Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:38:11.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

9 - Membrane Enzymes and Transducers

Mary Luckey
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University
Get access

Summary

An understanding of their lipid environment, structural constraints and predictions, types of functions, and biogenesis lays the foundation for a survey of membrane protein structures. The remaining chapters showcase a gallery of high-resolution structures selected to be representative of the different well-characterized membrane proteins. The fact that the structures of the vast majority of the proteins predicted to be transmembrane (see “Predicting TM Segments” in Chapter 6) are unknown means these first-obtained structures will not likely portray all types of integral membrane proteins. The class of β-barrel membrane proteins is overrepresented in the structure database, with over half of the approximately 100 unique structures of integral membrane proteins solved as of 2005. They undoubtedly have less structural variation than the class of helical bundle proteins. The progress of determining the structures of helical membrane proteins has increased tremendously with 38 new structures in the last 5 years (Figure 9.1). Even more variety can be expected as new structures are obtained for helical bundles and for membrane proteins of mixed secondary structures.

The availability of structures has provided great insight into how membrane proteins function, igniting much interest and fresh excitement in the field. Often these structures are representative of many others in their families; occasionally they seem unique. This chapter looks at examples of membrane enzymes and transducers (including receptors) that are not part of extensive macromolecular machines; therefore, their structures tell much about how they carry out their functions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Membrane Structural Biology
With Biochemical and Biophysical Foundations
, pp. 213 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

∗Snijder, H. J., et al., Structural evidence for dimerization-regulated activation of an integral membrane phospholipase. Nature. 1999, 401:717–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijder, H. J., and Kijkstra, B. W., Bacterial phospholipase A: structure and function of an integral membrane phospholipase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000, 1288:91–101 (review).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garavito, R. M., and Mulichak, A. M., The structure of mammalian cyclooxygenases. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003, 32:183–206.
Kulmacz, R. J., et al., Comparison of the properties of prostaglandin H synthase-1 and -2. Prog Lipid Res. 2003, 42:377–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loll, P. J., et al., The structural basis of aspirin activity inferred from the crystal structure of inactivated prostaglandin H2 synthase. Nat Struct Biol. 1995, 2:637–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Malkowski, M. G., et al., The x-ray structure of prostaglandin endoroperoxide H synthase 1 complexed with arachidonic acid. Science. 2000, 289:1933–1937.Google Scholar
Rouzer, C. A., and Marnett, L. J., Structural and functional differences between cyclooxygenases: fatty acid oxygenases with a critical role in cell signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 338:34–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Snijder, H. J., et al., Structural evidence for dimerization-regulated activation of an integral membrane phospholipase. Nature. 1999, 401:717–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snijder, H. J., and Kijkstra, B. W., Bacterial phospholipase A: structure and function of an integral membrane phospholipase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000, 1288:91–101 (review).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garavito, R. M., and Mulichak, A. M., The structure of mammalian cyclooxygenases. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003, 32:183–206.
Kulmacz, R. J., et al., Comparison of the properties of prostaglandin H synthase-1 and -2. Prog Lipid Res. 2003, 42:377–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loll, P. J., et al., The structural basis of aspirin activity inferred from the crystal structure of inactivated prostaglandin H2 synthase. Nat Struct Biol. 1995, 2:637–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Malkowski, M. G., et al., The x-ray structure of prostaglandin endoroperoxide H synthase 1 complexed with arachidonic acid. Science. 2000, 289:1933–1937.Google Scholar
Rouzer, C. A., and Marnett, L. J., Structural and functional differences between cyclooxygenases: fatty acid oxygenases with a critical role in cell signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 338:34–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jormakka, M., Byrne, B., and Iwata, S., Formate dehydrogenase – a versatile enzyme in changing environments. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003, 13:418–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jormakka, M., Byrne, B., and Iwata, S., Protonmotive force generation by a redox loop mechanism. FEBS Lett. 2003, 545:25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Jormakka, M., Tornroth, S., Byrne, B., and Iwata, S., Molecular basis of proton motive force generation: structure of formate dehydrogenase-N. Science. 2002, 295:1863–1868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filipek, S., Teller, D. C., Palczewski, K., and Stenkamp, R., The crystallographic model of rhodopsin and its use in studies of other G protein–coupled receptors. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003, 32:375–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Li, J., et al., Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. J Mol Biol. 2004, 343:1409–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Palczewski, K., et al., Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein–coupled receptor. Science. 2000, 289:739–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palczewski, K., G protein–coupled receptor rhodopsin. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006, 75:743–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schertler, G., Structure of rhodopsin and the metarhodopsin I photointermediate. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005, 15:408–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Bass, R. B., et al., Crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a voltage-modulated and mechanosensitive channel. Science. 2002, 298:1582–1587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Chang, G., et al., Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science. 1998, 282:2220–2226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peerozo, E., and Rees, D. C., Structure and mechanism in prokaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003, 13:432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukharev, S., and Anishkin, A., Mechanosensitive channels: what can we learn from “simple” model systems?Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:345–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filipek, S., Teller, D. C., Palczewski, K., and Stenkamp, R., The crystallographic model of rhodopsin and its use in studies of other G protein–coupled receptors. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003, 32:375–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Li, J., et al., Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. J Mol Biol. 2004, 343:1409–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
∗Palczewski, K., et al., Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein–coupled receptor. Science. 2000, 289:739–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palczewski, K., G protein–coupled receptor rhodopsin. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006, 75:743–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schertler, G., Structure of rhodopsin and the metarhodopsin I photointermediate. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005, 15:408–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Bass, R. B., et al., Crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a voltage-modulated and mechanosensitive channel. Science. 2002, 298:1582–1587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
∗Chang, G., et al., Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science. 1998, 282:2220–2226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peerozo, E., and Rees, D. C., Structure and mechanism in prokaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003, 13:432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukharev, S., and Anishkin, A., Mechanosensitive channels: what can we learn from “simple” model systems?Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:345–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×