Abraham, K. S., The Liability Century. Insurance and Tort Law from the Progressive Era to 9/11 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

,American Law Institute (ed.), Restatement of the Law: Torts, 4 vols. (St Paul, MN: ALI Publishers, 1934/1938).Google Scholar

,American Law InstituteRestatement of the Law (Second): Torts, 4 vols. (St Paul, MN: ALI Publishers, 1965/1977/1979).Google Scholar

,American Law InstituteReporters' Study: Enterprise Responsibility for Personal Injury, 2 vols. (Philadelphia: ALI Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar

,American Law InstituteRestatement of the Law (Third): Torts – Products Liability (St Paul, MN: ALI Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar

,American Law InstituteRestatement of the Law (Third): Torts – Liability for Physical Harm (Propos ed Final Draft No. 1; Philadelphia: ALI, 2005).Google Scholar

,American Law InstituteRestatement of the Law (Third): Torts – Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm, vol. 1, (St Paul, MN: ALI Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar

Apathy, P., Bollenberger, R., Bydlinski, P., Iro, G., Karner, E. and Karollus, M. (eds.), Festschrift für H. Koziol zum 70. Geburtstag (Vienna: Sramek, 2010).

Atiyah, P. S., Vicarious Liability in the Law of Torts (London: Butterworths, 1967).Google Scholar

Atiyah, P. S., Accidents, Compensation and the Law (3rd edn, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980).Google Scholar

Bar, C., Verkehrspflichten. Richterliche Gefahrsteuerungsgebote im deutschen Deliktsrecht (Cologne: Heymanns, 1980).Google Scholar

Bar, C., ‘Deliktsrecht’, in Federal Minister of Justice (ed.), Gutachten und Vorschläge zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts, vol. 2 (Cologne: Bundesanzeiger Verlag, 1981), pp. 1681–778.

Bar, C., The Common European Law of Torts, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998/2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar, C., ‘Konturen des Deliktsrechtskonzepts der Study Group on a European Civil Code: Ein Werkstattbericht’, ZEuP 2001, 515–32.Google Scholar

Bar, C., Clive, E. and Schulte-Nölke, H. (eds.), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) (outline edn, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers, 2009).

Baston-Vogt, M., Der sachliche Schutzbereich des zivilrechtlichen allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997).Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., Liability and Environment: Private and Public Law Aspects of Civil Liability for Environmental Harm in an International Context (The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar

Blackie, J., ‘The Torts Provisions of the Study Group on a European Civil Code’, in Bussani, M. (ed.), European Tort Law. Eastern and Western Perspectives (Berne: Stämpfli, 2007), pp. 55–80.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, M., Das Beweismaß im Zivilprozess aus rechtsvergleichender Sicht (Cologne: Heymanns, 2005).Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Deliktsrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1986).Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., ‘Unternehmenshaftung – Enterprise Liability. Eine europäische Perspektive?’, HAVE/REAS 2004, 162–75.Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Common Principles of Tort Law. A Pre-Statement of Law (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004).Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Haftungsrecht. Struktur, Prinzipien, Schutzbereich – Ein Beitrag zur Europäisierung des Privatrechts (Heidelberg: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., ‘Western Tort Law – A Jurisprudence of Injury’, in Bussani, M. and Werro, F. (eds.), European Private Law – A Handbook, vol. 1 (Berne: Stämpfli, 2009), pp. 245–334.Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Colombi-Ciacchi, A. and O'Callaghan, P. (eds.), Personality Rights in European Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRef

Brüggemeier, G., Colombi-Ciacchi, A. and Comandé, G. (eds.), Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the European Union, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Buchner, B., Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im Privatrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003).Google Scholar

Bussani, M. (ed.), European Tort Law: Eastern and Western Perspectives (Berne: Stämpfli, 2007).

Bussani, M. and Palmer, V. V. (eds.), Pure Economic Loss in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

Bussani, M. and Werro, F. (eds.), European Private Law – A Handbook, 2 vols. (Berne: Stämpfli, 2009).

Bydlinski, F., Krejci, H., Schilcher, B. and Steininger, V. (eds.), Das bewegliche System im geltenden und künftigen Recht, (Vienna/New York: Springer, 1986).CrossRef

Caemmerer, E., ‘Wandlungen des Deliktsrechts’, in Caemmerer, E., Friesenhahn, E. and Lange, R. (eds.), Hundert Jahre deutsches Rechtsleben. Festschrift zum hundertjährigen Bestehen des DJT 1860–1960, vol. 2 (Karlsruhe: C.F. Müller, 1964), pp. 49–136.Google Scholar

Caemmerer, E., Reform der Gefährdungshaftung (Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calabresi, G., The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis (NewHaven/London: Yale University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. and Klevorick, A. K., ‘Four Tests for Liability in Torts’, 14 J Legal Stud. 585–627 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, P., The Anatomy of Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 1997).Google Scholar

Cartwright, J., Vogenauer, S. and Whittaker, S. (eds.), Reforming the French Law of Obligations (Oxford: Hart, 2009).

Cranor, C. F., Toxic Torts: Science, Law, and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dam, C., European Tort Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Faria e Castro, A., Die Merkmale der unerlaubten Handlung im sowjetischen Zivilrecht unter Berücksichtigung ihrer historischen Entwicklung (Tübingen/Basel: Erdmann, 1969).Google Scholar

Deutsch, E., ‘Methode und Konzept der Gefährdungshaftung’, VersR 1971, 1–6.Google Scholar

Deutsch, E., Allgemeines Haftungsrecht (2nd edn, Cologne: Heymanns, 1996).Google Scholar

Dietz, F. M.Technische Risiken und Gefährdungshaftung (Cologne: Heymanns, 2006).Google Scholar

Dobbs, D. B., The Law of Torts (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2000).Google Scholar

Dugdale, A. M., and Jones, M. (gen. eds.), Clerk and Lindsell On Torts (19th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006).

Ebert, I., Pönale Elemente im deutschen Privatrecht. Von der Renaissance der Privatstrafe im deutschen Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar

Eidenmüller, H., Faust, F., Grigoleit, H. C., Jansen, N., Wagner, G. and Zimmermann, R., ‘Der Gemeinsame Referenzrahmen für das Europäische Privatrecht’, JZ 2008, 529–50.Google Scholar

Eörsi, G., ‘Private and Governmental Liability for the Torts of Employees and Organs’, in IECL, vol. 11: Torts, ch. 4 (1976).Google Scholar

Ernst, W. (ed.), Comparative Studies in the Development of the Law of Torts in Europe, vol. 5: The Development of Traffic Liability (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Esser, J., Grundlagen und Entwicklung der Gefährdungshaftung (2nd edn, Munich: C. H. Beck, 1961).Google Scholar

,European Group on Tort Law (ed.), Principles of European Tort Law. Text and Commentary (Vienna/New York: Springer, 2005).Google Scholar

Faure, M. (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability and Compensation in Environmental Liability. Future Developments in the European Union (Vienna/New York; Springer, 2003).CrossRef

Faure, M. and Hartflief, T., ‘Towards an Expanding Enterprise Liability in Europe?’(1996) 3 MJ235–70.Google Scholar

Feenstra, R., ‘Das Deliktsrecht bei Grotius’, in Feenstra, R. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Das römisch-holländische Recht: Fortschritte des Zivilrechts im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1992), pp. 429–54.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, M., Grundlagen und Besonderheiten des außervertraglichen Haftungsrechts der VR China (Osnabrück: Universitätsverlag Rasch, 2001).Google Scholar

Fleming, J. G., Hellner, J., and Hippel, E., Haftungsersetzung durch Versicherungsschutz (Frankfurt am Main: A. Metzner, 1980).Google Scholar

Foex, B. and Werro, F. (eds.), La réforme du droit de la responsabilité civile (Geneva: Schulthess, 2004).

Gall, J. P., ‘Liability for Persons under Supervision’, in IECL, vol. 11: Torts, ch. 3 (1977).Google Scholar

Gebauer, M., Hypothetische Kausalität und Haftungsgrund (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007).Google Scholar

Gerven, W., ‘Bringing (Private) Laws Closer to Each Other at the European Level’, in Cafaggi, F. (ed.), The Institutional Framework of European Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2006), pp. 37–79.Google Scholar

Gerven, W., Lever, J. and Larouche, P., Common Law of Europe Casebooks: Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2000).Google Scholar

Gordley, J., Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Green, M. D., ‘The Future of Proportional Liability: The Lessons of Toxic Substances Causation’, in Madden, M. S. (ed.), Exploring Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 352–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griss, I., Kathrein, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadensersatzrechts (Vienna/New York: Springer, 2006).CrossRef

Godt, C., Haftung für ökologische Schäden (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1997).Google Scholar

Goecke, K., Die unbegrenzte Haftung Minderjähriger im Deliktsrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1997).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, A., Causation in Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartkamp, A., Hesselink, M., Hondius, E. et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri/The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004; 4th edn in preparation).

Hesselink, M., ‘The CFR and Social Justice’, in Somma, A. (ed.), The Politics of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (Alphen: Kluwer Law International, 2009), pp. 95–113.Google Scholar

Hinteregger, M. (ed.), Environmental Liability and Ecological Damage in European Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRef

Honoré, A. M., ‘Causation and Remoteness of Damage’, in, Tunc, (ed.), IECL, vol. 11: Torts, ch. 7 (1983).

Howarth, D., ‘Is there a Future for the Intentional Torts?’, in Birks, P. (ed.), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), pp. 233–63.Google Scholar

Howarth, D., ‘Muddying the Waters: Tort Law and the Environment from an English Perspective’, 41 Washburn LJ469–513 (2002).Google Scholar

Howarth, D., ‘The General Conditions of Unlawfulness’, in Hartkamp, A. et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code (3rd edn, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri/The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 607–44.Google Scholar

Howells, G. (gen. ed.), The Law of Product Liability (2nd edn, London: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2007).

Ibbetson, D. J., A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Ibbetson, D. J., ‘Harmonisation of the Law of Tort and Delict: A Comparative and Historical Perspective’, in Zimmermann, R. (ed.), Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003), pp. 83–104.Google Scholar

Jansen, N., Die Struktur des Haftungsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 2003).Google Scholar

Jhering, R., Das Schuldmoment im Römischen Recht (Giessen: E. Roth, 1867).Google Scholar

Jianfu, C., Chinese Law: Context and Transformation (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar

Jones, W. K., ‘Strict Liability for Hazardous Enterprise’, 92 Colum. L Rev. 1705–79 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, B. A. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Strict Liability (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).

Kokott, J., Klaphake, A. and Marr, S., Ökologische Schäden und ihre Bewertung im internationalen, europäischen und nationalen Haftungssystemen (Berlin: E. Schmidt, 2003).Google Scholar

König, A., Produktsicherheitsgesetz und Produkthaftung (Cologne: Heymanns, 2003).Google Scholar

Konzen, H., Aufopferung im Zivilrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1969).Google Scholar

Kötz, H., ‘Haftung für besondere Gefahr’, AcP 170 (1970), 1–41.Google Scholar

Kötz, H., Sozialer Wandel im Unfallrecht (Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller, 1976).Google Scholar

Kötz, H., ‘Gefährdungshaftung’, in ,Federal Minister of Justice (ed.), Gutachten und Vorschläge zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts, vol. 2 (Cologne: Bundesanzeiger Verlag, 1981), pp. 1779–134.Google Scholar

Kötz, H. and Wagner, G., Deliktsrecht (11th edn, Neuwied: Luchterhand, 2010).Google Scholar

Koziol, H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Wrongfulness (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).

Koziol, H. ‘Liability Based on Fault: Subjective or Objective Yardstick?’, (1998) 5 MJ111–28.Google Scholar

Koziol, H.Grundfragen des Schadensersatzrechts (Vienna: J. Sramek Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Schulze, R. (eds.), Tort Law of the European Community (Vienna/New York: Springer, 2009).

Koziol, H. and Wilcox, V. (eds.), Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives (Vienna/New York: Springer, 2009).CrossRef

Lange, H. and Schiemann, G., Schadensersatz (3rd edn, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003).Google Scholar

,Law Commission, Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary Damages, Law Com. no 247, 16 December 1997.

Legrand, P., ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’ (1996) 55 ICLQ52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leslie, R. M., O Código Civil Brasileiro em Ingles (Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008).Google Scholar

Lübtow, U., Untersuchungen zur Lex Aquilia de damno inuria dato (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1971).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (2nd edn, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997).Google Scholar

Magnus, U. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Damages (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001).

Magnus, U. and Micklitz, H. W., Liability for the Safety of Services (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006).Google Scholar

Martin-Casals, M. (ed.), Children in Tort Law, vol. 1: Children as Tortfeasers (New York: Springer, 2004).

Mäsch, G., Chance und Schaden. Zur Dienstleistungshaftung bei unaufklärbaren Kausalverläufen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar

Mataja, V., Das Recht des Schadensersatzes vom Standpunkt der Nationalökonomie (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1888).Google Scholar

Mathieu, B., The Right to Life in European Constitutional and International Case Law (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Matusche-Beckmann, A., Das Organisationsverschulden (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001).Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. T, The Rights of Publicity and Privacy, 2 vols. (2nd edn, St Paul, MN: West Group, 2002).Google Scholar

McGregor, H., McGregor On Damages (17th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003).Google Scholar

McGregor, J., ‘Force, Consent, and the Reasonable Woman’, in Buchanan, A. and Coleman, J. (eds.), In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 231–55.Google Scholar

McNorrie, K., ‘History and Function of Delict’, in The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, vol. 15: Obligations (Edinburgh: Butterworths, 1996).Google Scholar

Menyhárd, A., ‘Eastern Tort Law’, in Bussani, M. and Werro, F. (eds.), European Private Law – A Handbook, vol. 1 (Berne: Stämpfli, 2009), pp. 337–74.Google Scholar

Mohnhaupt-Wolf, U., Deliktsrecht und Rechtspolitik (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004).Google Scholar

Moore, M. S., Causation and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, M. S.Motive zu dem Entwurfe eines Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches für das Deutsche Reich, vol. 2: Recht der Schuldverhältnisse (Berlin/Leipzig: Guttentag, 1888).Google Scholar

Ogorek, R., Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der Gefährdungshaftung im 19. Jahrhundert (Cologne/Vienna: Böhlan Verlag, 1975).Google Scholar

Otto, H. and Schwarze, R., Die Haftung des Arbeitnehmers (3rd edn, Karlsruhe: Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft, 1998).Google Scholar

Owen, D. G. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995).

Owen, D. G.Products Liability Law (St Paul, MN: West Group, 2005).

Özsunay, E., ‘Rights of Embryo and Foetus in Private Law’, in International Academy of Comparative Law, Convergence of Legal Systems in the 21st Century. General Reports at the XVIth International Congress of Comparative Law (Brussels: Bruylant, 2006), pp. 1274–413.Google Scholar

Petershagen, J., Die Gebäudehaftung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000).Google Scholar

Posner, R., ‘A Theory of Negligence’, 1 J Legal Stud. 29–96 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, R.Economic Analysis of Law (7th edn, New York: Aspen, 2007).Google Scholar

Prosser, W., ‘Privacy’, 48 Cal. L Rev. 383–423 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prosser, W.Protokolle der Kommission für die zweite Lesung des Entwurfs des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuchs, vol. 2: Recht der Schuldverhältnisse (Berlin: Guttentag, 1898).Google Scholar

Rehbinder, E., ‘Ersatz ökologischer Schäden – Begriff, Anspruchsvoraussetzungen und Umfang des Ersatzes unter Berücksichtigung rechtsvergleichender Erfahrungen’, NuR 1988, 105–15.Google Scholar

Reich, N., ‘Horizontal Liability in EU Law’ (2007) 44 CML Rev. 705–742.Google Scholar

Reimann, M. W., ‘Liability for Defective Products and Services: Emergence of a World Standard?’, in International Academy of Comparative Law (ed.), Convergence of Legal Systems in the 21st Century: General Reports Delivered at the XVIth International Congress of Comparative Law (Brussels: Bruylant, 2006), pp. 367–539.Google Scholar

Röckrath, L., Kausalität, Wahrscheinlichkeit und Haftung. Rechtliche und ökonomische Analyse (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2004).Google Scholar

Römermann, L., Aufopferungshaftung in Europa (Marburg: Tectum, 2007).Google Scholar

Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (Vienna/New York: Springer, 2001).CrossRef

Rudden, B., ‘Soviet Tort Law’, 42 NYUL Rev583–630 (1967).Google Scholar

Rudden, B.Russian Civil Code, Parts 1–3: Text and Analysis, prepared by Osakwe, C. (Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2008).Google Scholar

Schamps, G., La mise en danger: Un concept fondateur d'un principe général de responsabilité. Analyse de droit comparé (Brussels: Bruylant, 1998).Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. P., Zivilrechtskodifikation in Brasilien (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009).Google Scholar

Schmidt-Kessel, M., Reform des Schadensersatzrechts, vol. 1: Europäische Vorgaben und Vorbilder (Vienna: Manz, 2006).Google Scholar

Schrage, E. J. H. (ed.), Negligence. The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Torts (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2001).

Schulze, R., Bar, C. and Schulte-Nölke, H. (eds.), Der akademische Entwurf für einen Gemeinsamen Referenzrahmen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008).

Shapo, M. S., Towards a Jurisprudence of Injury: The Continuing Creation of a System of Substantive Justice in American Tort Law (Chicago: American Bar Association, 1984).Google Scholar

Shavell, S., Economic Analysis of Accident Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shavell, S.Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Simons, W. (ed.), Private and Civil Law in the Russian Federation (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRef

Somma, A. (ed.), The Politics of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (Alphen: Kluwer Law International, 2009).

Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Liability for Damage Caused by Others (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).

Stahmer, N., Entschädigung von Nichtvermögensschäden bei Tötung (Hamburg: Kovac Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar

Stapleton, J., Product Liability (London: Butterworths, 1994).Google Scholar

Stijns, S. (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Tort Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001).

Stoll, H., ‘Consequences of Liability: Remedies’, in Tunc, (ed.), IECL, vol. 11: Torts, ch. 8 (1972).

Stone, F. F., ‘Liability for Damage Caused by Things’, in Tunc, (ed.), IECL, vol. 11: Torts, ch. 5 (1972).

,Study Group on a European Civil Code (ed.), Principles of European Law: Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another, prepared by Bar, C. (Munich: Sellierropean Law Publishers/Brussels: Bruylant/Berne: Stämpfli, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taschner, H. C., Produkthaftung (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1986).Google Scholar

Tunc, A. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (IECL), vol. 11: Torts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck /Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983).

Viney, G., Le déclin de la responsabilité individuelle (Paris: LGDJ, 1965).Google Scholar

Viney, G. and Jourdain, P., Droit Civil: Les effets de la responsabilité (2nd edn, Paris: LG DJ, 2001).Google Scholar

Viney, G. and Jourdain, P.Droit Civil: Les conditions de la responsabilité (3rd edn, Paris: LGDJ, 2006).Google Scholar

Wagner, G., ‘Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts’, in Zimmermann, R. (ed.), Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003), pp. 189–340.Google Scholar

Wagner, G.Tort Law and Liability Insurance (Vienna/New York: Springer, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, C., Cooper, R. and Wood, S. E. (eds.), Charlesworth and Percy On Negligence (11th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006).

Weir, T., Economic Torts (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werro, F., ‘The Swiss Tort Reform: A Possible Model for Europe?’, in Bussani, M. (ed.), European Tort Law (Berne: Stämpfli, 2007), pp. 81–102.Google Scholar

Werro, F. and Palmer, V. V. (eds.), The Boundaries of Strict Liability in European Tort Law (Berne: Stämpfli/Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press/Brussels: Bruylant, 2004).

Widmer, P., ‘Reform und Vereinheitlichung des Haftpflichtrechts auf schweizerischer und europäischer Ebene’, in Zimmermann, R. (ed.), Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003), pp. 147–88.Google Scholar

Widmer, P.Unification of Tort Law: Fault (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005).Google Scholar

Wiethölter, R., Der Rechtfertigungsgrund des verkehrsrichtigen Verhaltens (Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller, 1960).Google Scholar

Wilburg, W., Entwicklung eines beweglichen Systems im bürgerlichen Recht (Graz: Kienreich, 1950).Google Scholar

Will, M. R., Quellen erhöhter Gefahr (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1980).Google Scholar

Winiger, B., La responsabilité aquilienne romaine – Damnum Inuria Datum (Basel/Frankfurt am Main: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1997).Google Scholar

Winiger, B. (ed.), La responsabilité civile européenne de demain – Europäisches Haftungsrecht morgen (Geneva: Schulthess, 2008).

Zimmermann, R., The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Cape Town: Juta/Munich: C.H. Beck, 1990/Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, R. (ed.), Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003).