Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:37:28.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Bryophytes as Predictors of Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

L. Dennis Gignac
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Canada
Nancy G. Slack
Affiliation:
Sage Colleges, New York
Lloyd R. Stark
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases that produce positive radiative forcings are having large-scale impacts on the global climate system, such as increases in temperatures, changes in precipitation patterns, and changes in the frequency of severe weather events. The greatest impact is occurring at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere, at high altitudes throughout the world, and in Antarctica and the sub-Antarctic Islands. Because of their efficient long-distance dispersal mechanisms and their high fidelity to climatically sensitive habitats, bryophytes should react quickly to changes to their environment and thus have the potential of being effective predictors of current climate change.

Since the beginning of the industrial era approximately 200 years ago, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) concentrations have been increasing exponentially in the atmosphere (IPCC 2001). Concentrations of other greenhouse gases such as halocarbons and perfluorocarbons that are produced by anthropogenic activities are also increasing in the atmosphere. As a result of greenhouse gas enrichment, global mean surface air temperatures have risen by about 0.3–0.6 °C since the nineteenth century and by 0.2–0.3 °C over the past 40 years (IPCC 2001). The largest temperature increases have occurred over the northern hemisphere land mass north of 40° latitude (Serreze et al. 2000), on widespread high-altitude mountains throughout the world (Böhm et al. 2001), and in the Antarctic (Nyakatya & McGeoch 2008). Temperature increases have also been observed at low latitudes, although to a lesser extent than at high latitudes (Dash et al. 2007; Malhi et al. 2008).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aerts, R., Wallén, B. & Malmer, N. (1992). Growth-limiting nutrients in Sphagnum-dominated bogs subject to low and high atmospheric nitrogen supply. Journal of Ecology 80: 131–40.Google Scholar
Aerts, R., Wallén, B., Malmer, N. & Caluwe, H. D. (2001). Nutritional constraints on Sphagnum growth and potential decay in northern peatlands. Journal of Ecology 80: 292–9.Google Scholar
Aldous, A. R. (2002). Nitrogen retention by Sphagnum mosses: responses to atmospheric nitrogen deposition and drought. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 721–31.Google Scholar
Bates, J. W., Thompson, K. & Grime, J. P. (2005). Effects of simulated long-term climatic change on the bryophytes of a limestone grassland community. Global Change Biology 11: 757–69.Google Scholar
Beilman, D. W. (2001). Plant community and diversity change due to localized permafrost dynamics in bogs of western Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 983–93.Google Scholar
Berendse, F., Breeman, N., Rydin, H.et al. (2001). Raised atmospheric CO2 and increased N deposition cause shifts in plant species composition and production in Sphagnum bogs. Global Change Biology 7: 591–8.Google Scholar
Birks, H. J. B. (1982). Quaternary bryophyte paleo-ecology. In Bryophyte Ecology, ed. Smith, A. J. E., pp. 273–490. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Böhm, R., Auer, I., Brunetti, M.et al. (2001). Regional temperature variability in the European Alps: 1760–1998 from homogenized instrumental time series. International Journal of Climatology 21: 1779–801.Google Scholar
Bragazza, L., Tahvanainen, T., Kutnar, L.et al. (2004). Nutritional constraints in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants under increasing atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe. New Phytologist 163: 609–16.Google Scholar
Brooker, R. W. (2006). Plant-plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytologist 171: 271–89.Google Scholar
Callaghan, T. V., Carlsson, B. Å., Sonnesson, M. & Temesváry, A. (1997). Between-year variation in climate-related growth of circumarctic populations of the moss Hylocomium splendens. Functional Ecology 11: 157–65.Google Scholar
Camill, P. (1999). Patterns of boreal permafrost peatland vegetation across environmental gradients sensitive to climate warming. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 721–33.Google Scholar
Camill, P. (2005). Permafrost thaw accelerates in boreal peatlands during late-20th century climate warming. Climatic Change 68: 135–52.Google Scholar
Camill, P. & Clark, J. S. (1998). Climate change disequilibrium of boreal permafrost peatlands caused by local processes. American Naturalist 151: 207–22.Google Scholar
ChapinIII, F. S., Shaver, G. R., Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J. & Laundre, J. A. (1995). Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76: 694–711.Google Scholar
Christensen, T. R., Johansson, T., Åkerman, H. J.et al. (2004). Thawing sub-arctic permafrost: effects on vegetation and methane emissions. Geophysical Research Letters 31: 1–4.Google Scholar
Chylek, P., Box, J. E. & Lesins, G. (2004). Global warming and the Greenland Ice Sheet. Climatic Change 63: 201–21.Google Scholar
Convey, P., Frenot, Y., Gremmen, N. & Bergstrom, D. M. (2006). Biological invasions. In Trends in Antarctic Terrestrial and Limnetic Ecosystems, ed. Bergstrom, D. M., Convey, P. & Huiskes, A. L., pp. 193–220. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
Cornelissen, J. H. C., Callaghan, T. V., Alatalo, J. M.et al. (2001). Global change and Arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? Journal of Ecology 89: 984–94.Google Scholar
Dash, S. K., Jenamani, R. K., Kalsi, S. R. & Panda, S. K. (2007). Some evidence of climate change in twentieth-century India. Climatic Change 85: 299–321.Google Scholar
Dirkse, G. M. & Martakis, G. F. P. (1992). Effects of fertilizer on bryophytes in Swedish experiments on forest fertilization. Biological Conservation 59: 155–61.Google Scholar
Dorrepaal, E., Aerts, R., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Callaghan, T. V. & Logtestijn, R. S. P. (2003). Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Global Change Biology 10: 93–104.Google Scholar
Frahm, J.-P. (2007). Moose als Indikatoren des Klimawandels. Gefahrstofee-Reinhaltung der Luft-Ausgabe 6: 269–73.Google Scholar
Frahm, J.-P. (2008). Diversity, dispersal and biogeography of bryophytes (mosses). Biodiversity Conservation 17: 277–84.Google Scholar
Frahm, J. -P. & Klaus, D. (2001). Bryophytes as indicators of recent climate fluctuations in Central Europe. Lindbergia 26: 97–104.Google Scholar
Gerdol, R., Petraglia, A., Bragazza, L., Iacumin, P. & Brancaleoni, L. (2007). Nitrogen deposition interacts with climate in affecting production and decomposition rates in Sphagnum mosses. Global Change Biology 13: 1810–21.Google Scholar
Giannini, A., Biasutti, M., Held, I. M. & Sobel, A. H. (2008). A global perspective on African climate. Climatic Change 90: 359–83.Google Scholar
Gordon, C., Wynn, J. M. & Woodin, S. J. (2001). Impacts of increased nitrogen supply on high Arctic heath: the importance of bryophytes and phosphorus availability. New Phytologist 149: 461–71.Google Scholar
Graglia, E., Jonasson, S., Michelsen, A.et al. (2001). Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments. Ecography 24: 5–12.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, U. & Flodin, L-Å. (2007). Vegetation shifts towards wetter site conditions on oceanic ombrotrophic bogs in southwestern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 595–604.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, U. & Rydin, H. (2000). Nitrogen fertilization reduces Sphagnum production in bog communities. New Phytologist 147: 527–37.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, U., Granberg, G. & Nilsson, M. (2004). Growth, production and interspecific competition in Sphagnum: effects of temperature, nitrogen and sulphur treatments on a boreal mire. New Phytologist 163: 349–59.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, U., Malmer, N. & Rydin, H. (2002). Dynamics or constancy in Sphagnum dominated mire ecosystems? A 40 year old study. Ecography 25: 685–704.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, U., Rydin, H. & Sjörs, H. (2000). Diversity and pH changes after 50 years on the boreal mire Skattlösbergs Stormosse, Central Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 277–86.Google Scholar
Hedenäs, L., Bisang, I., Tehler, A.et al. (2002). A herbarium-based method for estimates of temporal frequency changes: mosses in Sweden. Biological Conservation 105: 321–31.Google Scholar
Heijmans, M. M. P. D., Berendse, F., Arp, W. J.et al. (2001). Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and increased nitrogen deposition on bog vegetation in the Netherlands. Journal of Ecology 89: 268–79.Google Scholar
Heijmans, M. M. P. D., Klees, H. & Berendse, F. (2002). Competition between Sphagnum magellanicum and Eriophorum angustifolium as affected by raised CO2 and increased N deposition. Oikos 97: 415–25.Google Scholar
Hobbie, S. E., Shevtsova, A. & Chapin, F. S. (1999). Plant response to species removal and experimental warming in Alaskan tussock tundra. Oikos 84: 417–34.Google Scholar
Hohenwallner, D., Zechmeister, H. G. & Grabherr, G. (2002). Bryophyten und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren für den Klimawandel im Hochgebirge – erste Ergebnisse. Österreichisches Botanikertreffen 10: 19–21.Google Scholar
Hogg, P., Squires, P. & Fitter, A. H. (1995). Acidification, nitrogen deposition and rapid vegetational change in a small valley mire in Yorkshire. Biological Conservation 71: 143–53.Google Scholar
Hollister, R. D., Webber, P. J. & Tweedie, C. E. (2005). The response of Alaskan arctic tundra to experimental warming: differences between short- and long-term responses. Global Change Biology 11: 525–36.Google Scholar
Hoosbeek, M. R., Breemen, N., Berendse, F.et al. (2001). Limited effect of increased atmospheric CO2 concentration on ombrotrophic bog vegetation. New Phytologist 150: 459–63.Google Scholar
Hoosbeek, M. R., Breemen, N., Vasander, H., Buttler, A. & Berendse, F. (2002). Potassium limits potential growth of bog vegetation under elevated atmospheric CO2 and N deposition. Global Change Biology 8: 1130–8.Google Scholar
,IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
,IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Change (2007): The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jägerbrand, A. K., Lindblad, K. E. M., Björk, R. G., Alatalo, J. M. & Molau, U. (2006). Bryophyte and lichen diversity under simulated environmental change compared with observed variation in unmanipulated alpine tundra. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 4453–75.Google Scholar
Jägerbrand, A. K., Molau, U. & Alatalo, J. M. (2003). Responses of bryophytes to simulated environmental change at Latnjajaure, northern Sweden. Journal of Bryology 25: 163–8.Google Scholar
Jauhiainen, J., Vasander, H. & Silvola, J. (1994). Response of Sphagnum fuscum to N deposition and increased CO2. Journal of Bryology 18: 183–95.Google Scholar
Jauhiainen, J., Vasander, H. & Silvola, J. (1998a). Nutrient concentration in Sphagna at increased N-deposition rates and raised atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Plant Ecology 138: 149–60.Google Scholar
Jauhiainen, J., Wallén, B. & Malmer, N. (1998b). Potential NH4+ and NO3− uptake in seven Sphagnum species. New Phytologist 138: 287–93.Google Scholar
Jones, M. L. M., Oxley, E. R. B. & Ashenden, T. W. (2002). The influence of nitrogen deposition, competition and desiccation on growth and regeneration of Racomitrium lanuginosum (Hedw.) Brid. Environmental Pollution 120: 371–8.Google Scholar
Jónsdóttir, I. S., Magnússon, B., Gudmundsson, J., Elmarsdóttir, Á. & Hjartarson, H. (2005). Variable sensitivity of plant communities in Iceland to experimental warming. Global Change Biology 11: 553–63.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, M. T., Racine, C. H., Walters, J. C. & Osterkamp, T. E. (2001). Permafrost degradation and ecological changes associated with a warming climate in central Alaska. Climatic Change 48: 551–79.Google Scholar
Lamers, L. P. M., Bobbink, R. & Roelofs, J. G. M. (2000). Natural nitrogen filter fails in raised bog. Global Change Biology 6: 583–6.Google Scholar
Roux, P. & McGeoch, M. A. (2008). Changes in climate extremes, variability and signature on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Climatic Change 86: 309–29.Google Scholar
Lewis Smith, R. I. (2005). Bryophyte diversity and ecology of two geologically contrasting Antarctic islands. British Bryophyte Society 25: 195–206.Google Scholar
Limpens, J., Berendse, F. & Klees, H.. (2004). How phosphorus availability affects the impact of nitrogen deposition on Sphagnum and vascular plant bogs. Ecosystems 7: 793–804.Google Scholar
Limpens, J., Tomassen, H. B. M. & Berendse, F. (2003). Expansion of Sphagnum fallax in bogs: striking the balance between N and P availability. Journal of Bryology 25: 83–90.Google Scholar
Malhi, Y., Roberts, T., Betts, R. A.et al. (2008). Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319: 169–72.Google Scholar
Malmer, N., Albinsson, C., Svensson, B. M. & Wallén, B. (2003). Interferences between Sphagnum and vascular plants: effects on plant community structure and peat formation. Oikos 100: 469–82.Google Scholar
Malmer, N., Johansson, T., Olsrud, M. & Christensen, T. R. (2005). Vegetation, climatic changes and net carbon sequestration in a North-Scandinavian subarctic mire over 30 years. Global Change Biology 11: 1895–909.Google Scholar
Miller, N. G. (1980). Fossil mosses of North America and their significance. In The Mosses of North America, ed. Taylor, R. J. & Leviton, A. E., pp. 9–36. San Francisco, CA:Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Molau, U. & Alatalo, J. M. (1998). Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants. Ambio 27: 322–9.Google Scholar
Nyakatya, M. J. & McGeoch, M. A. (2008). Temperature variation across Marion Island associated with a keystone plant species (Azorella selago Hook. (Apiaceae)). Polar Biology 31: 139–51.Google Scholar
Osterkamp, T. E. & Jorgenson, M. T. (2005). Response of boreal ecosystems to varying modes of permafrost degradation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 2100–11.Google Scholar
Osterkamp, T. E., Viereck, L., Shur, Y.et al. (2000). Observations of thermokarst and its impact on boreal forests in Alaska, U.S.A. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 32: 303–15.Google Scholar
Paeth, H, Scholten, A., Friederichs, P. & Hense, A. (2008). Uncertainties in climate change predictions: El Niño-Southern Oscillation and monsoons. Global and Planetary Change 60: 265–88.Google Scholar
Payette, S., Delwaide, A., Caccianiga, M. & Beauchemin, M. (2004). Accelerated thawing of sub-arctic peatland permafrost over the last 50 years. Geophysical Research Letters 31: 1–4.Google Scholar
Pearce, I. S. K. & Wal, R. (2002). Effects of nitrogen deposition on growth and survival of montane Racomitrium lanuginosum heath. Biological Conservation 104: 83–9.Google Scholar
Phuyal, M., Artz, R. R. E., Sheppard, L., Leith, I. D. & Johnson, D. (2008). Long-term nitrogen deposition increases phosphorus limitation of bryophytes in an ombrotrophic bog. Plant Ecology 196: 111–21.Google Scholar
Potter, J. A., Press, M. C., Callaghan, T. V. & Lee, J. A. (1995). Growth responses of Polytrichum commune and Hylocomium splendens to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic. New Phytologist 131: 533–41.Google Scholar
Press, M. C., Potter, J. A., Burke, M. J. W., Callaghan, T. V. & Lee, J. A. (1998). Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change. Journal of Ecology 86: 315–27.Google Scholar
Robinson, C. H., Wookey, P. A., Lee, J. A., Callaghan, T. V. & Press, M. C. (1998). Plant community responses to simulated environmental change at a high arctic site. Ecology 79: 856–66.Google Scholar
Robroek, B. J. M., Limpens, J., Breeuwer, A., Crushell, P. H. & Schouten, M. G. C. (2007). Interspecific competition between Sphagnum mosses at different water tables. Functional Ecology 21: 805–12.Google Scholar
Root, L. T., Price, J. T., Hall, K. H.et al. (2003). Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57–60.Google Scholar
Sandvik, M. & Heegaard, E. (2003). Effects of simulated environmental changes on growth and growth form in a late snowbed population of Pohlia wahlenbergii (Web. et Mohr) Andr. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 35: 341–8.Google Scholar
Schipperges, B. & Rydin, H. (1998). Response of photosynthesis of Sphagnum species from contrasting microhabitats to tissue water content and repeated desiccation. New Phytologist 140: 677–84.Google Scholar
Schuur, E. A. G., Crummer, K. G., Vogel, J. G. & Mack, M. C. (2007). Plant species composition and productivity following permafrost thaw and thermokarst in Alaskan tundra. Ecosystems 10: 280–92.Google Scholar
Serreze, M. C., Walsh, J. E., Chapin, F. S., et al. (2000). Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment. Climatic Change 46: 159–207.Google Scholar
Shaver, G. R., Bret-Harte, M. S., Jones, M. H.et al. (2001). Species competition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity. Ecology 82: 3163–81.Google Scholar
Söderström, L. & During, H. J. (2005). Bryophyte rarity viewed from the perspectives of life history strategy and metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Bryology 27: 261–8.Google Scholar
Soja, A. J., Tchebakova, N. M., French, N. H. F., et al. (2007). Climate-induced boreal forest change: predictions versus current observations. Global and Planetary Change 56: 274–96.Google Scholar
Sollid, J. L. & Sørbell, L. (1998). Palsa bogs as climate indicators – examples from Doorefjell, southern Norway. Ambio 27: 287–91.Google Scholar
Sonesson, M., Carlsson, B. Å., Callaghan, T. V., et al. (2002). Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change. Oikos 99: 151–60.Google Scholar
Stapper, N. J. & Kricke, R. (2004). Epiphytische Moose und Flechten als Bioindikatoren von städtischer Überwärmung, Standorteutrophierung und verkehrsbedingten Immissionen. Limprichtia 24: 187–208.Google Scholar
Sturm, M., Racine, C. & Tape, K. (2001). Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411: 546–7.Google Scholar
Toet, S., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Aerts, R., et al. (2006). Moss responses to elevated CO2 and variations in hydrology in a temperature lowland peatland. Plant Ecology 182: 27–40.Google Scholar
Turetsky, M. R., Wieder, R. K., Vitt, D. H., Evans, R. J. & Scott, K. D. (2007). The disappearance of relict permafrost in boreal north America: effects on peatland carbon storage and fluxes. Global Change Biology 13: 1922–34.Google Scholar
Heijden, E., Verbeek, S. K. & Kuiper, P. J. C. (2000). Elevated atmospheric CO2 and increased nitrogen deposition: effects on C and N metabolism and growth of the peat moss Sphagnum recurvum P. Beauv. var. mucronatum (Russ.) Warnst. Global Change Biology 6: 201–12.Google Scholar
Wal, R., Pearce, I., Brooker, R., et al. (2003). Interplay between nitrogen deposition and grazing causes habitat degradation. Ecology Letters 6: 141–6.Google Scholar
Wijk, M. T., Clemmensen, K. E., Shaver, G. R., et al. (2003). Long-term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change. Global Change Biology 10: 105–23.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H. (1990). Growth and production dynamics of boreal mosses over climatic, chemical and topographic gradients. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 35–59.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H. & Halsey, L. A. (1994). The bog landforms of continental Western Canada in relation to climate and permafrost patterns. Arctic and Alpine Research 26: 1–13.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A. & Zoltai, S. C. (2000a). The bog landforms of continental western Canada in relation to climate and permafrost patterns. Arctic and Alpine Research 26: 1–13.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A. & Zoltai, S. C. (2000b). The changing landscape of Canada's western boreal forest: the current dynamics of permafrost. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 283–7.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Wieder, K., Halsey, L. A. & Turetsky, M. (2003). Response of Sphagnum fuscum to nitrogen deposition: a case study of ombrogenous peatlands in Alberta, Canada. Bryologist 106: 235–45.Google Scholar
Wahren, C.-H. A., Walker, M. D. & Bret-Harte, M. S. (2005). Vegetation responses in Alaskan arctic tundra after 8 years of a summer warming and winter snow manipulation experiment. Global Change Biology 11: 537–52.Google Scholar
Wasley, J., Robinson, S. A., Lovelock, C. E. & Popp, M. (2006). Climate change manipulations show Antarctic flora is more strongly affected by elevated nutrients than water. Global Change Biology 12: 1800–12.Google Scholar
Weltzin, J. F., Harth, C., Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J. & Vonderharr, M. (2001). Production and microtopograhy of bog bryophytes: response to warming and water-table manipulations. Oecologia 128: 557–65.Google Scholar
Whinam, J. & Copson, G. (2006). Sphagnum moss: an indicator of climate change in the sub-Antarctic. Polar Record 42: 43–9.Google Scholar
Wiedermann, M. M., Nordin, A., Gunnarsson, U., Nilsson, M. B. & Ericson, L. (2007). Global change shifts vegetation and plant-parasite interactions in a boreal mire. Ecology 88: 454–64.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, H. G. (1995). Growth rates of five pleurocarpous moss species under various climatic conditions. Journal of Bryology 18: 455–68.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×