Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T05:17:24.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

25 - Land surface processes in climate models

from Part VII - Terrestrial Forcings and Feedbacks

Gordon B. Bonan
Gordon B. Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Chapter summary

Much of our understanding of how land surface processes and vegetation affect weather and climate comes from numerical models of surface energy fluxes and the hydrologic cycle coupled to atmospheric numerical models. Land surface models are coupled to atmospheric numerical models to simulate the absorption of radiation at the land surface, the exchanges of sensible and latent heat between land and atmosphere, storage of heat in soil, and the frictional drag of vegetation and other surface elements on wind. These models of land surface processes were initially developed to provide the surface boundary conditions of radiative and turbulent fluxes required by atmospheric numerical models. They have since evolved to simulate the hydrologic cycle, biogeochemical cycles, and vegetation dynamics so that the land and atmosphere are represented as a coupled system. This chapter reviews the historical development of land surface models, particularly the parameterization of processes, the inclusion of satellite data in the models, and the representation of heterogeneity in the landscape. Model validation is discussed, as well as application of the models in climate model experiments.

Hydrometeorological models

Global climate models represent a set of numerical equations that describe the large-scale circulation of the atmosphere and ocean and their physical state, including interactions among oceans, atmosphere, land, and sea ice that affect climate (Trenberth 1992; McGuffie and Henderson-Sellers 2001, 2005; Washington and Parkinson 2005; Randall et al. 2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Climatology
Concepts and Applications
 , pp. 395 - 417
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avissar, R., 1992. Conceptual aspects of a statistical-dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid-scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97D, 2729–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A., 1989. A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Monthly Weather Review, 117, 2113–36.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnoud, N., Pitman, A. J., McAvaney, B. J., and Holbrook, N. J., 2005. The contribution of the land surface energy balance complexity to differences in means, variances and extremes using the AMIP-II methodology. Climate Dynamics, 25, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlage, M. and Zeng, X., 2004. The effects of observed fractional vegetation cover on the land surface climatology of the Community Land Model. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5, 823–30.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, P. A., McCaughey, J. H., Lafleur, P. M., and Verseghy, D. L., 2002. A comparison of the mosaic and aggregated canopy frameworks for representing surface heterogeneity in the Canadian boreal forest using CLASS: a soil perspective. Journal of Hydrology, 266, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. J., 2005. Representing urban areas within operational numerical weather prediction models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 114, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. J., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Villani, M. G., 2006. Evaluation of the urban tile in MOSES using surface energy balance observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 118, 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., 1995a. Land–atmosphere CO2 exchange simulated by a land surface process model coupled to an atmospheric general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100D, 2817–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., 1995b. Sensitivity of a GCM simulation to inclusion of inland water surfaces. Journal of Climate, 8, 2691–704.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., Davis, K. J., Baldocchi, D., Fitzjarrald, D., and Neumann, H., 1997. Comparison of the NCAR LSM1 land surface model with BOREAS aspen and jack pine tower fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research 102D, 29 065–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., Levis, S., Kergoat, L., and Oleson, K. W., 2002a. Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 1021, doi:10.1029/2000GB001360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., Oleson, K. W., Vertenstein, M., et al., 2002b. The land surface climatology of the Community Land Model coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. Journal of Climate, 15, 3123–49.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, G. B., Levis, S., Sitch, S., Vertenstein, M., and Oleson, K. W., 2003. A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics. Global Change Biology, 9, 1543–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., et al., 2007. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 13, 679–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, A., Habets, F., Noilhan, J., et al., 2004. The Rhône-aggregation land surface scheme intercomparison project: an overview. Journal of Climate, 17, 187–208.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounoua, L., Collatz, G. J., Sellers, P. J., et al., 1999. Interactions between vegetation and climate: radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO2. Journal of Climate, 12, 309–24.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounoua, L., Collatz, G. J., Los, S. O., et al., 2000. Sensitivity of climate to changes in NDVI. Journal of Climate 13, 2277–92.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, L. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., Nijssen, B., et al., 2003a. Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne–Kalix basin: PILPS Phase 2(e). 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons. Global and Planetary Change, 38, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, L. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., Nijssen, B., et al., 2003b. Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS Phase 2(e). 3: Equivalent model representation and sensitivity experiments. Global and Planetary Change, 38, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buermann, W., Dong, J., Zeng, X., Myneni, R. B., and Dickinson, R. E., 2001. Evaluation of the utility of satellite-based vegetation leaf area index data for climate simulations. Journal of Climate 14, 3536–51.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buermann, W., Wang, Y., Dong, J., et al., 2002. Analysis of a multiyear global vegetation leaf area index data set. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107D, 4646, doi:10.1029/2001JD000975.Google Scholar
Chase, T. N., Pielke, R. A., Kittel, T. G. F., Nemani, R., and Running, S. W., 1996. Sensitivity of a general circulation model to global changes in leaf area index. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101D, 7393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. and Kumar, P., 2001. Topographic influence on the seasonal and interannual variation of water and energy balance of basins in North America. Journal of Climate, 14, 1989–2014.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, T. H., Henderson-Sellers, A., Milly, P. C. D., et al., 1997. Cabauw experimental results from the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes. Journal of Climate, 10, 1194–215.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., and Berry, J. A., 1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 54, 107–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collatz, G. J., Ribas-Carbo, M., and Berry, J. A., 1992. Coupled photosynthesis–stomatal conductance model for leaves of C4 plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 19, 519–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, W. D., Bitz, C. M., Blackmon, M. L., et al., 2006. The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3). Journal of Climate, 19, 2122–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, B. A., Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K. E., et al., 2003. Land surface model spin-up behavior in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS). Journal of Geophysical Research, 108D, 8845, doi:10.1029/2002JD003316.Google Scholar
Cox, P. M., 2001. Description of the “TRIFFID” dynamic global vegetation model. Hadley Centre Technical Note 24, Hadley Centre, Met Office, Bracknell, UK, 16 pp.
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Bunton, C. B., et al., 1999. The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Climate Dynamics, 15, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, S. G., Holmén, K. J., Bonan, G. B., and Rasch, P. J., 1998. Atmospheric CO2 simulated by the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model. 1. Mean fields and seasonal cycles. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103D, 13 213–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, Q.-L., Margolis, H. A., and Collatz, G. J., 1998. Parameterization and testing of a coupled photosynthesis–stomatal conductance model for boreal trees. Tree Physiology, 18, 141–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deardorff, J. W., 1978. Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83C, 1889–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S. and Townshend, J. R. G., 1994. NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15, 3567–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Field, C. B., Fung, I., et al., 1995. Mapping the land surface for global atmosphere–biosphere models: toward continuous distributions of vegetation's functional properties. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100D, 20 867–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R., Hansen, M., Steininger, M., et al., 1997. Subpixel forest cover in Central Africa from multisensor, multitemporal data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 60, 228–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M., Townshend, J. R. G., and Sohlberg, R., 1998. Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution: the use of training data derived from Landsat Imagery in decision tree classifiers. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 3141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., and Hansen, M. C., 1999. Continuous fields of vegetation characteristics at the global scale at 1-km resolution. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104D, 16 911–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., and Townshend, J. R. G., 2000a. Global continuous fields of vegetation characteristics: a linear mixture model applied to multi-year 8 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Townshend, J. R. G., Janetos, A. C., and Loveland, T. R., 2000b. A new global 1-km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing. Global Change Biology, 6, 247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, A. S., Fung, I. Y., and Randall, D., 1995. Latitudinal gradient of atmospheric CO2 due to seasonal exchange with land biota. Nature, 376, 240–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, A. S., Collatz, G. J., Zhang, C., et al., 1996a. Simulations of terrestrial carbon metabolism and atmospheric CO2 in a general circulation model. Part 1: Surface carbon fluxes. Tellus, 48B, 521–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, A. S., Randall, D. A., Collatz, G. J., and Sellers, P. J., 1996b. Simulations of terrestrial carbon metabolism and atmospheric CO2 in a general circulation model. Part 2: Simulated CO2 concentrations. Tellus, 48B, 543–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desborough, C. E., Pitman, A. J., and Irannejad, P., 1996. Analysis of the relationship between bare soil evaporation and soil moisture simulated by 13 land surface schemes for a simple non-vegetated site. Global and Planetary Change, 13, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, R. E., 1983. Land surface processes and climate–surface albedos and energy balance. Advances in Geophysics, 25, 305–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P. J., and Wilson, M. F., 1986. Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-275+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 69 pp.
Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P. J., 1993. Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 72 pp.
Dickinson, R. E., Oleson, K. W., Bonan, G., et al., 2006. The Community Land Model and its climate statistics as a component of the Community Climate System Model. Journal of Climate, 19, 2302–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, J. L. and Sellers, P. J., 1989. A global climatology of albedo, roughness length and stomatal resistance for atmospheric general circulation models as represented by the simple biosphere model (SiB). Journal of Applied Meteorology 28, 833–55.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducharne, A., Koster, R. D., Suarez, M. J., and Kumar, P., 1999. A catchment-based land surface model for GCMs and the framework for its evaluation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 24, 769–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducharne, A., Koster, R. D., Suarez, M. J., Stieglitz, M., and Kumar, P., 2000. A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model 2. Parameter estimation and model demonstration. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105D, 24 823–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entekhabi, D. and Eagleson, P. S., 1989. Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability. Journal of Climate, 2, 816–31.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essery, R. L. H., Best, M. J., Betts, R. A., Cox, P. M., and Taylor, C. M., 2003. Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 4, 530–43.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, G. D., 1989. Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 323B, 357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, G. D. and Caemmerer, S., 1982. Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology New Series, vol. 12B. Physiological Plant Ecology. II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation, ed. Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B., and Ziegler, H.. Springer-Verlag, pp. 549–87.Google Scholar
Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S., and Berry, J. A., 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., et al., 1996. An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 603–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. A., Levis, S., Prentice, I. C., Pollard, D., and Thompson, S. L., 1998. Coupling dynamic models of climate and vegetation. Global Change Biology, 4, 561–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. A., Levis, S., Costa, M. H., Cramer, W., and Pollard, D., 2000. Incorporating dynamic vegetation cover within global climate models. Ecological Applications, 10, 1620–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S., Pitman, A. J., Boone, A., and Habets, F., 2006. The relationship between intermodel differences and surface energy balance complexity in the Rhône-Aggregation Intercomparison Project. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedl, M. A., McIver, D. K., Hodges, J. C. F., et al., 2002. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, A. D. and Kiang, N. Y., 2005. Land surface model development for the GISS GCM: effects of improved canopy physiology on simulated climate. Journal of Climate, 18, 2883–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervois, S., Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Viovy, N., et al., 2004. Including croplands in a global biosphere model: methodology and evaluation at specific sites. Earth Interactions, 8, 1–25.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grini, A., Myhre, G., Zender, C. S., and Isaksen, I. S. A., 2005. Model simulations of dust sources and transport in the global atmosphere: effects of soil erodibility and wind speed variability. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110D, D02205, doi:10.1029/2004JD005037.Google Scholar
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., et al., 1995. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100D, 8873–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutman, G. and Ignatov, A., 1998. The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 1533–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahmann, A. N. and Dickinson, R. E., 2001. A fine-mesh land approach for general circulation models and its impact on regional climate. Journal of Climate, 14, 1634–46.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. C. and DeFries, R. S., 2004. Detecting long-term global forest change using continuous fields of tree-cover maps from 8-km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data for the years 1982–1999. Ecosystems, 7, 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., and Sohlberg, R., 2000. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1331–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M., DeFries, R., Townshend, J. R. G., Marufu, L., and Sohlberg, R., 2002a. Development of a MODIS tree cover validation data set for Western Province, Zambia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 320–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., et al., 2002b. Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 303–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., et al., 2003. Global percent tree cover at a spatial resolution of 500 meters: first results of the MODIS vegetation continuous fields algorithm. Earth Interactions, 7, 1–15.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C., 1996. BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, A., 1993. Continental vegetation as a dynamic component of a global climate model: a preliminary assessment. Climatic Change, 23, 337–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, A. and McGuffie, K., 1995. Global climate models and “dynamic” vegetation changes. Global Change Biology, 1, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, A., McGuffie, K., and Pitman, A. J., 1996. The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): 1992 to 1995. Climate Dynamics, 12, 849–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, A., Irannejad, P., McGuffie, K., and Pitman, A. J., 2003. Predicting land-surface climates-better skill or moving targets?Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 1777, doi:10.1029/2003GL017387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, P. A. T. and Harte, J., 2006. Biophysical and biogeochemical responses to climate change depend on dispersal and migration. BioScience, 56, 407–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogue, T. S., Bastidas, L. A., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S., 2006. Evaluating model performance and parameter behavior for varying levels of land surface model complexity. Water Resources Research, 42, W08430, doi:10.1029/2005WR004440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetler, S. W., 1991. Simulation of lake ice and its effect on the late-Pleistocene evaporation rate of Lake Lahontan. Climate Dynamics, 6, 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetler, S. W. and Bartlein, P. J., 1990. Simulation of lake evaporation with application to modeling lake level variations of Harney-Malheur Lake, Oregon. Water Resources Research, 26, 2603–12.Google Scholar
Hostetler, S. W. and Giorgi, F., 1995. Effects of a 2 × CO2 climate on two large lake systems: Pyramid Lake, Nevada, and Yellowstone Lake, Wyoming. Global and Planetary Change, 10, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetler, S. W., Bates, G. T., and Giorgi, F., 1993. Interactive coupling of a lake thermal model with a regional climate model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98D, 5045–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, P. G., 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 273B, 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, H.-S., Xue, Y., and Collatz, G. J., 2007. Impact assessment of satellite-derived leaf area index datasets using a general circulation model. Journal of Climate, 20, 993–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J., 1992a. Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97D, 2697–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J., 1992b. A comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representations. Journal of Climate, 5, 1379–90.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D. and Milly, P. C. D., 1997. The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models. Journal of Climate, 10, 1578–91.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D., Suarez, M. J., Ducharne, A., Stieglitz, M., and Kumar, P., 2000. A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model 1. Model structure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105D, 24 809–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krinner, G., 2003. Impact of lakes and wetlands on boreal climate. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108D, 4520, doi:10.1029/2002JD002597.Google Scholar
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., Noblet-Ducoudré, N., et al., 2005. A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere–biosphere system. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB1015, doi:10.1029/2003GB002199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucharik, C. J., 2003. Evaluation of a process-based agro-ecosystem model (Agro-IBIS) across the U.S. cornbelt: simulations of the interannual variability in maize yield. Earth Interactions, 7, 1–33.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucharik, C. J., Foley, J. A., Delire, C., et al., 2000. Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 14, 795–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucharik, C. J., Barford, C. C., Maayar, M. El, et al., 2006. A multiyear evaluation of a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model at three AmeriFlux forest sites: vegetation structure, phenology, soil temperature, and CO2 and H2O vapor exchange. Ecological Modelling, 196, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. J. and Chase, T. N., 2007. Representing a new MODIS consistent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3.0). Journal of Geophysical Research, 112G, G01023, doi:10.1029/2006JG000168.Google Scholar
Levis, S., Wiedinmyer, C., Bonan, G. B., and Guenther, A., 2003. Simulating biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the Community Climate System Model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108D, 4659, doi:10.1029/2002JD003203.Google Scholar
Li, B. and Avissar, R., 1994. The impact of spatial variability of land-surface characteristics on land-surface heat fluxes. Journal of Climate, 7, 527–37.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, X., Wood, E. F., Lettenmaier, D. P., et al., 1998. The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 2. Spatial and temporal analysis of energy fluxes. Global and Planetary Change, 19, 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofgren, B. M., 1997. Simulated effects of idealized Laurentian Great Lakes on regional and large-scale climate. Journal of Climate, 10, 2847–58.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, D., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., et al., 1998. The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 3. Spatial and temporal analysis of water fluxes. Global and Planetary Change, 19, 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, T. R., Reed, B. C., Brown, J. F., et al., 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1303–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., Pielke, R. A., Sr., Liston, G. E., et al., 2001. Implementation of a two-way interactive atmospheric and ecological model and its application to the central United States. Journal of Climate, 14, 900–19.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, L., Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., et al., 2003. Effects of frozen soil on soil temperature, spring infiltration, and runoff: Results from the PILPS 2(d) experiment at Valdai, Russia. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 4, 334–51.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manabe, S., 1969. Climate and the ocean circulation. I. The atmospheric circulation and the hydrology of the Earth's surface. Monthly Weather Review, 97, 739–74.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manabe, S., Smagorinsky, J., and Strickler, R. F., 1965. Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrologic cycle. Monthly Weather Review, 93, 769–98.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marticorena, B. and Bergametti, G., 1995. Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil-derived dust emission scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100D, 16 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, V., 2000. A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 94, 357–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, V., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Oke, T. R., 2002. Evaluation of the Town Energy Balance (TEB) scheme with direct measurements from dry districts in two cities. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 41, 1011–26.Google Scholar
Masson, V., Champeaux, J.-L., Chauvin, F., Meriguet, C., and Lacaze, R., 2003. A global database of land surface parameters at 1-km resolution in meteorological and climate models. Journal of Climate, 16, 1261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, E., 1983. Global vegetation and land-use: new high-resolution data bases for climate studies. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 22, 474–87.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuffie, K. and Henderson-Sellers, A., 2001. Forty years of numerical climate modeling. International Journal of Climatology, 21, 1067–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuffie, K. and Henderson-Sellers, A., 2005. A Climate Modelling Primer, 3rd edn. Wiley, 280 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. L., Cakmur, R. V., Perlwitz, J., et al., 2006. Mineral dust aerosols in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Sciences ModelE atmospheric general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111D, D06208, doi:10.1029/2005JD005796.Google Scholar
Molod, A. and Salmun, H., 2002. A global assessment of the mosaic approach to modeling land surface heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107D, 4217, doi:10.1029/2001JD000588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myneni, R. B., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W., 1997. Estimation of global leaf area index and absorbed par using radiative transfer models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35, 1380–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, R. P., Pitelka, L. F., Solomon, A. M., et al., 2005. Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. BioScience, 55, 749–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemani, R. R., Running, S. W., Pielke, R. A., and Chase, T. N., 1996. Global vegetation cover changes from coarse resolution satellite data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101D, 7157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijssen, B., Bowling, L. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., et al., 2003. Simulation of high latitude hydrological processes in the Torne–Kalix basin: PILPS Phase 2(e). 2: Comparison of model results with observations. Global and Planetary Change, 38, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, G.-Y. and Yang, Z.-L., 2006. Effects of frozen soil on snowmelt runoff and soil water storage at a continental scale. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7, 937–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleson, K. W., Bonan, G. B., Feddema, J., Vertenstein, M., and Grimmond, C. S. B., 2008. An urban parameterization for a global climate model: 1. Formulation and evaluation for two cities. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J. S., Watts, J. A., and Allison, L. J., 1983. Carbon in live vegetation of major world ecosystems. ORNL-5862, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 164 pp.
Osborne, T. M., Lawrence, D. M., Challinor, A. J., Slingo, J. M., and Wheeler, T. R., 2007. Development and assessment of a coupled crop–climate model. Global Change Biology, 13, 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, A. J., 1991. A simple parameterization of sub-grid scale open water for climate models. Climate Dynamics, 6, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, A. J., 2003. The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 23, 479–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, A. J. and McAvaney, B. J., 2002. The role of surface energy balance complexity in land surface models' sensitivity to increasing carbon dioxide. Climate Dynamics, 19, 609–18.Google Scholar
Pitman, A. J., Henderson-Sellers, A., Desborough, C. E., et al., 1999. Key results and implications from phase 1(c) of the Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parametrization Schemes. Climate Dynamics, 15, 673–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, A. J., McAvaney, B. J., Bagnoud, N., and Cheminat, B., 2004. Are inter-model differences in AMIP-II near surface air temperature means and extremes explained by land surface energy balance complexity?Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L05205, doi:10.1029/2003GL019233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poutou, E., Krinner, G., Genthon, C., and Noblet-Ducoudré, N., 2004. Role of soil freezing in future boreal climate change. Climate Dynamics, 23, 621–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, I. C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P., et al., 1992. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 19, 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J. C., 1992. Estimating vegetation amount from visible and near infrared reflectances. Remote Sensing of Environment, 41, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, W., Henderson-Sellers, A., Pitman, A. J., et al., 1998. Sensitivity of latent heat flux from PILPS land-surface schemes to perturbations of surface air temperature. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 55, 1909–27.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. A., Dazlich, D. A., Zhang, C., et al., 1996. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for GCMS. Part III: The greening of the Colorado State University General Circulation Model. Journal of Climate, 9, 738–63.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. A., Wood, R. A., Bony, S., et al., 2007. Climate models and their evaluation. In Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., et al., Cambridge University Press, pp. 589–662.Google Scholar
Schlosser, C. A., Slater, A. G., Robock, A., et al., 2000. Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS Phase 2(d). Monthly Weather Review, 128, 301–21.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Mintz, Y., Sud, Y. C., and Dalcher, A., 1986. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 43, 505–31.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Tucker, C. J., Collatz, G. J., et al., 1994. A global 1° by 1° NDVI data set for climate studies. Part 2: The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15, 3519–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Los, S. O., Tucker, C. J., et al., 1996a. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part II: The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. Journal of Climate, 9, 706–37.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Collatz, G. J., et al., 1996b. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: Model formulation. Journal of Climate, 9, 676–705.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Bounoua, L., Collatz, G. J., et al., 1996c. Comparison of radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric CO2 on climate. Science, 271, 1402–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, P. J., Dickinson, R. E., Randall, D. A., et al., 1997. Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science, 275, 502–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seth, A., Giorgi, F., and Dickinson, R. E., 1994. Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere–atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS). Journal of Geophysical Research, 99D, 18 651–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, Y. and Henderson-Sellers, A., 1996a. Modeling soil moisture: a Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes Phase 2(b). Journal of Geophysical Research, 101D, 7227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, Y. and Henderson-Sellers, A., 1996b. Validation of soil moisture simulation in landsurface parameterisation schemes with HAPEX data. Global and Planetary Change, 13, 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y., 1982. Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the Earth's climate. Science, 215, 1498–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, A. G., Schlosser, C. A., Desborough, C. E., et al., 2001. The representation of snow in land surface schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d). Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2, 7–25.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, E. E., Sloan, L. C., Hostetler, S., and Giorgi, F., 1999. Simulating the water balance of the Aral Sea with a coupled regional climate–lake model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104D, 6583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegen, I. and Fung, I., 1994. Modeling of mineral dust in the atmosphere: sources, transport, and optical thickness. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99D, 22 897–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegen, I. and Miller, R., 1998. A general circulation model study on the interannual variability of soil dust aerosol. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103D, 25 975–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Y., Dickinson, R. E., Zhou, L., and Shaikh, M., 2004a. Impact of new land boundary conditions from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data on the climatology of land surface variables. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109D, D20115, doi:10.1029/2003JD004499.Google Scholar
Tian, Y., Dickinson, R. E., Zhou, L., et al., 2004b. Land boundary conditions from MODIS data and consequences for the albedo of a climate model. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L05504, doi:10.1029/2003GL019104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenberth, K. E. (ed.), 1992. Climate System Modeling. Cambridge University Press, 788 pp.Google Scholar
Tsvetsinskaya, E. A., Mearns, L. O., and Easterling, W. E., 2001. Investigating the effect of seasonal plant growth and development in three-dimensional atmospheric simulations. Part I: Simulation of surface fluxes over the growing season. Journal of Climate 14, 692–709.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnen, J. G., Leemans, R., and Ihle, F., 2000. Defining the importance of including transient ecosystem responses to simulate C-cycle dynamics in a global change model. Global Change Biology, 6, 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, W. M. and Parkinson, C. L., 2005. An Introduction to Three-Dimensional Climate Modeling, 2nd edn. University Science Books, 353 pp.Google Scholar
Williamson, D. L., Kiehl, J. T., Ramanathan, V., Dickinson, R. E., and Hack, J. J., 1987. Description of NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-285+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 112 pp.
Wilson, M. F. and Henderson-Sellers, A., 1985. A global archive of land cover and soil data for use in general circulation climate models. Journal of Climatology, 5, 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. F., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., et al., 1998. The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons. Global and Planetary Change, 19, 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, S., 2001. Modeling the atmospheric life cycle and radiative impact of mineral dust in the Hadley Centre climate model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106D, 18 155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z.-L., Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Pitman, A. J., 1995. Preliminary study of spin-up processes in land surface models with the first stage data of Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes Phase 1(a). Journal of Geophysical Research, 100D, 16 553–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zender, C. S., Bian, H., and Newman, D., 2003. Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: description and 1990s dust climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108D, 4416, doi:10.1029/2002JD002775.Google Scholar
Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Walker, A., et al., 2000. Derivation and evaluation of global 1-km fractional vegetation cover data for land modeling. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 39, 826–39.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, X., Shaikh, M., Dai, Y., Dickinson, R. E., and Myneni, R., 2002. Coupling of the Common Land Model to the NCAR Community Climate Model. Journal of Climate, 15, 1832–54.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, X., Rao, P., DeFries, R. S., and Hansen, M. C., 2003. Interannual variability and decadal trend of global fractional vegetation cover from 1982 to 2000. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42, 1525–30.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×