Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:39:29.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Ethics and Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Christopher W. Morris
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Almost all of Amartya Sen's work has been, broadly speaking, about “ethics and economics”. Sen's professional reputation rests in large part on work in normative areas of economics, welfare economics, and social choice theory, and on helping to restore “an ethical dimension to economics and related disciplines” (Nobel Committee 1998). His interests in poverty, justice, and development clearly are ethical. And, he has also made some substantial contributions to moral theory understood narrowly. In a way, virtually all of the chapters of this book take up topics in “ethics and economics”.

My main concern in this chapter will be about the relation between the two, ethics and economics, and, in particular, the pressure that economics puts on ethics. Sen has long been concerned about the distance between the two fields of inquiry and has argued that “modern economics has been substantially impoverished by the distance that has grown between economics and ethics” (Sen 1987: 7). He thinks that the consequences to economics, both to the subfield of welfare economics and to the core predictive theory, have been serious (Sen 1987: 57).

SKEPTICISM ABOUT ETHICS

Economists in the twentieth century have often been skeptical about inquiries about value quite generally. They often have been concerned, first of all, to keep their field free of all normative elements, ethics included, so that it could be a “value-free” science.

Type
Chapter
Information
Amartya Sen , pp. 40 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Arrow, K., and Hahn, F. (1971). General Competitive Analysis (San Francisco: Holden-Day).Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989). The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1994). “Assure and Threaten,” Ethics, 104, 690–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1996). “Commitment and Choice: An Essay on the Rationality of Plans,” in Farina, Hahn, and Vannucci, (eds.), Ethics, Rationality, and Economic Behaviour (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1998a). “Intention and Deliberation,” in Danielson, (ed.), Modeling Rationality, Morality, and Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1998b). “Rethinking the Toxin Puzzle,” in Coleman, and Morris, (eds.), Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (2005). “Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference,” Economics & Philosophy, 21, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M., and McPherson, M. S. (2006). Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. (2008). Following the Rules: Practical Reasoning and Deontic Constraint (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1991). Leviathan. Tuck, R., ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lenman, J. (2006). “Moral Naturalism,” in Zalta, (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism-moral/.
Levi, I. (1986). Hard Choices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. (1991). “Consequentialism and Sequential Choice,” in Bacharach, and Hurley, (eds.), Foundations of Decision Theory: Issues and Advances (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G., and Lancaster, K. (1956). “The General Theory of Second Best,” Review of Economic Studies, 24, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (1988). “Constrained Maximization and Resolute Choice,” Social Philosophy & Policy, 5, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (1990). Rationality and Dynamic Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (2004). “The Rationality of Being Guided by Rules,” in Mele, and Rawlings, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F., and Shapiro, S. (1998). “Rule-Guided Behavior,” in Newman, (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1998). An Essay on the Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1999). “What Is This Thing Called ‘Reputation’?Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. W. (2008). “The Trouble with Justice,” in Bloomfield, (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
,Nobel Committee (1998). Statement of the award of the 1998 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, Press Release (Background Information). http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1998/ecoback98.pdf.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1991). “Decision Theory and Folk Psychology,” in Bacharach, and Hurley, (eds.), Foundations of Decision Theory: Issues and Advances (Oxford: Blackwell). Reprinted in Pettit 2002.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2002). Rules, Reasons, and Norms (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2005). “Construing Sen on Commitment,” Economics & Philosophy, 21, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Raz, J. ([1975] 1990). Practical Reason and Norms (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1935). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (1994). “Choosing Ends,” Ethics, 104, 226–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San Francisco: Holden-Day).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1973). “Behavior and the Concept of Preference,” Economica, 40, 241–59. Reprinted in Sen 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1974). “Choice, Orderings and Morality,” in Körner, (ed.), Practical Reason (Oxford: Blackwell). Reprinted in Sen 1982.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977). “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6, 317–44. Reprinted in Sen 1982.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982). Choice, Welfare, and Measurement (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1984). Resources, Values and Development (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985). “Goals, Commitment, and Identity,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1, 341–55. Reprinted in Sen 2002.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1987). On Ethics and Economics (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Sen, A (1997). “Maximization and the Act of Choice,” Econometrica, 65, 745–79. Reprinted in Sen 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2002). Rationality and Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2005). “Why Exactly Is Commitment Important for Rationality?Economics & Philosophy, 21, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. (1996). Rules and Practical Rationality (PhD dissertation, Columbia University).Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2001). “Judicial Can't,” Noûs, 35, 530–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smullyan, R. (1980). This Book Needs No Title (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1981). “Economics or Ethics?” in McMurrin, (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Roojen, M. (2008). “Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism,” in Zalta, (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moralcognitivism/.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×