Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T11:03:55.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Exploring Legal Culture

A Few Cautionary Remarks from Comparative Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

By
José Juan Toharia
Edited by
Robert W. Gordon  and
Morton J. Horwitz
José Juan Toharia
Affiliation:
Autonomous University of Madrid
Robert W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Morton J. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Since Lawrence M. Friedman first published his seminal paper on legal culture in 1969, the number of empirical studies on opinions and attitudes with respect to legal and judicial institutions has been constantly growing. Even if, on the whole, the mass of reliable and comparable opinion data now available worldwide is still relatively thin, in some countries the systematic measurement of both the internal and external legal culture has become a fully consolidated area of research.

It has gradually become accepted that legal culture is an extremely important variable for obtaining a better understanding of how legal systems operate. It is “in a way, the fuel that makes the law machine move and work. It determines the pattern of demands on the legal system. Without the legal culture, ‘law’ is dead, inert, a skeleton, words on paper.”

Legal culture consists basically of values, attitudes, and opinions related to the legal system, and survey research represents a particularly effective operational tool to explore it. Obviously, opinion polls cannot properly and fully capture all the aspects of a legal culture (whether internal or external), but most of its dimensions can only be grasped and measured with the help of surveys. In this sense surveys represent a basic, even if incomplete, instrument in the production of reliable and comparative information.

It is not my intention in this chapter to summarize or even discuss the mass of empirical information already available from research carried out in the United States and in most European Union (EU) countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Society, and History
Themes in the Legal Sociology and Legal History of Lawrence M. Friedman
 , pp. 90 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Converse, Philip (1987). Changing Conceptions of Public Opinion in the Political Process, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51/Supplement, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, T.. (2004). Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. An American Perspective, in Parmentier, S. et al., eds. Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice. Brussels: Politeia.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. (1969). Legal Culture and Social Development, in Kruger, H., ed., Verfassung und Recht in Ubersee. Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. and Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2003). Latin Legal Cultures in the Age of Globalization, in Friedman, L. M. and Pérez-Perdomo, R., eds., Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
García de la Cruz, J. J. and Toharia, J. J. (2005). La Justicia ante el espejo: veinticinco años de estudios de opinión del CGPJ. Madrid: CGPJ.Google Scholar
Jensen, E. G., and Heller, Th. C., eds. (2003). Beyond Common Knowledge. Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. M., and Voelker, J. (1998). Familiarity Breeds Respect, 82(2) Judicature58.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M.. (2000). Sword and Scales. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
,National Center for State Courts (1999). How the Public Views the State Courts. Williamsburg, VA: NCSC.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E.. (1984). The Spiral of Silence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Packer, H.. (1968). The Limits of the Penal Sanction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parmentier, S.. et al., eds. (2004). Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice. Brussels: Politeia.Google Scholar
Robert, P.. (2004). Opinion publique et administration de la Justice. Recherches françaises, in Parmentier, S. et al., eds. Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice. Brussels: Politeia.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. V. (2004). Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice in Canada, in Parmentier, S. et al., eds. Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice. Brussels: Politeia.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M.. (1981) Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Toharia, J. J. (1987). !Pleitos tengas! Introducción a la cultura legal española. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Toharia, J. J. (2001). Opinión pública y Justicia. Madrid: Consejo General del Poder Judicial.Google Scholar
Toharia, J. J. (2003a). La imagen ciudadana de la Justicia. Madrid: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Toharia, J. J. (2003b). The Organization, Functioning and Evaluation of the Spanish Judicial System, in Friedman, L. M. and Pérez-Perdomo, R., eds., Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Toharia, J. J. (2003c). Evaluating Systems of Justice through Public Opinion, in Jensen, E. G. and Heller, Th. C., eds. Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×