Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- PART I FOUNDATIONS
- PART II METHODOLOGIES
- PART III THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE
- 14 Case-Based Reasoning
- 15 The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction
- 16 A History of Conceptual Change Research
- 17 Spatial Representations and Imagery in Learning
- 18 Literacy and the Learning Sciences
- PART IV MAKING KNOWLEDGE VISIBLE
- PART V LEARNING TOGETHER
- PART VI LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
- Afterword: After How Comes What
- Epilogue: The Fundamental Issue in the Learning Sciences
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
16 - A History of Conceptual Change Research
Threads and Fault Lines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- PART I FOUNDATIONS
- PART II METHODOLOGIES
- PART III THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE
- 14 Case-Based Reasoning
- 15 The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction
- 16 A History of Conceptual Change Research
- 17 Spatial Representations and Imagery in Learning
- 18 Literacy and the Learning Sciences
- PART IV MAKING KNOWLEDGE VISIBLE
- PART V LEARNING TOGETHER
- PART VI LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
- Afterword: After How Comes What
- Epilogue: The Fundamental Issue in the Learning Sciences
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Characterizing Conceptual Change
Within the learning sciences, conceptual change is probably best defined by its relevance to instruction. In the broad educational experience, some topics seem systematically to be extremely difficult for students. Learning and teaching in these areas are problematic and present persistent failures of conventional methods of instruction. Many areas in the sciences, from elementary school through university level, have this characteristic, including, in physics, concepts of matter and density, Newtonian mechanics, electricity, and relativity; in biology, evolution and genetics. To learn such topics, students must go through a conceptual change. Conceptual change contrasts with less problematic learning such as skill acquisition and acquisition of facts, where difficulty may be evident, but for more apparent reasons such as sheer mass of learning, or the necessity of practice to produce quick, error free, highly refined performance.
The name “conceptual change” embodies a first approximation of what constitutes the primary difficulty: students must build new ideas in the context of old ones; hence, the emphasis on “change” rather than on simple acquisition. Strong evidence exists that prior ideas constrain learning in many areas. The “conceptual” part of the conceptual change label must be treated less literally. Various theories locate the difficulty in such entities as “beliefs,” “theories,” or “ontologies,” in addition to “concepts.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 265 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
(1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month infants. Cognition, 23, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, S. (1986). Reorganization of knowledge in the course of acquisition. In (Ed.) Ontogeny and phylogeny of human development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In & (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 257–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In , , , & (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy (pp. 293–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129–160). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. In (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 16 (pp. 3–56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
diSessa, A. A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In and (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225; Responses to commentary, 261–280. (Cognition and Instruction, Monograph No. 1.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
diSessa, A. A. (1996). What do “just plain folk” know about physics? In and (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling. Oxford: Blackwell, 709–730.Google Scholar
, , & (2004). Coherence vs. fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
diSessa, A. A., & Wagner, J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multi-disciplinary perspective (pp. 121–154). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
(1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., & H. M. Wellman (1994). The theory theory. In & (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257–293). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In , & (Eds.), Personal epistemology (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (1987). A private universe. Video. Annenberg/CPB: http://www.learner.org.
Hewson, P., & Hennessey, M. G. (1992). Making status explicit: A case study of conceptual change. In , , & (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical and empirical studies (pp. 176–187). Kiel, Germany: IPN.Google Scholar
, & (1983). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, E., & Minstrell, J. (1994). A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. In (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 51–74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, & (2002). Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
(1988). The child as a theoretician, not an inductivist. Mind and Language 3(3), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In & (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In & (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, M. (1983a). Naive theories of motion. In and (Eds.) Mental Models (pp. 299–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
, ., (2002). Tutorials in introductory physics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1982). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In , & (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum (pp. 129–149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? In (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 3–44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
, & (1988). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education. (2nd ed.). Kiel, Germany: IPN.Google Scholar
, , , & (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students' preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 317–393.Google Scholar
, , & (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodword, A. (1995). Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In , , & (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1990). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In & (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive science, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Tiberghien, A. (1980). Modes and conditions of learning: The learning of some aspects of the concept of heat. In , , , & (Eds.), Cognitive development research in science and mathematics: Proceedings of an international symposium (pp. 288–309). Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
(1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In & (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61–76). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In & (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267–298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 20
- Cited by