Abbi, A. (1992). Reduplication in South Asian Languages: an Areal, Typological, and Historical Study. New Delhi, India: Allied Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar

Abbi, A. (2001). A Manual of Linguistic Field Work and Structures of Indian Languages. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Abraham, W., Epstein, S., Thräinsson, H. and Zwart, C. J.-W. (eds.) (1996). Minimal Ideas, Syntactic Studies in the Minimalistic Framework. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adger, D. (2004). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford; New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. (1998). The Articulate Mammal: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. (2003a). A Glossary of Language and Mind. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. (2003b). Linguistics. An Introduction. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. and M. Straf (1982). Lexical Storage and Retrieval: A Developing Skill? In Cutler, A. (ed.), Slips of the Tongue. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Akhtar, N. and Tomasello, M. (1996). “Two-Year-Olds Learn Words for Absent Objects and Actions.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 14(Pt. 1): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akhtar, N., Jipson, J. and Callahan, M. A. (2001). “Learning words through overhearing.” Child Development 72(2): 416–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Akmajian, A. (2001). Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmers, A. K. and Harnish, R. M. (2001). Linguistics: an introduction to language and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Allen, G. D. and S. Hawkins (1980). Phonological Rhythm: Definition and Development. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. F. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Child Phonology. New York: Academic Press. 1: 227–256.Google Scholar

Allen, S. E. M. (1994). “Acquisition of some Mechanisms of Transitivity Alternation in Arctic Quebec Inukititut.” Ph.D. dissertation. Montreal: McGill University

Allen, S. E. M. (1996). Aspects of Argument Structure Acquisition in Inuktitut. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, S. E. M. and M. B. Crago (1993a). The Acquisition of Passives and Unaccusatives in Inuktitut. In J. Matthews and L. White (eds.), McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 9: 1–29

Allen, S. E. M. and Crago, M. B. (1993b). “Early Acquisition of Passive Morphology in Inuktitut.” Twenty-Fourth Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Anderson, S. R. (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, S. R. and Lightfoot, D. W. (2002). The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, Object and Conceptual Development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Anglin, J. M. (1993). “Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58(10 (238)): 1–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angluin, D. (1980). “Inductive Inference of Formal Languages for Positive Data.” Information and Control 45(2): 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aram, D., Ekleman, B. and Whitaker, H. (1986). “Spoken Syntax in Children with Acquired Unilateral Hemisphere Lesions.” Brain and Language 27: 75–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Archibald, J. (1995). Introduction: Phonological Competence. Phonological acquisition and Phonological Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: xiii–ⅹⅺ.Google Scholar

Arlman-Rupp, A. J. L., Haan, D. V. N.Sandt-Koenderman, M. (1976). “Brown's Early Stages: Some Evidence from Dutch.” Journal of Child Language 3(2): 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armitage, S., Baldwin, B. A. and Vince, M. A. (1980). “The Fetal Sound Environment of Sheep.” Science 208(4448): 1173–1174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Armon-Lotem, S. (1998). Mommy Sock in a Minimalist Eye: On the Acquisition of DP in Hebrew. In Ditmer, N. and Penner, Z. (eds.), Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Armstrong, S.Gleitman, L. and Gleitman, H. (1983). “What Some Concepts Might Not Be.” Cognition 13(3): 263–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Asher, J. and Garcia, R. (1969). “The Optimal Age to Learn a Foreign Language.” Modern Language Journal 53: 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aslin, R. N. (1987). Visual and Auditory Development in Infancy. In J. Osofsky (ed.), Handbook of Infant Development. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

Aslin, R. N. (1993). Segmentation of Fluent Speech into Words: Learning Models and the Role of Maternal Input. In Boysson-Bardies, B. (ed.), Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aslin, R. N., P. W. Jusczyk and D. B. Pisoni (1998). Speech and Auditory Processing During Infancy: Constraints on Precursors to Language. In Damon, W. (ed.), Cognition, Perception and Language. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. 2: 147–198.Google Scholar

Aslin, R. N., D. B. Pisoni and P. W. Jusczyk (1983). Auditory Development and Speech Perception in Infancy. In Haith, M. and Campos, J. (eds.), Carmichael's Handbook of Child Psychology: Infancy and Developmental Psychobiology. New York: Wiley. 2: 573–670.Google Scholar

Aslin, R. N., Pisoni,, D. B.Hennessy, B. L. and Perey, A. J. (1981). “Discrimination of Voice Onset Time by Human Infants: New Findings and Implications for the Effects of Early Experience.” Child Development 52(4): 1135–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Astington, J. W. and Jenkins, J. M. (1999). “A Longitudinal Study of the Relation between Language and Theory-of-Mind Development.” Developmental Psychobiology 35(5): 1311–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atkinson, M. (1992). Children's Syntax: An Introduction to Principles and Parameters Theory. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Au, T. K. F. (1983). “Chinese and English Counterfactuals: the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Revisited.” Cognition 15(1–3): 155–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Au, T. K. F. and Glusman, M. (1990). “The Principle of Mutual Exclusivity in Word Learning: To Honor or Not to Honor?”Child Development 61(5): 1474–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Au, T. K. F., Knightly,, L. M.Jun, S. A. and Oh, J. S. (2002). “Overhearing a Language During Childhood.” Psychological Science 13(3): 238–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Austin, , J. (2001). Language Differentiation and the Development of Morphosyntax in Bilingual Children Acquiring Basque and Spanish. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar

Austin, J., M. Blume, D. Parkinson, Z. Nuñez del Prado, R. Proman and B. Lust (1996). Current Challenges to the Parameter-Setting Paradigm: The Pro-Drop Parameter. In C. Koster and F. Wijnen (eds.), Proceedings of the Groningen Assembly on Language Acquisition, 1995. 87–97

Austin, J., M. Blume, D. Parkinson, Z. Nuñez del Prado, R. Proman and B. Lust (1997). The Acquisition of Spanish Null and Overt Pronouns: Pragmatic and Syntactic Factors. In S. Somashekar, K. Yamakoshi, M. Blume and C. Foley (eds.), Papers on Language Acquisition: Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics. 15: 160–177

Austin, J., M. Blume, D. Parkinson, Z. Nuñez del Prado and B. Lust (1998). Interactions Between Pragmatic and Syntactic Knowledge in the First Language Acquisition of Spanish Null and Overt Pronominals. In Lema, J. and Trevino, E. (eds.), Theoretical Analyses of Romance Languages. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J., M. Blume, D. Parkinson, Z. Nuñez del Prado, R. Proman and B. Lust (1997). The Status of Pro-Drop in the Initial State: Results from New Analyses of Spanish. In Perez-Leroux, A. and Glass, W. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish. Vol. I: Developing Grammars. Boston: Cascadilla Press. 1: 37–54.Google Scholar

Badecker, W. and Caramazza, A. (1989). “A Lexical Distinction Between Inflection and Derivation.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 108–116.Google Scholar

Bahrick, L. E. and Pickens, J. N. (1988). “Classification of Bimodal English and Spanish Language Passages by Infants.” Infant Behavior and Development 11(3): 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, Lakshmi (1983, 1984). “Case Relations and Case Forms in Child Language.” Osmania Papers in Linguistics. Vols. 9, 10. Nirmala Memorial Volume. Hyderabad: Department of Linguistics. Osmania University. 73–101.Google Scholar

Bai, Lakshmi (1989, 1984). “Dative in Dravidian-A Perspective from Child Language.” Psycho-Lingua XIV(2): 135–144.Google Scholar

Bai, Lakshmi (1996–1997). “Inflection, Split or Not? Evidence from Tamil-Telugu Children.” Osmania Papers in Linguistics 22–23: 29–43.Google Scholar

Bai, Lakshmi and Nirmala, C. (1978). “Assimilatory Processes in Child Language.” Osmania Papers in Linguistics 4: 9–22.Google Scholar

Baird, R. (1972). “On the Rule of Chance in Imitation-Comprehension-Production Test Results.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11(4): 474–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, C. L. (1979). “Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem.” Linguistic Inquiry 10(4): 533–581.Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. (2001). The Atoms of Language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P., M. Post and H. van der Voort (1995). TMA Particles and Auxiliaries. In Arends, J., Muysken, P. and Smith, N. (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 247–258.Google Scholar

Balaban, M. T. and Waxman, S. R. (1997). “Do Word Labels Facilitate Categorization in 9-month-old Infants?”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, D. A. (1991). “Infants' Contribution to the Achievement of Joint Reference.” Child Development 62(5): 875–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baldwin, D. A. (1993a). “Early Referential Understanding: Young Children's Ability to Recognize Referential Acts for What They Are.” Developmental Psychology 29(5): 832–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, D. A. (1993b). “Infants' Ability to Consult the Speaker for Clues to Word Reference.” Journal of Child Language 20(2): 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, D. A. and Markman, E. M. (1989). “Establishing Word-Object Relations: A First Step.” Child Development 60(2): 381–398.Google ScholarPubMed

Baldwin, D. A., Markman,, E. M.Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M. and Tidball, G. (1996). “Infants' Reliance on a Social Criterion for Establishing Word-Object Relations.” Child Development 67(6): 3135–3153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Banich, M. (1997). Neuropsychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Banich, M. T. and Heller, W. (1998). “Evolving Perspectives on Lateralization of Function.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 7: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baraniga, M. (1997). “New Imaging Methods Provide a Better View into the Brain.” Science 276: 1974–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbier, I. (1995). Configuration and Movement: Studies of the First Language Acquisition of Dutch Word Order. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University

Barbier, I. (1996). The Head-Direction of Dutch VPs: Evidence from L1 acquisition. Proceedings from the Groningen Assembly on Language Acquisition, Groningen

Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstrom, P., McGinnis, M. and Pesetsky, D. (eds.) (1998). Is the Best Good Enough?Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, M. (ed.) (1999). The Development of Language. Hove, East Sussex:Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, M. D. (1978). “Lexical Development and Overextension in Child Language.” Journal of Child Language 5(2): 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, E. J. (1978). The Acquisition of the Meaning of Color Terms: A Study of Lexical Development. In Campbell, R. and Smith, P. T. (eds.), Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language. New York: Plenum Press. 1: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, E. (1979). The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. and Elman, J. (1996). “Learning Rediscovered.” Science 274: 1849–1850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bates, E. A. and B. MacWhinney (1987). Competition, Variation and Language Learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 157–194.Google Scholar

Bates, E. A. and B. MacWhinney (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. A. (eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. 3–73.Google Scholar

Bates, E. A., Bretherton, I. and Snyder, L. (1988). From First Words to Grammar: Individual Differences and Dissociable Mechanisms. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bates, E. A., Snyder, L., Bretherton, I. and Volterra, V. (1979). “First Words in Language and Action: Similarities and Differences.”Stanford Child Language Research Forum, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Bates, E., D. Thal and J. Janowsky (1992). Early Language Development and its Neural Correlates. In Rapin, I., and Segalowitz, S. (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Bates, M., R. J. Bobrow and R. M. Weischedel (1993). Critical Challenges for Natural Language Processing

Baynes, K. and M. Gazzaniga (1988). Right Hemisphere Language: Insights into Normal Language Mechanisms. In Plum, F. (ed.), Language, Communication and the Brain. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar

Baynes, K. and M. Gazzaniga (2000). Consciousness, Introspection, and the Split-Brain: The Two Minds/One Body Problem. In Gazzaniga. 1355–1363

Baynes, K., Eliassen,, J.Lutsep, H. and Gazzaniga, M. (1998). “Modular Organization of Cognitive Systems Masked by Interhemispheric Integration.” Science 280: 902–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baynes, K., Wessinger,, C.Fendrich, R. and Gazzaniga, M. (1995). “The Emergence of the Capacity to Name Left Visual Field Stimuli in a Callosotomy Patient: Implications for Functional Plasticity.” Neuropsychologia 33(10): 1225–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsley, M. C. (ed.) (1960). The European Philosophers from Descartes to Nietzsche. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar

Beckwith, R., E. Tinker and L. Bloom (1989). The Acquisition of Nonbasic Sentences. 4th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA

Beeman, M. (1993). “Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences During Comprehension.” Brain and Language 44: 80–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beeman, M., and Chiarello, C. (1998). Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Beeman, M., Bowden, E. and Gernsbacher, M. A. (2000). “Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension.” Brain and Language 71: 310–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beers, M. (1995). The Phonology of Normally Developing and Language Disordered Children. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Beilin, H. (ed.) (1975). Studies in the Cognitive Basis of Language Development. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bellugi, U. (1988). The Acquisition of a Spatial Language. In Brown, R. and Kessel, F. S. (eds.), The Development of Language and Language Researchers: Essays in Honor of Roger Brown. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 153–186.Google Scholar

Bellugi, U., A. Bihrle, H. Neville, S. Doherty and T. Jernigan (1992). Language, Cognition and Brain Organization in a Neurodevelopmental Disorder. In M. R. Gunnan and C. A. Nelson (eds.), Developmental Behavioral Neuroscience: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. 24: 201–231

Benedict, H. (1979). “Early Lexical Development: Comprehension and Production.” Journal of Child Language 6(2): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berk, S. (1996). What Does Why What Trigger? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Unpublished Honors Thesis.Google Scholar

Berk, S. (2002). Why “Why” is different. BUCLD Proceedings, Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Berk, Stephanie and B. Lust (1999). “Early Knowledge of Inversion in Yes/No Questions, New Evidence from Children's Natural Speech.” Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA

Berko, J. (1958). “The Child's Learning of English Morphology.” Word 17(2–3): 150–177. Republished in Lust and Foley 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleason, Berko J. and Ratner, N. (eds.) (1993a). Instructor's Manual to Accompany Psycholinguistics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Gleason, Berko J. and Ratner, N. (1993b). Psycholinguistics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Berlin, B. and Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A. and Clark, E. (1989). “Learning to Use Compounds for Contrast: Data from Hebrew.” First Language 9(3(27)): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berthoud-Papandropoulou, I. (1978). An Experimental Study of Children's Ideas about Language. In Sinclair,, A.Jarvella, R. and Levelt, W. (eds.), The Child's Conception of Language. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 2: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertoncini, J., Bijeljac-Babic,, R.Jusczyk, P., Kennedy, L. and Mehler, J. (1987). “Discrimination in Neonates of Very Short CVs.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82(1): 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bertoncini, J., Bijeljac-Babic,, R.Jusczyk, P., Kennedy, L. and Mehler, J. (1988). “An Investigation of Young Infants' Perceptual Representations of Speech Sounds.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bertoncini, J., Morais,, R.Bijeljac-Babic, R., MacAdams, S., Peeretz, I. and Mehler, J. (1989). “Dichotic Perception and Laterality in Neonates.” Brain Cognition 37: 591–605.Google ScholarPubMed

Berwick, R. C. (1985). The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1988). The Emergence of Cerebral Asymmetries in Early Human Development: A Literature Review and a Neuroembryological Model. In Molfese, D. L. and Segalowitz, S. J. (eds.), Brain Lateralization in Children: Developmental Implications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Native and Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development. In Boysson-Bardies,, B.Schonen, S., Justczyk,, P.MacNeilage, P. and Morton, J. (eds.), Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, C. T. (1994). The Emergence of Native-Language Phonological Influences in Infants: A Perceptual Assimilation Model. Goodman, In J. C. and Nusbaum, H. C. (eds.), The Development of Speech Perception: the Transition from Speech Sounds to Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). Learning to Perceive the Sound Patterns of English. In Rovee-Collier, C. and Lipsett, L. (eds.), Advances in Infancy Research. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. and Sithole, N. (1988a). “Examination of Perceptual Reorganization for Nonnative Speech Contrasts: Zulu Click Discrimination by English-Speaking Adults and Infants.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 345–360.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. and Sithole, N. (1988). “The Phonological Basis of Perceptual Loss for Nonnative Contrasts: Maintenance of Discrimination among Zulu Clicks by English-Speaking Adults and Infants.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 345–360.Google Scholar

Bever, T. (1975). Psychologically Real Grammar Emerges because of its Role in Language Acquisition. In Dato, D. (ed.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: Theory and Applications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Bever, T. (1992). The Logical and Extrinsic Sources of Modularity. In Gunnar, M. and Maratsos, M. (eds.), Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 179–212.Google Scholar

Bever, T. G., Katz, J. J. and Langendoen, D. T. (eds.) (1976). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. The Language & Thought Series. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej and Ritchie, W. (2004). The Handbook of Bilingualism. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. and Hakuta, K. (1994). In Other Words. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1999). How to Acquire Language Without Positive Evidence: What Acquisitionists Can Learn from Creoles. In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language Creation and Language Change; Creolization, Diachrony, and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ⅹ, 573.Google Scholar

Bijeljac-Babic, R., Bertoncini, J. and Mehler, J. F. (1993). “How Do Four Day Old Infants Categorize Multisyllabic Utterances?”Developmental Psychology 29(4): 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, J. and C. Price (2001). Functional Neuroimaging of Language. In Cabeza, R. and Kingstone, A. (eds.), Handbook of Functional Neuroimaging of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 186–251.Google Scholar

Bird, S. and Simons, G. (2003). “Seven Dimensions of Portability for Language Documentation and Description.” Language 79(3): 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D. (1992). “Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition.” Language 68: 706–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D. (1999). Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bishop, D. (1997). Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Comprehension in Children. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Bishop, D. V. M. (1988). Language Development in Children with Abnormal Structure or Function of the Speech Apparatus. In Bishop, D. V. M. and Mogford-Bevan, K. (eds.), Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances. London: Livingston. 220–238.Google Scholar

Blake, J. (2000). Routes to Child Language: Evolutionary and Developmental Precursors. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, J. and Boysson-Bardies, B. (1992). “Patterns in Babbling: A Cross-Linguistic Study.” Journal of Child Language 19(1): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blake, J. and Fink, R. (1987). “Sound–Meaning Correspondences in Babbling.” Journal of Child Language 14(2): 229–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blake, J. and Quartaro, G. (1990). Manual for Recording, Transcribing and Analyzing Speech Samples of Preschool Children. Toronto, Canada: York University.Google Scholar

Blake, J., Quartaro, G. and Onorati, S. (1993). “Evaluating Quantitative Measures of Grammatical Complexity in Spontaneous Speech Samples.” Journal of Child Language 20(1): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blank, M., Gessner, M. and Esposito, A. (1979). “Language Without Communication: A Case Study.” Journal of Child Language 6(2): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bleser, R. D., Faiss, J. and Schwartz, M. (1995). “Rapid Recovery of Aphasia and Deep Dyslexia after Cerebrovascular Left-Hemisphere Damage in Childhood.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 9(1): 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, L. (1970a). Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, L. (1970b). The Reduction Transformation and Constraints on Sentence Length. In Bloom, L. (ed.), Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 135–169.Google Scholar

Bloom, L. (1974). Talking, Understanding, and Thinking. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. and Lloyd, L. L. (eds.), Language Perspectives – Acquisition, Retardation, and Intervention. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press. 285–312.Google Scholar

Bloom, L. (1993). The Transition from Infancy to Language: Acquiring the Power of Expression. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, L. and M. Lahey (1978). Deviant Language Development: A Definition of Language Disorders. In Bloom, L. and Lahey, M. (eds.), Language Development and Language Disorders. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. 289–303.Google Scholar

Bloom, L., Hood, L. and Lightbown, P. (1974). “Imitation in Language Development. If, When and Why?”Cognitive Psychology 6(3): 380–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, L., Lifter, K. and Hafitz, J. (1980). “The Semantics of Verbs and the Development of Verb Inflections in Child Language.” Language 56(2): 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, L., Tinker, E. and Margulis, C. (1993). “The Words Children Learn: Evidence Against a Noun Bias in Early Vocabularies.” Cognitive Development 8(4): 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, P. (1990). “Subjectless Sentences in Child Language.” Linguistic Inquiry 21(4): 491–504.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (1994). “Possible Names: The Role of Syntax-Semantics Mapping in the Acquisition of Nominals.” Lingua 92: 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, P. (1994). Syntax-Semantics Mappings as an Explanation for Some Transitions in Language Development. In Levy, L. (ed.), Other Children, Other Languages: Theoretical Issues in Language Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (1996). Language Acquisition: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (1999). The Role of Semantics in Solving the Bootstrapping Problem. In Jackendoff,, R.Bloom, P. and Wynn, K. (eds.), Language, Logic and Concepts: Essays in Memory of John Macnamara. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2001). “Precis of How Children Learn the Meanings of Words.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(6): 1095–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, P. and L. Gleitman (1999). Word Meaning, Acquisition of. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 856–858.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. and Markson, L. (1998). “Capacities underlying word learning.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(2(11)): 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloom, R., Borod,, L.Obler, K., Santschi-Hayward, C. and Pick, L. (1996). “Right and Left Hemispheric Contributions to Discourse Coherence and Cohesion.” International Journal of Neuroscience 88: 125–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Blume, M. (2002). Discourse-Morphosyntax Interface in Spanish Non-Finite Verbs: A Comparison Between Adult and Child Grammars. Unpublished dissertation. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University

Bohannon, J. and Stanowicz, L. (1988). “The Issue of Negative Evidence: Adult Responses to Children's Language Errors.” Developmental Psychology 24: 684–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohannon, J. N., MacWhinney, B. and Snow, C. (1990). “No Negative Evidence Revisited: Beyond Learnability or Who to Prove What to Whom.” Developmental Psychology 24: 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonvillian, J. D., Garber, A. M. and Dell, S. B. (1997). “Language Origin Accounts: Was the Gesture in the Beginning?”First Language 17(3): 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borden, G., Harris, K. and Raphael, L. (1994). Speech Science Primer. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar

Borer, H. and B. Rohrbacher (1997). Features and Projections: Arguments for the Full Competence Hypothesis. In Hughes,, E.Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 24–35.Google Scholar

Borer, H., and Rohrbacher, B. (2002). “Minding the Absent: Arguments for the Full Competence Hypothesis.” Language Acquisition 10(2): 123–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borer, H. and K. Wexler (1987). The Maturation of Syntax. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E. (eds.), Parameter Setting. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1950). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar

Bornstein, M. H. (1975). “Qualities of Color Vision in Infancy.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 19(3): 410–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bornstein, M., Haynes, O. M., Painter, K. and Genevro, J. (2000). “Child Language with Mothers and with Strangers at Home and in the Laboratory: a Methodological Study.” Journal of Child Language 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornstein, M., Tal, J., Rahn, C., Galperin, C., Lamour, M., Oginop, M., Pecheux, M-G., Toda, S., Azuma, H. and Tamis-LeMonda, C. (1992a). “Functional Analysis of the Contents of Maternal Speech to Infants of 5 and 13 Months in Four Cultures: Argentina, France, Japan, and the United States.” Developmental Psychology 28 (4): 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornstein, M., Tamis-LeMonda, C., Tal, J., Ludemann, P., Toda, S., Rahn, C., Pecheux, M.-G., Azuma, H. and Vardi, D. (1992b). “Maternal Responsiveness to Infants in Three Societies: The United States, France and Japan.” Child Development 63: 808–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2001). “Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time.” Cognitive Psychology 43(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosch, L. and Sebastian-Galles, N. (1997). “Native-Language Recognition Abilities in 4-Month-Old Infants From Monolingual and Bilingual Environments.” Cognition 65(1): 33–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boser, K. (1989). The First Language Acquisition of German Word Order. Honor's thesis. Ithaca: Cornell University

Boser, K. (1992). Early Knowledge of Verb Position in Children's Acquisition of German: An Argument for Continuity of Universal Grammar. Master's thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Boser, K. (1995). Verb Initial Utterances in Early Child German: A Study of the Interaction of Grammar and Pragmatics. Proceedings of the 27th Stanford Child Language Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications

Boser, K. (1997a). The Acquisition of Word Order Knowledge in Early Child German: Interactions Between Syntax and Pragmatics. Ph.D. dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Boser, K. (1997b) “A New Null Auxiliary Proposal for Strong Continuity in Early Child German: Converging Evidence from Crossectional and Longitudinal Data.” In Shamitha Somashekar, Kyoko Yamakoshi, Maria Blume and Claire Foley (eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 15. Papers on Language Acquisition. Ithaca: Cornell University. 178–199

Boser, K., B. Lust, L. Santelmann and J. Whitman (1991). The Theoretical Significance of Auxiliaries in Early Child German. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press

Boser, K., B. Lust, L. Santelmann and J. Whitman (1992). The syntax of CP and V-2 in Early German Child Grammar: The Strong Continuity Hypothesis. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Association. Vol. 22. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. 51–66

Boser, K., L. Santelmann, I. Barbier and B. Lust (1995). Grammatical Mapping from UG to Language Specific Grammars: Deriving Variation in the Acquisition of German, Dutch and Swedish. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press

Bourgeois, J. P.,Goldman-Rakic, P. S. and Rakic, P. (1994). “Synaptogenesis in the Prefrontal Cortex of Rhesus Monkeys.” Cereb Cortex 4: 76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowerman, M. (1973). Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-Linguistic Study with Special Reference to Finnish. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1978). The Acquisition of Word Meaning: An Investigation of Some Current Conflicts. In Waterson, N. and Snow, C. E. (eds.), The Development of Communication. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. 263–287.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1982a). “Evaluating Competing Linguistic Models with Language Acquisition Data: Implications of Developmental Errors with Causative Verbs.” Quaderni di Semantica 3: 5–66.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1982b). Reorganizational Processes in Lexical and Syntactic Development. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1987). Commentary: Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), The Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 443–466.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1988). The “No Negative Evidence” Problem: How Do Children Avoid Construction an Overly General Grammar? In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. Oxford; New York: Basil Blackwell. 73–104.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1989). Learning a Semantic System: What Role do Cognitive Predispositions Play? In Rice, M. and Schiefelbusch, R. L. (eds.), The Teachability of Language. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1990). “Mapping Thematic Roles Onto Syntactic Functions: Are Children Helped by Innate ‘Linking Rules’?”Linguistics 28: 1253–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowerman, M. (1996). The Origins of Children's Spatial Semantic Categories: Cognitive vs. Linguistic Determinants. In Gumpertz and Levinson (eds.)

Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. (2001). Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boysson-Bardies, B. (1999). How Language Comes to Children: From Birth to Two Years. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boysson-Bardies, B., Vihman, B. and Vihman, M. M. (1991). “Adaptation to Language: Evidence from Babbling and First Words in Four Languages.” Language 67(2): 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boysson-Bardies, B., Sagart, L. and Durand, C. (1984). “Discernible Differences in the Babbling of Infants According to Target Language.” Journal of Child Language 11(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boysson-Bardies, B., Sagart, L. and Durand, C. (1989). “A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Vowel Formants in Babbling.” Journal of Child Language 16(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brainard, M. and Doupe, A. (2002). “What Songbirds Teach Us About Learning.” Nature 417: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Braine, M. D. S. (1971). On Two Types of Models of the Internalization of Grammars. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The Ontogenesis of Grammar: A Theoretical Symposium. New York: Academic Press. 153–186.Google Scholar

Braine, M. D. S. (1974). “On What Might Constitute Learnable Phonology.” Language 50(2): 27–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braine, M. D. S. (1976). “Review Article: Smith, 1973.” Language 52(2): 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brent, M. and Siskind, J. M. (2001). “The Role of Exposure to Isolated Words in Early Vocabulary Development.” Cognition 81(2): B33–B34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brent, M., A. Gafos and T. Cartwright (1994). “Phonotactics and the Lexicon: Beyond Bootstrapping.” In E. Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the 1994 Stanford Child Language Research Forum. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Brill, E. and S. Kapur (1997). An Information-Theoretic Solution to Parameter Setting. In S. Somashekar, K. Yamakoshi, M. Blume and C. Foley (eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics. 15: 200–216

Brinkman, U., K. F. Drozd and I. Krämer (1996). Physical Individuation as a Prerequisite for Children's Symmetrical Interpretations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA

Bromberger, S. and M. Halle (2000). The Ontology of Phonology. In Burton-Clements, N., Carr, P. and Docherty, G. (eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, C. and Hagoort, P. (eds.) (1999). The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, E. and C. Hanlon (1970). Derivational Theory and Order of Acquisition in Child Speech. In Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the Development in Language. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Brown, K. (1999). “Grammar's Secret Skeleton.” Science 283(5403): 774–775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, R. (1957). “Linguistic Determinism and the Parts of Speech.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 55(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. (1958). Words and Things. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1970). The First Sentences of Child and Chimpanzee. Psycholinguistics: Selected Papers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1973a). Characterization of the Data and Telegraphic Speech. In Brown, R., A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. (1973b). A First Language: The Early Stages. In R. Brown A First Language

Brown, R. (1973c). The Study of Adam, Eve and Sarah. In R. Brown. A First Language. 51–58

Brown, R. (1977). Introduction. In Snow, C. E. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–30.Google Scholar

Brownell, H. and Stringfellow, A. (1999). “Making Requests: Illustrations of How Right-Hemisphere Brain Damage Can Affect Discourse Production.” Brain and Language. 68(3): 442–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brownell, H., Potter,, H.Bihrle, ., and Gardner, H. (1986). “Inference Deficits in Right Brain-Damaged Patients.” Brain and Language 27: 310–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruce, D. (1964). “The Analysis of Word Sounds.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 34(2): 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruce, D. (1994). “Lashley and the Problem of Serial Order.” American Psychologist 49(2): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. (1964). “The Course of Cognitive Growth.” American Psychologist 19(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butt, M., King, T. H. and Ranchard, G. (1994). Theoretical Perspectives in Word Order in South Asian Languages. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Cairns, H. S., McDaniel, D. and Hsu, J. R. (1993). “A Reply to ‘Children are in Control.’”Cognition 48(2): 193–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, H. S., McDaniel,, D.Hsu, J. R. and Rapp, M. (1994). “A Longitudinal Study of Principles of Control and Pronominal Reference in Child English.” Language 70(2): 260–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvin, W. and Ojemann, G. (1994). Conversations with Neil's Brain: The Neural Nature of Thought and Language. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Camaioni, L., Longobardi,, E.Venut, P. and Bornstein, M. H. (1998). “Maternal Speech to 1-Year-Old Children in Two Italian Cultural Contexts.” Early Development and Parenting 7(1): 9–17.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, R. and Grieve, R. (1982). “Royal Investigations of the Origin of Language.” Historiographia Linguistica 9(1–2): 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplan, D. (1992). Language: Structure, Processing and Disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Caplan, D. (1995). “Issues Arising in Contemporary Studies of Disorders of Syntactic Processing in Sentence Comprehension in Agrammatic Patients.” Brain and Language 50: 325–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caplan, P. and Kinsbourne, M. (1976). “Baby Drops the Rattle: Asymmetry of Duration of Grasp by Infants.” Child Development 47: 532–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caramazza, A. (1997a). Brain and Language. In Gazzaniga, M. (ed.), Conversations in the Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Caramazza, A. (1997b). “How Many Levels of Processing are There in Lexical Access?”Cognitive Neuropsychology 14(1): 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caramazza, A., Papagno, C. and Ruml, W. (2000). “The Selective Impairment of Phonological Processing in Speech Production.” Brain and Language 75: 428–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carden, G. (1986). Blocked Forward Conference. In Lust, B. (ed.), Studies in Acquisition of Anaphora. Dordrecht: Riedel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, S. (1978). The Child as a Word Learner. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. and Miller, G. (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carey, S. and Bartlett, E. J. (1978). “Acquiring a Single New Word.” Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 15: 17–29.Google Scholar

Carpenter, K. (1991). “Later Rather Than Sooner: Extralinguistic Categories in the Acquisition of Thai Classifiers.” Journal of Child Language 18(1): 93–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carpenter, M., Nagell, K. and Tomasello, M. (1998). “Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 63(4): 225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carroll, L. (1964). Through the Looking Glass. New York: Parents' Magazine Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, L. (1998). Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. New York: Dutton Children's Books.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (1997). “Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed?” Linguistische Berichte 8(Special Issue on Pragmatics): 103–127.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casasola, M. and Cohen, L. (2000). “Infants' Association of Linguistic Labels with Causal Actions.” Developmental Psychology 36(2): 155–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Casasola, M. and Cohen, L. (2002). “Infant Categorization of Containment, Support, and Tight-Fit Spatial Relationships.” Developmental Science 5(2): 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casasola, M., Cohen, L. and Chiarello, E. (2003). “Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations.” Child Development 74(3): 679–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Casasola, M., M. Parramore and S. Yang (forthcoming). “Can English-learning toddlers acquire and generalize a novel spatial word?” First Language

Casey, B. J. (2002). “Windows into the Human Brain.” Science 296: 1408–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cattell, N. R. (2000). Children's Language: Consensus and Controversy. London; New York: Cassell.Google Scholar

Cazden, C. (1968). “The Acquisition of Noun and Verb Inflections.” Child Development 39(2): 433–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cazden, C. (1972). Child Language and Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Chambers, K., Onishi, K. and Fischer, C. (2003). “Infants Learn Phonotactic Regularities from Brief Auditory Experience.” Cognition 87: 869–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chandler, D. (2002). Semiotics: The Basics. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, R. S. and J. F. Miller (1973). Word Order in Early Two and Three Word Utterances: Does Production Precede Comprehension? Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: Stanford University

Charmon, T. and Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). “Understanding Drawings and Beliefs: A Further Test of the Metarepresentation Theory of Autism.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 33(6): 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chee, M., Hon, N., Lee, H. L. and Soon, C. S. (2001). “Relative Language Proficiency Modulates Bold Signal Change When Bilinguals Perform Semantic Judgments.” Neuroimaging 13: 1155–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheng, L. and , R. Sybesma (1998). “Yi-wan Tang, Yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and Massifiers.” The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 28(3): 385–412.Google Scholar

Chi, J. G., E. Dooling and F. H. Gilles (1977). “Gyral Development of the Human Brain.” Annals of Neurology1(86)

Chien, Y.-C. (1994). Structural Determinants of Quantifier Scope: An Experimental Study of Chinese First Language Acquisition. In Lust, B., Hermon, G. and Kornfilt, J., (eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross Linguistic Persepectives. Vol II. Binding Dependencies and Learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2: 391–415.Google Scholar

Chien, Y.-C. and Li, Y. H. A. (1998). The Subject-Orientation Requirement and Chinese Children's Acquisition of Reflexives and Pronouns. Studia Linguistica Serica. Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong. 209–224.Google Scholar

Chien, Y.-C. and Lust, B. (1985). “The Concepts of Topic and Subject in First Language Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese.” Child Development 56(6): 1359–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chien, Y.-C. and B. Lust (forthcoming). Chinese Children's Acquisition of Binding Principles. In P. Li et al. (eds.), Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics

Chien, Y.-C. and K. Wexler (1987a). “A Comparison Between Chinese-Speaking and English-Speaking Children's Acquisition of Reflexives and Pronouns.” Paper Presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA

Chien, Y.-C. and Wexler, K. (1987b). Children's Acquisition of the Locality Condition for Reflexives and Pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 26: 30–39.Google Scholar

Chien, Y.-C. and Wexler, K. (1990). “Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics.” Language Acquisition 1(3): 225–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chien, Y.-C., Lust, B. and Chiang, C.-P. (2003). “Chinese Children's Acquisition of Classifiers and Measure Words.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12(2): 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chien, Y.-C., B. Lust and S. Flynn (1999). Testing Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition: A Study of Chinese ESL High School Students' Interpretation of English Pronouns. 1999 Biennial Meeting of the Society of Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM

Chien, Y.-C., Wexler, K. and Chang, H.-W. (1993). “Children's Development of Long-Distance Binding in Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chien, Y.-C., K. Wexler and H.-W. Chang (1995). Children's Acquisition of the Subject-Orientation Property of the Chinese Reflexive Ziji'. Sixth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, Los Angeles

Chierchia, G. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and Grammar.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Choi, S. (2000). “Caregiver Input in English and Korean: Use of Nouns and Verbs in Book-Reading and Toy-Play Contexts.” Journal of Child Language 27(1): 69–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Choi, S. and A. Gopnik (1993). Nouns are Not Always Learned Before Verbs: An Early Verb Spurt in Korean. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: Child Language Research Forum

Choi, S. and Gopnik, A. (1995). “Early Acquisition of Verbs in Korean: A Cross-Linguistic Study.” Journal of Child Language 22(3): 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chomsky, C. (1969). The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, C. (1986). “Analytic Study of the Tadoma Method: Language Abilities of Three Deaf-Blind Subjects.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29(3): 332–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chomsky, N. (1959). “Review of B. F. Skinner's ‘Verbal Behavior’.” Language 35(1): 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1964). Formal Discussion. The Acquisition of Language. In U. Bellugi and R. Brown (eds.), Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, serial no. 92, vol. 29, no. 1: 35–42

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1975a). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1975b). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981a). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981b). “On the Representation of Form and Function.” The Linguistic Review 1(1): 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1984). Modular Approaches to the Study of the Mind.San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1987). The Chomsky Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1988a). Language and Problems of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1988b). Language in a Psychological Setting. Japan: Sophia University.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1991a). Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: A Personal View. In Kasher, A. (ed.), The Chomsky Turn. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. 3–25.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1991b). Linguistics and Cognitive Science: Problems and Mysteries. In Kasher, A. (ed.), The Chomsky Turn. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. 26–55.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1992). The Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1993a). From Orwell's Problem to Plato's Problem. In Reuland, E. and Abraham,, W. (eds.), Knowledge and Language.Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic. 1.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1993b). Language and Thought. Wakefield, RI; London: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1993c). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1996). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1999). On the Nature, Use, and Acquisition of Language. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Child Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 33–54.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik (1996). The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In Chomsky, N. (ed.), The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 13–128.Google Scholar

Christophe, A., Dupoux,, E.Bertonicini, J. and Mehler, J. F. (1994). “Do Infants Perceive Word Boundaries? An Empirical Study of the Bootstrapping of Lexical Acquisition.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95(3): 1570–1580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christophe, A., M. Nespor, M. Guasti and B. V. Ooyen (1997). Reflections on Phonological Bootstrapping: its Role in Lexical and Syntactic Acquisition. In G. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing. A Special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes

Chugani, H. T., Phelps, M. E. and Mazziotta, J. C. (1987). “Positron Emission Tomography Study of Human Brain Functional Development.” Annals of Neurology 22: 487–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cipollone, N., Keiser, S. Hartman and Vasishth, Shravan (1998). Language Files. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Dept of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Clahsen, , H. (1982). Spracherwerb in der Kindheit. Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Clahsen, , H. (1999). “Lexical Entries and Rules of Language: A Multidisciplinary Study of German Inflection.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(6): 991–1062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, E. (1973a). “Nonlinguistic Strategies and the Acquisition of Word Meanings.” Cognition 2(2): 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. (1973b). What's in a Word? On the Child's Acquisition of Semantics in His First Language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press. 65–110.Google Scholar

Clark, E. (1977). Universal Categories: On the Semantics of Classifiers and Children's Early Word Meanings. In Juilland, A. (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg. Saratoga, CA: Amma Libri.Google Scholar

Clark, E. (1978). “Strategies for Communicating.” Child Development 49(4): 953–959. Reprinted in Lust and Foley (2004). 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. (1982). The Young Word Maker: A Case Study of Innovation in the Child's Lexicon. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 390–425. Reprinted in Lust and Foley (2004). 396–422.Google Scholar

Clark, E. (1983). Meanings and Concepts. In Flavell, J. and Markman, E. M. (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: formerly Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. 3: 787–840.Google Scholar

Clark, E. (1985). The Acquisition of Romance with Special Reference to French. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates. 1: 687–782.Google Scholar

Clark, E. (1988). “On the Logic of Contrast.” Journal of Child Language 15: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, E. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. (1997). “Conceptual Perspective and Lexical Choice in Acquisition.” Cognition 64(1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, E. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, E. and Andersen, E. S. (1979). “Spontaneous Repairs: Awareness in the Process of Acquiring Language.” Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 16.Google Scholar

Clark, E., Gelman, S. A. and Lane, N. (1985). “Compound Nouns and Category Structure in Young children.” Child Development 56(1): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. and Grossman, J. (1998). “Pragmatic Directions and Children's Word Learning.” Journal of Child Language 25(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, E. and Svaib, T. (1997). “Speaker Perspective and Reference in Young Children.” First Language 17(1(49)): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. (1999). Psycholinguistics. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 688–690.Google Scholar

Clark, H. and Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and Language.New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Clark, R. (1994). Finitude, Boundedness and Complexity: Learnability and the Study of First Language. In Lust,, B.Hermon, G. and Kornfilt, J. (eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2: 473–490.Google Scholar

Clements, G. N. (1999a). The Geometry of Phonological Features (1985). In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.), Phonological Theory. The Essential Readings. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Clements, G. N. (1999b). Phonology. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 639–641.Google Scholar

Clements, G. N. and Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clifford, T. (1984). Acquisition of Pronouns in the First Language Acquisition of English: A Study of Natural Speech. Unpublished Master's thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Cohen Sherman, J. (1983). The Acquisition of Control in Complement Sentences. The Role of Structural and Lexical Factors. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Cohen Sherman, J. and B. Lust (1986). Syntactic and Lexical Constraints on the Acquisition of Control in Complement Sentences. In Lust, B. (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora. Defining the Constraints. Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel. I: 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherman, Cohen J. and Lust, B. (1993a). “Children are in Control.” Cognition 46: 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherman, Cohen J. and Lust, B. (1993b). “A Note on Continuity of Universal Grammar: Response to Cairns, McDaniel and Hsu.” Cognition 48(2): 195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, R. A. and J. Jakinik (1980). A Model of Speech Perception. In Cole, R. (ed.), Perception and Production of Fluent Speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 133–163.Google Scholar

Cole, P., G. Hermon and C.-T. J. Huang (2001). Introduction. Long-Distance Reflexives: the State of the Art. In Cole, P., Hermon, G. and Huang, C.-T. J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. XXXIII. Long-Distance Reflexives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cole, P., Hermon, G. and Sung, L.-M. (1990). “Principles and Parameters of Long-Distance Reflexives.” Linguistic Enquiry 21: 22.Google Scholar

Colombo, J. and Bundy, R. (1983). “Infant Response to Auditory Familiarity and Novelty.” Infant Behavior and Development 6(3): 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. (ed.) (1987). The World's Major Languages. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B., Matthews, S. and Polinsky, M. (eds.) (1996). The Atlas of Languages. New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar

Conant, S. (1987). “The Relationship Between Age and MLU in Young Children: A Second Look at Klee and Fitzgerald's Data.” Journal of Child Language 14(1): 169–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Connelly, M. (1984). Basotho Children's Acquisition of Noun Morphology.Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar

Cook, V. (1988). Chomsky's Universal Grammar. An Introduction.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cook, V. (1994). Chomsky's Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cook, V. and Newson, M. (1996). Chomsky's Universal Grammar. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cooper, F. S., Delattre,, P. C.Liberman, A. M., Borst, J. M. and Gerstman, L. J., (1952). “Some Experiments on the Perception of Synthetic Speech Sounds.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(6): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, R. P., Abraham,, J.Berman, J. and Staska, M. (1997). “The Development of Infants' Preference for Motherese.” Infant Behavior and Development 20(4): 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, R. P. and Aslin, R. N. (1990). “Preference for Infant Directed Speech in the First Month After Birth.” Child Development 61(5): 1584–1595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooper, W. and Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, W. and Walker, E. (1979). Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies. Presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Corbalis, M. (1991). The Lopsided Ape: Evolution of the Generative Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corrigan, R. (1978). “Language Development as Related to Stage 6 Object Permanence.” Journal of Child Language 5: 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowan, N. (ed.) (1997). The Development of Memory in Childhood. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Crain, S. (1991). “Language Acquisition in the Absence of Experience.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14(4): 597–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crain, S. (1999). Semantics, Acquisition of. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 742–743.Google Scholar

Crain, S. and J. D. Fodor (1985). How Can Grammars Help Parsers? In Dowty,, D. R.Karttunen, L. and Zwicky, Z. (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crain, S. and Lillo-Martin, D. (1999). An Introduction to Linguistic Theory and Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Crain, S. and C. McKee (1985). Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphors. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (NELS). Montreal: McGill University. 94–110

Crain, S. and Nakayama, M. J. J. (1987). “Structure Dependence in Grammar Formation.” Language 63: 522–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crain, S. and Pietroski, P. (2002). “Why Language Acquisition is a Snap.” Linguistic Review 19(1–2): 163–184.Google Scholar

Crain, S. and Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Crain, W. and K. Wexler (1999). Methodology in the Study of Language Acquisition: A Modular Approach. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Child Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 387–426.Google Scholar

Crain, S., L. Conway and R. Thornton (1994). D-Quantification in Child Language. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Department of Linguistics

Crain, S., Shankweiler, D., Marcuso, P. and Bar-Shalom, E. (1990). Working Memory and Comprehension of Spoken Sentences: Investigations of Children with Reading Disorders. Neurophysical Disorders of Short-Term Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D. and Woodams, E. (1996). “Quantification without Qualification.” Language Acquisition 5: 83–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crelin, E. S. (1969). Anatomy of the Newborn: An Atlas. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar

Cromer, R. (1987). “Language Growth with Experience without Feedback.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 16(3). Reprinted in Bloom (1994). 411–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cromer, R. (1988). The Cognition Hypothesis Revisited. In Kessel, F. S. (ed.), The Development of Language and Language Researchers: Essays in Honor of Roger Brown. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 223–248.Google Scholar

Cromer, R. (1994). A Case Study of Dissociations Between Language and Cognition. In Tager-Flusberg, H. (ed.), Constraints on Language Acquisition: Studies of Atypical Children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 141–153.Google Scholar

Cruttendon, A. (1974). “An Experiment Involving Comprehension of Intonation in Children from 7 to 10.” Journal of Child Language 1(2): 221–31.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1979). Prosodic Development. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds.), Language Acquisition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 33–48.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1986). Prosodic Development. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds.), Language Acquisition. 2nd edn.Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, D. (1992). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1997a). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1997b). Language and Thought. Cambridge Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. 14–16.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (1997c). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 4th edition. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Crystal, D., Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (1976). The Grammatical Analysis of Language Disability: a Procedure for Assessment and Remediation. New York: Elsevi.Google Scholar

Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day “Wild Child”. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Curtiss, S. (1988). Abnormal Language Acquisition and the Modularity of Language. In Newmyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. II. Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 96–116.Google Scholar

Curtiss, S. and J. Schaeffer (1997). Syntactic Development in Children with Hemispherectomy: The Infl-System. Proceedings of Boston University Child Language Development21

Curtiss, S. and P. Tallal (1991). On the Nature of the Impairment in Language-Impaired Children. In Miller, J. F. (ed.), Research on Child Language Disorders: A Decade of Progress.Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

Curtiss, S., Bode, S. and Mathern, G. (2001). “Spoken Language Outcomes After Hemispherectomy: Factoring in Etiology.” Brain and Language 79(3): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Curtiss, S., Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Rigler, D. and Rigler, M. (1974). “The Linguistic Development of Genie.” Language 50(3): 528–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A. (1994). “The Perception of Rhythm in Language.” Cognition 50: 79–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutler, A. and Carter, D. (1987). “The Predominance of Strong Initial Syllables in the English Vocabulary.” Computer Speech and Language 2(3–4): 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A. and D. Swinney (1980). Development of the Comprehension of Semantic Focus in Young Children. Presented at the Fifth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA

Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Nons, D. and Segni, J. (1983). “A Language Specific Comprehension Strategy.” Nature 304: 159–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Nons, D. and Segni, J. (1986). “The Syllable's Differeng Role in the Segmentation of French and English.” Journal of Memory and Language 25(4): 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Nons, D. and Segni, J. (1992). “The Monolingual Nature of Speech Segmentation by Bilinguals.” Cognitive Psychology 24(3): 381–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dale, P. S. (1976). Language Development: Structure and Function. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Dale, P. S. and Crain-Thornson, C. (1993). “Pronoun Reversals: Who, When and Why?”Journal of Child Language 20(3): 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damasio, A. and H. Damasio (1993). Brain and Language. In A. Goldman (ed.), Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 585–595.

Damasio, A. R. and D. Tranel (1993). “Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90, 4957–4960CrossRef

Damasio, A., Bellugi, U., Damasio, H., Poizner, H. and Gilder, J. V. (1986). “Sign Language Aphasia During Left-Hemisphere Amytal Injection.” Nature 322: 363–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danesi, M. (1994). “The Neuroscientific Perspective in Second Language Acquisition Research: A Critical Synopsis.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 32(3): 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidoff, J., Davies, I. and Robertson, D. (1999). “Colour Categories in a Stone Age Tribe.” Nature 398: 203–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, D. and Wimbish, J. (1994). The Linguist's SHOEBOX. Waxhaw, NC: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Davis, K. (1995). “Phonetic and Phonological Contrasts in the Acquisition of Voicing: Voice Onset Time Production in Hindi and English.” Journal of Child Language 22(2): 275–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davison, A. (2004). “Structural Case, Lexical Case and the Verbal Projection Problem.” In Dayal, V. and Mahajan, A. (eds.), Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleser, R., Faiss, J. and Schwartz, M. (1995). “Rapid Recovery of Aphasia and Deep Dyslexia after Cerebrovascular Left-Hemisphere Damage in Childhood.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 9(1): 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeCasper, A. and Fifer, W. P. (1980). “Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer their Mothers' Voices.” Science 208(4448): 1174–1176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeCasper, A. and Spence, M. (1986). “Prenatal Maternal Speech Influences Newborns' Perception of Speech Sounds.” Infant Behavior and Development 9(2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGraff, M. (ed.) (1999). Language Creation and Language Change. Learning, Development, and Conceptual Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2000). “Cerebral Specialization for Speech and Non-Speech Stimuli in Infants.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12(3): 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dehaene-Lambertz, G. and Dehaene, S. (1994). “Speed and Cerebral Correlatives of Syllable Discrimination in Infants.” Nature 370: 292.CrossRef

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S. and L. Hertz-Pannier (2002). “Functional Neuroimaging of Speech Perception in Infants.” Science 298(5600): 2013–2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Delattre, P. C., Liberman, A. M. and Cooper, F. S. (1955). “Acoustic Loci and Transitional Cues for Consonants.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(4): 769–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLoache, J. (1995). Early Symbol Understanding and Use. In Medin, D. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 33: 65–114.Google Scholar

Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N. and Snow, C. F. (1986). “Feedback to First Language Learners: The Role of Repetitions and Clarification Questions.” Journal of Child Language 13: 275–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Demorny, L. and Mckenzie, E. (1999). “Rhythm in Early Infancy.” Nature 266: 718–719.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (1987). Acquisition of Impersonal Passives: A Matter of Case. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston: Boston University

Demuth, K. (1988). Noun Classes and Agreement in Sesotho Acquisition. In Barlow, M. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (1990). Relative Clauses, Cleft Constructions and Functional Categories in Sesotho Acquisition. Paper Presented at the 5th Child Language Congress, Budapest

Demuth, K. (1992). Interactions at the Morpho-Syntax Interface. In Meisel, J. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Development. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demuth, K. (1994). On the Underspecification of Functional Categories in Early Grammars. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross Linguistic Perspectives. Vol 1. Heads, Projections and Learnability. 119–134

Demuth, K. (1995). Problems in the Acquisition of Tonal Systems. In Archibald, J. (ed.), Phonological Acquisition and Phonological Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (1996a). Collecting Spontaneous Production Data. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C. and Cairns, H., (eds.), Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 3–22.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (1996b). Alignment, Stress and Parsing in Early Phonological Words. Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Demuth, K. (1996c). The Prosodic Structure of Early Words. In Morgan, J. L. and Demuth, K. (eds.), Signal to Syntax. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (1997). Multiple Optimal Outputs in Acquisition. University Of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 53–71.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (2001). Prosodic Constraints on Morphological Development. In Weissenborn, J. and Hohle, B. (eds.), Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, Syntactic and Neurophysiological Aspects of Early Language Acquisition. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. and Suzman, S. (1997). “Language Impairment in Zulu.” BUCLD 21: 1224–1235.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Cambrige, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Dennis, M. (1980). “Capacity and Strategy for Syntactic Comprehension after Left or Right Hemidecortication.” Brain and Language 10: 287–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennis, M. (1983). Syntax in Brain-Injured Children. In Studdert-Kennedy, M. (ed.), Psychobiology of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 195–202.Google Scholar

Dennis, M. and Kohn, B. (1975). “Comprehension of Syntax in Infantile Hemiplegics after Cerebral Hemidecortication: Left-Hemisphere Superiority.” Brain and Language 2: 472–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennis, M. and Whitaker, H. (1976). “Language Acquisition Following Hemidecortication: Linguistic Superiority of the Left over the Right Hemisphere.” Brain and Language 3: 404–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennis, M. and H. Whitaker (1977). Hemispheric Equipotentiality and Language Acquisition. In Segalowitz, S. and Gruber, F. (eds.), Language Development and Neurological Theory. New York: Academic Press. 93–106.Google Scholar

Dennis, M., Lovett, M. and Wiegel-Crump, C. A. (1981). “Written Language Acquisition after Left or Right Hemidecortication in Infancy.” Brain and Language 12: 54–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennis, M., Sugar, J. and Whitaker, H. A. (1982). “The Acquisition of Tag Questions.” Child Development 53(5): 1254–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deprez, V. and Pierce, Amy (1993). “Negation and Functional Projections in Early Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 25–67.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand (1959). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Deutsch, W., Koster, C. and J. Koster (1986). “What Can We Learn from Children's Errors of Understanding Anaphora?”Linguistics 24: 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutscher, G. (2002). “On the Misuse of the Notion of ‘Abduction’ in Linguistics.” Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeVilliers, J., (1995a). Empty Categories and Complex Sentences: The Case of Wh-Questions. In Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), Handbook of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

DeVilliers, J. (1995b). “Introduction to the Special Issue on the Acquisition of Wh-Questions.” Language Acquisition 4(1&2): 1–4.Google Scholar

, J. and DeVilliers, P. (1978). From Sound to Meaning. In Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 6–30.Google Scholar

DeVilliers, J. and P. DeVilliers (2000). Linguistic Determinism and the Understanding of False Beliefs. In Mitchell, M. and Riggs, K. (eds.), Children's Reasoning and the Mind. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

DeVilliers, J., T. Roeper and A. Vainikka (1990). The Acquisition of Long-Distance Rules. In Frazier, L. and Villiers, J. (eds.), Language Processing and Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 257–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, M. (1999). Reference, Theories of. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 714–715.Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, A. M. and Williams, E. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Fourteen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dittmar, N. and Penner, Z. (eds.) (1998). Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition. Essays in Honor of Jurgen Weissenborn. Bern: PeterLang.Google Scholar

Dockrell, J. and R. Campbell (1986). Lexical Acquisition Strategies in the Preschool Child. In Kuczaj, S. A. and Barrett, M. D. (eds.), The Development of Word Meaning: Progress in Cognitive Development Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donahue, M. (1984). “Learning Disabled Children's Comprehension and Production of Syntactic Devices for Marking Given vs. New Information.” Applied Psycholinguistics 5: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drachman, G. and A. Malkouti-Drachman (1973). Studies in the Acquisition of Greek as a Native Language: 1. Some Preliminary Findings on Phonology. Ohio State University Working Papers on Linguistics. 99–114

Dresher, B. E. (1999). “Charting the Learning Path: Cues to Parameter Setting.” Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 26–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dresher, B. E. and Kaye, J. D. (1990). “A Computational Learning Model for Metrical Phonology.” Cognition 34(2): 137–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dromi, E. (1987). Early Lexical Development. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dromi, E. and Berman, R. (1982). “A Morphemic Measure of Early Language Development: Data from Modern Hebrew.” Journal of Child Language 9: 403–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dromi, E., Leonard, L. B., Adam, G. and Erlich, S. Zadoneisky (1999). “Verb Agreement Morphology in Hebrew-Speaking Children with Specific Language Impairment.” Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42 (6): 1414–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dronkers, N. (1996). “A New Brain Region for Coordinating Speech Articulation.” Nature 384: 159–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dronkers, N., S. Pinker and A. Damasio (2000). Language, Thought, Mood and Learning and Memory. In Kandel, Schwartz and Jessell. 1169–1187

Drozd, K. (2004). “Learnability and Linguistic Performance. A Review of Crain, S. and Thornton, R. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar. Cambridge, MIT.” Journal of Child Language 31(2): 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dye, C. 2004. Optional Infinitives or Silent auxes? New Evidence from Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002. In Bok-Bennema, R., Hollebrandse, B., Kampers-Manhe, B. and Sleeman, P. (eds.), Selected Papers from “Going Romance” 2002. Groningen 28–30 November. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dye, C. (2005a). Identifying Auxiliaries in First Language Acquisition: Evidence from a New Child French Corpus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cornell University. Ithaca

Dye, C. (2005b). The Status of Ostensibly Nonfinite Matrix Verbs in Child French: Results from a New Corpus. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton and S. Ha. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston: Cascadilla Press

Dye, C. (2004). The Acquisition of Verb Morphosyntax: Evidence for the Grammatical Mapping Paradigm. Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Boston, MA

Dye, C., C. Foley and B. Lust (2002). Dissociating Finiteness from Morphology: New Evidence from the Acquisition of Verbal Inflection in French. Paper Presented at the 32nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Language, Toronto, April 19–21

Dye, C., C. Foley and B. Lust (in preparation). On the Universal Dissociation of Finiteness and Morphology. Evidence from the Acquisition of Verbal Inflection in French. Cornell University.

Dye, C., Foley, C., Blume, M. and Lust, B. (2004). Mismatches between Morphology and Syntax in First Language Acquisition Suggest a “Syntax First” Model. In Online Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Eblen, R. (1982). “A Study of the Acquisition of Fricatives by Three-Year-Old Children Learning Mexican Spanish.” Language and Speech 25(3): 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Echols, C. (1993). “A Perceptually-Based Model of Children's Earliest Productions.” Cognition 46: 245–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Echols, C. H. and Newport, E. L. (1992). “The Role of Stress and Position in Determining First Words.” Language Acquisition 2(3): 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, M., Lobardino, L. and Leonard, C. (2001). “Planar Asymmetry Tips the Phonological Playground and Environment Raises the Bar.” Child Development 72(4): 988–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, J. (1992a). Transcription of discourse. In Bright., W. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 367–370.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. (1992b). “Computer Methods in Child Language Research: Four Principles for the Use of Archived Data.” Journal of Child Language 19: 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, J. and Lampert, M. (eds.) (1993). Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Egido, C., (1983). “The Functional Role of the Closed Class Vocabulary in Children's Language Processing.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Eimas, P. D. and Miller, J. L. (1992). “Organization in the Perception of Speech by Young Infants.” Psychological Science 3: 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eimas, P., J. Miller and P. Jusczyk (1987). On Infant Speech Perception and the Acquisition of Language. In Harnad, S. (ed.), Categorical Perception: the Groundwork of Cognition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 161–195.Google Scholar

Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P. and Vigorito, J. (1971). “Speech Perception in Infants.” Science 171: 303–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eisele, J. (1988). Meaning and Form in Children's Judgments about Language: A Study of the Truth-Value Judgment Test. Unpublished Master's thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Eisele, J. and Aram, D. (1993a). “Differential Effects of Early Hemisphere Damage on Lexical Comprehension and Production.” Aphasiology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisele, J. and Aram, D. (1993b). “Comprehension and Imitation of Syntax Following Early Hemisphere Damage.” Brain and Language 46: 212–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisele, J. and D. Aram (1995). “Lexical and Grammatical Development in Children with Early Hemisphere Damage: A Cross-Sectional View from Birth to Adolescence.” In Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Child Language. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell: 664–689.Google Scholar

Eisele, J. and Lust, B. (1996). “Knowledge about Pronouns: A Developmental Study Using a Truth-Value Judgment Task.” Child Development 67(6): 3086–3100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisele, J., Lust, B. and Aram, D. (1998). “Presupposition and Implication of Truth: Linguistic Deficits Following Early Brain Lesions.” Brain and Language 61: 376–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eisenberg, R. B. (1976). Auditory Competence in Early Life. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. and Bates, E. A. (1997). “Response to ‘Little Statisticians’.” Science 276(5315): 1161–1300.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Entus, A. (1977). Hemispheric Asymmetry in Processing of Dichotically Presented Speech and Nonspeech Stimuli by Infants. In Segalowitz, S. and Gruber, F. (eds.), Language Development and Neurological Theory. New York: Academic Press. 64–74.Google Scholar