Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T23:13:22.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Elliott Sober
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Evidence and Evolution
The Logic Behind the Science
, pp. 368 - 384
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. (1973) “Information Theory as an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle,” in Petrov, B. and Csaki, F. (eds), Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–81.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. M. (1996) Optima for Animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allman, J., Rosin, A., Kumar, R., and Hasenstaub, A. (1998) “Parenting and Survival in Anthropoid Primates: Caretakers Live Longer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 95: 6866–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anscombe, F. J. (1954) “Fixed-Sample-Size Analysis of Sequential Observations,” Biometrics 10: 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonovics, J. and Tienderen, P. H. (1991) “Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The Chaos of Constraint Terminology,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 166–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbuthnot, J. (1710) “An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observ'd in the Births of Both Sexes,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 27: 186–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, P. (1975) Sequential Medical Trials, 2nd edn, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Backe, A. (1999) “The Likelihood Principle and the Reliability of Experiments,” Philosophy of Science 66: S354–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, D. and Larson, A. (1991) “Adaptation Reviewed: A Phylogenetic Methodology for Studying Character Coevolution,” Systematic Zoology 40: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behe, M. (1996) Darwin's Black Box, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Behe, M. (2001) “Reply to My Critics:” A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution,”Biology of Philosophy, 16(5) 683–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behe, M. (2005) “Design for Living,” New York Times, February 7, p. A27.Google Scholar
Behe, M. (2006) “Whether Intelligent Design Is Science: A Response to the Opinion of the Court in Kitzmiller vs Dover Area School District,” Special Report, Center for Science and Culture, Discovery Institute. Available online at http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command= download& id=697. (Accessed April 21, 2007.)
Borel, E. (1913) “Mécanique Statistique et Irréversibilité,” Journal of Physics, 5(3): 189–96.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, W. and Holzapfel, C. M. (1996) “Genetic Constraints to Life-History Evolution in the Pitcher-Plant Mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii,” Evolution 50: 1176–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooke, J. (2003) “Darwin and Victorian Christianity,” in Hodge, J. and Radick, G. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Darwin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192–213.Google Scholar
Brown, F. B. (1986) “The Evolution of Darwin's Theism,” Journal of the History of Biology 19: 1–45.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, F. (1993) The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, Volume VIII: 1860, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, K. and Anderson, D. (1998) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, K. and Anderson, D. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Burt, A. (1988) “Comparative Methods Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts,” Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
Butler, M. and King, A. (2004) “Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution,” American Naturalist 164: 683–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cairn-Smith, A. G. (1982) Genetic Takeover and the Mineral Origins of Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1947) Meaning and Necessity, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950) Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (2005) Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1994) Nature's Capacities and their Measurement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalcanti, A. and Landweber, L. (2004) “Genetic Code,” Current Biology 14: R147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, J. (1996) “Inconsistency of Evolutionary Tree Topology Reconstruction Methods When Substitution Rates Vary Across Characters,” Mathematical Biosciences 134: 189–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. D., and Leutenegger, W. (1985) “The Quantitative Assessment of Phylogenetic Constraints in Comparative Analyses: Sexual Dimorphism in Body Weight among Primates,” Evolution 39: 1335–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifford, W. K. (1999) “The Ethics of Belief,” in The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. First published 1877.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. (2003) Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. and Cockrell, B. (1978) “Predator Ingestion Rate and its Bearing on Feeding Time and the Theory of Optimal Diets,” Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 529–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, R. and Robbins, H. (1959) What is Mathematics?Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. and Orr, A. (2004) Speciation, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Creath, R. (1991) “Every Dogma Has Its Day,” Erkenntnis 35: 347–89.Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1968) “The Origin of the Genetic Code,” Journal of Molecular Biology 38: 367–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J., Budowle, B., Erlich, H., Lederberg, J., Reeder, D., Schumm, J., Thompson, E., Walsh, P., and Weir, B. (2000) “The Future of Forensic DNA Testing: Predictions of the Research and Development Working Group,” National Institute of Justice, NCJ 183697.Google Scholar
Crow, J. and Kimura, M. (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgess.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. W., Omland, K. E., and Oakley, T. H. (1998) “Reconstructing Ancestral Character States: A Critical Appraisal,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Costa, N. C. and French, S. (2003) Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Account to Models and Scientific Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1876) The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, 2nd edn, New York: D. Appleton. First published 1868.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1887) The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, ed. Darwin, F., London: Murray, Vols I–III.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1958) The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882, with original omissions restored, ed. Barlow, N., London: Collins.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1959) On the Origin of Species: A Variorum Edition, ed. Peckham, M., Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1964) The Origin of Species, London: Murray; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. First published 1859.Google Scholar
Dauben, J. W. (1994) “Topology: Invariance of Dimension,” in Grattan-Guinness, I. (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 939–49.Google Scholar
Dawid, P. (2002) “Bayes' Theorem and Weighing Evidence by Juries,” in Swinburne, R. (ed.), Bayes's Theorem, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1986) The Blind Watchmaker, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2006) The God Delusion, Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Dembski, W. (1998) The Design Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, W. (2004) The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design, Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1978) Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1987a) “Intentional Systems in Cognitive Ethology: The ‘Panglossian Paradigm’ Defended,” in The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 237–86.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1987b) “True Believers,” in The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 13–42.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea, New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (2006) Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1985) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D., 2 vols, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desmond, A. and Morris, J. (1991) Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist, New York: Times Warner.Google Scholar
Diaconis, P. and Mosteller, F. (1989) “Methods of Studying Coincidences,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84: 853–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Uriarte, R. and Garland, T. (1996) “Testing Hypotheses of Correlated Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts: Sensitivity to Deviations from Brownian Motion,” Systematic Biology 45: 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, S. (1996) The Biological Universe: The Twentieth-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doolittle, W. F. (2000) “The Nature of the Universal Ancestor and the Evolution of the Proteome,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology 10: 355–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doolittle, W. F. and Bapteste, E. (2007) “Pattern Pluralism and the Tree of Life Hypothesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 2043–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draper, P. (1989) “Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists,” Noûs 23: 331–50. Reprinted in D. Howard-Snyder (ed.), The Evidential Argument from Evil, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, P. (1996) “The Skeptical Theist,” in Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.), The Evidential Argument from Evil, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, pp. 175–92.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1954) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First published in French 1914.Google Scholar
Dye, J. (1988) “Supernatural Speech and Biological Books,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 257–72.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1986) A Primer on Determinism, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. (1992) Bayes or Bust: A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (2000) Hume's Abject Failure: The Miracles Argument, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, T. H. (1960) “The Aquatic Origin of Tetrapods,” Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 63: 115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. (1928) The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. (1939) The Philosophy of Physical Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (1972) Likelihood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. L. (1989) “Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb,” American Zoologist 29: 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, E. (1985) “Problems of Old Evidence,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. and Morris, C. (1977) “Stein's Paradox in Statistics,” Scientific American 236: 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J. (1980) Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Escoto, B. (2004) “Philosophical Significance of Akaike's Theorem,” Unpublished.
Falconer, D. and MacKay, T. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh: Pearson.Google Scholar
Farris, J. S. (1994) “The Logical Basis of Phylogenetic Analysis,” in Sober, E. (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. First published 1983 in N. Platnick and V. Funk (eds), Advances in Cladistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 7–36.Google Scholar
Farris, J. S. (1986) “On the Boundaries of Phylogenetic Systematics,” Cladistics 2: 14–27.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1973) “Maximum Likelihood and Minimum-Step Methods for Estimating Evolutionary Trees from Data on Discrete Characters,” Systematic Zoology 22: 240–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1978) “Cases in which Parsimony and Compatibility Methods Can Be Positively Misleading,” Systematic Zoology 27: 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1979) “Alternative Methods of Phylogenetic Inference and their Interrelationships,” Systematic Biology 28: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1981) “A Likelihood Approach to Character Weighting and What It Tells Us About Parsimony and Compatibility,” Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 16: 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985) “Phylogenies and the Comparative Method,” American Naturalist 125: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring Phylogenies, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1974) Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1922a) “On the Dominance Ratio,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 42: 321–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1922b) “On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 222: 309–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1956) Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1957) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1959) Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, 2nd edn, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. (1999) “The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity,” Philosophy of Science 66: S362–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2007) “Likelihoodism, Bayesianism, and Relational Confirmation,” Synthese 156: 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitelson, B., Stephens, C., and Sober, E. (1999) “How Not to Detect Design: A Review of W. Dembski's The Design Inference,” Philosophy of Science 66: 472–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (1986) “Statistical Covariance as a Measure of Phylogenetic Relationship,” Cladistics 2: 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (1999) “Model Selection in Science: The Problem of Language Invariance,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (2000a) “Hard Problems in the Philosophy of Science: Idealisation and Commensurability,” in Nola, R. and Sankey, H. (eds), After Popper, Kuhn, and Feyerabend, London: Kluwer, pp. 231–50.Google Scholar
Forster, M. (2000b) “Key Concepts in Model Selection: Performance and Generality,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (2001) “The New Science of Simplicity,” in Zellner, A., Keuzenkamp, H., and McAleer, M. (eds), Simplicity, Inference, and Modeling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–119.Google Scholar
Forster, M. (2006) “Counterexamples to the Likelihood Theory of Evidence,” Mind and Machines 16: 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (in press) “A Philosopher's Guide to Empirical Success,” Philosophy of Science.
Forster, M. and Sober, E. (1994) “How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. and Sober, E. (in preparation) “AIC Scores as Evidence: A Bayesian Interpretation.”
Freeland, S., Knight, R., Landweber, L., and Hurst, L. (2000) “Early Fixation of an Optimal Genetic Code,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 511–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frigg, R. and Hartmann, S. (2006) “Models in Science,” in Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/spr2006/entries/models-science. (Accessed May 5 2007.)
Gaut, B. S. and Lewis, P. O. (1995) “Success of Maximum Likelihood Phylogeny Inference in the Four Taxon Case,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 152–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehring, W. J. (2002) “The Genetic Control of Eye Development and Its Implications for the Evolution of the Various Eye-Types,” The International Journal of Developmental Biology 46: 65–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, J. H. (1986) “Natural Selection and the Molecular Clock,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 3: 138–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Gilovich, T., Valone, R., and Tversky, A. (1985) “The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences,” Cognitive Psychology 17: 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, N. (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Inference of Phylogenetic Trees, with Special Reference to a Poisson Process Model of DNA Substitution and to Parsimony Analyses,” Systematic Biology 39: 345–61.Google Scholar
Good, I. J. (1967) “On the Principle of Total Evidence,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, S. N. (1999) “Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics: 1. The P Value Fallacy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 130: 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. (1977) “The Misnamed, Mistreated, and Misunderstood Irish Elk,” in Ever Since Darwin, New York: Norton, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
Gould, S. (1980) The Panda's Thumb, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S. (1989) Wonderful Life, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S. (1991) “The Ant and the Plant,” in Bully for Brontosaurus, New York: Norton, pp. 479–88.Google Scholar
Gould, S. and Lewontin, R. (1979) “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Paradigm,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 205: 581–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. and Vrba, E. (1982) “Exaptation: A Missing Term in the Science of Form,” Paleobiology 8: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A., Wessler, S., Lewontin, R., Gelbart, W., Suzuki, D., and Miller, J. (2005) Introduction to Genetic Analysis, New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Grossman, J. (2007) “Statistical Inference: From Data to Simple Hypotheses,” Unpublished.
Hacking, I. (1965) The Logic of Statistical Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975) The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1987) “The Inverse Gambler's Fallacy: The Argument from Design. The Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler Universes,” Mind 96: 331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajek, A. (2003) “What Conditional Probabilities Could Not Be,” Synthese 137: 273–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, T. (1997) “Stabilizing Selection and the Comparative Analysis of Adaptation,” Evolution 51: 1341–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, N. R. (1969) Perception and Discovery: An Introduction to Scientific Inquiry, San Francisco, Calif.: Freeman-Cooper.Google Scholar
Harman, G. and Kulkarni, M. (2007) Reliable Reasoning: Induction and Statistical Learning Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. and Pagel, M. (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. (1992) The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. (1951) “The Concept of Cognitive Significance: A Reconsideration,” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 80: 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. (1965a) “Empiricist Criteria of Cognitive Significance: Problems and Changes,” in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. (1965b) “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation,” in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press, pp. 3–46.Google Scholar
Hereford, J., Hansen, T., and Houle, E. (2004) “Comparing Strengths of Directional Selection: How Strong Is Strong?Evolution 58: 2133–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesse, M. (1966) Models and Analogies in Science, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J. (1978) Evil and the God of Love, rev. edn, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Himma, K. (2005) “The Application-Conditions of Design Inferences: Why the Design Argument Needs the Help of Other Arguments for God's Existence,” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 57: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. (1987) “Natural Selection as a Causal, Empirical and Probabilistic Theory,” in Krüger, L., Daston, R., and Heidelberg, M. (eds), The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. II, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 233–70.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. (1991) “The History of the Earth, Life, and Man: Whewell and Palaetiological Science,” in Fisch, M. and Schaffer, S. (eds), William Whewell: A Composite Portrait, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 255–89.Google Scholar
Hoover, K. (2003) “Nonstationary Time Series, Cointegration, and the Principle of the Common Cause,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 527–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. (ed.) (1996) The Evidential Argument from Evil, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.
Howson, C. (2001) “The Logic of Bayesian Probability,” in Corfield, D. and Williamson, J. (eds), Foundations of Bayesianism, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1993) Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, Peru, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J., Larget, B., and Alfaro, M. (2004) “Bayesian Phylogenetic Model Selection Using Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1123–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huelsenbeck, J., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R., and Bollback, J. (2001) “Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny and Its Impact on Evolutionary Biology,” Science 294: 2310–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, D. (2000) “Why Did Darwin Fail? The Case of John Stuart Mill,” in Creath, R. and Maienschein, J. (eds), Biology and Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–63.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1990) Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, London: Penguin. First published in 1779.Google Scholar
James, W. (1897) “The Will to Believe,” in The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, New York: Longmans Green & Co., pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
James, W. and Stein, C. (1961) “Estimation with Quadratic Loss,” in Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. I, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, pp. 361–79.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1983) The Logic of Decision, 2nd edn, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press. First published 1965.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. (1995) “Statistical Sirens: The Allure of Nonparametrics,” Ecology 76: 1998–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. (1991) Darwin on Trial, Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1997) Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Jukes, T. and Cantor, C. (1969) “Evolution of Protein Molecules,” in Munro, H. (ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism, New York: Academic Press, pp. 21–132.Google Scholar
Justus, J. (2007) “The Search for a Formal Criterion of Empirical Significance: A Reconsideration,” Unpublished.
Kadane, J. B., Schervish, M., and Seidenfeld, T. (1996), “Reasoning to a Foregone Conclusion,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 1228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M. (1996) Decision Theory as Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. (1921) A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1980) “A Simple Method for Estimating Evolutionary Rates of Base Substitutions through Comparative Studies of Nucleotide Sequences,” Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1981) “Estimation of Evolutionary Distances Between Homologous Nucleotide Sequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 78: 454–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1983) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsolver, J. and Koehl, M. (1985) “Aerodynamics, Thermoregulation, and the Evolution of Insect Wings: Differential Scaling and Evolutionary Change,” Evolution 39: 488–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishino, H. and Hasegawa, M. (1990) “Converting Distance to Time: Application to Human Evolution,” Methods in Enzymology 183: 550–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, P. (1983) Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1993) The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2001) “Real Realism: The Galilean Strategy,” Philosophical Review 110: 151–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2003) “Darwin's Achievement,” in In Mendel's Mirror, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–93.Google Scholar
Knight, R., Freeland, S., and Landweber, L. (2001) “Rewiring the Keyboard: Evolvability of the Genetic Code,” Nature Reviews: Genetics 2: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, K., Evans, J. M., Hendricks, J. C., and Sehgal, A. (2006) “A Drosophila Model for Age-Associated Changes in Sleep:Wake Cycles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 13843–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1950) Foundations of the Theory of Probability, New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. and Davies, N. (1981) An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Kreitman, M. (2000) “How to Detect Selection in Populations with Applications to the Human,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 1: 539–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kyburg, H. (1970) “Conjuctivitis” in Swain, M. (ed.) Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 55–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C., and Serio, G. (1984) “A New Method for Calculating Evolutionary Substitution Rates,” Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Land, M. (1984) “Molluscs,” in Ali, M. (ed.), Photoreception and Vision in Invertebrates, New York: Plenum, pp. 699–725.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1976) “Natural Selection and Random Genetic Drift in Phenotypic Evolution,” Evolution 30: 314–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1985) “Expected Time for Random Genetic Drift of a Population between Stable Phenotypic States,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 82: 7641–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, C., Sober, E., and Strier, K. (2002) “Are Human Beings Part of the Rest of Nature?Biology and Philosophy 17: 661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplace, P. S. (1951) Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, New York: Dover. First published in French 1829.Google Scholar
Lauder, G. (1996) “The Argument from Design,” in Rose, M. and Lauder, G. (eds), Adaptation, New York: Academic Press, pp. 55–92.Google Scholar
Leroi, A. M., Rose, M. R., and Lauder, G. V. (1994) “What Does the Comparative Method Reveal About Adaptation?The American Naturalist 143: 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, R. (1980) “Evolutionary Theory under Fire,” Science 210: 883–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P. (1998) “Maximum Likelihood as an Alternative to Parsimony for Inferring Phylogeny Using Nucleotide Sequence Data,” in Soltis, D., Soltis, P., and Doyle, J. (eds), Molecular Systematics of Plants II, Boston, Mass.: Kluwer, pp. 132–63.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. (2001) “A Likelihood Approach to Estimating Phylogeny from Discrete Morphological Character Data,” Systematic Biology 50: 913–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. (1978) “Adaptation,” Scientific American 239: 156–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, W. H. (1993) “So, What About the Molecular Clock Hypothesis?Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 3: 896–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, W. H. and Tanimura, M. (1987) “The Molecular Clock Runs More Slowly in Man than in Apes and Monkeys,” Nature 326: 93–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindley, D. V. (1957) “A Statistical Paradox,” Biometrika 44: 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley, D. V. and Phillips, L. D. (1976) “Inference for a Bernouilli Process (a Bayesian view),” The American Statistician 30: 112–19.Google Scholar
Littlewood, J. (1953) A Mathematician's Miscellany, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Maddison, W. (1991) “Squared-Change Parsimony Reconstructions of Ancestral States for Continuous-Valued Characters on a Phylogenetic Tree,” Systematic Zoology 40: 304–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1978) “Optimization Theory in Evolution,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. (1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1976) “Typological versus Population Thinking,” in Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 26–9. First published 1963.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1988) Towards a New Philosophy of Biology, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (2000) “The Biological Species Concept,” in Wheeler, Q. and Meier, R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 17–29, 93–100, 161–6.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. and Kreitman, M. (1991) “Adaptive Protein Evolution at the Adh Locus in Drosophila,” Nature 351: 652–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMullin, E. (1985) “Galilean Idealization,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16: 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, J. (1971) Chance and Necessity, New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. and Morrison, M. (eds) (1999) Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Morgenbesser, S. (1960) “The Realist-Instrumentalist Controversy,” in Morgenbesser, S., Suppes, P., and White, M. (eds), Philosophy, Science, and Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, pp. 106–22.Google Scholar
Morris, H. (1980) King of Creation, San Diego, Calif.: CLP Publishers.Google Scholar
Mougin, G. and Sober, E. (1994) “Betting Against Pascal's Wager,” Noûs 28: 382–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. (1996) “The Role of Theology in Current Evolutionary Reasoning,” Biology and Philosophy 11: 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1933) “On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 231: 289–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, R. (2005) “Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection,” Annual Review of Genetics 39: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, D. (1989) “Vision Optics and Evolution,” Bioscience 39: 298–307.Google Scholar
Nilsson, D. and Pelger, S. (1994) “A Pessimistic Estimate of the Time Required for an Eye to Evolve,” Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, Biological Sciences 256: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Numbers, R. (1992) The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Numbers, R. (2003) “Science Without God: Natural Law and Christian Beliefs: An Essay on Methodological Naturalism,” in Lindberg, D. and Numbers, R. (eds), When Science and Christianity Meet, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 265–86.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R. (1988) “Homage to Clio, or, Towards an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology,” Systematic Zoology 37: 142–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, R. (1998) “Population Thinking and Tree Thinking in Systematics,” Zoological Scripta 26: 323–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olby, R. (1985) The Origins of Mendelism, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oparin, A. (1953) The Origin of Life, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Orr, A. (1996) “Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again),”Boston Review of Books, Dec/June: 28–31.Google Scholar
Orzack, S. and Sober, E. (1993) “A Critical Examination of Richard Levins' ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology’,” Quarterly Review of Biology 68: 533–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orzack, S. and Sober, E. (2001) “Adaptation, Phylogenetic Inertia, and the Method of Controlled Comparisons,” in Adaptationism and Optimality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ospovat, D. (1981) The Development of Darwin's Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection 1838–1859, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page, R. and Holmes, E. (1998) Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paley, W. (1809) Natural Theology, or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature, 12th edn, London: Rivington. First published 1802. Available online at http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=A142 & viewtype=text & pageseq=1.Google Scholar
Parker, G. (1978) “Searching for Mates,” in Krebs, J. and Davies, N. (eds), Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 214–44.Google Scholar
Parker, G. and Stuart, R. (1976) “Animal Behavior as a Strategy Optimizer: Evolution of Resource Assessment Strategies and Optimal Emigration Thresholds,” American Naturalist 110: 1055–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parzen, E. (1962) Stochastic Processes, San Francisco, Calif.: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. (1981) “Significance of Fossils in Determining Evolutionary Relationships,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1934) “The Fixation of Belief,” in Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., and Burks, A. (eds), The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Volume V, pp. 223–47. First published 1877.Google Scholar
Pennock, R. (1999) Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Penny, D.Foulds, L. R., and Hendy, M. D. (1982) “Testing the Theory of Evolution by Comparing Phylogenetic Trees Constructed from Five Different Protein Sequences,” Nature 297: 197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plantinga, A. (1974) The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1993) Warrant and Proper Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2000) Warranted Christian Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1959) Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1976) Unended Quest, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1978) “Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind,” Dialectica 32: 339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada, D. and Buckley, T. (2004) “Model Selection in Phylogenetics: Advantages of the AIC and Bayesian Approaches,” Systematic Biology 53: 793–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posada, D. and Crandall, K. (2001) “Selecting the Best-Fit Model of Nucleotide Substitution,” Systematic Biology 50: 580–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provine, W. (1989) “Progress in Evolution and Meaning in Life,” in Nitecki, M. (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1953) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Raddick, G. (2005) “Deviance, Darwinian-Style: A Review of A. Lustig, R. Richards, and M. Ruse's Darwinian Heresies (Cambridge: CUP, 2004),” Metascience 14: 453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rannala, B., and Yang, Z. (1996) “Probability Distribution of Molecular Evolutionary Trees: a New Method of Phylogenetic Inference,” Journal of Molecular Evolution 43: 304–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichenbach, H. (1938) Experience and Prediction, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956) The Direction of Time, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (1983) The Explanation of Organic Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, H. (1970) “Statistical Methods Related to the Law of the Iterated Logarithm,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41: 1397–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J. L., Marin, A., and Medina, J. R., (1990) “The General Stochastic Model of Nucleotide Substitution,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, W. (1979) “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 335–341.Google Scholar
Royall, R. (1997) Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm, Boca Raton, Fla.: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1979) The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (2000) Can a Darwinian Be a Christian?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1919) Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, New York: The Macmillan Company; London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., and Kitagawa, G. (1986) Akaike Information Criterion Statistics, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plaven, L. and Mayr, E. (1977) “On the Evolution of Photoreceptors and Eyes,” in Hecht, M., Sterre, W., and Wallace, B. (eds), Evolutionary Biology, Vol. X, New York: Plenum, pp. 207–63.Google Scholar
Schlichting, C. D. and Pigliucci, M. (1998) Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Schwarz, G. (1978) “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” Annals of Statistics 6: 461–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, N. (2004) God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. and Sober, E. (2007) “Epiphenomenalism: The Do's and Don'ts,” in Wolters, G. and Machamer, P. (eds), Studies in Causality: Historical and Contemporary, Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Shoesmith, E. (1987) “The Continental Controversy over Arbuthnot's Argument for Divine Providence,” Historia Mathematica 14: 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1981) “The Architecture of Complexity,” in The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 193–229.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1984) Pragmatics and Empiricism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1996) The Evolution of the Social Contract, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, L. J. (2006) Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1980) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science 47: 350–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1984) The Nature of Selection, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Second edition published 1993 Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1988) Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1989) “Independent Evidence About a Common Cause,” Philosophy of Science 56: 275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1990) Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1993a) “Mathematics and Indispensability,” Philosophical Review 102: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1993b) Philosophy of Biology, Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1994) “Progress and Directionality in Evolutionary Theory,” in Campbell, J. (ed.), Creative Evolution?!Boston, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1998) “Three Differences Between Evolution and Deliberation,” in Danielson, P. (ed.), Modeling Rationality, Morality, and Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 408–22.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1999a) “Modus Darwin,” Biology and Philosophy 14: 253–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1999b) “Testability,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73: 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2000a) “Evolution and the Problem of Other Minds,” Journal of Philosophy 97: 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2000b) “Quine's Two Dogmas,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 74: 237–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2001) “Venetian Sea Levels, British Bread Prices, and the Principle of the Common Cause,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2002a) “Intelligent Design and Probability Reasoning,” International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 52: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2002b) “Instrumentalism, Parsimony, and the Akaike Framework,” Philosophy of Science 69: S112–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2002c) “Reconstructing Ancestral Character States: A Likelihood Perspective on Cladistic Parsimony,” The Monist 85: 156–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2003a) “It Had to Happen: A Review of Simon Conway Morris' Life's Solution in a Lonely Universe,” New York Times, November 30, Book Review Section, p. 18.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2003b) “Two Uses of Unification,” in Stadler, F. (ed.), The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2002, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 205–16.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2004a) “The Contest Between Likelihood and Parsimony,” Systematic Zoology 53: 6–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Sober, E. (2004b) “The Design Argument,” in Mann, W. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117–47.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2004c) “Likelihood, Model Selection, and the Duhem–Quine Problem,” Journal of Philosophy 101: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2004d) “A Modest Proposal: A Review of John Earman's Hume's Abject Failure: The Miracles Argument,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 118: 487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2005) “Parsimony and its Presuppositions,” in Albert, V. (ed.), Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2007a) “Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural: The ‘God or Extra-Terrestrials’ Reply,” Faith and Philosophy 24: 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2007b) “Sex Ratio Theory, Ancient and Modern: An 18th Century Debate about Intelligent Design and the Development of Models in Evolutionary Biology,” in Riskin, J. (ed.), Genesis Redux: Essays on the History and Philosophy of Artificial Life, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 131–62.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2008a) “Empiricism,” in Psillos, S. and Curd, M. (eds), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2008b) “Evolutionary Theory and the Reality of Macro-Probabilities,” in Eells, E. and Fetzer, J. (eds), Probability in Science, Chicago, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Sober, E. and Orzack, S. (2003) “Common Ancestry and Natural Selection,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 423–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. and Steel, M. (2002) “Testing the Hypothesis of Common Ancestry,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 218: 395–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, E. and Wilson, D. S. (1998) Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sorenson, R. (2001) Vagueness and Contradiction, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R. (2001) Causality, Prediction, and Search, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stace, C. (2000) “Cytology and Cytogenetics as a Fundamental Taxonomic Resource for the 20th and 21st Centuries,” Taxon 49: 451–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, K. (2006) Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. (1979) Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Steel, M. and Penny, D. (2000) “Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Role of Models in Molecular Phylogenetics,” Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 839–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, M. and Penny, D. (2004) “Two Further Links between MP and ML under the Poisson Model,” Applied Mathematics Letters 17: 785–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P. (1999) Sex and Death: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stone, M. (1977) “An Asymptotic Equivalence of Choice of Model by Cross-Validation and Akaike's Criterion,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39: 44–7.Google Scholar
Sugiura, N. (1978) “Further Analysis of the Data by Akaike's Information Criterion and the Finite Corrections,” Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods A7: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, J. (1984) Gulliver's Travels, London: Herbert Press. First published 1726.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1968) “The Argument from Design,” Philosophy 43: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1990) “The Limits of Explanation,” in Knowles, D. (ed.), Explanation and Its Limits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–93.Google Scholar
Swofford, D., Olsen, G., Waddell, P., and Hillis, D. (1996) “Phylogenetic Inference,” in Hillis, D., Moritz, C., and Marble, B. (eds), Molecular Systematics, 2nd edn, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer, pp. 407–514.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, K. (1976) “Distribution of Informational Statistics and a Criterion of Model Fitting,” (in Japanese), Suri-Kapaku (Mathematical Sciences) 153: 12–18.Google Scholar
Taveré, S. (1986) “Some Probabilistic and Statistical Problems on the Analysis of DNA Sequences,” Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences 17: 57–86.Google Scholar
Tuffley, C. and Steel, M. (1997) “Links Between Maximum Likelihood and Maximum Parsimony under a Simple Model of Site Substitution,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 59: 581–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. (1988) “Population Genetic Models for Polygenic Variation and Evolution,” in Weir, B., Eisen, E., Goodman, M., and Namkoong, G. (eds), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer, pp. 601–18.Google Scholar
Fraassen, B. (1982) “The Charybdis of Realism: Epistemological Implications of Bell's Inequality,” Synthese 52: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwagen, P. (1993) Metaphysics, Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Venn, J. (1866) The Logic of Chance, New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. (2004) “Modus Tollens Probabilized,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 747–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, D. B., Roth, G., and Wake, M. H. (1983) “On the Problem of Stasis in Organismal Evolution,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 101: 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, A. (1947) Sequential Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Walsh, D., Lewens, T., and Ariew, A. (2002) “The Trials of Life: Natural Selection and Random Drift,” Philosophy of Science 69: 452–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardrop, R. (1999) “Statistical Tests for the Hot-Hand in Basketball in a Controlled Setting,” Technical Report, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Available online at http://hot-hand. behaviouralfinance. net/Ward99. pdf. (Accessed 4 February 2007.)
Whewell, W. (1833) Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, Philadelphia, Pa.: Carey, Lea and Blanchard.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1847) The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded Upon Their History, Vol. I, London: J. Parker.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. (1981) Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994) Vagueness, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woese, C. (1998) “The Universal Ancestor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 6854–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, J. (2003) Making Things Happen, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, L. (1976) “Functions,” Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.Google Scholar
Wykstra, S. (1984) “The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of ‘Appearance’,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoccoz, N. (1991) “The Use, Overuse, and Misuse of Significance Tests in Evolutionary Biology and Ecology,” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 32: 106–11.Google Scholar
Young, R. (1985) Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1926) “Why Do We Sometimes Get Nonsensical Relations Between Time Series? A Study of Sampling and the Nature of Time Series,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 89: 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerkandl, E. and Pauling, L. (1965) “Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins,” in Bryson, V. and Vogel, H. J. (eds), Evolving Genes and Proteins, New York: Academic Press, pp. 97–166.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Elliott Sober, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Evidence and Evolution
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806285.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Elliott Sober, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Evidence and Evolution
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806285.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Elliott Sober, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Evidence and Evolution
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806285.007
Available formats
×