Abelson, Reid, 2001, “Enron Board Comes under a Storm of Criticism,” The New York Times, December 16, C4.

Aghion, P., and Bolton, P., 1988, “An ‘Incomplete Contract’ Approach to Bankruptcy and the Financial Structure of the Firm,” Stanford University, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences Technical Report No. 536.

Aghion, P., Bolton, P., and Felli, L., 1997, “Some Issues on Contract Incompleteness,” London School of Economics Working Paper.Google Scholar

Agrawal, Anup, and Knoeber, Charles R., 1998, “Managerial Compensation and the Threat of Takeover,” Journal of Financial Economics, 47(2): 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmadjian, Christina, and Lincoln, James, 1997, “Changing Firm Boundaries in Japanese Auto Parts Supply Networks,” draft, Columbia Business School.

Akerlof, George, 1982, “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 47(4): 543–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, George A., and Katz, Lawrence F., 1988, “Workers' Trust Funds and the Logic of Wage Profiles,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 2548. (Published in 1989 as “Workers' Trust Funds and the Logic of Wage Profiles,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(3): 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, A. A., 1965, “The Basis of Some Recent Advances in the Theory of Management of the Firm,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 14: 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, A. A., 1968, “Corporate Management and Property Rights,” in Economic Policy and the Regulation of Securities. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Alchian, A. A., and Kessel, R. A., 1962, “Competition, Monopoly, and the Pursuit of Pecuniary Gain,” in National Bureau of Economic Research, Aspects of Labor Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen, A., and Demsetz, Harold, 1972, “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen A., 1969, “Corporate Management and Property Rights,” in Manne, Henry G. (ed.), Economic Policy and the Regulation of Corporate Securities. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen, 1984, “Specificity, Specialization, and Coalitions,” draft manuscript, February.

Altenberg, Lee, 1990, “An End to Capitalism: Leland Stanford's Forgotten Vision,” Sandstone and Tile, 14(1): 8–20.Google Scholar

Andersen, Erin, 1985, “The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis,” Marketing Science, 4: 234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Erin, and Schmittlein, David, 1984, “Integration of the Sales Force: An Empirical Examination,” Rand Journal of Economics, 15: 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoki, Masahiko, 1984, The Co-operative Game Theory of the Firm. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J., 1969, “The Organization of Economic Activity,” in The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System. 91st Congress, 1st Session, vol. 1, JEC, 47–64.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J., 1974, The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth, 1975, “Vertical Integration and Communication,” Bell Journal of Economics, 6: 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asanuma, Banri, 1989, “Manufacturer–Supplier Relationships in Japan and the Concept of Relation-Specific Skill,” The Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 3: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asanuma, Banri, 1992, “Japanese Manufacturer–Supplier Relationships in International Perspective,” in Sheard, Paul (ed.), International Adjustment and the Japanese Economy. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, O., and Johnson, G., 1972, “Unionism, Relative Wages, and Labor Quality in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” International Economic Review, 13: 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atiyah, P. S., 1979, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Atwood, Jane, and Kobrin, Paul, 1977, “Integration and Joint Ventures in Pipelines,” Research Study No. 5, American Petroleum Institute.

Baker, George, 1989, “Price Rate Contracts and Performance Measurement Error,” Graduate School of Business, Harvard University.

Baker, George, Gibbons, Robert, and Murphy, Kevin J., 2002, “Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 39–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, George P., Jensen, Michael C., and Murphy, Kevin J., 1988. “Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory,” Journal of Finance, 63(3): 593–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balsam, Steven, 2002, An Introduction to Executive Compensation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bardhan, Pranab K., and Roemer, John E. (eds.), 1993, Market Socialism: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bar-Gill, Oren, and Bebchuk, Lucian, 2002, “Misreporting Corporate Performance,” Discussion Paper No. 400, Harvard Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business.

Bar-Gill, Oren, and Bebchuk, Lucian, 2003a, “The Costs of Permitting Managers to Sell Shares,” mimeo, Harvard Law School.

Bar-Gill, Oren, and Bebchuk, Lucian, 2003b, “Corporate Transparency and Managerial Incentives,” mimeo, Harvard Law School.

Barnard, Chester, 1938, The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Barnard, C. I., 1962, The Functions of the Executive, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C., 1932, Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barzel, Yoram, 1982, “Measurement Costs and the Organization of Markets,” Journal of Law and Economics, 25: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batt, Francis R, 1929, The Law of Master and Servant. New York: Pitman Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Baumol, William J., 1959, Business Behavior, Value and Growth. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian, Coates, John IV, and Subramanian, Guhan, 2002, “The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy,” Stanford Law Review, 54: 887–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Fried, Jesse M., 2003a, “Stealth Compensation,” mimeo, Harvard Law School and Boalt Hall School of Law.

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Fried, Jesse M., 2003b, “Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Fried, Jesse M., 2004, Pay without Performance, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, Fried, Jesse M., and Walker, David I., 2002, “Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation.” University of Chicago Law Review, 69(3): 751–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Kahan, Marcel, 1990, “A Framework for Analyzing Legal Policy Toward Proxy Contests,” California Law Review, 78: 1071–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary S., and Stigler, George J., 1974, “Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers,” Journal of Legal Studies, 3: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckmann, Martin, 1983, Tinbergen Lectures on Economic Organization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benassy, Jean-Pascal, 1982, The Economics of Market Disequilibrium. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Benz, Matthias, Kucher, Marcel, and Stutzer, Alois, 2001, “Stock Options: The Managers' Blessing: Institutional Restrictions and Executive Compensation,” Working Paper No. 61, University of Zurich Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.

Ben-Ner, Avner, and Hoomissen, Theresa, 1991, “Nonprofit Organizations in the Mixed Economy: A Demand and Supply Analysis,” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62: 519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berhold, M., 1971, “A Theory of Linear Profit Sharing Incentives,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85: 460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berle, Adolf A., and Means, Gardiner C., 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Commerce Clearing House.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil, 2001, “Are CEO's Rewarded for Luck? The Ones without Principals Are,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3): 901–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettis, J. Carr, Bizjak, John, M., and Lemmon, Michael L., 2001, “Managerial Ownership, Incentive Contracting, and the Use of Zero-Cost Collars and Equity Swaps by Corporate Insiders,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36: 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettis, J. Carr, Coles, Jeffrey, L., and Lemmon, Michael L., 2000, “Corporate Policies Restricting Trading by Insiders,” Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2): 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bewley, Truman F., 1999, Why Wages Don't Fall during a Recession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bizjack, John M., Lemmon, Michael L., and Naveen, Lalitha, 2000, “Has the Use of Peer Groups Contributed to Higher Levels of Executive Compensation?” Working Paper, Portland State University.

Blanchard, Olivier Jean, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei, 1994, “What Do Firms Do with Cash Windfalls?” Journal of Financial Economics, 36: 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Margaret M., 1995, Ownership and Control. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Blair, Margaret M., and Stout, L., 1997, “A Theory of Corporation Law as a Response to Contracting Problems in Team Production,” The Brookings Institution Working Paper, available at www.brook.edu.

Blau, P., and Scott, W., 1962, Formal Organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar

Blinder, Alan (ed.), 1990, Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Blum, Milton L., 1956, Industrial Psychology and Its Social Foundations. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Bolster, Paul, Chance, Don, and Rich, Don, 1996, “Executive Equity Swaps and Corporate Insider Holdings,” Financial Management, 25: 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonin, John, P., Jones, Derek C., and Putterman, Louis, 1993, “Theoretical and Empirical Research on Producers' Cooperatives: Will Ever the Twain Meet?” Journal of Economic Literature, 31: 1290–1320.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert, 1954, “Vertical Integration and the Sherman Act: The Legal History of an Economic Misconception,” University of Chicago Labor Review, 22: 157–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borokhovich, Kenneth A., Brunarski, Kelly R., and Parrino, Robert, 1997, “CEO Contracting and Anti-Takeover Amendments,” Journal of Finance, 52(4): 1495–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, 1985, “The Production Process in a Competitive Economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian Models,” American Economic Review, 75: 16–36.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, 1988, “Social Institutions and Technical Choice,” in DeMatteo, M., Vercelli, A., and Goodman, R. (eds.), Technological and Social Factors in Long-Term Economic Fluctuations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Boyer, Robert, 1990, “Labour Market Flexibility and Decentralization as Barriers to High Employment,” in Brunetta, Renato and Dell'Aringa, Carlo (eds.), Labor Relations and Economic Performance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1975, “The Problems with Human Capital Theory,” American Economic Review, 65: 74–82.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1976, Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1982a, “The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism,” Politics and Society, 10: 51–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1982b, “The Welfare State and Long-Term Economic Growth: Marxian, Neoclassical, and Keynesian Approaches,” American Economic Review, 72: 341–345.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1990a, “Contested Exchange: New Microfoundations of the Political Economy of Capitalism,” Politics and Society, 18: 165–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1990b, “Bonding and Dismissal in Labor Discipline Models,” photocopy, University of Massachusetts.

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1993a, “The Democratic Firm: An Agency Theory Evaluation,” in Bowles, Samuel, Gintis, Herbert, and Gustaffson, Bo (eds.), Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability, and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1993b, “The Revenge of Homo Economics: Contested Exchange and the Revival of Economy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert, 1995, “Democratic Firms and the Distribution of Wealth,” in Roemer, J. E. (ed.), Property Relations, Incentives and Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, Gordon, David M., and Weisskopf, Thomas E., 1989, “Business Ascendancy and Economic Impasse: A Structural Retrospective on Conservative Economics, 1979–87,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3: 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Keith, and Gelb, Alan, 1981, “Motivation and Control in the Mondragon Experiment,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 19: 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branch, B., 1973, “Corporate Objectives and Market Performance,” Financial Management, 2: 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brickley, James, and Dark, Frederick, 1987, “The Choice of Organizational Form: The Case of Franchising,” Journal of Financial Economics, 18: 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James, Tollison, Robert, and Tolluck, Gordon, 1990, Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Buttrick, John, 1952, “The Inside Contracting System,”Journal of Economic History, 12: 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Guillermo, and Wellisz, Stanislaw, 1978, “Supervision, Loss of Control, and the Optimum Size of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy, 86: 943–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, Colin, and Fehr, Ernst, 2004, “Measuring Social Norms and Preferences Using Experimental Games: A Guide for Social Scientists” (Chapter 3, pp. 55–95), in Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (Henrich, Joseph, et al., eds.); Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canes, M., 1970, “A Model of a Sports League,” doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.

Carpenter, Jennifer N., 1998, “The Exercise and Valuation of Executive Stock Options,” Journal of Financial Economics, 48: 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, A., 1977, The Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred Dupont, 1962, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cheng, Shun, Nagar, Venky, and Rajan, Madhar V., 2001, “Control Versus Risk in Stock-Based Incentives: Evidence from Antitakeover Regulation,” Working Paper, University of Michigan Business School.

Cheung, S. N. S., 1969, “Transaction Costs, Risk Aversion, and the Choice of Contractual Arrangements,” Journal of Law and Economics, 12: 23–42.Google Scholar

Cheung, Steven, 1983, “The Contractual Nature of the Firm,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 1–21.Google Scholar

Clague, Christopher, 1993, “Rule Obedience, Organizational Loyalty, and Economic Development,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149: 393–414.Google Scholar

Clark, J. B., 1900, Distribution of Wealth. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Clark, Robert C., 1985, Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Clarkson, Kenneth W., Miller, Roger LeRoy, and Muris, Timothy J., 1978, “Liquidated Damages Versus Penalties: Sense or Nonsense?” Wisconsin Law Review, 1978: 351–390.Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., 1959, “The Federal Communications Commission,” Journal of Law and Economics, 2: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H., 1960, “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, 15: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H., 1964, Discussion, American Economic Review, 3: 194–197.Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., 1972, “Durability and Monopoly,” Journal of Law and Economics, 15: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, Ronald, 1991a, “The Nature of the Firm: Origin,” 34–47 in Williamson, Oliver and Winter, Sidney (eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald, 1991b, “The Nature of the Firm: Meaning,” 48–60 in Williamson, Oliver and Winter, Sidney (eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald, 1992, “The Institutional Structure of Production: 1991 Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize Lecture in Economic Sciences,” American Economic Review, 82: 713–719.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H., 1937, “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4: 396–405; reprinted 331–351 in American Economic Association, Readings in Price Theory, Chicago: Irwin, 1952; reprinted, 33–55 in Coase, The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; reprinted, G. J. Stigler and K. E. Boulding (eds.), Readings in Price Theory. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar

Commons, J., 1970, The Economics of Collective Action. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Core, John E., Guay, Wayne, and Larcker, David F., 2001, “Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey,” Working Paper, Wharton School. (Published in 2003 as “Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey,”Economic Policy Review, 9(1): 27–50.)Google Scholar

Core, John E., Holthausen, Robert W., and Larcker, David E., 1999, “Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Compensation, and Firm Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 51: 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Core, John E., and Larcker, David, 2002, “Performance Consequences of Mandatory Increases in Executive Stock Ownership,” Working Paper, Wharton School. (Published in 2002 as “Performance Consequences of Mandatory Increases in Executive Stock Ownership,” Journal of Financial Economics, 64(3): 317–340.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, A., 1958, “The Legal Nature of Collective Bargaining Agreements,” Michigan Law Review, 57: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crocker, K. J., and Masten, S. E., 1991, “Pretia ex Machina? Prices and Process in Long-Term Contracts,” Journal of Law and Economics, 34: 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, Graef S., 1991, In Search of Excess. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M., and Hedrick, C. L., 1972, “Theory of the Firm: Past, Present, and Future: An Interpretation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 10: 398–412.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Cyert, Richard, Kang, Sok-Hyon, and Kumar, Praveen, 2002, “Corporate Governance, Takeovers, and Top-Management Compensation: Theory and Evidence,” Management Science, 48(4): 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., 1985, A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Darby, Michael R., and Karni, Eli, 1973, “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud,” Journal of Law and Economics, 16: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, Parthiban, Kochar, Rahul, and Levitas, Edward, 1998, “The Effect of Institutional Investors on the Level and Mix of CEO Compensation,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): 200–208.Google Scholar

Dawes, Harry, 1934, “Labour Mobility in the Steel Industry,” The Economic Journal, 44: 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, H., 1967, “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review, 57: 347–359.Google Scholar

Demsetz, H., 1969,” Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint,” Journal of Law and Economics, 12: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, Harold, 1983, “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, Harold, and Lehn, Kenneth, 1985, “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Political Economy, 93: 1155–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickens, William T., Katz, Lawrence F., Lang, Kevin, and Summers, Lawrence H., 1989, “Employee Crime and the Monitoring Puzzle,” Journal of Labor Economics, 7: 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobb, Maurice, 1925, Capitalist Enterprise and Social Progress. London: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar

Doeringer, P., and Piore, M., 1971, International Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar

Dong, Xiao-Yuan, 1991, “Production and Monitoring Incentives in China's Collective Farming: Theory and Evidence,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta.

Dong, Xiao-Yuan, and Dow, Gregory, 1993, “Monitoring Costs in Chinese Agricultural Teams,” Journal of Political Economy, 101: 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dow, Greogry, 2003, Governing the Firm: Workers' Control in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dow, Gregory, and Putterman, Louis, 2000, “Why Capital Suppliers (Usually) Hire Workers: What We Know, and What We Need to Know,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43: 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durbin, E. F. M., 1936, “Economic Calculus in a Planned Economy,” Economic Journal, 46: 676–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank, and Fischel, Daniel, 1983, “Voting in Corporate Law,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eaton, B, and White, William, 1982, “Agent Compensation and the Limits of Bonding,” Economic Inquiry, 20: 330–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eccles, Robert G., 1981, “The Quasi Firm in the Construction Industry,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2: 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Richard, 1979, Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Elster, John, 1979, Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eswaran, Mukesh, and Kotwal, Ashok, 1989, “Why Are Capitalists the Bosses?” Economic Journal, 99: 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fama, E. F., 1970, “Multiperiod Consumption-Investment Decisions,” American Economic Review, 60: 163–174.Google Scholar

Fama, E. F., 1972, “Ordinal and Measurable Utility,” in Jensen, M. C. (ed.), Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., 1976, Foundations of Finance. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fama, Eugene, 1978, “The Effects of a Firm's Investment and Financing Decisions on the Welfare of Its Security Holders,” American Economic Review, 68: 272–284.Google Scholar

Fama, Eugene, 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., and Jensen, Michael C., 1983a, “Agency Problems and Residual Claims,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., and Jensen, Michael C., 1983b, “Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., and Jensen, Michael C., 1985, “Organizational Forms and Investment Decision,” Journal of Financial Economics, 14: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., and Miller, Merton H., 1972, The Theory of Finance. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Farrell, Joseph, and Shapiro, Carl, 1989, “Optimal Contracts with Lock-in,” American Economic Review, 79: 51–68.Google Scholar

Fehr, Ernst, and Gächter, Simon, 2000, “Cooperation and Punishment,” American Economic Review, 90: 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, Ernst, and Schmidt, Klaus, 2003, “Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity – Evidence and Economic Applications,” in Dewatripont, M., Hansen, L., and Turnovsky, S. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics – 8th World Congress, Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feldman, J., and Kanter, H., 1965, “Organizational Decision-Making,” in March, J. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Feldman, Martha S., and March, James G., 1981, “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feller, David E., 1973, “A General Theory of the Collective Bargaining Agreement,” California Labor Review, 3: 663–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Adam, 1767, An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Dublin: Boulter Grierson.Google Scholar

FitzRoy, Felix R., and Kraft, Kornelius, 1986, “Profitability and Profit-Sharing,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Richard, 1976, “Individual Mobility and Union Voice in the Labor Market,” American Economic Review, 66: 361–368.Google Scholar

Freeman, Richard B., and Rogers, Joel, 1999, What Workers Want, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Fried, Jesse M., 1998, “Reducing the Profitability of Corporate Insider Trading through Pre-trading Disclosure,” Southern California Law Review, 71(2): 303–392.Google Scholar

Friedman, James, 1971, “A Non-Cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames,” Review of Economic Studies, 38: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M., 1970, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32ff.Google Scholar

Fudenberg, Drew, and Tirole, Jean, 1991, Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fudenberg, D., Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P., 1990, “Short-Term Contracts and Long-Term Agency Relationships,” Journal of Economic Theory, 51(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furubotn, E. G., and Pejovich, S., 1972, “Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature,” Journal of Economic Literature, 10: 1137–1162.Google Scholar

Garnier, Germain, 1815, Abrege elementaire des principes de l'Economie Politique. Paris: Agasse.Google Scholar

Ghemawat, Pankaj, 1995, “Competitive Advantage and Internal Organization: Nucor Revisited,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 3: 685–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillan, Stuart, 2001, “Has Pay for Performance Gone Awry: Views from a Corporate Governance Forum,” Research Dialogue, TIAA CREF Institute, 68: 1–16.Google Scholar

Gintis, Herbert, 1976, “The Nature of the Labor Exchange and the Theory of Capitalist Production,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 8(2): 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gintis, Herbert, and Ishikawa, Tsuneo, 1987, “Wages, Work Discipline, and Unemployment,” Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 1: 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleitman, Henry, 1995, Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Goetz, Charles J., and Scott, Robert E., 1983, “The Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation,” Virginia Law Review, 69: 967–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golbe, Devra, and White, Lawrence, 1988, “Mergers and Acquisitions in the United States Economy: An Aggregate and Historical Overview,” Mergers and Acquisitions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.Google Scholar

Golbe, Devra, and White, Lawrence, 1993, “Catch a Wave: The Time Series Behavior of Mergers,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 75: 493–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Victor P., 1976, “Regulation and Administered Contracts,” Bell Journal of Economics, 7: 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Victor, 1980a, “Relational Exchange: Economics and Complex Contracts,” American Behavioral Scientist, 23(3): 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Victor, 1980b, “Bridges Over Contested Terrain: Exploring the Radical Account of the Employment Relationship,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1: 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Victor, and Erickson, John R., 1987, “Quantity and Price Adjustment in Long-Term Contracts: A Case Study of Petroleum Coke,” Journal of Law and Economics, 30: 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gouldner, A. W., 1961, “The Norm of Reciprocity,” American Sociological Review, 25: 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granovetter, Mark, 1983, “Loyalty Filters,” American Economic Review, 73(1): 54–63.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Edward S., 1986, Workplace Democracy: The Political Effects of Participation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Greenwald, Bruce, and Stiglitz, Joseph, 1986, “Externalities in Economies with Imperfect Information and Incomplete Markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101: 229–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Sanford J., and Hart, Oliver D., 1980, “Takeover Bids, the Free Rider Problem, and the Theory of Corporation,” Bell Journal of Economics, 11: 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Sanford J., and Hart, Oliver D., 1984, “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical Integration,” unpublished manuscript, March.

Grossman, Sanford J., and Hart, Oliver D., 1986, “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration,” Journal of Political Economy, 94: 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Sanford J., and Hart, Oliver D., 1988, “One Share–One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustafson, W. Eric, 1959, Periodicals and Books, in Hall, Max (ed.), Case Studies in Metropolitan Manufacturing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Habib, Michel A., and Ljungqvist, Alexander P., 2000, “Firm Value and Managerial Incentives,” Working Paper, London Business School.

Hadlock, Charles, and Lumer, Gerald, 1997, “Compensation, Turnover, and Top Management Incentives: Historical Evidence,” Journal of Business, 70: 153–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Brian J., 1999, “A Better Way to Pay CEO's?,” in Executive Compensation and Shareholder Value: Theory and Evidence, Carpenter, Jennifer and Yermack, David (eds.), Kluwer Academic, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Brian, and Liebman, Jeffrey, 1998, “Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3): 653–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Brian J., and Murphy, Kevin J., 2003, “The Trouble with Stock Options,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3): 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, H., 1996, The Ownership of the Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar

Hansmann, Henry, 1988, “Ownership of the Firm,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4: 267–304.Google Scholar

Harris, Milton, and Raviv, Artur, 1988, “Corporate Governance: Voting Rights and Majority Rules,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Oliver, 1983, “The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme,” Bell Journal of Economics, 14: 366–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Oliver, 1989, “An Economist's Perspective on the Theory of the Firm,” Columbia Law Review, 89: 1757–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Oliver, and Holmstrom, Bengt, 1987, “The Theory of Contracts,” in Bewley, Truman F. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory – Fifth World Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, Oliver, and Moore, J., 1988, “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 495.

Hart, Oliver D., and Moore, John, 1990, “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy, 98: 1119–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, Jay C., and Starks, Laura T., 2002, “Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation,” Working Paper, New York University Stern School of Business (Published in 2003 as “Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation,” Journal of Finance, 58 (6): 2351–2374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. A., 1933, “The Trend of Economic Thinking,” Economica, 13: 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. A., 1945, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” The American Economic Review, 35: 519–530.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich, 1972, Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.Google Scholar

Healy, Paul M., Palepu, Krishna G., and Ruback, Richard S., 1992, “Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?” Journal of Financial Economics, 31: 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckerman, D. G., 1975, “Motivating Managers to Make Investment Decisions,” Journal of Financial Economics, 2: 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helper, Susan, 1991, “Strategy and Irreversibility in Supplier Relations: The Case of the U.S. Automobile Industry,” Business History Review, 65: 781–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, Hubert D., 1922, Supply and Demand. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.Google Scholar

Henry, Robert S., 1942, This Fascinating Railroad Business. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Himmelberg, Charles, Hubbard, R. Glenn, and Palia, Darius, 1999, “Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance,”Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3): 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschman, A. O., 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hodgeskin, Thomas, 1827, Popular Political Economy. London: Charles Tait.Google Scholar

Holderness, Clifford, Kroszner, Randall, and Sheehan, Dennis, 1995, “Changes in Corporate Stock Ownership since the Great Depression,” Working Paper, University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business.

Holderness, Clifford G., Kroszner, Randall S., and Sheehan, Dennis P., 1999, “Were the Good Old Days that Good? Changes In Managerial Stock Ownership since the Great Depression,”Journal of Finance, 54: 435–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holderness, Clifford G., Kroszner, Randall S., and Sheehan, Dennis P., 2000, “The Rise in Managerial Stock Ownership,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(3): 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holderness, Clifford, and Sheehan, Dennis, 1988, “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P., 1991a, “Multi-task Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7: 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, 1982a, “Moral Hazard in Teams,” Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 324–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, 1982b, “Managerial Incentives – A Dynamic Perspective,” in Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, 1996, “The Firm as a Subeconomy,” draft, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Milgrom, Paul, 1987, “Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives,” Econometrica, 55: 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Milgrom, Paul, 1990, “Regulating Trade Among Agents,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 146: 85–105.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Milgrom, Paul, 1991b, “Measurement Cost and Organization Theory,” Working Paper, Stanford University.

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Milgrom, Paul, 1994, “The Firm as an Incentive System,” American Economic Review, 84: 972–991.

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Ricart i Costa, Joan, 1986, “Managerial Incentives and Capital Management,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101: 835–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Roberts, John, 1998, “The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt, and Tirole, Jean, 1989, “The Theory of the Firm,” in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Organization. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Hubbard, Glenn R., and Weiner, Robert J., 1986, “Regulation and Long-Term Contracting in U.S. Natural Gas Markets,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, Glenn R., and Weiner, Robert J., 1991, “Long-Term Contracting and Multiple-Price Systems,” NBER Working Paper 3782, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. (Published in 1992 as “Long-Term Contracting and Multiple-Price Systems,” Journal of Business, 65: 177–198.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ichniowski, Casey, Levine, David I., Olson, Craig, and Strauss, George, 2000, The American Workplace: Skills, Compensation, and Employee Involvement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ichniowski, Casey, Shaw, Kathryn, L., and Prennushi, Giovanna, 1997, “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines,” American Economic Review, 87(3): 291–313.Google Scholar

Itoh, Hideshi, 1989, “Coalitions, Incentives, and Risk Sharing,” mimeograph, Kyoto University, Japan.

Itoh, Hideshi, 1991, “Incentives to Help in Multi-Agent Situations,” Econometrica, 59: 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarrell, Gregg A., Brickley, James, and Netter, Jeffrey M., 1988, “The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H., 1977, “On the Labor-Managed Firm and the Co-determination Movement,” unpublished manuscript.

Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H., 1979, “Rights and Production Functions: An Application to Labor-Managed Firms and Co-determination,” Journal of Business, 52: 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., 1972, “Capital Markets: Theory and Evidence,” Bell Journal of Economics, 3: 357–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael, 1983, “Organization Theory and Methodology,” Accounting Review, 58: 319–339.Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael, 1986, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers,” American Economic Review, 76: 323–329.Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael, 1989, “Eclipse of the public corporation,” Harvard Business Review, 67: 61–74.Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael, 1993, “The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems,” Journal of Finance, 48: 831–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H., 1976a, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H., 1976b, “Can the Corporation Survive,” Center for Research in Government Policy and Business Working Paper No. PPS 76–4. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester. (Published in 1978 as “Can the Corporation Survive,” Financial Analysts Journal, 31(1): 31–37.)Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H., 1988, “The Distribution of Power Among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and Directors,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael, and Murphy, Kevin, 1990, “Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives,” Journal of Political Economy, 98: 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., and Warner, Jerold B., 1988, “The Distribution of Power Among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and Directors,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Harry G., 1963, “The ‘Higher Criticism’ of the Modern Corporation,” Columbia Law Review, 63: 399–432.Google Scholar

Johnson, Marilyn F., Porter, Susan, and Shackell, Margaret B., 1997, “Stakeholder Pressure and the Structure of Executive Compensation,” Working Paper, Michigan State University, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Notre Dame.

Jones, Eliot, 1927, The Trust Problem. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., 1977, “Commercial Impossibility, the Uranium Market, and the Westinghouse Case,” Journal of Legal Studies, 6: 119–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., 1985, “Vertical Integration and Long-Term Contracts: The Case of Coal-Burning Electric Generating Plants,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1: 33–80.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., 1987, “Contract Duration and Relationship-Specific Investments: Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 77: 168–185.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., 1988a, “Asset Specificity and the Structure of Vertical Relationships: Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4: 95–117.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., 1988b, “Price Adjustment in Long-Term Contracts: The Case of Coal,” Journal of Law and Economics, 31: 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juster, R, 1985, “Preferences for Work and Leisure,” Chapter 13 in Thomas, F. Juster and Frank Stafford, P. (eds.), Time, Goods, and Well-Being. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Kahn, C., and Huberman, G., 1988, “Default, Foreclosure, and Strategic Renegotiation,” presented at the Conference on Economics of Contract Law, Duke University.

Kaldor, Nicholas, 1934a, “A Classificatory Note of the Determinateness of Equilibrium,” The Review of Economic Studies, 1: 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaldor, Nicholas, 1934b, “The Equilibrium of the Firm,” Economic Journal, 44: 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kandel, Eugene, and Lazear, Edward, 1992, “Peer Pressure and Partnerships,” Journal of Political Economy, 100: 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Steven N., 1989, “The Effects of Management Buyouts on Operating Performance and Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24: 581–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, R. W., and Klein, B., 1983, “The Economics of Block Booking,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 497–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, C., 1954, “The Balkanization of Labor Markets,” in E. Wight Bakke et al., Labor Mobility and Economic Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of MIT.Google Scholar

Kessler, Friedrich, and Stern, Richard H., 1959, “Competition, Contract, and Vertical Integration,” Yale Law Journal, 69: 1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard, 1933, Essays in Biography. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Khalil, Elias L., 1994, “Can Transaction-Cost, Competence-Bundle, and Process Theories of the Firms Sustain the Market/Form Dichotomy Thesis?” Working Paper, Ohio State University, Mansfield Campus.

Kihlstrom, Richard, and Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 1979, “A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion,” Journal of Political Economy, 87: 719–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kihlstrom, Richard E., and Matthews, Steven A., 1990, “Managerial Incentives in an Entrepreneurial Stock Market Model,” Discussion Papers 876, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management, Science.

Kirzner, I., 1973, Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kirzner, Israel M., 1979, Perception, Opportunity, Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, 1974, “The Competitive Supply of Money,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 6: 423–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, 1983, “Contracting Costs and Residual Claims: The Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, 1988, “Vertical Integration as Organized Ownership: The Fisher Body-General Motors Relationship Revisited,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4: 199–213.Google Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, Crawford, Robert G., and Alchian, Armen, 1978, “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents and the Competitive Contracting Process,” Journal of Law and Economics, 21: 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, and Leffler, Keith, 1979, “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, 89: 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, and McLaughlin, Andrew, 1978, “Resale Price Maintenance, Exclusive Territories, and Franchise Termination: The Coors Case,” unpublished manuscript.

Klein, Peter G., and Shelanski, Howard A., 1994, “Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Survey and Assessment,” Business and Public Policy Working Paper BPP-60, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley. (Published in 1995 as “Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11: 335–361.)Google Scholar

Klein, W. A., 1976, “Legal and Economic Perspectives on the Firm,” unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.

Knight, Frank, 1921, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Knight, Frank, 1933, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, preface to the re-issue. London: London School of Economics Series of Reprints, No. 16.Google Scholar

Knight, Frank H., 1965, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Kole, Stacey, and Lehn, Kenneth, 1999, “Deregulation and the Adaptation of Governance Structure: The Case of the U.S. Airline Industry,” Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1): 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kronman, A. T., 1985, “Contract Law and the State of Nature,” Journal of Law, Economies and Organizations, 1: 4–32.Google Scholar

Kroszner, Randall, and Rajan, Raghuram, 1997, “Organization Structure and Credibility: Evidence from Commercial Bank Securities Activities before the Glass-Steagall Act,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. (Published in 1997 as “Organization Structure and Credibility: Evidence from Commercial Bank Securities Activities before the Glass-Steagall Act,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 39: 475–516.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krueger, Alan, 1991, “Ownership, Agency, and Wages: An Examination of Franchising in the Fast Food Industry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruse, Douglas, 1993, Profit Sharing: Does It Make a Difference?Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Tirole, Jean, 1989, “Provision of Quality and Power of Incentive Schemes in Regulated Industries,” in Barnett, W., Cornet, B., d'Aspremont, C., Gabsewicz, J., and Mas-Colell, A. (eds.), Equilibrium Theory and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

LaFontaine, Francine, and Slade, Margaret, 1997, “Retail Contracting: Theory and Practice,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 45: 1–25.CrossRef

Langlois, Richard, 2003, “The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2): 351–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei, 1999, “Corporate Ownership around the World,” Journal of Finance, 54: 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawler, Edward, 1971, Pay and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lazear, Edward, 1989, “Pay Equality and Industrial Politics,” Journal of Political Economy, 97: 561–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazear, Edward, and Rosen, Sherwin, 1981, “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts,” Journal of Political Economy, 89: 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leff, Nathaniel H., 1978, “Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in the Developing Countries: The Economic Groups,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26: 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leffler, Keith B., and Rucker, Randal, 1991, “Transaction Costs and the Efficient Organization of Production: A Study of Timber-Harvesting Contracts,” Journal of Political Economy, 99: 1060–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibenstein, H., 1966, “Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency,” American Economic Review, 56: 392–415.Google Scholar

Leibenstein, Harvey, 1979, “A Branch of Economics Is Missing: Micro-Micro Theory,” Journal of Economic Literature, 17(2): 477–502.Google Scholar

Leibenstein, Harvey, 1982, “The Prisoners' Dilemma in the Invisible Hand: An Analysis of Intrafirm Productivity,” American Economic Review, 72: 92–97.Google Scholar

Lerner, Abba, 1972, “The Economics and Politics of Consumer Sovereignty,” American Economic Review, 62: 259.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret, 1988, Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Levinsohn, Alan, 2001, “A Garden of Stock Options Helps Harvest Talent,” Strategic Finance, 82: 81–82.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl N., 1931, “What Price Contract? An Essay in Perspective,” Yale Law Journal, 40: 704–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loasby, Brian J., 1986, “Competition and Imperfect Knowledge: The Contribution of G. B. Richardson,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 33: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowry, S,1976, “Bargain and Contract Theory in Law and Economics,” Journal of Economic Issues, 10: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lutz, Nancy, 1995, “Ownership Rights and Incentives in Franchising,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 2: 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macaulay, Stewart, 1963, “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” American Sociological Review, 28: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Glenn, 1984, “New Directions in the Economic Theory of Agency,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 17: 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macgregor, David H., 1906, Industrial Combination. London: George Bell and Sons.Google Scholar

Machlup, F., 1967, “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial,” American Economic Review, 57: 1–33.Google Scholar

Machlup, F., and Taber, Martha, 1960, “Bilateral Monopoly, Successive Monopoly, and Vertical Integration,” Economica, 27: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machlup, Fritz, 1961, International Trade and the National Income Multiplier. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Bentley, 1987, “Behavior and the Organization of the Firm,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 11: 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLeod, W,1988, “Equity, Efficiency, and Incentives in Cooperative Teams,” in Jones, Derek and Svejar, Jan (eds.), Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Macneil, I. R., 1974, “The Many Futures of Contracts,” Southern California Law Review, 47: 691–816.Google Scholar

Macneil, I. R., 1978, “Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law,” Northwestern University Law Review, 72: 854–906.Google Scholar

Malcomson, James, 1984, “Work Incentives, Hierarchy, and Internal Labor Markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 92: 486–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malmgren, H., 1961, “Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75: 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maness, Robert, 1996, “Incomplete Contracts and the Choice between Vertical Integration and Franchising,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 32: 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manne, Henry G., 1962, “The ‘Higher Criticism’ of the Modern Corporation,” Columbia Law Review, 53: 259–285.Google Scholar

Manne, Henry, 1965, “Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 73: 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manne, Henry G., 1967, “Our Two Corporate Systems: Laws and Economics,” Virginia Law Review, 53: 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G., and Simon, H. A., 1958, Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Marglin, Stephen, 1974, “What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 6: 60–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marris, R., 1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl, 1967, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume I. The Process of Capitalist Production. Edited by Engels, Frederick, translated from the Third German Edition by Moore, Samuel and Aveling, Edward. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Masten, Scott, 1988, “A Legal Basis for the Firm,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4: 191–198.Google Scholar

Masten, Scott E., 1984, “The Organization of Production: Evidence from the Aerospace Industry,” Journal of Law & Economics, 27(2): 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masten, Scott E., and Crocker, Keith J., 1988, “Efficient Adaptation in Long-Term Contracts: Take-or-Pay Provisions for Natural Gas,” American Economic Review, 75: 1083–1093.Google Scholar

McAfee, R, and McMillan, John, 1991, “Organizational Diseconomies of Scale,” mimeo, University of California, San Diego.

McConnell, John J., and Servaes, Henri, 1990, “Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, J. C., 1975, “The Costs of Alternative Economic Organizations,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 8: 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meade, J., 1971, The Controlled Economy, London: G. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Meade, James, 1972, “The Theory of Labor-Managed Firms and of Profit-Sharing,” Economic Journal, 82: 401–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meckling, W. H., 1976, “Values and the Choice Model of the Individual in the Social Sciences,” Zeitschrift fur Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 112: 545–560.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert, 1995, “Financial Innovation and the Management and Regulation of Financial Institutions,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 19: 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J., 1986, “Relying on the Information of Interested Parties,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, 1988, “Employment Contracts, Influence Activities and Efficient Organization Design,” Journal of Political Economy, 96: 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John, 1988a, “An Economic Approach to Influence Activities and Organizational Responses,” American Journal of Sociology, 93: S154–S179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John, 1988b, “Economic Theories of the Firm: Past, Present, and Future,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 21: 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, Paul A., and Roberts, John, 1990a, “Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity,” in Alt, James E. and Shepsle, Kenneth A. (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John, 1990b, “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization,” American Economic Review, 80: 511–528.Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John, 1992, Economics, Organization, and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John, 1993, “Johnson Controls, Inc.: Automotive Systems Group: The Georgetown Kentucky Plant,” Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case S-BE-9.

Minahan, John, 1988, “Managerial Incentive Schemes and the Divisional Structure of Firms,” mimeograph, University of Massachusetts.

Mitchell, Daniel E. B., and Kimbell, Larry J., 1982, “Labor Market Contracts and Inflation,” in Baily, Martin Neil (ed.), Workers, Jobs, and Inflation. Washington, DC: The Brookings, Institution.Google Scholar

Monsen, R. J., and Downs, A., 1965, “A Theory of Large Managerial Firms,” Journal of Political Economy, 73: 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monteverde, Kirk, and Teece, David, 1982, “Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry,” Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montias, J, 1970, “The Price Mechanism in Socialist Countries – Discussion,” American Economic Review, 60: 321–323.Google Scholar

Montias, John M., 1976, The Structure of Economic Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Morck, Randall, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W., 1988, “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Charles, 1980, The Cost of Good Intentions, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Mulherin, J, 1986, “Complexity in Long-Term Contracts: An Analysis of Natural Gas Contractual Provisions,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2: 105–117.Google Scholar

Murphy, Kevin J., 1999, “Executive Compensation,” in Handbook of Labor Economics. Ashenfelter, Orley and Card, David (eds.), North Holland, 2485–2563.Google Scholar

Murphy, Kevin J., 2002, “Explaining Executive Compensation: Managerial Power vs. the Perceived Cost of Stock Options,” University of Chicago Law Review, 69: 847–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muth, John F., 1960, “Optimal Properties of Exponentially Weighted Forecasts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myerson, R., 1979. “Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica, 47: 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nalbantian, Haig R. (ed.), 1987, Incentives, Cooperation, and Risk Sharing: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Employment Contracts. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

National Association of Corporate Directors, 1995, Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Director Compensation. NACD, Washington, D.C.

Nelson, Charles R., 1973, Applied Time Series Forecast for Managerial Forecasting. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar

Nelson, R., 1959, Merger Movements in American Industry, 1895–1956. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard R., and Winter, Sidney G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Neuberger, Egon, and James, Estelle, 1973, “The Yugoslav Self-Managed Enterprise: A Systemic Approach,” 245–284 in Bornstein, Morris (ed.), Plan and Market: Economic Reform in Eastern Europe. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Newman, Andrew, 1995, “Employment Contracts, Finance, and the Distribution of Wealth,” in Roemer, J. E. (ed.), Property Relations, Incentives and Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nilsson, Eric, 1989, “International Trade and the Social Relations of Production,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

North, Douglas, 1981, Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Novaes, W., and Zingales, L., 1995, “Capital Structure Choice When Managers Are in Control: Entrenchment versus Efficiency,” NBER Working Paper No. 5384, available at gsblgz.uchicago.edu.

Nove, Alec, 1958, “The Problem of Success Indicators in Soviet Industry,” Economica, 25: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutter, Warren, 1951, The Extent of Enterprise Monopoly in the United States 1899–1939. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ofek, Eli, and Yermack, David, 2000, “Taking Stock: Equity-Based Compensation and the Evolution of Managerial Ownership,” Journal of Finance, 55(3): 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortiz, Fernando, 1963, Contraputo del Tabaco y el Azucar. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.Google Scholar

Ortuno-Ortin, Ignacio, Roemer, John E., and Silvestre, Joaquim, 1993, “Investment Planning and Market Socialism,” in Bowles, S., Gintis, H., and Gustafsson, B. (eds.), The Microfoundations of Political Economy: Problems of Participation, Democracy, and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pagano, Ugo, 1985, Work and Welfare in Economic Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pagano, Ugo, 1988, “Determinazione Endogena dei Diritti di Proprieta in un Economia di Mercato,” Working Paper, University of Siena.

Palay, Thomas M., 1984. “Comparative Institutional Economics: The Governance of Rail Freight Contracting,” Journal of Legal Studies, 13: 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearl, Meyers & Partners, 2002, Executive Pay Trends: Looking Forward and Looking Back.

Pejovich, S., 1969, “The Firm, Monetary Policy and Property Rights in a Planned Economy,” Economic Inquiry, 7(3): 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pencavel, John, 2001, Worker Participation: Lessons from the Worker Co-Ops of the Pacific Northwest. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Penrose, E., 1958, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Perrow, Charles, 1983, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Plant, Arnold, 1932, “Trends in Business Administration,” Economica, 12: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, Walter, 1996, “Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(1): 197–215.Google Scholar

Preston, L. E., 1975, “Corporation and Society: The Search for a Paradigm,” Journal of Economic Literature, 13: 434–453.Google Scholar

Publishers' Association v. Newspaper and Mail Delivery Union, 1952, 114 N.Y.S. 2d401.

Putterman, Louis, 1984, “On Some Recent Explanations of Why Capital Hires Labor,” Economic Inquiry, 22: 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putterman, Louis, 1988, “The Firm as Association versus the Firm as Commodity: Efficiency, Rights, and Ownership,” Economics and Philosophy, 4: 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putterman, Louis, 1993a, “Ownership and the Nature of the Firm,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 17: 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putterman, Louis, 1993b, “Exit, Voice, and Portfolio Choice: Agency and Public Ownership,” Economics and Politics, 5: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putterman, Louis, 1993c, “Incentive Problems Favoring Noncentralized Investment Fund Ownership,” pp. 156–168 in Bardhan, P. and Roemer, J. E. (eds.), Market Socialism: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Putterman, Louis, 1995, “Markets, Hierarchies, and Information: On a Paradox in the Economics of Organization,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26: 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putterman, Louis, and Dietrich, Rueschemeyer (eds.), 1992, States and Markets in Development: Synergy or Rivalry?Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Putterman, Louis, and Skillman, Gilbert, 1992, “The Role of Exist in the Theory of Cooperative\Teams,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 16: 596–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radner, R., 1970, “Problems in the Theory of Markets under Uncertainty,” The American Economic Review, 60: 454–460.Google Scholar

Rajan, Raghuram G., and Zingales, Luigi, 1997, “The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy,” University of Chicago Working Paper, available at gsblgz.uchicago.edu.

Rajan, Raghuram G., and Zingales, Luigi, 1998, “Power in a Theory of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2): 387–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rajan, Raghuram G., and Zingales, Luigi, 2001, “The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy: A Theory of the Origins and Growth of Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3): 805–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rappaport, Alfred, 1999, “New Thinking on How to Link Executive Pay with Performance,” Harvard Business Review, 77(2): 91–101.Google ScholarPubMed

Richardson, G. B., 1972, “The Organization of Industry,” Economic Journal, 82: 883–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, G. B., 1990, Information and Investment: A Study in the Working of the Competitive Economy, with a New Foreword by David Teece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Riordan, Michael, 1990, “Vertical Integration and the Strategic Management of the Enterprise,” in Aoki, M., Gustafsson, B., and Williamson, O. (eds.), The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Robbins, L., 1932, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Robertson, D. H., 1930, Control of Industry. London: Nisbet and Co.Google Scholar

Robinson, E. A. G., 1931, The Structure of Competitive Industry. London: Nisbet; and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, E. A. G., 1934, “The Problem of Management and the Size of the Firm,” The Economic Journal, 44: 242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Joan, 1932, Economics Is a Serious Subject: The Apologia of an Economist to the Mathematician, the Scientist and the Plain Man. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar

Roe, Mark, 1994, Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roemer, John, 1994, A Future for Socialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, S. A., 1973, “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem,” American Economic Review, 62: 134–139.Google Scholar

Ross, S. A., 1974, “The Economic Theory of Agency and the Principal's Similarity,” in Balch, Michael, McFadden, Daniel, and Wu, Shih-yen (eds.), Essays on Economic Behavior under Uncertainty. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan, 1987, “Property,” in John Eatwell, Murray, and Newman, Peter (eds.), The New Palgrave: Dictionary of Economics. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul, 1957, “Wages and Interest: A Modern Dissection of Marxian Economics,” American Economic Review, 47: 884–912.Google Scholar

Schelling, T., 1971, “On the Ecology of Micromotives,” The Public Interest, 25: 61–98.Google Scholar

Scherer, R., and Ross, David, 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Peter, and Strauss, Robert P., 1976, “The Effect of Unions on Earnings and Earnings on Unions: A Mixed Logit Approach,” International Economic Review, 17: 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schor, Juliet B., and Bowles, Samuel, 1987, “Employment Rents and the Incidence of Strikes,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4): 584–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Richard, 1981, Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Segal, Ilya, and Whinston, Michael, 1997, “On the Transaction Cost Determinants of Vertical Integration,” draft, Department of Economics, Northwestern University.

Selznick, Philip, 1948, “Foundations of the Theory of Organization,” American Sociological Review, 13: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selznick, Philip, 1949, TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Seyhun, H, 1998, Investment Intelligence from Insider Trading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl, and Stiglitz, Joseph, 1984, “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device,” American Economic Review, 74: 433–444.Google Scholar

Shepard, Andrea, 1993, “Contractual Form, Retail Price, and Asset Characteristics,” Rand Journal of Economics, 24: 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shove, G. F., 1933, “The Imperfection of the Market: A Further Note,” The Economic Journal, 43: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shubik, M., 1970, “A Curmudgeon's Guide to Microeconomics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 8: 405–434.Google Scholar

Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W., 1986, “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 94(3): 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silver, M., and Auster, R., 1969, “Entrepreneurship, Profit and Limits on Firm Size,” Journal of Business, 42: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H., 1959, “Theories of Decision Making in Economics and Behavioral Science,” American Economic Review, 49: 253–283.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., 1955, “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A., 1957, Models of Man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1951, “A Formal Theory of the Employment Relation,” Econometrica, 19: 293–305. Reprinted in Models of Man, 1957, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1991, “Organizations and Markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slade, Margaret, 1996, “Multitask Agency and Contract Choice: An Empirical Assessment,” International Economic Review, 37: 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam, 1937, The Wealth of Nations, Cannan edition. New York: Modern Library. Originally published in 1776.Google Scholar

Smith, Clifford, and Watts, Ross, 1992, “The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies,” Journal of Financial Economics, 32: 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sonnenschein, Hugo, 1987, “Oligopoly and Game Theory,” John Eatwell, Murray, and Newman, Peter (eds.), in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spence, Michael, and Zeckhauser, Richard, 1971, “Insurance, Information, and Individual Action,” American Economic Review, 61: 380–387.Google Scholar

Steinherr, Alfred, and Thisse, J-F, 1979, “Are Labor-Managers Really Perverse?” Economics Letters, 2: 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, George, and Friedland, Claire, 1983, “The Literature of Economics: The Case of Berle and Means,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph, 1975, “Incentives, Risk, and Information: Notes toward a Theory of Hierarchy,” Bell Journal of Economics, 6: 552–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1977, “The Theory of Local Public Goods,” in The Economics of Public Services, Martin Feldstein, S. and Robert Inman, P. (eds.), London: Macmillan, for International Economic Association.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, Arthur L., 1983, “Contracts as Hierarchical Documents,” unpublished manuscript, Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Stuckey, John, 1983, Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stulz, Rene, 1988, “Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market tor Corporate Control,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 24–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stulz, Rene, 1996, “Rethinking Risk Management,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9: 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Summers, C., 1969, “Collective Agreements and the Law of Contracts,” Yale Law Journal, 78: 527–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tajfel, Henri, 1970, “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination,” Scientific American, 223: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Curtis, and Wiggins, Steven, 1997, “Competition or Compensation: Supplier Incentives Under the American and Japanese Subcontracting Systems,” American Economic Review, 87(4): 598–618.Google Scholar

Teece, David J., 1976, Vertical Integration and Vertical Divestiture in the U.S. Petroleum Industry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

Teece, David J., 1980, “Economics of Scope and the Scope of Enterprise,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1: 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teece, David J., 1982, “Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3: 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teece, David, Rumelt, Richard, Dosi, Giovanni, and Winter, Sidney, 1994, “Understanding Corporate Coherence, Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Randall S., and Martin, Kenneth J., 1999, “The Effect of Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation,” University of Cincinnati Law Review, 67: 1021–1081.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. A., 1970, “Nonpecuniary Rewards and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 52: 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tiebout, Charles M., 1956, “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tirole, Jean, 1986, “Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2: 181–214.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L., 1971, “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,” Quarterly Review of Biology, 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufano, Peter, 1996, “Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk Management Practices in the Gold Mining Industry,” Journal of Finance, 51: 1097–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, John C., 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Urquhart, David, 1856, Familiar Words as Affecting England and the English. London: Trubner & Co.Google Scholar

Usher, Abbott P., 1921, Introduction to the Industrial History of England. London: G. C. Harrap and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar

Veblen, Thorstein, 1964, Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of America. New York: B. W. Huebsch, reprinted by Augustus M. Kelly.Google Scholar

Stackelberg, H., 1934, Marktform and Gleichgewicht. Vienna: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Wade, James B., Porac, Joseph, and Pollock, Timothy, 1997, “Worth, Words, and the Justification of Executive Pay,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 641–664.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, Mary, 1997, Car: A Drama of the American Workplace. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Watts, Ross L., and Zimmerman, Jerod, 1978, “Auditors and the Determination of Accounting Standards, an Analysis of the Lack of Independence,” Working Paper GPB 7806, University of Rochester, Graduate School of Management.

Weisbach, Michael, 1988, “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weitzman, Martin L., and Kruse, Douglas, 1990, “Profit Sharing and Productivity,” in Blinder, Alan S. (ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

White, Harrison, 1981. “Where Do Markets Come From?” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Horace, J, 1936, “Monopolistic and Perfect Competition,” American Economic Review, 26: 645.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E., 1964a, “The Economics of Antitrust: Transaction Cost Considerations,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 122: 1439–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, O. E., 1964b, The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E., 1970, Corporate Control and Business Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., 1967a, “Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size,” Journal of Political Economy, 75: 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., 1967b, “The Economics of Defense Contracting: Incentives and Performance,” in Issues in Defense Economics. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., 1971, “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure and Considerations,” American Economic Review, 61: 112–123.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver, 1979, “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver, E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver, 1988, “The Logic of Economic Organizations,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4: 65.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver, 1994, “Evaluating Coase,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 201–204.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver, Wachter, Michael, and Harris, Jeffery, 1975, “Understanding the Employment Relation,” Bell Journal of Economics, 6: 250–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., and Winter, Sidney G. (eds.), 1991, The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, R., 1968, “On the Theory of Syndicates,” Econometrica, 36: 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R., 1969, La Decision: Aggregation et Dynamique des Orders de Preference, Extrait. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche, Scientifique.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Mark A., 1983, “Empirical Evidence of Incentive Problems and Their Mitigation in Oil and Gas Tax Shelter Programs,” unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.

,World Bank, 1991, World Development Report 1991. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yermack, David, 1996, “Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors,” Journal of Financial Economics, 40: 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yermack, David, 1997, “Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements,” Journal of Finance, 52: 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar