Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:32:38.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 121 - Lumbar spine surgery

from Section 24 - Orthopedic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Neil H. Winawer
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Lumbar surgery in adults can be divided into three general levels of complexity and associated morbidity. The first, an operation to treat herniated lumbar nucleus pulposus, is relatively straightforward from a medical management perspective. The second, an operation for multilevel lumbar stenosis, is usually more involved and tends to be performed for older patients with more comorbidities. The most complicated surgeries are fusion surgeries, which may be carried out with a posterior or anterior approach, or with both approaches.

Patients with a lumbar disc herniation present with radiculopathy in a dermatomal pattern, and may exhibit motor weakness or reflex changes which correspond to the anatomic level of neural compression. The patient is typically a young adult in good health. Axial back pain is not a predominant symptom of this condition and is generally unimproved with a discectomy. If the symptoms produced by lumbar disc herniation fail to respond to appropriate non-operative therapy, laminotomy and discectomy are indicated. Patients are placed either prone or in the knee–chest position on a specially designed operating table; the latter position affords decompression of the abdominal cavity and the epidural veins. The procedure is performed with either loupe magnification or use of the surgical microscope through a posterior midline incision measuring 2.5–5 cm. The operative level is confirmed radiographically to prevent harm to an otherwise normal intervertebral disc. Blood loss is minimal and the total anesthetic time is usually 1–2 hours. A subset of these patients will present with acutely worsening neurologic dysfunction with or without cauda equina syndrome. In these cases, the herniated nuclear fragment is so large that it causes ischemia of the nerve roots. Although unusual, this situation is a true surgical emergency and requires prompt clinical diagnosis to give the patient the best chance of neurologic recovery.

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
, pp. 727 - 731
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne, JA, Cook, C, Pietrobon, R, Bethel, MA, Richardson, WJ.Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 2007; 32: 2214–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, JS, Arnold, PM, Anderson, PA, Fischer, D, Dettori, JR.Anticoagulation risk in spine surgery. Spine 2007; 35 (9 Suppl) :S117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassman, SD, Alegre, G, Carreon, L, Dimar, JR, Johnson, JR.Perioperative complications of lumbar instrumentation and fusion in patients with diabetes mellitus. Spine J 2003; 3: 496–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, P, Upadhyaya, C, Garton, HJ, Foley, KT.The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 693–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrozza, PH.Major spine surgery. Anesthesiology Clin North Am 2002; 20: 405–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodgers, WB, Gerber, EJ, Patterson, J.Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine 2011; 36: 26–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Vela, J, Lobo-Escolar, A, Joven-Aliaga, E et al. Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion. European Spine J 2009; 18: 1194–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spivak, JM.Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1053–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×