Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:16:15.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Population density, social behaviour and sex allocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Suzanne H. Alonzo  and
Ben C. Sheldon
Edited by
Tamás Székely ,
Allen J. Moore  and
Jan Komdeur
Suzanne H. Alonzo
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Ben C. Sheldon
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
Tamás Székely
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Allen J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Jan Komdeur
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Overview

Evolution and ecology naturally intersect through birth, death and dispersal rates as they determine both population dynamics and individual fitness. However, we still understand very little about the connections between population dynamics, the evolution of individual behaviour patterns and the resulting social interactions. In this chapter, we first review how density affects individuals and discuss various ways in which population density is expected to influence social behaviour, using local competition for resources, reproductive cooperation and mating systems as illustrative examples. Following a brief introduction to evolutionary theory on sex allocation, we consider a few empirical examples from social insects, hermaphroditic fish, breeding birds and group-living mammals to demonstrate some of the observed patterns of sex allocation and the effect of density and social behaviour on these patterns. We then explore how sex allocation in hermaphrodites and sex ratios in cooperatively breeding animals can be used to demonstrate the links between sex allocation, sex ratio and social behaviours, as well as the difficulty and importance of understanding links between ecological and evolutionary dynamics generally. We finish the chapter with a discussion of directions for future empirical and theoretical research.

Introduction

Social behaviour takes diverse and fascinating forms in a wide variety of taxa, as the chapters in this book demonstrate. In this chapter, we examine the links between population density, social behaviour and sex allocation as an illustrative example of the general connection between individual-level processes and population patterns.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Behaviour
Genes, Ecology and Evolution
 , pp. 474 - 488
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charnov, E. L. (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komdeur, J. (2003) Daughters on request: about helpers and egg sexes in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 3–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Trivers, E. L. & Willard, D. E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, S. A. (2009) Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. A., Shuker, D. M. & Sheldon, B. C. (2005) Sex-ratio adjustment when relatives interact: a test of constraints on adaptation. Evolution, 59, 1211–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allsop, D. J. & West, S. A. (2004) Sex-ratio evolution in sex changing animals. Evolution, 58, 1019–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alonzo, S. H. & Mangel, M. (2004) The effects of size-selective fisheries on the stock dynamics of and sperm limitation in sex changing fish: California sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) as an illustrative example. Fishery Bulletin, 102, 1–13.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S. H. & Sinervo, B. (2007) The effect of sexually antagonistic selection on adaptive sex ratio allocation. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9, 1097–1117.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S. H., Ish, T., Key, M., MacCall, A. & Mangel, M. (2008) The importance of incorporating protogynous sex change into stock assessments. Bulletin of Marine Science, 83, 163–179.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., Richardson, D. S., Eikenaar, C. & Komdeur, J. (2006). The role of group size and environmental factors on survival in a cooperatively breeding tropical passerine. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 1321–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buston, P. M. (2003a) Social hierarchies: size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature, 424, 145–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buston, P. M. (2003b) Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buston, P. M. (2004) Territory inheritance in clownfish. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 271, S252–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buston, P. M., Bogdanowicz, S. M., Wong, A. & Harrison, R. G. (2007) Are clownfish groups composed of close relatives? An analysis of microsatellite DNA variation in Amphiprion percula. Molecular Ecology, 16, 3671–3678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnov, E. L. (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A. A. & Nichol, J. D. (2001) Dispersal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1874) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd edn. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düsing, C. (1884) Die Regulierung des Geschlechtsverhältnisses bei der Vermehrung der Menschen, Tiere und Pflanzen. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. W. F. (1998) Natural selection and the sex ratio: Fisher's sources. American Naturalist, 151, 564–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969) The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 44, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfray, H. C. J. & Werren, J. H. (1996) Recent developments in sex ratio studies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godwin, J., Crews, D. & Warner, R. R. (1996) Behavioural sex change in the absence of gonads in a coral reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 263, 1683–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P. J. (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1140–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Sheldon, B. C. & West, S. A. (2005) Cooperative breeders adjust offspring sex ratios to produce helpful helpers. American Naturalist, 166, 628–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haney, R. A., Silliman, B. R. & Rand, D. M. (2007) A multi-locus assessment of connectivity and historical demography in the bluehead wrasse (Thalassoma bifasciatum). Heredity, 98, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herre, E. A. (1987) Optimality, plasticity and selective regime in fig wasps. Nature, 329, 627–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holekamp, K. E. & Sherman, P. W. (1989) Why male ground squirrels disperse. American Scientist, 77, 232–239.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N., Clinchy, M., Taylor, A. C.et al. (2001) Adjustment of offspring sex ratios in relation to availability of resources for philopatric offspring in the common brushtail possum. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268, 2001–2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, M. O., Das, B. & Hoeh, W. R. (1998) Negative correlation between male allocation and rate of self-fertilization in a hermaphroditic animal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 617–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komdeur, J. (1992) Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Nature, 358, 493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komdeur, J. (2003) Daughters on request: about helpers and egg sexes in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 3–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Komdeur, J., Daan, S., Tinbergen, J. & Mateman, C. (1997) Extreme adaptive modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs. Nature, 385, 522–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munch, S. B., Walsh, M. R. & Conover, D. O. (2005) Harvest selection, genetic correlations, and evolutionary changes in recruitment: one less thing to worry about?Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, 802–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munday, P. L., White, J. W. & Warner, R. R. (2006) A social basis for the development of primary males in a sex-changing fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 2845–2851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, C. & Pusey, A. E (1987) Intrasexual cooperation and the sex ratio in African lions. American Naturalist, 130, 636–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A. (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, ed. Birkhead, T. R. and Møller, A. P., London: Academic Press, pp. 3–54.Google Scholar
Pen, I. & Weissing, F. J. (2000) Sex-ratio optimization with helpers at the nest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 267, 539–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reece, S. E., Drew, D. R. & Gardner, A. (2008). Sex ratio adjustment and kin discrimination in malaria parasites. Nature, 453, 609–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semsar, K. & Godwin, J. (2003) Social influences on the arginine vasotocin system are independent of gonads in a sex-changing fish. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 4386–4393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R. F. & Mohler, J. D. (1953) The selective significance of the sex ratio. American Naturalist, 837, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, P. W. (1977) Nepotism and evolution of alarm calls. Science, 197, 1246–1253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenseth, N. C., Chan, K.S., Tong, H.et al. (1999) Common dynamic structure of Canada lynx populations within three climatic regions. Science, 285, 1071–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swearer, S. E., Caselle, J. E., Lea, D. W. & Warner, R. R. (1999) Larval retention and recruitment in an island population of a coral-reef fish. Nature, 402, 799–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, E. L. & Willard, D. E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turchin, P. (2005) Complex Population Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, R. R. (1975) The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in animals. American Naturalist, 109, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. R. (2002) Synthesis: environment, mating systems, and life-history allocations in the bluehead wrasse. In: Model Systems in Behavioral Ecology, ed. Dugatkin, L. A.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 227–244.Google Scholar
Warner, R. R. & Swearer, S. E. (1991) Social control of sex change in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum (Pisces, Labridae). Biological Bulletin, 181, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S. A., Herre, E. A. & Sheldon, B. C. (2000) The benefits of allocating sex. Science 290, 288–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, S. A., Shuker, D. M. & Sheldon, B. C. (2005) Sex-ratio adjustment when relatives interact: a test of constraints on adaptation. Evolution, 59, 1211–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wild, G. & West, S. A. (2007) A sex allocation theory for vertebrates: combining local resource competition and condition-dependent allocation. American Naturalist, 170, E112–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkin, T. A., Garant, D., Gosler, A. G. & Sheldon, B. C. (2006). Density effects on life-history traits in a wild population of the great tit (Parus major): analyses of long-term data with GIS techniques. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×