Business Review, 52: 6–20Google Scholar
Merges, R. 2006. Patents, Entry and Growth in the Software Industry. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series [online database], No. 926204Google Scholar
Kramer, R. 2004. Technology Neutrality in Software Procurement: The Soundest IT and Procurement Policy. UNCTAD: Expert Meeting on Free and Open Source Software Policy and Development Implications, Session 3: Government Usage and Policy Implications (September 23, 2004)
Merges, R. 2006. Patents, Entry and Growth in the Software Industry. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series [online database], No. 926204Google Scholar
Mann, R. 2006. Commercializing Open Source Software: Do Property Rights Still Matter? Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 20: 1Google Scholar
Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R.. 2001. The Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry [working draft]
Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R.. 2001. The Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry [working draft]
Arora, A. 1995. Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and Market for Know-How. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4: 41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A. and Merges, R.. 2004. Specialized Supply Firms, Property Rights, and Firm Boundaries. Industrial & Corporate Change 13: 451–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. 1997. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems (Harper Business)Google Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Levien, R.. 2004. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3): 68–78Google ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. 1997. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems (Harper Business)Google Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Levien, R.. 2004. The Keystone Advantage (Harvard Business School Press)Google Scholar
Abernathy, W. and Utterback, J.. 1978. Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review. 80: 40–47Google Scholar
Anderson, P. and Tushman, M.. 1990. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (HarvardBusiness School Press)Google Scholar
Dosi, G, Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L., and Salvatore, R.. 1995. Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industry Structures. Small Business Economics. 7: 411–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. 1999. Crossing the Chasm (Harper Business)Google Scholar
Moore, G. 1999. Crossing the Chasm (Harper Business)Google Scholar
,Leichtman Research Group (2007), quoted at: http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2007/09/26/dvr_use_expected_to_reach_50_of_us_households_by_2011
Edwards, M., Murray, F., and Yu, R.. 2003. Value-Creation and Sharing Among Universities, Biotechnology and Pharma. Nature Biotechnology, 21: 6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1996. Patents as an Incentive System, Suzanne Scotchmer. Ch. 12, pp. 281–296, of Economics in a Changing World, Volume 2, Beth Allen, ed., McMillan Press (London) and St. Martin's Press (New York)
Scotchmer, S. 2004. Innovation and Incentives (MIT Press)Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and David, P.. Toward a New Economics of Science, Research Policy, 1994, 23: 487–521Google Scholar
Romer, P. 2002. When Should We Use Intellectual Property Rights?The American Economic Review. 92: 213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., and Vickers, J.. Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation. Review of Economic Studies (July 2001): 467–92 and in particular, “the importance of adequate economic incentives for investment in cumulative innovation” such as patents, and the “appropriate distribution of rewards across different generations of innovators”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1996. Patents as an Incentive System, Suzanne Scotchmer. Ch. 12, pp. 281–296, of Economics in a Changing World, Volume 2, Beth Allen, ed., McMillan Press (London) and St. Martin's Press (New York)
Murray, F. and O'Mahony, S.. 2007. Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science. Organization Science, 18: 1006–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
Long, C. 2000. Patents and Cumulative Innovation. Re-Engineering Patent Law. 2 Wash. UJL & POL'Y229–46Google Scholar
Rai, A. K. 2001. Fostering Cumulative Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Role of Patents and Antitrust. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16: 813Google Scholar
Murray, F. and O'Mahony, S.. 2007. Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science. Organization Science, 18: 1006–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1Google Scholar
Eisenmann, T. and Barley, L.. 2006. PayPal Merchant Services. Harvard Business School Case Study No. 9–806-188
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M.. 2005. Market Value and Patent Citations. Rand Journal of Economics 36 (Spring).16–38Google Scholar
Merges, R. 2006. Patents, Entry and Growth in the Software Industry. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series [online database], No. 926204Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, J., and Smith, M.. 2003. Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers. Management Science.16: 131–141Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Smith, Michael. 1999. “Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers,” 1999 Computing in Economics and Finance (CEF) Conference; Boston, Massachusetts; June 24–26
Buccirossi, P., Cambini, C., Bravo, L., and Siciliani, P.. 2005. Competition Issues in the Provision of Content and E-Commerce Services. Competition, Contents and Broadband for the Internet in Europe (EU Framework Programme 6 Specific Support Action/Thematic Priority: Information Society Technologies)Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, J., and Smith, M.. 2003. Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers. Management Science.16: 131–141Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Hu, Yu “Jeffrey”, and Smith, Michael D.. 2006. From Niches to Riches: The Anatomy of the Long Tail. Sloan Management Review, 47(4 Summer) 67–71Google Scholar
Elberse, A. and Oberholzer-Gee, F.. 2006. Superstars and Underdogs: An Examination of the Long-Tail Phenomenon in Video Sales. Harvard Business School Working Paper [unpublished draft]
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, J., and Smith, M.. 2003. Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers. Management Science.16: 131–141Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, J., and Smith, M.. 2003. Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers. Management Science.16: 131–141Google Scholar
Morton Scott, Fiona, Zettelmeyer, Florian, and Silva-Risso, Jorge. Internet Car Retailing. The Journal of Industrial Economics 49, 4 (2001): 501–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A. and Ceccagnoli, M.. 2005. Patent Protection, Complementary Assets and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing. Management Science. 52: 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J.. “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity,” with P. Dasgupta, Economic Journal, 90(358), June 1980, pp. 266–293. Reprinted in The Economics of Technical Change, Elgar Reference Collection, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 31, Edwin Mansfield and Elizabeth Mansfield (eds.), Aldershot, UK: Elgar. pp. 133–160

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×