Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T14:17:37.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - A Reluctant State and Its Enterprises: State-Owned Enterprises in the Netherlands in the “Long” Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

M. Davids
Affiliation:
Technical University Eindhoven
Jan L. van Zanden
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
Pier Angelo Toninelli
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Get access

Summary

The rise and fall of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) should be seen in the context of broader changes in the socioeconomic structure of the Netherlands after about 1870. In an ongoing study of the Dutch economy in the twentieth century, Jan van Zanden has developed the concept of the “long” twentieth century to describe these changes. In the decades after 1870 three interrelated processes of structural change began; these processes dominated economic life during the twentieth century. These three changes are the rise of trade unions, the growth of the managerial enterprise, and the development of the welfare state. After about 1900 these changes accelerated, reaching full maturity after 1945. Since the early 1970s all three seemed to be in decline: union membership fell, the crisis in the welfare state led to large-scale cuts in welfare provision, and the large multinationals radically decreased their share of total employment due to downsizing, increased subcontracting, and intense competition from abroad. Economic development since the early 1980s has been characterized by (1) increased flexibility in the labor market (in spite of trade union resistance), (2) a government that officially aims at reducing its role in the economy, and (3) the decline of (large-scale) industry and the great increase in (small-scale) service employment (Van Zanden 1997).

The rise and decline of SOEs in the long twentieth century is another feature of these interrelated processes. The forces that contributed to the rise of the welfare state and trade unionism, for example, also favored increased direct state intervention in production through the establishment of SOEs and the nationalization of private enterprises.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×