Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:38:34.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Psychological Tools and Mediated Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Alex Kozulin
Affiliation:
The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential, Jerusalem, Israel
Alex Kozulin
Affiliation:
International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential, Jerusalem
Boris Gindis
Affiliation:
Touro College, New York
Vladimir S. Ageyev
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Suzanne M. Miller
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

What is the secret of Vygotsky's popularity? Why does a theory developed in Moscow a few years after the Russian Revolution capture the imagination of American educators at the beginning of the 21st century?

One possible explanation of this puzzling phenomenon is that Vygotsky's theory offers us answers to the questions that were not asked earlier. It is only now that we have started posing questions that make Vygotsky's “answers” relevant. Following this logic of explanation, instead of starting with a systematic exposition of Vygotskian theory, I would first focus on those contemporary questions that highlight the relevance of sociocultural theory.

Question 1: Multiculturalism. The issues of culture and learning have been inseparable for centuries for the simple reason that one of the main goals of learning is the transmission of culture from generation to generation. Nevertheless, the majority of educators were oblivious of this cultural element until confronted with it in the reality of the multicultural classroom. In a monocultural environment culture remains mostly invisible, and educators start paying attention to it only when two or more cultural patterns are empirically present in the same classroom at the same time. One may say that Vygotsky had a certain advantage in this respect because he worked in a period of great social upheaval that put different social and ethnic groups into the same educational focus. The issues of literacy, as well as ethnic and cultural diversity, were much more obvious for Vygotsky and his colleagues than for their Western contemporaries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Hur, M. (Ed.) (1994). On Feuerstein's instrumental enrichment. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight
Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22(1), 37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Ferrara, R. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). New York: Cambridge University Press
Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching. Soviet Education, 30(8), 15–97; 30(9), 3–83; 30(10), 3–77Google Scholar
Davydov, V. V., & Tzvetkovich, Z. (1991). On the objective origin of the concept of fractions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 3(1), 13–64Google Scholar
DeLoach, J. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science – from behaviorism toward social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Learning and thinking styles: Classroom applications (pp. 68–134). Washington, DC: National Education Association
Feuerstein, R., Hoffman, M., Egozi, M., & Ben Shachar, N. (1994). Intervention programs for low performers. In M. Ben-Hur (Ed.), On Feuerstein's Instrumental Enrichment (pp. 3–50). Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight
Feuerstein, R., Krasilovsky, D., & Rand, Y. (1978). Modifiability during adolescence. In J. Anthony (Ed.), The child and his family: Children and their parents in a changing world (pp. 197–217). London: Wiley
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1979). Dynamic assessment of retarded performer. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press
Fischer, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Hatano, G. (1993). Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Addison Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 153–166). New York: Oxford University Press
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as a basis for instruction. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 349–371). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Jensen, M. (1990). Change models and some evidence for phases and their plasticity in cognitive structures. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 5–16Google Scholar
Karpov, Y., & Bransford, J. (1995). Vygotsky and the doctrine of empirical and theoretical learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, P. (1988). Stability and change in interaction of Israeli mothers and infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky's psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kozulin, A. (2000). Diversity of instrumental enrichment applications. In A. Kozulin and Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning (pp. 257–273). Oxford: Pergamon
Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23, 112–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A., & Lurie, L. (1994). Psychological tools and mediated learning: Cross-cultural aspects. Paper presented at the International Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pamplona, Spain
Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools. Educational Psychologis, 30(2), 67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, R., & Shumow, L. (1997). Aligning the construction zones of parents and teachers for math reform. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 41–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, C. (1987). Dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press
Lidz, C. (1991). Practitioners guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press
Lompscher, J. (1984). Problems and results of experimental research on the formation of theoretical thinking through instruction. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Learning and teaching on scientific basis (pp. 293–358). Aarus: Aarus University
Lompscher, J. (1997). General effects without domain-specific effects? Paper presented at the 7th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece
Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Olson, D. (1994). World on paper. New York: Cambridge University Press
Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, P. (1991). Assessing children's cognitive environment through parent-child interactions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 24, 30–37Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). New York: Cambridge University Press
Savell, J., Twohig, P., & Rachford, D. (1986). Empirical status of Feuerstein's Instrumental Enrichment. Review of Educational Research, 56, 381–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, R. (1996). Joint involvement episodes as context for development. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An Introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 251–280). London: Routledge
Scribner, S. (1997). Mind and social practice. New York: Cambridge University Press
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). Psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumow, L. (1998). Promoting parental attunement to children's math reasoning through parent education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R., & Grigorenko, Y. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tharp, R., & Gillimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tzuriel, D. (1996). Mediated learning experience in free-play versus structured situations among preschool children of low-, medium-, and high-SES. Child Development and Care, 126, 57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzuriel, D. (1997). The relation between parent-child MLE interactions and children's cognitive modifiability. In A. Kozulin (Ed.), The Ontogeny of cognitive modifiability (pp. 157–180). Jerusalem: ICELP
Venger, A., & Gorbov, S. (1993). Psychological foundations for the introductory course of mathematics for six year olds. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 15(1), 2–13Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (rev. ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Vygotsky, L. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In The collected works ofL. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum
Vygotsky, L., & Luria, A. (1930/1993). Studies on the history of behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Wagner, D., Messic, B., & Spratt, J. (1986). Studying literacy in Morocco. In B. Shieffelin, & P. Gilmore (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 233–260). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Wallace, B., Pandaram, S., & Modiroa, T. (1996). Language in my world. Kenvyn, South Africa: Juta Publishers
Wertsch, J., & Stone, A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162–179). New York: Cambridge University Press
Wood, D. (1999). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language, and thought. In P. Lloyd and C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments, (vol. 3, pp. 259–275). London: Routledge

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×