Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:20:37.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Multimedia Learning with Hypermedia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Andrew Dillon
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Jennifer Jobst
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Richard Mayer
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Hypermedia proponents suggest that its ability to make information available in a multitude of formats, provide individual control, engage the learner, and cater to various learning styles and needs makes it the harbinger of a new learning revolution. However, despite nearly two decades of research on hypermedia in education, researchers have not yet solved some of the basic issues raised by this technology. In this chapter, we review empirical studies performed since Dillon and Gabbard's (1998) landmark review in an attempt to analyze and draw conclusions from this diverse and extensive literature.

Introduction

Since Vannevar Bush's ground-breaking article As We May Think (Bush, 1945), the idea of using technology to link the world's information resources in new ways has been heralded by some as a revolutionary opportunity to design new instructional media. The term hypermedia is commonly used to refer to this type of information resources and is based on the term hypertext, coined by Ted Nelson around 1965 to refer to “nonsequential” or “nonlinear” text where authors and readers were free to explore and to link information in ways that made personal sense for them (Nelson, 1965). In general usage, the terms are often used interchangeably but to be strictly accurate, hypermedia consists of more than linked texts; it includes other forms of media as well, such as images, video, and sound.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astleitner, H. (1997). Effects of external learning aids on learning with ill-structured hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barab, S. A., Young, M. F., & Wang, J. (1999). The effects of navigational and generative activities in hypertext learning on problem solving and comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 283–309Google Scholar
Beccue, B., Vila, J., & Whitley, L. K. (2001). The effects of adding audio instructions to a multimedia compter based training environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(1), 47–67Google Scholar
Boechler, P. M. (2001). How spatial is hyperspace? Interacting with hypertext documents: Cognitive processes and concepts. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 4(1), 23–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinkerhoff, J. D., Klein, J. D., & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2001). Effects of overviews and computer experience on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101–108Google Scholar
Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 151–176Google Scholar
Curry, J., Haderlie, S., Ku, T., Lawless, K. A., Lemon, M., & Wood, R. (1999). Specified learning goals and their effect on learners' representations of a hypertext reading environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 43–52Google Scholar
Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1999). Hypertext segmentation and goal compatibility: Effects on study strategies and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(3), 279–313Google Scholar
Vries, E., & Jong, T. (1997). Using information systems while performing complex tasks: An example from architectural design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, A. (2004). Designing usable electronic text (2nd ed.). London: CRC PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing ServiceGoogle Scholar
Fabos, B. (2001). Media in the classroom: An alternative history. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the American Educators Research Association, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 281–312Google Scholar
Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, R., & Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Jones, P. A., & Martin, R. J. (2002). The effect of questioning on concept learning within a hypertext system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Y., & Schwen, T. M. (2003). The effects of structural cues from multiple metaphors on computer users' information search performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 239–281Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40(1), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–3713.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettanurak, V., Ramamurthy, K., & Haseman, W. D. (2001). User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: An empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 541–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Moore, P. J., & Schofield, N.J. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, IncGoogle Scholar
Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency. Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In Kuhl, J., Beckman, J. (Eds.), Action control. From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. (1995). The trouble with computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, S. C., & Hawamdeh, S. (1999). Gender and learning attitudes in using Web-based science lessons. Information Research, 5(1)Google Scholar
Liao, Y. C. (1998). Effects of hypermedia versus traditional instruction on students' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, D. M. (2003). Hypertext for the aged: Effects of text topologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1), 61–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40(1), 18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1999). Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(1), 43–64Google Scholar
McKnight, C., Dillon, A., & Richardson, J. (1991). Hypertext in context. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Melara, G. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: Hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000a). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000b). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 724–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. (1965). The hypertext. Paper presented at the Word Documentation Federation Conference, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. J., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(3), 237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, J. (1989). The matters that really matter for hypertext usability. Paper presented at the Hypertext' 89, Second ACM Conference on Hypertext, Pittsburgh, PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users' navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimwegen, C. V., Pouw, M., and Oostendorp, H. (1999). The influence of structure and reading-manipulation on usability of hypertexts. Interacting with Computers, 12, 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padovani, S., and Lansdale, M. (2003). Balancing search and retrieval in hypertext: Context-specific trade-offs in navigational tool use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 125–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, R. A., and Kim, K.-S. (2000). Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 558–5663.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolucci, R. (1998). The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 123–150Google Scholar
Parlangeli, O., Marchigiani, E., & Bagnara, S. (1999). Multimedia systems in distance education: Effects of usability on learning. Interacting with Computers, 12, 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Plass, J., Chun, D., Mayer, R., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., and Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potelle, H., & Rouet, J. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, K., & Davidson-Shivers, G. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced?Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291–308Google Scholar
Reed, W. M., & Oughton, J. M. (1997). Computer experience and interval-based hypermedia navigation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(1), 38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinert, H. (1976). Identifying student learning styles. The Modern Language Journal, 60(4), 156–163Google Scholar
Schoon, P., & Cafolla, R. (2002). World Wide Web hypertext linkage patterns. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(2), 117–139Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 143–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(1), 57–78Google Scholar
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: Some constructivist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext. Educational Technology, 31(9), 22–25Google Scholar
Spruijt, S., & Jansen, C. (1999). The influence of task and format on reading results with an online text. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(2), 92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimwegen, C., Pouw, M., & Oostendorp, H. (1999). The influence of structure and reading-manipulation on usability of hypertexts. Interacting with Computers, 12, 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, C. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational research. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. T., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Group embedded figures test manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists PressGoogle Scholar
Yeh, S., & Lehman, J. D. (2001). Effects of learner control and learning strategies on English as a foreign language (EFL) learning from interactive hypermedia lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 141–159Google Scholar
Yildirim, Z., Ozden, Y., & Aksu, M. (2001). Comparison of hypermedia learning and traditional instruction on knowledge acquisition and retention. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2002). Enhancing learning from hypertext by inducing a goal orientation: Comparing different approaches. Instructional Science, 30, 243–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×