Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T23:39:40.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - European Court of Justice

Creative Responses in Uncharted Territory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Malcolm Langford
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, University of Oslo
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Although not always readily admitted, the reality is that the European Community (‘EC’), is primarily concerned with economic rights. It is this body of rights that is given the greatest degree of protection within the Community legal order. Social rights depend, for the most part, on either the exercise of an economic activity, which brings entitlement to those rights, or are an integral part of that economic activity, in the sense that they regulate the conditions under which that economic activity may be exercised. It is rare to find purely social rights – that is, rights that are unconnected to any economic activity on the part of the beneficiary – which are justiciable under EC law. The most notable exception to this general rule is the directive on racial equality which grants the right to equal treatment in many spheres of life unconnected with, and not contingent upon, the exercise of an economic activity, such as housing, social protection, health care and education. Moreover, the European Court of Justice (‘ECJ’) has confirmed in a number of recent cases that the European citizen who moves within the Community, but who is not necessarily economically active, may enjoy some entitlement to social rights which was previously believed to be confined to those who were economically active or who were dependants of economically active persons. This development is discussed more fully below at Section 5.5.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Rights Jurisprudence
Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law
, pp. 453 - 474
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ewing, K., Gearty, C. and Hepple, B. (eds.), Human Rights and Labour Law: Essays for Paul O'Higgins (London: Mansell, 1994)
Tridimas, T., ‘The Court of Justice and Judicial Activism’, European Law Review, Vol. 21 (1996), pp. 199–210Google Scholar
Keeling, D., ‘In praise of Judicial Activism. But what does it mean? And has the European Court of Justice ever practised it?’, Scritti in onore di Giuseppe Federico Mancini, Vol. II (Milano: Diritto dell'Unione Europea, 1998), pp. 505–536Google Scholar
Davies, P., ‘The European Court of Justice, National Courts and the Member States’, in Davies, P.et al., (eds.), European Community Labour Law: Principle and Perspectives. Liber Amicorum Lord Wedderburn of Charlton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), pp. 95–138Google Scholar
Hatzopoulos, V., ‘A (more) Social Europe: A Political Crossroad or a Legal One Way? Dialogues between Luxembourg and Lisbon’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 42 (2005), pp. 1599–1635Google Scholar
Simitis, S., ‘Dismantling or Strengthening Labour Law: The Case of the European Court of Justice’, European Law Journal, Vol. 2 (1996), pp. 156–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, R., ‘Employee Rights in the European Community: A Panorama from the 1974 Social Action Program to the Social Charter of 1989’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 17 (1993), pp. 2–95, at 4–10Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, D., ‘The Uneasy Progress of European Social Policy’, Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 2 (19970, pp. 241–263, at 241–243
Watson, P., ‘The Community Social Charter’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 28 (1991), pp. 37–68, at 39–41Google Scholar
Takis, T., The General Principles of EC Law, 2nd Ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Mancini, G. F., ‘The Free Movement of Workers in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice, in Curtin, D. and O'Keeffe, D. (eds.), Constitutional Adjudication in European Community and National Law. Essays for the Hon. Mr. Justice T.F. O'Higgins (Dublin: Butterworths Law, 1992), pp. 67–77Google Scholar
Wyatt, D., ‘Community competence to Regulate Medical Services’, in Dougan, M. and Spaventa, E. (eds.) Social Welfare and EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005), at pp. 131–144Google Scholar
Fuchs, M., ‘Free Movement of Services and Social Security – Quo Vadis?’, European Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2002), pp. 536–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, A., ‘Bonjour Herr Doctor? National Healthcare Systems: The Internal Market and Cross-Border Medical Care within the European Union’, Legal Issues of European Integration, Vol. 33 (2006), pp. 167–182Google Scholar
Giesen, R., ‘Comments to ECJ's judgements in C-120/95, Nicolas Decker v. caisse de maladie des employés privés and C-158/96, Raymond Kohll v. Union des caisses des maladie’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 36 (1999), pp. 841–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, A. P., ‘Cross-Border Access to Medical care within the European Union – Some Reflections on the Judgments Decker and Kohll’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 5, No. 3 (1998), pp. 277–297Google Scholar
Dougan, M., ‘Fees, Grants, Loans and Dole Cheques: Who covers the cost of migrant education within the EU?’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 4 (2005), pp. 943–986Google Scholar
Davies, G. T., ‘“Any Place I Hang My Hat?” or: Residence is the New Nationality’, European Law Journal, Vol. 11 (2005), pp. 43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, J. D., ‘The Court of Justice and the Union Citizen’, European Law Journal, Vol. 11 (2005), pp. 722–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C., ‘The Economic Objectives of Article 119’, in Hervey, T. K. and O'Keeffe, D. (eds.), Sex Equality Law in the European Union (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996), pp. 321–334Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, C., ‘Community or Communities of Courts in European Integration: Sex Equality Dialogues between UK Courts and the ECJ’, European Law Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1998), pp. 121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D., Hadjiemmanuil, C., Monti, G. G and Tomkins, A., European Union Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 881Google Scholar
Hailbronner, K., ‘Union citizenship and access to social benefits’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 5 (2005), pp. 1245–1267Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×