Acosta Méndez, E. and Angeli, A. (1992) Filodemo: Testimonianze su Socrate, La Scuola di Epicuro 13, Naples.Google Scholar

Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angeli, A. (1981) ‘I frammenti di Idomeneo di Lampsaco’, Cronache Ercolanesi 11: 41–101.Google Scholar

Angeli, A. (1988) Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola, La Scuola di Epicuro 7, Naples.Google Scholar

Angeli, A. and Colaizzo, M. (1979) ‘I frammenti di Zenone Sidonio’, Cronache Ercolanesi 9: 47–133.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1989) ‘Epicurean emotions’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 145–64.Google ScholarPubMed

Annas, J. (1992) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness, Oxford.Google Scholar

Annas, J.<008a> (2001) Cicero: On Moral Ends, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (1993) ‘The addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean protreptic’, Materiali e discussioni 31: 185–230.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (2004) ‘All things to all men: Philodemus’ model of therapy and the audience of De Morte', in Fitzgerald et al. 2004: 15–54.

Armstrong, D. (2006) Review of Warren 2004. Philosophical Quarterly 56: 294–7.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (2008) ‘Be angry and sin not: Philodemus versus the Stoics on natural bites and natural emotions’, in Fitzgerald 2008: 79–121.

Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2004) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, Austin.

Arndt, W., Danker, F. and Bauer, W. (2000) A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd edn, Chicago.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (1960) Emotion and Personality, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1961) ‘Filodemo, De disiii, col. xii–xiii,20’, Studi classici e orientali 10: 112–21.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1973) Epicuro: Opere, 2nd edn, Turin.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1975) ‘L'Opera “Sulla natura” e le lettere di Epicuro a Erodoto e a Pitocle’, Cronache Ercolanesi 5: 45–51.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (1979) ‘Un passo dell'opera “Sulla natura” di Epicuro, Democrito e Colote’, Cronache Ercolanesi 9: 5–10.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G., Kleve, K. and Auricchio, F. Longo (2002) ‘Dedica’, Cronache Ercolanesi 32: 5–6.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1981) ‘Lucretius’ explanation of moving dream figures at 4.768–76', American Journal of Philology 102: 138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1990) ‘Philodemus’ Epicureanism', Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, pt ii, vol. xxxvi, no. 4: 2369–406.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1991) ‘Philodemus's poetic theory and On the Good King according to Homer’, Classical Antiquity 10: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asmis, E. (1996) ‘Epicurean semiotics’, in Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices, ed. Manetti, G., Brussels: 155–85.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1999) ‘Epicurean epistemology’, in Algra et al. 1999: 260–94.CrossRef

Asmis, E. (2001) ‘The politician as public servant in Cicero's De republica’, in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 109–128.

Asmis, E. (2004), ‘Epicurean economics’, in Fitzgerald et al. 2004: 133–76.

Auvray-Assayas, C. (1992) ‘Le livre I duDe natura deorum et le traité De signisde Philodème: Problèmes de théologie et de logique’, Revue des Études Latines 69: 51–62.Google Scholar

Auvray-Assayas, C. and D. Delattre (eds.) (2001) Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie, Paris.Google Scholar

Aydede, M. (2000) ‘An analysis of pleasure vis-à-vis pain’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 537–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aydede, M. (2006) ‘A critical and quasi-historical essay on theories of pain’, in Pain: New Essays on the Nature of Pain and the Methodology of Its Study, ed. Aydede, M., Cambridge, Mass.: 1–58.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le stoïcisme, Paris.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (2005) ‘Sur les dieux d’Épicure', Elenchos 26: 79–110.Google Scholar

Badian, E. and Lintott, A. W. (1996) ‘Pro consule’, ‘Pro praetore’, in Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edn, Oxford: 1248–49.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Balaudé, J.-F. (1994) Épicure: Lettres, maximes, sentences, Paris.Google Scholar

Becchi, F. (2003) ‘La pensée morale de Plutarque et le Περὶ ὀργῆς: Une nouvelle interpretation’, Humanitas 55: 89–110.Google Scholar

Beer, B. (2009) Lukrez und Philodem: Poetische Argumentation und poetologischer Diskurs, Basel.Google Scholar

Benferhat, Y. (2005) Cives Epicurei: Les épicuriens et l'ideé de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave, Brussels.Google Scholar

Benferhat, Y. (2009) Review of Roskam 2007. Classical Review 59: 393–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bignone, E. (1920) Epicuro: Opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita, Bari.Google Scholar

Bignone, E. (1936) L'Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, 2nd edn, Florence.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (1998) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians (Adversus Mathematicos i), Oxford.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (1999) ‘Reflections on re-reading Piaggio and the early history of the Herculaneum papyri’, Cronache Ercolanesi 29: 55–82.Google Scholar

Bockemüller, F. (1874) T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 2nd edn, Stade.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. (1975) La pensée du plaisir: Épicure, textes moraux, commentaires, Paris.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. and Laks, A. (eds.) (1976) Études sur l'épicureisme antique, Cahiers de Philologie 1, Lille.Google Scholar

Booras, S. and Seely, D. (1999) ‘Multispectral imaging of the Herculaneum papyri’, Cronache Ercolanesi 29: 95–100.Google Scholar

Boyancé, P. (1955) ‘Sur une épitaphe épicurienne’, Revue des Études Latines 33: 113–20.Google Scholar

Braund, D. (1996) Ruling Roman Britain: Kings, Queens, Governors and Emperors from Julius Caesar to Agricola, London and New York.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.) (1997) The Passions in Roman Thought and Practice, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brennan, T. (1996) ‘Epicurus on sex, marriage, and children’, Classical Philology 91: 346-52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brennan, T. (2003) ‘Stoic moral psychology’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B., Cambridge: 257–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, F. (1896) De natura deorum, London.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. (1991) ‘Candidates defeated in Roman elections: Some ancient Roman “also-rans”’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 81: i–vi, 1–64.Google Scholar

Brown, E. (2009) ‘Politics and Society’, in Warren 2009: 179–96.CrossRef

Brown, P. M. (1997) De rerum natura iii, Warminster.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1987), ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield and Striker 1986: 113–44.

Brunschwig, J. (1993) ‘The Anaxarchus case: An essay on survival’, Proceedings of the British Academy 82: 59–88.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.) (1993): Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge.CrossRef

Brunt, P. A. (1989) ‘Philosophy and religion in the Late Republic’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 174–98.

Buckler, J. (1980) The Theban Hegemony 371–362 bc, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil's Augustan Epic, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canfora, L. (1993) Vita di Lucrezio, Palermo.Google Scholar

Capasso, M. (1988), Carneisco: Il secondo libro del Filista, Naples.Google Scholar

Capasso, M. (1989) ‘Primo supplemento al Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi’, Cronache Ercolanesi 19: 193–264.Google Scholar

Capasso, M. (1991) Manuale di papirologia ercolanese, Galatina.Google Scholar

Capasso, M. <067a> (2005) ‘L'intelettuale e il suo re’ (Filodemo, L'Adulazione, P. Herc 1675, col. V 21–32)', Studi di Egittologia e di Papirologia 2: 46–52.

Castagnoli, L. (2000) ‘Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 263–328.Google Scholar

Castner, C. (1985) ‘Difficulties in identifying Roman Epicureans: Orata in Cicero De fin. 2.22.70’, Classical Journal 81: 138–47.Google Scholar

Castner, C. (1988) A Prosopography of Roman Epicureans, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. L. (1972) ‘Epameinondas and Thebes’, Classical Quarterly 22: 254–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus ‘On Rhetoric’ Books 1 and 2: Translation and Exegetical Essays, New York.Google Scholar

Chadwick, J. (1996) Lexicographica Graeca: Contributions to the Lexicography of Ancient Greek, Oxford.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. L. (1971) Review of D. West 1969. Classical Review 21: 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, M. L. (1981) The Noblest Roman, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1983) ‘Individual and community in the first generation of the Epicurean school’, in Gigante 1983b: vol. i, pp. 255–79. Reprinted in D. Clay, Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, Ann Arbor: 55–74.Google Scholar

Cleary, J. and Shartin, D. (eds.) (1988) Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. iv, Lanham.

Cooper, J. (2004) ‘Moral theory and improvement: Seneca’, in Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton: 309–34.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. and Procopé, J. (1995) Seneca: Moral and Political Essays, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. (1974) Roman Republican Coinage, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Creech, T. (1682) T. Lucretius Carus: The Epicurean Philosopher, His Six Books ‘De Natura Rerum’ Done into English Verse, with Notes, Oxford.Google Scholar

Creech, T. (1695) Titi Lucretii Cari De rerum natura libri sex; quibus interpretationem et notas addidit Thomas Creech, Oxford.Google Scholar

Creech, T. <081a> (1818) De rerum natura libri sex; quibus interpretationem et notas addidit Thomas Creech; variae lectiones iv. edd. antiquissimarum necnon annotationes R. Bentleii, Oxford.Google Scholar

Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos, Munich.Google Scholar

DeFilippo, J. G. and Mitsis, P. (1994) ‘Socrates and Stoic natural law’, in Vander Waerdt 1994: 252–71.

Lacy, P. and Lacy, E. (1958) ‘Epicurean ἐπιλογισμός’, American Journal of Philology 79: 179–83.Google Scholar

Lacy, P. (1978) Philodemus, On Methods of Inference, La Scuola di Epicuro 1, rev. edn, Naples.Google Scholar

Delattre, D. (2007) Philodème de Gadara: Sur la musique, livre iv, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Del Mastro, G. (2000) ‘Secondo supplemento al Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi’, Cronache Ercolanesi 30: 157–242.Google Scholar

Del Mastro, G. (2005) Chartes: Catalogo Multimediale dei Papiri Ercolanesi, Naples.Google Scholar

Denniston, J. D. (1950), The Greek Particles, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Places, E. (1973) Numénius. Fragments, Paris.Google Scholar

DeWitt, N. W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Diano, C. (1942) ‘La psicologia di Epicuro e la teoria delle passione’, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 23: 5–49, 121–50.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci, Berlin.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1916) ‘Philodemus über die Götter: Erstes Buch’, Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1916, no. 7 (text and commentary), Berlin.Google Scholar

Diels, H. <093a> (1917) ‘Philodemus über die Götter: Drittes Buch’, Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1917, no. 4 (text) and 6 (commentary), Berlin.Google Scholar

Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1951) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th edn, 3 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1977) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 b.c. to a.d. 220, London.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1988) ‘“Orthodoxy” and “Eclecticism”: Middle Platonists and neo-Pythagoreans’, in Dillon and Long 1988: 103–25.

Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.) (1988) The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1988) ‘The history of the concept of eclecticism’, in Dillon and Long 1988: 15–33.

Dorandi, T. (1982) Filodemo: Il buon re secondo Omero, La Scuola di Epicuro 3, Naples.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1994a) ‘I frammenti di Anassarco di Abdera’, Atti e memorie della Accademia toscana delle scienze e lettere 59: 11–58.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1994b) ‘De Zenon d’Élée à Anaxarque: Fortune d'un topos littéraire', in Ainsi parlaient les Anciens – In honorem Jean-Paul Dumont, ed. Jerphagnon, L., Lagrée, J. and Delattre, D., Lille: 27–37.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1996) ‘Gaio bambino’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 111: 41–42.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2005) ‘Le philosophe et le pouvoir: Un cas de propagande inversée’, in L'Écriture publique du pouvoir, Études 10, ed. Bresson, A., Cocula, A. and Pébarthe, C., Paris: 27–34.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2003) Cicero: De Natura Deorum, Book i, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. (1972–99) Posidonius, 3 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2007) Death in Ancient Rome, New Haven.Google Scholar

Effe, B. (1970) Studien zur Kosmologie und Theologie der Aristotelischen Schrift ‘Über die Philosophie’, Munich.Google Scholar

Ellis, A. (1962) Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy, New York.Google Scholar

Englert, W. (tr.) (2003) Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, Newburyport.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1987) Der Sinn der Aporien in den Dialogen Platons, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erler, M. (1992a) ‘Orthodoxie und Anpassung: Philodem, ein Panaitios des Kepos?’, Museum Helveticum 49: 171–200.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1992b) ‘Cicero und “unorthodoxer” Epikureismus’, Anregung 38: 307–22.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1992c) ‘Der Zorn des Helden: Philodems De ira und Vergils Konzept des Zorns in der Aeneis’, Grazer Beiträge 18: 103–26.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans: Wie die Epikureer die Schriften ihres Meisters lasen’, in Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, ed. Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J., Tübingen: 281–303.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1994) ‘Epikur – Die Schule Epikurs – Lucrez’, in Die hellenistische Philosophie, ed. H. Flashar, vol. iv of Die Philosophie der Antike, Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie, Basel: 29–490.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2001a) ‘Sokrates’ Rolle im Hellenismus', in Sokrates: Nachfolge und Eigenwege, ed. Kessler, H., Kusterdingen: 201–32.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2001b) ‘Response to Voula Tsouna’, in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 173–78.

Erler, M. (2002a) ‘Epicurus as deus mortalis: Homoiosis theoi and Epicurean self-cultivation’, in Frede and Laks 2002: 159–81.

Erler, M. (2002b) ‘Hilfe der Götter und Erkenntnis des Selbst: Sokrates als Göttergeschenk bei Platon und den Platonikern’, in Metaphysik und Religion, ed. Kobusch, Th and Erler, M., Munich and Leipzig: 387–414.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2003a) ‘To hear the right thing and to miss the point: Plato's implicit poetics’, in Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy, ed. Michelini, A., Leiden: 153–73.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2003b) ‘Exempla amoris: Der epikureische Epilogismos als philosophischer Hintergrund der Diatribe gegen die Liebe in Lukrez’ De Rerum Natura', in Le jardin romain: Épicurisme et poésie à Rome, mélanges offerts à Mayotte Bollack, ed. Monet, A., Lille: 147–62.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2003c) ‘Das Bild vom “Kind im Menschen” bei Platon und der Adressat von Lukrez' De rerum natura’, Cronache Ercolanesi 33: 107–116.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2008) ‘Dire il nuovo in modo vecchio e il vecchio in modo nuovo: Gli spuria del Corpus Platonicum fra poetica e retorica ellenistica’, in Filologia, papirologia, storia dei testi: Giornate di studio in onore di Antonio Carlini, Udine, 9–10 dicembre 2005, ed. Carlini, A., Pisa: 225–41.Google Scholar

Erler, M. and Ungern-Sternberg, J. (1987) ‘Κακὸν γυναῖκες. Griechisches zu der Rede des Metellus Macedonicus “De prole augenda”’, Museum Helveticum 44: 254–56.Google Scholar

Essler, H. (2005) ‘Un nuovo frammento di Ermarco nel PHerc. 152/157 (Filodemo, De dis, libro iii)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 35: 53–59.Google Scholar

Essler, H. (2009) ‘Fälsche Götter bei Philodem (Diiii Kol. 8.5–Kol. 10.6)’ Cronache Ercolanesi 39: 161–206.Google Scholar

Everson, S. (1997) ‘Epicureanism’, in From Aristotle to Augustine, ed. Furley, D., London: 188–221.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Farrington, B. (1967) The Faith of Epicurus, London.Google Scholar

Feldman, F. (1994) Confrontations with the Reaper: A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, J. (1990) ‘Epicureanism under the Roman Empire’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, pt ii, vol. xxxvi, no. 4: 2257–327.Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (1955) Epicurus and His Gods, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fillion-Lahille, J. (1970) ‘La colère chez Aristote’, Revue des Études Anciennes 72: 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le ‘De Ira’ de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions, Paris.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. M. (ed.) (1993) The Metaphysics of Death, Stanford.Google Scholar

Fish, J. (1998) ‘Is Death Nothing to Horace?’, Cronache Ercolanese 28: 99–104.Google Scholar

Fish, J. (2004) ‘Anger, Philodemus’ good king, and the Helen episode of Aeneid 2.567–89: A new proof of authenticity from Herculaneum', in Armstrong et al. 2004: 111–38.

Fitzgerald, J. T. (ed.) (2008) Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought, London and New York.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. T., Obbink, D. and Holland, G. S. (eds.) (2004) Philodemus and the New Testament World, Leiden.Google Scholar

Florian, V. and Kravetz, S. (1983) ‘Fear of personal death: Attribution, structure, and relation to religious belief’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 600–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2002) Aristotle on Emotion, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W., Huby, P., Sharples, R. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Philosophia Antiqua 54, Leiden.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1986) Review of Dorandi 1982. Classical Review 36: 81–5.CrossRef

Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 120–50.

Fowler, D. P. (1997) ‘Epicurean anger’, in Braund and Gill 1997: 16–35.CrossRef

Frede, D. (1997) Philebos: Übersetzung und Kommentar, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) (2002) Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath, Leiden.Google Scholar

Frede, M. and G. Striker (eds.) (1996) Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford.Google Scholar

Freymuth, G. (1953) Zur Lehre von den Götterbilden in der epikureischen Philosophie, Berlin.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fröhlich, F. (1899) ‘C. Cassius Longinus’, Paulys Realenclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, 1st ser., vol. iii: 1727–36.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (1977) ‘Lucretius the Epicurean: On the history of man’, in Lucrèce: Huit exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Furley, D. J. and Gigon, O., Geneva: 1–37.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (1986) ‘Nothing to us?’, in Schofield and Striker 1986: 75–91.

Gale, M. (2001) Lucretius and the Didactic Epic, Bristol.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (1980) Frammenti biografici da papiri, vol.ii: La biografia dei filosofi, Rome.Google Scholar

Gallo, I. (ed.) (1988) Aspetti dello stoicismo e dell'epicureismo in Plutarco, Ferrara, aprile 2–3 1987, Ferrara.Google Scholar

Gargiulo, T. (1981) ‘PHerc. 222: Filodemo sull'adulazione’, Cronache Ercolanesi 11: 103–27.Google Scholar

Gera, D. (1999) ‘Philonides the Epicurean at court: Early connections’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 125: 77–83.Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. (1996) ‘Epicuro e l'ateismo antico’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996: vol. i, pp. 21–63.

Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) (1996) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993, 2 vols., Naples.Google Scholar

Gigandet, A. (1998) Fama Deum: Lucrèce et les raisons du mythe, Paris.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1979) Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi, Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1981) Scetticismo e epicureismo: Per l'avviamento di un discorso storiografico, Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1983a) ‘Il ritratto di Filodemo nella Pisoniana’, in Gigante 1983c: 35–53.

Gigante, M. (1983b) ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ: Studi sull'epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante, 2 vols., Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1983c) Ricerche Filodemee, 2nd edn, Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1992) Cinismo e epicureismo, Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici 23, Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1999) Kepos e Peripatos: Contributo alla Storia dell'Aristotelismo Antico, Naples.Google Scholar

Giussani, C. (1896–8) T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex: Revisione del testo, commentario e studi, 4 vols., Turin.Google Scholar

Glare, P.G. (ed.) (1982) Oxford Latin Dictionary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Godwin, J. (2004) Lucretius, London.Google Scholar

Gomperz, T. (1864) Philodemi Epicurei De ira liber, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gosling, G. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graver, M. R. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, W. (1999) ‘Epicurus and the harm of death’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 358–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 1–37.

Griffin, M. (1999) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero's letters to his friends’, in Powell 1999: 325–46.

Griffin, M. (2001) ‘Piso, Cicero, and their audience’, in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 85–99.

Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1989) Philosophia Togata, Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1997) Philosophia Togata i, repr. of Griffin and Barnes 1989, with updated bibliography.

Grilli, A. (1983) ‘Diathesis in Epicuro’, in Gigante 1983b: vol. i, pp. 93–109.

Grimal, P. (1966) Cicéron: Discours contre L. Pison, Paris.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (1969) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammerstaedt, J. (1992) ‘Der Schlußteil von Philodems drittem Buch über Rhetorik’, Cronache Ercolanesi 22: 9–117.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (2001) Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinze, R. (1897) T. Lucretius Carus De rerum natura: Buch iii, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Henry, W. B. (2009) Philodemus: On Death, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Hieronymus, F. (1970) Melete: Übung, Lernen und angrenzende Begriffe, PhD diss., Basel.Google Scholar

Hoelter, J. (1979) ‘Multidimensional treatment of fear of death’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47: 996–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holford-Strevens, L. (2002) ‘Horror vacui in Lucretian biography’, Leeds International Classical Studies 1.1 (www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/2002/200201.pdf).

Holler, E. (1934) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleitung, Kallmünz.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Keith (1983) Death and Renewal, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, including the Lives of Cato and Atticus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hossenfelder, M. (1995) Die Philosophie der Antike 3: Stoa, Epikureismus, und Skepsis, 2nd edn, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huby, P. (1978) ‘Epicurus’ attitude to Democritus', Phronesis 23: 80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) ‘The date of De rerum natura’, Classical Quarterly 51: 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Indelli, G. (1988a) Filodemo: L'ira, La Scuola di Epicuro 5, Naples.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. (1988b) ‘Considerazioni sugli opuscoli “De ira” di Filodemo e Plutarco’, in Gallo 1988: 57–64.

Indelli, G and Laurenti, R. (1988) Plutarco: Sul controllo dell'ira, Naples.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. and Tsouna-McKirahan, V. [see V. Tsouna] (1995) [Philodemus]. [On Choices and Avoidances], La Scuola di Epicuro 15, Naples.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2005) Reading Seneca, Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. P. (1994) The Epicurus Reader, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Jackson-McCabe, M. (2004) ‘The Stoic theory of implanted preconceptions’, Phronesis 49: 323–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus, On Poems, Book One, Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2010) Philodemus, On Poems, Books Three and Four: With the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets, Oxford.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1977) ‘The ruling class of the Roman Republic and Greek philospohers’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 59: 323–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joly, R. (1956) Le thème philosophique des genres de vie dans l'antiquité classique, Brussels.Google Scholar

Kany-Turpin, J. (2007) ‘Les dieux: Représentation mentale des dieux, piété et discours théologique’, in Lire Épicure et les épicuriens, ed. Gigandet, A. and Morel, P.-M., Paris: 145–65.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1971) Lucretius: De rerum natura Book iii, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. (ed.) and Waterfield, R. H. (tr.) (1992) Plutarch: Essays, London.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1961) ‘Wie kann man an das Nicht-Existierende denken?’, Symbolae Osloenses 37: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleve, K. (1963) Gnosis Theon: Die Lehre von der natürlichen Gotteserkenntnis in der epikureischen Theologie, Oslo.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1978) ‘On the beauty of God: A discussion between Epicureans, Stoics, and Sceptics’, Symbolae Osloenses 53: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleve, K. (1983) ‘Scurra Atticus: The Epicurean view of Socrates’, in Gigante 1983b: vol. i, pp. 227–53.

Kleve, K. and Del Mastro, G. (2000) ‘Il PHerc. 1533: Zenone Sidonio A Cratero’, Cronache Ercolanesi 30: 149–56.Google Scholar

Koch, R. (2005), Comment peut-on être Dieu? La secte d'Épicure, Paris.Google Scholar

Kondo, E. (1974) ‘Per L'interpretazione del pensiore filodemeo sulla adulazione nel PHerc. 1457’, Cronache Ercolanesi 4: 43–56.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1994) ‘Friendship from Epicurus to Philodemus’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996: vol. i, pp. 387–96.

Konstan, D. (1997) Friendship in the Classical World, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konstan, D. (2006) ‘Epicurean “passions” and the good life’, in The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, ed. Reis, B., Cambridge: 194–205.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2007) Lucrezio e la psicologia epicurea, tr. Ilaria Ramelli, Milan.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2008a) ‘Response’ to Pierre-Marie Morel, ‘Method and evidence (enargeia): Epicurean prolêpsis’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. xxiii, ed. J. Cleary and G. Gurtler, Leiden: 49–54.

Konstan, D. (2008b) A Life Worthy of the Gods: The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus, Las Vegas.Google Scholar

Konstan, D., Clay, D., Glad, C. E., Thom, J. C. and Ware, J. (1998) Philodemus: On Frank Criticism, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Körte, A. (1980) ‘Metrodori Epicurei fragmenta’, Jahrbücher für Classische Philologie Suppl. 17: 531–97.Google Scholar

Krische, A. B. (1840) Die theologischen Lehren der griechischen Denker: Eine Prüfung der Darstellung Cicero's, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Kuiper, T. (1925) Philodemus over den Dood, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (1976) ‘Édition critique et commentée de la “Vie d’Épicure” dans Diogène Laërce (X, 1–34)', in Bollack and Laks 1976: 1–118.

Lamont, J. (1998) ‘A solution to the puzzle of when death harms its victims’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lange, F. A. (1866) Geschichte des Materialismus, Iserlohn.Google Scholar

Laurenti, R. (1988) ‘Lo stoicismo romano e Plutarco di fronte al tema dell'ira’, in Gallo 1988: 33–56.

Lemaire, P. (1838) Titi Lucretii Cari De rerum natura libri sex, Paris.Google Scholar

Lemke, D. (1973) Die Theologie Epikurs: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion, Munich.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (1984), ‘Epicuro, “Della natura”, libro xiv’, Cronache Ercolanesi 14: 17–107.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (1987) ‘La chiusa del xiv libro “Della natura” di Epicuro’, Cronache Ercolanesi 17: 49–76.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. T. and Short, C. (1879) A Latin Dictionary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S. et al. (1996) A Greek–English Lexicon 9th edn, with rev. suppl. by H. S. Jones, with R. McKenzie, suppl. ed. P. G. W. Glare and A. A. Thompson, Oxford.

Long, A. A. (1986a) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics, 2nd edn, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1986b) ‘Pleasure and social utility: The virtues of being Epicurean’, in Aspects de la Philosophie Hellenistique, ed. Flashar, H. and Gigon, O., Geneva: 284–324.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2001) Les philosophes hellénistiques, translation of Long and Sedley 1987 by J. Brunschwig and P. Pellegrin, 3 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Longo Auricchio, F. (1978) ‘La Scuola di Epicuro’, Cronache Ercolanesi 8: 21–37.Google Scholar

Longo Auricchio, F. (1988) Ermarco: Frammenti, La Scuola di Epicuro 6, Naples.Google Scholar

Longo Auricchio, F. and Tepedino Guerra, A. (1981) ‘Aspetti e problemi della dissidenza epicurea’, Cronache Ercolanesi 11: 25–40.Google Scholar

Luper, S. (2009) The Philosophy of Death, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luper-Foy, S. [see S. Luper] (1987) ‘Annihilation’, Philosophical Quarterly 37: 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luschnat, O. (1961/2) ‘Autodidaktos. Eine Begriffsgeschichte’, Theologia Viatorum 10: 156–72.Google Scholar

Mackey, J. L. (2006) ‘Saving the appearances: The phenomenology of epiphany in atomist theology’, Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics (www.princeton.edu/∼pswpc/pdfs/mackey/050601.pdf).

McKirahan, R. (1996) ‘Epicurean doxography in Cicero, De natura deorum Book i’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996: vol. ii, pp. 865–78.

McMahan, J. (2002) The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maehler, H. (1963) Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Manetti, D. (1985) ‘Tematica filosofica e scientifica nel Papiro Fiorentino 115: Un probabile frammento di Galeno In Hippocratis De alimento’, in Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, ed. Cavini, W., Macciò, M. C. Donnini, Funghi, M. S. and Manetti, D., Florence: 173–213.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1993) ‘Aspects of Epicurean theology’, Mnemosyne 46: 172–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1999) ‘Theology’, in Algra et al. 1999: 452–78.CrossRef

Manuwald, A. (1972) Die Prolêpsislehre Epikurs, Bonn.Google Scholar

Maslowski, T. (1974) ‘The chronology of Cicero's anti-Epicureanism’, Eos 62: 55–78.Google Scholar

Maslowski, T. (1978) ‘Cicero, Philodeus, Lucretius’, Eos 66: 215–26.Google Scholar

Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History, Leiden.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1987) ‘Epicurus on friendship and altruism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5: 127–53.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1988a) Epicurus' Ethical Theory: The Pleasures of Invulnerability, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1988b) ‘Epicurus on death and the duration of life’, in Cleary and Shartin 1988: 303–22.

Moles, J. L. (1996) ‘Diatribe’, in Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edn, Oxford: 463–4.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1941) ‘Epicureans in Revolt’, Journal of Roman Studies 31: 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, Journal of Roman Studies 55: 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, O. (1984a) Review of Dorandi 1982. Journal of Roman Studies 74: 235–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, O. (1984b) ‘Rileggendo il buon re secondo Omero’, Cronache Ercolanesi 14: 157–60.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (2007) ‘Philosophy and Monarchy in the Hellenistic World’, in Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers, ed. Rajak, T., Pearce, S., Aitken, J. and Dines, J., Berkeley: 13–28.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1970) ‘Death’, Nous 4: 73–80. Reprinted in Nagel 1979: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, T. (1979) Mortal Questions, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1992) ‘Pity and fear in the Rhetoric and the Poetics’, in Essays on Aristotle's Poetics, ed. Rorty, A. O., Princeton: 291–314.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. H. (1976) Epicurean Political Philosophy: The ‘De rerum natura’ of Lucretius, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1961) In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1978) A Commentary on Horace ‘Odes’, Book II, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connor, D. (1989) ‘The invulnerable pleasures of Epicurean friendship’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 165–86.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 187–223.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1992) ‘What all men believe – must be true: Common conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10: 193–231.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (ed.) (1995) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus: On Piety Part I, Critical Text with Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1997) ‘The mooring of philosophy’. Review of Indelli and Tsouna-McKirahan 1995. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 259–81.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (2002) ‘“All gods are true” in Epicurus’, in D. Frede and Laks 2002: 183–221.

Obbink, D. (2004) ‘Craft, cult, and canon in the books from Herculaneum’, in Fitzgerald et al. 2004: 73–84.

Obbink, D. (Forthcoming) Philodemus: On Piety, pt ii, Oxford.

Ogilvie, R. M. (1978) The Library of Lactantius, Oxford.Google Scholar

O'Keefe, T. (2010) Epicureanism, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Olivieri, A. (1914) Philodemi Peri Parrhesias, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism, Brussels.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2005) ‘Plutarch's Platonism revisited’, in L'Eredità platonica: Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo, ed. Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V., Naples: 163–200.Google Scholar

Paolucci, M. (1955) ‘Studi sull'epicureismo romano, i: Note al περὶ τοῦ καθ᾽ Ὅμηρον ἀγαθοῦ βασιλέως di Filodemo’, Rendiconti dell'Istituto lombardo di scienze e lettere 88: 483–511.Google Scholar

Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons, Oxford.Google Scholar

Pasquali, G. (1994) Pagine stravaganti di un filologo, 2 vols., ed. Russo, C. F., Florence.Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. (1955–58) M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum libriiii, 2 vols., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) (1988) Plutarch: Life of Antony, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1915) Review of Wilke 1914, Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 35: 645–52.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1916a) ‘Philodems Buch über den Zorn: Ein Beitrag zu seiner Wiederherstellung und Auslegung’, Rheinisches Museum 71: 425–60.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1916b) ‘Zur epikureischen Götterlehre’, Hermes 51: 568–608.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1918) ‘Nachträgliches zur epikureischen Götterlehre’, Hermes 53: 358–95.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1939) ‘Die Quelle der epikureischen Götterlehre in Ciceros erstem Buche De natura deorum’, Symbolae Osloenses 19: 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philippson, R. (1940) ‘Des Akademikers Kritik der epikureischen Theologie im ersten Buch der Tuskulanen Ciceros’, Symbolae Osloenses 20: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (ed.) (1999) Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford.Google Scholar

Procopé, J. (1993) ‘Epicureans on anger’, in Philanthropia Kai Eusebeia: Festschrift für Albrecht Dihle, ed. Most, G., Petersmann, H. and Ritter, A., Göttingen: 363–86. Reprinted as Procopé 1998.Google Scholar

Procopé, J. (1998) ‘Epicureans on anger’, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T., Dordrecht: 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puglia, E. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali ed esegetiche in Epicuro, La Scuola di Epicuro 8, Naples.Google Scholar

Purinton, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus on the nature of the gods’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 181–231.Google Scholar

Purinton, J. (2002) Review of Santoro 2000. Classical Review 52: 267–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rackham, H. (tr.) (1933) Cicero: De Natura Deorum, Cambridge, Mass.

Rawson, E. (1975) ‘Caesar's heritage: Hellenistic kings and their Roman equals’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic, London.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1986) ‘Cassius and Brutus: The memory of the liberators’, in Past Perspectives, ed. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J., Cambridge: 101–20.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1989) ‘Roman rulers and the philosophic adviser’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 233–57.

Reinhardt, T. (2002) ‘The speech of Nature in Lucretius’ De rerum natura 3.931–71', Classical Quarterly 52: 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, T. (2004) ‘Readers in the Underworld: Lucretius, De rerum natura 3.912–1075’, Journal of Roman Studies 94: 27–46.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. (2005) ‘The language of Epicureanism in Cicero: The case of atomism’, in Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, ed. Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N., Proceedings of the British Academy 129: 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renehan, R. (1963) ‘Aristotle's definition of anger’, Philologus 107: 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ringeltaube, H. (1913) Quaestiones ad veterum philosophorum de affectibus doctrinam pertinentes, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, S. (1986) ‘How to be dead and not care: A defense of Epicurus’, American Philosophical Quarterly 23: 217–25.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, S. (1990) ‘Epicurus on pleasure and the complete life’, Monist 73: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roskam, G. (2003) ‘Being the physician of one's own soul: On a Plutarchan fragment on anger (fr. 148 Sandbach)’, Humanitas 55: 41–62.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2005), On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-) Platonism, Leuven.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2007) Live Unnoticed (Λάθε βιώσας): On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, W. H. D. (tr.) (1992) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura, revised by M. F. Smith, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Roy, J. (1994) ‘Thebes in the 360s b.c.’, in The Fourth Century B.C., vol. vi of The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd edn, pp. 187–208.CrossRef

Runia, D. T. (1996) ‘Atheists in Aëtius: Text, translation and comments on De placitis 1.7.1–10’, Mnemosyne 49: 542–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1973) Plutarch, London.Google Scholar

Russo, J., Fernández-Galiano, M. and Heubeck, A. (1992) A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey. Vol. iii: Books xvii–xxiv, Oxford.Google Scholar

Salem, J. (1989) Tel un dieu parmi les hommes: L'Ethique d'Épicure, Paris.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1930) ‘Ennoia and prolêpsis in the Stoic theory of knowledge’, Classical Quarterly 24: 45–51. Reprinted in Problems in Stoicism, ed. A. A. Long, London (1971).Google Scholar

Sanders, K. (2002) Natural Passions: Desire and Emotion in Epicurean Ethics, PhD diss., Austin.Google Scholar

Sanders, K. (2004) ‘Cicero De natura deorum 1.48–9: Quasi Corpus?’, Mnemosyne 57: 215–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, K. (2008a) ‘Mens and emotion: De rerum natura 3.136–46’, Classical Quarterly 58: 362–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, K. (2008b) ‘“Death” and “being dead”: Epicur. Sent. 2, Ep. ad Men. 124–5, and Phld. De morte 1.5–7’, La parola del passato 63: 427–8.Google Scholar

Sanders, K. <323a> (2009) ‘On a causal notion in Philodemus’ On Anger', Classical Quarterly 59: 642–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santoro, M. (2000) [Demetrio Lacone]: [La forma del dio] (PHerc. 1055), La Scuola di Epicuro 17, Naples.Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. (1990) Lukrez, der Kepos und die Stoiker: Untersuchungen zur Schule Epikurs und zu den Quellen von ‘De rerum natura’, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Schober, A. (1988) ‘Philodemi De pietate pars prior’, Cronache Ercolanesi 18: 67–125. (Diss. Königsberg 1923.)Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1996) ‘Epilogismos: An appraisal’, in M. Frede and Striker 1996: 221–37.

Schofield, M. (2000) ‘Epicurean and Stoic political thought’, in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Rowe, C. J. and Schofield, M., Cambridge: 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, M. (2007) Review of Benferhat 2005. Classical Review 57: 179–81.CrossRef

Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) (1986) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Schorn, Stefan (2004) Satyros aus Kallatis: Sammlung der Fragmente mit Kommentar, Basel.Google Scholar

Schwiebe, M. W. (2003) ‘Sind die epikureischen Götter “thought-constructs”?’, Mnemosyne 56: 703–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, D. (1995) Recollection and Experience, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, W. (1883) ‘The physical constitution of the Epicurean gods’, Journal of Philology 12: 212–47.Google Scholar

Scott, W. (1885) Fragmenta Herculanensia, Oxford.Google Scholar

Scotti, A. A. (ed.) (1839) Herculanensium Voluminum quae supersunt tomus vi, Naples.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1973) ‘Epicurus “On Nature”, Book xxviii’, Cronache Ercolanesi 3: 5–83.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1976a) ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’, Cronache Ercolanesi 6: 23–54.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1976b) ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’, in Bollack and Laks 1976: 119–59.

Sedley, D. (1989) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 97–119.

Sedley, D. (1996) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Giannantoni and Gigante 1996, vol. i, pp. 313–39. Reprinted with minor changes as Sedley 1998b.

Sedley, D. (1997) ‘The ethics of Brutus and Cassius’, Journal of Roman Studies 87: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. (1998a) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. (1998b) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Ethics, ed. S. Everson, Companions to Ancient Thought 4, Cambridge: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. (2007) ‘Epicureanism in the Roman Republic’, in Warren 2009: 29–45.

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad familiares, Volume 2, 47–43 bc, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1983) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Fate, London.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1996) Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shields, C. J. (1994) Socrates among the Skeptics, in Vander Waerdt 1994: 341–66.

Sider, D. (1997) The Epigrams of Philodemos, Oxford.Google Scholar

Sider, D. (2005) The Library of the Villa dei Papiri at Herculaneum, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Smith, J. Z. (1990) Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity, Chicago.Google Scholar

Smith, J. Z. (1993) Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions, Chicago.Google ScholarPubMed

Smith, M. F. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, La Scuola di Epicuro, Suppl. 1, Naples.Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (2001) (tr.) Lucretius: On the Nature of Things, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Smith, O. L. (1976) Scholia Graeca in Aeschylum quae exstant omnia, vol. i, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Solomon, D. (2004) ‘Lucretius’ progressive revelation of Nature in DRN 1.149-502', Phoenix 58: 260–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomon, R. (1993) The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life, rev. edn, Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Solomon, R. and Calhoun, C. (eds.) (1984) What Is an Emotion? Classical Readings in Philosophical Psychology, 1st edn, Oxford.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2000) Emotions and Peace of Mind, Oxford.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, F. A. (1967) Die Freundschaftslehre des Panaitios: Nach einer Analyse von Ciceros ‘Laelius de amicitia’, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Stenzel, J. (1961) Platon der Erzieher, Hamburg.Google Scholar

Stokes, M. C. (1995) ‘Cicero on Epicurean pleasures’, in Powell 1999: 145–70.

Striker, G. (1988) ‘Commentary on Mitsis’, in Cleary and Shartin 1988: 323–8.CrossRef

Strongman, K. T. (1987) The Psychology of Emotion, 3rd edn, Chichester.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution, Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Tatum, W. J. (2008) Always I Am Caesar, Malden, Mass.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus' ‘On Affections’: Reconstruction and Interpretation, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2001a) ‘Philodemus on the therapy of vice’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 233–58.Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2001b) ‘Cicéron et Philodème: Quelques considérations sur l’éthique', in Auvray-Assayas and Delattre 2001: 159–72.

Tsouna, V. (2003) ‘“Portare davanti agli occhi”: Una tecnica retorica nelle opere morali di Filodemo’, Cronache Ercolansi 33: 243–48.Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2006) ‘Aristo on blends of arrogance’, in Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. and White, S., Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 13, New Brunswick, N.J., and London: 279–92.Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2007a) The Ethics of Philodemus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2007b) ‘Philodemus on emotions’, in Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 bc to 200 ad, 2 vols., ed. Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R., Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 94, London: 213–41.Google Scholar

Tsouna, V. (2009) ‘Epicurean therapeutic strategies’, in Warren 2009: 249–65.CrossRef

Unamuno, M. (1954) Tragic Sense of Life, New York.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea, Leipzig. Repr. Stuttgart 1966.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (1977) Glossarium Epicureum, ed. Gigante, M., Rome.Google Scholar

Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.) (1994) The Socratic Movement, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Hoof, L. (2005) ‘Plutarch's De cohibenda ira and its model reader’, Plutarc a la seva època: Paideia i societat, ed. Jufresa, M., Barcelona: 501–6.Google Scholar

Hoof, L. (2007) ‘Strategic differences: Seneca and Plutarch on controlling anger’, Mnemosyne 60: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnim, H. (1903–5) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, 3 vols. Leipzig; vol. iv, indexes by M. Adler (Leipzig, 1924).Google Scholar

Fritz, K. (1972) ‘Zenon von Kition’, in Pauly-Wissowa's Realencyclopädie, 2nd ser., vol. x A: 83–8.

Vooys, C. J. (1933–41) Lexicon Philodemeum, vol. i (Purmerend 1934); vol. ii with D. A. van Krevelen (Amsterdam 1941).

Warren, J. (2000) ‘Epicurean immortality’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 231–61.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2004) Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, J. (2007) Review of Koch 2005. Classical Review 57: 338–9.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, D. (1969) The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (1978) Hesiod: Works and Days, Oxford.Google Scholar

Westmann, R. (1955) Plutarch gegen Kolotes, seine Schrift ‘Adversus Colotem’ als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Wigodsky, M. (1995) ‘The alleged impossibility of philosophical poetry’, in Obbink 1995: 58–68.

Wigodsky, M. (2004) ‘Emotions and immortality in Philodemus On the Gods 3 and the Aeneid ’, in Armstrong et al. 2004: 211–30.

Wilke, K. (1914) Philodemi De ira liber, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Williams, B. (1973) ‘The Makropulos case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality’, in Problems of the Self, Cambridge: 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1971) New Men in the Roman Senate 139 bc – ad 14, Oxford.Google Scholar

Woodward, P. (1989) ‘Star gods in Philodemus, PHerc. 152/157’, Cronache Ercolanesi 19: 29–47.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1856–9) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, 2nd edn, 3 vols., Tübingen.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1870) The Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics, translation of Zeller 1856–9, vol. iii, by O. J. Reichel, London.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1883) Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie, 1st edn, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1890) Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy, translation of Zeller 1883 by S. F. Alleyne and E. Abbott, New York.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1923) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, vol. iii, pt i, 5th edn, revised by E. Wellmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1928) Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie, 13th edn, revised by W. Nestle, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (1931) Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy, translation of Zeller 1928 by L. R. Palmer, New York.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. (1995) De re publica: Selections, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. (1999) Cicero: ‘On the Commonwealth’ and ‘On the Laws’, Cambridge.Google Scholar