Audi, Robert, The Good and the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Bealer, George, “Intuitions and the Autonomy of Philosophy,” in DePaul, and Ramsey, (eds.), 201–39.

Burge, Tyler, “Logic and Analyticity,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (2003), 199–249.Google Scholar

Burgess, John, “Quine, Analyticity and Philosophy of Mathematics,” Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2004), 38–55.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David, The Conscious Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Chalmers, David,“Phenomenal Concepts and the Knowledge Argument,” in Ludlow, P., Nagasawa, Y., and Stoljar, D. (eds.), There's Something about Mary, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004, 269–98.

Chalmers, David, “The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism,” in his The Character of Consciousness, Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming (a draft is available on Chalmers' website at http://consc.net/papers/2dargument.html)

Chomsky, Noam, Review of Verbal Behavior, Language 35 (1959), 26–58.CrossRef

Clark, Michael, “Knowledge and Grounds: A Comment on Mr. Gettier's Paper,” Analysis 24(2) (1963), 46–8.Google Scholar

Creath, Richard (ed.), Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine–Carnap Correspondence and Related Work, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.

Cummins, Robert, “Reflections on Reflective Equilibrium,” in DePaul, and Ramsey, (eds), 113–27.

Daniels, Norman, “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics,” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), 256–82.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donals, “Quine's Externalism,”Grazer Philosophische Studien, 66 (2003), 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, Daniel, “The Zombic Hunch: Extinction of an Intuition?,” in O'Hear, A. (ed.), Philosophy at the New Millennium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 27–43.

DePaul, Michael R., “Reflective Equilibrium and Foundationalism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1986), 59–69.Google Scholar

DePaul, Michael R.,“Why Bother with Reflective Equilibrium?,” in DePaul, and Ramsey, (eds.), 293–309.

DePaul, M. R. and Ramsey, W. (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.

DeRose, Keith, “Plantinga, Presumption, Possibility and the Problem of Evil,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1990), 497–512.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth, “The Causal Theory of Names,” Collected Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.

Fitch, G. W., Saul Kripke, Montreal: McGill Queen's University Press, 2004.

Flew, Anthony and MacIntyre, Alasdair (eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, London: Macmillan, 1955.

Fodor, Jerry, “Water's Water Everywhere,” London Review of Books, October 21, 2004.

Frankfurt, Harry, “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969), 829–39.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael, “Kuhn and Logical Empiricism,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 19–44.

Gettier, Edmund, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?,” Analysis 23 (1963), 121–3.Google Scholar

Gibson, Roger F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Quine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Giere, Ronald, “Kuhn's Legacy for North American Philosophy of Science,” Social Studies of Science 27 (1997), 496–8.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J., Glürt, K., and Keil, G. (eds.), Fifty Years of Quine's “Two Dogmas” (Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 [2003]), 1. Also published as a book by Rodopi, 2003.

Goldman, Alvin, “A Causal Theory of Knowing,” Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967), 335–72.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin,“What is Justified Belief?,” in Pappas, George (ed.), Justification and Knowledge, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979, 1–23.

Grice, H. P. and Strawson, P. F., “In Defense of a Dogma,” Philosophical Review 55 (1956), 141–58.Google Scholar

Gutting, Gary, Pragmatic Liberalism and the Critique of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Hardcastle, Valerie Gray, “The Why of Consciousness: A Non-Issue for Materialists,” in Shear, Jonathan (ed.), Explaining Consciousness – The “Hard Problem,”Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 61–8.

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul and Sankey, Howard (eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Boston: Kluwer, 2001.

Hughes, Christopher, Kripke: Names, Necessity, and Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Jackson, Frank, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Jackson, Frank,“Reference and Description Revisited,” in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 12: Language, Mind, and Ontology, Oxford: Blackwell, 1998, 201–18.

Katz, Jerrold, “Names without Bearers,” The Philosophical Review 103 (1994), 1–39.Google Scholar

Kim, Jaegwon, “The Mind–Body Problem at Century's Turn,” in Leiter, Brian (ed.), The Future for Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 129–52.

Kirk, Robert, “Zombies v. Materialists,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol. 48 (1974), 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip, “Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change,” The Philosophical Review 87 (1978), 519–47.Google Scholar

Klein, Peter, “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge,” Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971), 471–82.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul, Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970 [first published 1962].

Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Laudan, Laurens, Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

Lewis, David, “Are We Free to Break the Laws?,” in his Philosophical Papers, Volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, 291–8.

Lewis, David,“Elusive Knowledge,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1996), 549–67.Google Scholar

Loar, Brian, “Phenomenal States (Revised),” in Ludlow, P., Nagasawa, Y., and Stoljar, D. (eds.), There's Something about Mary, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004, 219–39.

Lycan, William, “Definition in a Quinean World,” in Fetzer, J., Shatz, D., and Schlesinger, G. (eds.), Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991, 111–31.

Lycan, William,“On the Gettier Problem Problem,” Hetherington, in Stephen (ed.), Epistemology Futures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 148–68.

Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., and Stich, S., “Semantics Cross-Cultural Style,” Cognition 92 (2004), B1–B12.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L., The Miracle of Theism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Martin, Michael, Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990.

McDowell, John, “Towards Rehabilitating Objectivity,” in Brandom, Robert B. (ed.), Rorty and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, 2000, 109–23.

McGinn, Colin, “Can We Solve the Mind–Body Problem?,” Mind, New Series, 98 (1989), 349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, “Conceiving the Impossible and the Mind–Body Problem,” Philosophy 73 (1998), 337–52.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?,” The Philosophical Review 83 (1974), 435–50.Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984.

Plantinga, Alvin, God and Other Minds, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967.

Plantinga, Alvin, The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.

Plantinga, Alvin, Warranted Christian Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Putnam, Hilary, “The Analytic and the Synthetic,” in his Mind, Language, and Reality, Philosophical Papers, Volume II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. [First published 1962.]

Putnam, Hilary, “The Greatest Logical Positivist,” in his Realism with a Human Face, ed. Conant, James, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Putnam, Hilary, Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Quine, W. V. O., “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in his From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.

Quine, W. V., “Two Dogmas in Retrospect,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1991), 265–74.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O, Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960.

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Richard, Rorty, “Response to John McDowell,” in Brandom, R. (ed.), Rorty and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell, 2000, 123–8.

Rorty, Richard, “An Imaginative Philosopher: The Legacy of W. V. Quine” [obituary notice], Chronicle of Higher Education, February 2, 2001.

Rorty, Richard, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Rorty, Richard, Philosophy as Cultural Politics (Philosophical Papers, Volume IV), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.

Salmon, Nathan, Reference and Essence, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982, 23–31.

Israel, Scheffler, Science and Subjectivity, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967.

Samuel, Scheffler, “Rawls and Utilitarianism,” in Freeman, Samuel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Searle, John, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Shapere, Dudley, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” The Philosophical Review 73 (1964), 383–94.Google Scholar

Shope, Robert K., The Analysis of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.

Shope, Robert K., “Conditions and Analyses of Knowing,” in Moser, Paul (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 25–70

Singer, Peter, “Philosophers Are Back on the Job,” The New York Times Magazine, July 7, 1974, 6–7; 17–20.Google Scholar

Soames, Scott, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume I: The Dawn of Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.

Soames, ScottPhilosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume II: The Age of Meaning, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.

Sosa, E. and Kim, J. (eds.), Epistemology: An Anthology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000, 340–53.

Stoljar, Daniel, “Physicalism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/

Swoyer, Chris, “How Ontology Might Be Possible: Explanation and Inference in Metaphysics,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXIII (1999), 100–31.Google Scholar

Inwagen, Peter, An Essay on Free Will, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

Inwagen, Peter, “Freedom to Break the Laws,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXVIII (2004), 334–50Google Scholar

Inwagen, Peter, “Free Will Remains a Mystery,” in Kane, Robert (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 158–77.

Inwagen, Peter, “The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism,” Philosophical Studies 27 (1975), 185–99.Google Scholar

Weatherson, Brian, “What Good Are Counterexamples?,” Philosophical Studies 115 (2003), 1–31.Google Scholar

Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., and Stich, S., “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions,” Philosophical Topics 29 (2001), 429–60.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred North, Adventures of Ideas, New York: Free Press, 1967 [first published 1933].

Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

Williamson, Timothy, The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.

Zammito, John H., A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

Zimmerman, Dean, “Materialism and Survival,” in Stump, E. and Murray, M. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, 379–86.